If you have been following Tour golf for the past two years, then you have undoubtedly seen Fujikura’s Ventus and Ventus TR shafts front and center any time you turn the television on to watch. That success is centered around their VeloCore design which is the key to the real Ventus shafts out there, and it has continued to rack up the accolades and the wins.
However, we aren’t here for Ventus wood shafts, we’re here for AXIOM, and that means iron shafts.

Fujikura AXIOM Iron Shafts
The MCI iron shafts which Fujikura previously designed were extremely good graphite shafts, yet never quite as heavily pushed as one might have expected. Since that time, if you are a lunatic like I am, then you have long been wondering when we would see Fujikura’s next premium iron shaft, and if it would include VeloCore. Well, the time is now, and the answer is yes.
Why is VeloCore such a story? Much of it has to do with the massive amount of play that the Ventus family has been getting on Tour, the rest is because of the consistency and accuracy which it provides. Those two things are central to the decision of Fujikura to include VeloCore into their new AXIOM iron shafts.

At the heart of AXIOM is indeed VeloCore which is driven by Pitch 70 ton carbon fiber that is 150% stronger and more stable than T1100 according to Fujikura. This multi-material bias core design is all about stability through transition and impact, and that stability offers maximization of the clubheads MOI and ball speed potential. However, when it comes to a graphite iron shaft there can be an amount of tipping involved, so they needed an answer to that which would not impact VeloCore.
That is where the “3-Parallel System” which Fujikura has created comes in. This is essentially designing the shafts to have three different optimizations depending on if they are long (2, 3, 4), mid (5, 6, 7), or short (8, 9, W) clubs. This was all about maximizing the VeloCore material in the shafts as well as creating a constant weight design with decreasing torque throughout the set.

Fujikura believes that this has allowed for more design versatility and material integration compared to what one gets in a single blank iron shaft which is tip trimmed to play in a specific spot. Here, every iron is designed to complement each other as well as the iron head they are installed in.
Could this be the iron shaft which makes the same kind of noise for Fujikura as the Ventus and Ventus TR have elsewhere in the bag? Time will tell!
The Details
Availability: March 2023
Retailers: Fujikura Charter Dealers
Weights and Flex: 125 (X), 105 (S, X), 75 (R2, R, S)
Price: $125 (125 gram), $115 (105 gram), $105 (75 gram)




[QUOTE=”Golfers Anonymous, post: 13055333, member: 59233″]
Have been pondering these as every time I hit [USER=65950]@That post[/USER] Mizunos with these the ability to time them up just feels so right. Love the more piercing launch it seems to give me vs the Recoil or Steelfibers I’ve been playing.
[/QUOTE]
You always hit them very nicely.
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 13055390, member: 65950″]
You always hit them very nicely.
[/QUOTE]
Kinda surprising as it’s a touch stouter and on a smaller head profile than normal as well.
[QUOTE=”Bryndom, post: 13055347, member: 53516″]
My clubs that I’m bringing to Bag Boy championship have Axioms in the irons. 😎
[/QUOTE]
Go on
[QUOTE=”outlawx, post: 13055584, member: 74252″]
Go on
[/QUOTE]
…. things
I’ve got Axiom in my RTZ wedges now and so far so good. I love the feel. Haven’t played them yet outside but seeing slightly lower peak height on full wedge shots in the sim.
5i – 58° all Axiom 105s.
Pulled the trigger on a somewhat unconventional? combo – 5-PW, PXG 0317 CB with Axiom 105s, used.
I am confused who would do such a build, thought you can’t buy PXG heads individually, and PXG themselves don’t offer Axioms, or am I mistaken ?
They arrived today and I dabbled on the range and course a bit. One thing that is immediately noticeable, the combination is stupidly easy to launch, and they launch HIGH, compared to my Cobra King CB with PX 6.0s, but it doesn’t look like I am loosing distance, quite the opposite, gaining some yards. maybe due to the 1 degree stronger lofts who knows. Stable and smooth feel, keeps up with my faster transition, so far enjoying the Axioms.
And my elbow is loving these! was one of the primary reasons to switch. Guess my fitter was a bit too optimistic (too stiff/stout, resulting in golfers elbow)
Really loving these shaft so far – was it a conscious decision to go same weight in the wedges ? At least I am seeing most times wedge shafts being heavier, in the bags.
Any reasons you didn’t go with 125x for the 54°+ ? How’re you enjoying them outside? 🙂
Thinking of getting wedges into Axiom as well. Running a Frankenstein wedge setup atm. Ping i230 50° in Axiom 105s (one of those random finds on Golfbidder) – and 2 x Jaws Raw 54° and 58° with DG Wedge Flex shafts.
Yes, it was a conscious decision for me to go with the same weight for every thing. I like the consistency of feel, but I could also see people going with 125X if they enjoy a heavier, more stout wedge shaft
Great to hear you’re enjoying them though. They’re definitely my forever shaft. I’ve got two sets of them now.
I’ve got an extra dart v5 that I’m considering in my gap wedge.
im in axiom 105s in my irons up to pw and then s400 in 54, 58.
would putting the dart be crazy different or should I just stick with an s400?
my gap wedge is mostly a full swing club
I’ve got Axiom 105s in all my irons and wedges. I like the consistency of feel and Axiom is far and away the best iron shaft for me. I sometimes get a little too high of a launch with wedges, but that can be controlled.
In my opinion, Dart and Axiom are two very different profiles. I’ve gamed both.
Has anyone tried the 125S ? Sounds like an interesting proposition for those seeking 120ish weight classe.
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 13664021, member: 65950″]
I’ve got Axiom 105s in all my irons and wedges. I like the consistency of feel and Axiom is far and away the best iron shaft for me. I sometimes get a little too high of a launch with wedges, but that can be controlled.
In my opinion, Dart and Axiom are two very different profiles. I’ve gamed both.
[/QUOTE]
Expanded on this as to what you were seeing.
[QUOTE=”Pops, post: 13665066, member: 56070″]
Expanded on this as to what you were seeing.
[/QUOTE]
Between Dart and Axiom or ballflight?
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 13665131, member: 65950″]
Between Dart and Axiom or ballflight?
[/QUOTE]
Yes. ?. I love my Dart 90s in irons. I gave an Axiom 105 in a TSR2 Titleist 4 hybrid. It’s my only experience with Axiom other than a CC fitting. Shaft difference and ball characteristics would be great.
[QUOTE=”Pops, post: 13665177, member: 56070″]
Yes. ?. I love my Dart 90s in irons. I gave an Axiom 105 in a TSR2 Titleist 4 hybrid. It’s my only experience with Axiom other than a CC fitting. Shaft difference and ball characteristics would be great.
[/QUOTE]
To my feels dart has a pronounced kick at the ball once I get to about P6 in the downswing. With Axiom it’s more of a smoother unloading. I prefer the smoother feeling. It just times better with my swing. I know some prefer the kick at the ball.
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 13665267, member: 65950″]
To my feels dart has a pronounced kick at the ball once I get to about P6 in the downswing. With Axiom it’s more of a smoother unloading. I prefer the smoother feeling. It just times better with my swing. I know some prefer the kick at the ball.
[/QUOTE]
Do you see lower ball flight with the Axiom.
I do. Not a lot. Maybe 10ft if I’m guessing. I didn’t game the darts when I had access to a simulator for numbers. I average around 85-90 foot peak with axiom