Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
These are near the top of the lists for adding a 8th set
You have me pondering these since the M3s are just sitting in the garage right now....I think a lot would really enjoy this set. I know we will be seeing the new C irons get most of the buzz and spotlight (as they should considering the tech is mind blowing) but these are sitting in that Apex like category which is becoming more popular and honestly they stand up really really well there.
FIFY bro
10 times better than the m3, in looks and performance imo.You have me pondering these since the M3s are just sitting in the garage right now....
very interesting..... will have to try and get my hands on a set sometime soon.10 times better than the m3, in looks and performance imo.
Sounds like Wilson has a couple great options going into 2016.I think a lot would really enjoy this set. I know we will be seeing the new C irons get most of the buzz and spotlight (as they should considering the tech is mind blowing) but these are sitting in that Apex like category which is becoming more popular and honestly they stand up really really well there.
Sounds like Wilson has a couple great options going into 2016.
Again, sorry for the quiet in here, but if you have ANY questions please feel free to post them up and I'll answer ASAP.
How do you think the F5s would play with the ProjectX shafts you were fit to at Granddaddy? I realize this would be more speculative than anything else...
They are also classified in the new "crossover" portion of the FCD categories for the company alongside the C200, bit definitely totally different beasts.
Reread the thread and along with the c200 review w/s has a solid line of irons this year. I want to give these irons a run. Hopefully I get to hit these at some point.
These are head and shoulders above the m3 they replace, IMHO.
Except in looks. I might be in the minority but I'm a sucker for the black finish on the m3, even though it wears fairly quickly.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
IMO, the F5 is targeted at the player who wants a forged iron with forgiveness & a little more distance in a pretty traditional package.Why then and for whom has Wilson Staff introduced the F5 iron? Thanks
I can't wait to hit these irons and others from WS. i am playing devils advocate here, hoping to get some talk back on these irons from the golfers that had the opportunity to meet with the Wilson Staff. It would appear from the reviews and comments here that the C200 is the new "the one" to check out. (bye-bye Srixon and CF16, lol) I would agree with that assessment given the introduction of the new features that they have incorporated into that iron it is a must see iron. I suppose they could have went from the C200 straight to the V4iron, but they did not. Why then and for whom has Wilson Staff introduced the F5 iron? Thanks
They both fit the new "Crossover" section of the W/S classification system extremely well IMO. Essentially, the F5 will appeal to more traditional "wants" while still offering a ton of tech itself. Its an extremely playable iron but IMO it doesn't run the spread of skill levels on the upper end like the C200. This is a way to offer a forged iron in a model that is more playable for the low-mid to mid cappers who want forged but can't or don't want to play a true players iron like the V4's.
I'm one who would go F5 over the C200's based on what I like to see/look at in an iron. While I adore all the tech in the C200 and believe it to be revolutionary, its just not something I personally would game as easily as these.
I suppose they could have went from the C200 straight to the V4iron, but they did not. Why then and for whom has Wilson Staff introduced the F5 iron? Thanks