- Staff
- #3,426
I chose wisely long run, poorly short run. LOL
Pondering, lusting, dreaming, drooling, hoping...yeah....yeah...definitely.
Official Equipment Pondering Thread
- Status
I chose wisely long run, poorly short run. LOL
Pondering, lusting, dreaming, drooling, hoping...yeah....yeah...definitely.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2012
- Messages
- 21,395
- Reaction score
- 13,411
- Location
- Parker, Colorado, United States
- Handicap
- 5.4
2.0 Flatso for the Z3w
Some Chrome Soft or Super Soft in yellow for the Minnesota trip (having played neither, I should grab some and give them a shot before the trip)..... also potentially some rain pants.
I played the Super Soft most of last season and really enjoyed it. Finally got a round in with the Chrome Soft and it more than delivered. Two very different types of balls, in my opinion. I have some extras of each. Let me know what you go with for the MN trip, and I'll bring a couple of sleeves of the other for you to try out.
Superstoke TX1 grips in blue for my new wedge shafts. trying to experiment with different grips a bit
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Need to get some midsize MCs. Sharpo or Avon?
- Staff
- #3,435
Threw the AMP cell in a bag over the weekend for my round with 441, and then used it again last night to practice on the course. Surprised by how well I am hitting it. Much better than I hit it when it was my gamer. I demo'd the FLY Z a few weeks back and really liked it. Makes me wonder if I should try that out or the Bio. Just want to find something that I can run with for a couple of seasons.
It's hard to argue against the Bio, given the price you can get those for. Cobra's stuff is incredibly underrated, IMO.
- Staff
- #3,437
They are. And the Bio IMO was a big jump from the AMP cell. Not sure how big of a leap the FLY Z is from the Bio.
Evok
Don't worry, Be happy!
Me too! Gotta add one to my bag, i hear thaey are great tools
- Staff
- #3,440
Massive leap from AC to BiO, which is crazy because the AC was a hell of a lot of fun.
To me, the Fly-Z screams BiO2.0...but I still want one.
- Admin
- #3,441
Its funny how we all see different things.
The Amp to Bio to me was a minor step in the overall scheme of things. Similar weight, similar adjustability. Small amount of less spin with the CG in a similar spot. The Fly Z is a larger jump to me as the CG got dropped lower, it launches higher and spins the same.
They need a major overhaul in something because none of them have sold at all, but Fly-Z+ offers that, but for some reason (sadly I know that answer) they are not selling at all.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2013
- Messages
- 17,428
- Reaction score
- 28
- Location
- Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Handicap
- 12.8
I have tried AMSmith's amp cell last year and quite liked it, but somehow all their colors, looks and marketing in general turns me off a bit.
I am in their target demographic being in my 20s (for a few more days at least), but I just don't like looking at them.
I am in their target demographic being in my 20s (for a few more days at least), but I just don't like looking at them.
- Staff
- #3,445
They do need an overhaul. And I suspect that is coming. I thought the Bio seemed to prevent more ball speeds and lower spin than the AMP cell did in my limited testing. The Z+ model was one I was interested in, but after hitting the regular model and listening to TO, I kind of thought about going the more forgiving way.
The search for my next driver continues.
- Admin
- #3,446
It certainly does. Every major "Most Used On Tour" translates to most sold. But that is not the ultimate miss here.
I think one is coming as well. You cannot just keep marketing the same thing and expect different results. While their footwear has doubled in market share from 2% to 4%, the driver sales have been stagnant and that is a shame, but it does come down to marketing and how its done.
Really considering throwing a 60* or 64* wedge back in the bag to mess around with. Rotex 2.0, me want.
Appreciate the offer Hawk!
- Status