bavs
Active member
Makes sense. But the pro v' s are only 3 dollars more than the new taylormade ball.Many refer to price with them because of the cost of the golf ball.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Makes sense. But the pro v' s are only 3 dollars more than the new taylormade ball.Many refer to price with them because of the cost of the golf ball.
Makes sense. But the pro v' s are only 3 dollars more than the new taylormade ball.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
I'm not saying the pro v is an affordable option, frankly I only played them when I was signed to a ball contract with them. But basing an entire company as being expensive based on the golf ball is misleadingAnd both the ProV's and the TM's are the two most expensive balls on the market (no, I'm not including Honma until they are readily available), and one of those is the only 5 layer tour ball on the market.
I'm not saying the pro v is an affordable option, frankly I only played them when I was signed to a ball contract with them. But basing an entire company as being expensive based on the golf ball is misleading
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
I'm not trying to attack anyone's opinion. However, when phrased as expensive someone who may not know the landscape of the golf club market might not even look at say an AP1 when it could very easily be in their price range. I think Titleist has transformed themselves from being a better player company to include a much broader spectrum of players from their drivers all the way down to their wedges and I think it goes largely unnoticed by the majority of golfers.Is it though? Or is it just part of the equation for some people? Genuinely posing that question and not attacking them as I agree with you on the gear price discussion, hell I like Titleist despite what some might think here.
Remember, the golf ball IS what keeps Titleist chugging along, even as renowned as Vokeys are and SC putters, the golf ball is the driving force so its no wonder some think of that first.
I'm not trying to attack anyone's opinion. However, when phrased as expensive someone who may not know the landscape of the golf club market might not even look at say an AP1 when it could very easily be in their price range. I think Titleist has transformed themselves from being a better player company to include a much broader spectrum of players from their drivers all the way down to their wedges and I think it goes largely unnoticed by the majority of golfers.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Yeah i can absolutely seeing the ball dominating a conversations. The company even had an exclusive ball rep for many territories for a while. I'm happy to see them broadening their focus however and think it's good for golfAaaaaaaaaaand I'm not arguing that, at all. What I'm presenting is merely that the ball does matter in the grand scheme of perception when its the piece of equipment that the company themselves puts out there more than anything else. It makes sense to see people taking that into the equation.
Beyond that, like it or not, there is an aura/perception surrounding the brand as a whole. But, its one they are beginning to truly change and that is a lot of fun to see.
I'm sure I'll ruffle feathers, and that is why I've all but given up talking Titleist in threads, but I think this is a great conversation and definitely worth discussing all angles.
I'm not saying the pro v is an affordable option, frankly I only played them when I was signed to a ball contract with them. But basing an entire company as being expensive based on the golf ball is misleading
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Yeah i can absolutely seeing the ball dominating a conversations. The company even had an exclusive ball rep for many territories for a while. I'm happy to see them broadening their focus however and think it's good for golf
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk