rollin
"Just playin golf pally"
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2012
- Messages
- 12,639
- Reaction score
- 1,119
- Location
- planet earth, milky way galaxy
- Handicap
- 15.7
While I agree that the driver should be the longest club in the bag, no where in the rules of golf does it say that every driver swing has to set a personal distance landmark. why not make the mental decision to "try and take 10 yards off" a driver swing? I bet it would smooth out the swing, be more consistent, and maybe even longer
we are not really disagreeing on much at all here. When I made my comments its not about a personal landmark. Its about what I have implied. No matter how we slice it (lol), the driver is there because (generally) we wan to hit a shot that is further than what any other clubs are capable of. We feel the need to be long as possible.
But again, as implied via the conversation, that (long as possible) distance must be one that is practical within ones ability of maintaining success. But for that desired long shot we are not going to take it with our 3,5woods or our 4iron or 3 hybrid. We generally use driver for it because its our longest club and we want that longest distance for the given scenario. If we didn't (in most cases) we would simply club up to something shorter. But we are not, why? because we want longest. I still maintain (in general) its the only club meant to be hit as far as possible. If I stand on the tee of a par4 and use my driver, its not because I don't want long, its usually because I want the longest shot I can make. Whenever I want something shorter, I use my 3,5w or 4iron, whatever. But here I want to hit the longest shot I can. I don't swing as hard as I possibly can because when I do it becomes useless due to the tiny success percentage. So I swing as hard as I can within my own ability and/or limitations to keep control. And that tamed swing would then (for all practicality) imo be considered to be - "as far as I can hit".
And it is also what my driver is mostly for. To hit the ball as far as I can.