Should a golfer shooting 90’s really spend $60 on a dozen golf balls?
That question is at the center of our latest episode of Splitting Fairways, recorded from the THP Titleist Golf Ball Experience at Hidden Creek Golf Club in New Jersey.
Does Handicap Really Matter?
There are plenty of shortcuts golfers use when picking a golf ball. Slower swing speed means play something soft. Higher handicaps shouldn’t waste money on premium balls. Faster players need something that spins less.

The problem is that golf ball fitting isn’t necessarily that simple.
Ryan and I have considerably different swing speeds, yet we both tend to benefit from a similar higher-flight, higher-full-swing-spin profile. We arrive there for different reasons, which raises a bigger question: Should golfers choose a ball based on handicap and swing speed, or what their game actually needs?
When Does a $60 Golf Ball Make Sense?
Maybe the better question isn’t whether a 15 handicap should play a $60 golf ball. It’s how many golf balls do you actually go through?
And maybe most importantly, why playing the same golf ball might matter more than playing the most expensive one.
What do you think? Should a 15 hdcp be playing a $60 golf ball? Let us know in the comments, we would love to hear your thoughts.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download




The key has been mentioned.
Whoever is paying $60 for golf balls, is doing it wrong. Period.
There’s so many ways to get premium golf balls without paying full retail price. I get the premise, but I just will never be the guy to go into a Dicks and grab $60 balls off the shelf.
[QUOTE=”TWright, post: 14349820, member: 11048″]
This has been the problem with the $40 urethane range for me since my 2025 Titleist Ball Experience fitting. I got put into the V1x specifically cause I needed the extra spin on my 7 iron for help with approach shots. The 50 yard wedge and full swing wedge Pro V1 would have been fine. The $40 urethane balls are usually lower spinning on full shots where I need the most help.
[/QUOTE]
Exactly this and I saw it first hand with [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] playing the Pro V1x at Hidden creek.
Will watch the video shortly. I have pretty strong feelings about this.
To answer the question, a 15 cap absolutely doesn’t need to spend $60 on a golf ball. If they understand they are lighting cash on fire but want to feel like it’s benefiting their game, sure. But is it needed to shoot their cap or even improve, no.
It’s more important to find a ball that fits your game and play it every round. That can be done at lower price points in a variety of ways.
Need is a strong word. I don’t think anyone [I][B]needs[/B][/I] to play an expensive ball. But I think it makes it easier for a big portion of golfers to shoot lower scores. Unless you’re a very good on approaches you’re missing at least half of the greens. That’s a pretty good chunk of shots. Being able to spin the ball and grab the greens helps.
My son was playing for less than a year before he moved to Pro V1 balls. I bought a sleeve of a bunch of balls at different tiers and the higher performance and higher cost balls were all regularly in a tighter group in the short game area. For both a 10 year old and an adult. That was tested and I think if scores matter it’s doing a disservice to not at least test which golf balls help you score better.
[QUOTE=”MikeG, post: 14349806, member: 15992″]
I was thinking about this last night. I know the majority of people who have responded say they won’t touch a premium ball because they lose them too much or have a wider dispersion. Obviously the answers is to take lessons, but I know that is a blanket statement that won’t be able to fit everyone.
Let’s say you do lose balls from the tee but with irons and wedges you don’t. How much performance are you giving up because of your tee game? are you losing a ball every tee shot? I can’t imagine that is the case. I think looking at this from purely a money standpoint might be costing some performance.
Before the pitchforks come out, I know everyone’s budgets are different and not everyone can afford the $60 dz golf ball. It was just an interesting thought on how some come to the conclusion that a premium ball isn’t worth it when it might be if you look at the whole picture.
[/QUOTE]
We got 2 dozen at WWGC and I came home with a lot less than that…
But your point is valid. Almost all of them were lost from the tee. I usually go with Maxfli Tours because it doesn’t hurt as much when losing them, but there is some performance loss even if it’s not much.
[QUOTE=”robrandalgz, post: 14349473, member: 44393″]
I was a 20 when I had the only ball fitting that I ever had (with Titleist, so it wasn’t at all brand agnostic), but they fit me into the Prov1X. I was actually striping the **** out the ball that day. He said one of the coolest things I’d ever heard about my swing that day. The fitter said, “You need t dial into what your scoring problem is. Because that’s not a 20 cap swing”. I was waling on air…….then proceeded to card a 98 that day……………….:LOL:
[/QUOTE]
I know that feel. I hit two six irons that may well have landed in the same spot, and was asked my handicap, to which I replied “around 20”. Fitter says, “You must really suck at putting.”
[QUOTE=”MikeG, post: 14349806, member: 15992″]
I was thinking about this last night. I know the majority of people who have responded say they won’t touch a premium ball because they lose them too much or have a wider dispersion. Obviously the answers is to take lessons, but I know that is a blanket statement that won’t be able to fit everyone.
Let’s say you do lose balls from the tee but with irons and wedges you don’t. How much performance are you giving up because of your tee game? are you losing a ball every tee shot? I can’t imagine that is the case. I think looking at this from purely a money standpoint might be costing some performance.
Before the pitchforks come out, I know everyone’s budgets are different and not everyone can afford the $60 dz golf ball. It was just an interesting thought on how some come to the conclusion that a premium ball isn’t worth it when it might be if you look at the whole picture.
[/QUOTE]
Its a cliche I’d heard before, but Charlie from Titleist repeated it. People say they’re not good enough to play a premium performance ball, when they should be asking themselves if they’re good enough [I]not[/I] to play a premium performance ball.
$60?
No
Need – It's not about need. It's about what fits you and what you play is consistent for your game and wallet.
I've been playing ProV1x since Titleist fit me into it since 2018, and picked up the 2026 Chrome Tour – I am not playing to my once-under 10hc. More like 15hc as I change my long and short game swing at my senior age.
As I get back to playing after researching a new swing for a year – I've lost about 9 balls a round for the two rounds – shocking for a guy that might lose 1-2 balls a round. Then last round, I finally started hitting a straight ball again – only lost 3 balls, and none on driver.
Was I concerned? Heck, yes.
But $60? I always buy the Titleist on the March Loyalty Offer, Callaway's on a similar offer – Buy 4dz for price of 3dz.
What do I like? Consistency and short-game spin, higher iron flight, decent feel, etc.
[QUOTE=”GraniteRoost, post: 14349556, member: 40185″]
Who, me?
[IMG alt=”Confused What The GIF by Sesame Street”]https://media3.giphy.com/media/mxXPuScIwPwK2oyD6i/200.gif[/IMG]
[/QUOTE]
Is this an admission of guilt?
I need all the help I can get out there. If I can afford the ball that will help me, then I will play it. On days that I can’t seem to keep it in play….the inexpensive balls come out. I do notice a difference playing with a V1 vs Velocity or TruFeel etc.
This is a great video, and there is great conversation here.
I have never done the ball fitting. However, I know from past iron fittings that I could use more spin on my 7 iron and I definitely could hit the ball much higher. That’s why I lean towards balls such as the V1x.
[QUOTE=”TWright, post: 14349820, member: 11048″]
This has been the problem with the $40 urethane range for me since my 2025 Titleist Ball Experience fitting. I got put into the V1x specifically cause I needed the extra spin on my 7 iron for help with approach shots. The 50 yard wedge and full swing wedge Pro V1 would have been fine. The $40 urethane balls are usually lower spinning on full shots where I need the most help.
[/QUOTE]
I find with the X balls I get more of a pro miss (short, little rollout), but with the softer balls I can “get away with it” when it tumbles and just bounces towards the total distance.
For my bad ball striking, the softer ball ends up with better total dispersion but worst carry dispersion if that makes sense. With either you’ll have to accept the pros and cons.
For me, I can put a mediocre swing, with mediocre contact, and still get decent results and I prefer that miss than the one that spins up too high.
[QUOTE=”Chow, post: 14351005, member: 80528″]
I find with the X balls I get more of a pro miss (short, little rollout), but with the softer balls I can “get away with it” when it tumbles and just bounces towards the total distance.
For my bad ball striking, the softer ball ends up with better total dispersion but worst carry dispersion if that makes sense. With either you’ll have to accept the pros and cons.
For me, I can put a mediocre swing, with mediocre contact, and still get decent results and I prefer that miss than the one that spins up too high.
[/QUOTE]
I’d rather have the ones that come up a bit short on a miss hit than to have my good shots roll out too much. I want to be rewarded when I hit a good shot, not have them roll out too much.
I’m a high capper… and I can tell the difference between many different types of balls. I have found that the Pro V1X is the right ball for my game at this time. That could change, but right now I believe it saves me a few shots a round.
[QUOTE=”TWright, post: 14351108, member: 11048″]
I’d rather have the ones that come up a bit short on a miss hit than to have my good shots roll out too much. I want to be rewarded when I hit a good shot, not have them roll out too much.
[/QUOTE]
When I hit a good shot. The BRX ball stops within a few feet for me. I enjoy that part very much from that ball.
[QUOTE=”Chow, post: 14351145, member: 80528″]
When I hit a good shot. The BRX ball stops within a few feet for me. I enjoy that part very much from that ball.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah obviously play the ball that works for you. When I tried the B RX this year with the demo balls Bridgestone sent out it was rolling out significantly more for me than the Pro V1x was on my good shots.
[QUOTE=”TWright, post: 14351150, member: 11048″]
Yeah obviously play the ball that works for you. When I tried the B RX this year with the demo balls Bridgestone sent out it was rolling out significantly more for me than the Pro V1x was on my good shots.
[/QUOTE]
Yup that’s why we have to all try them out ourselves. (y)
[QUOTE=”TWright, post: 14351150, member: 11048″]
Yeah obviously play the ball that works for you. When I tried the B RX this year with the demo balls Bridgestone sent out it was rolling out significantly more for me than the Pro V1x was on my good shots.
[/QUOTE]
Another thing I noticed, with X balls, I’m more accurate with half swing, wedge shots inside of 85 yards or so.
The Spin really kept that distance consistent, even on mishits which led to consistent carries. So that’s an advantage I’m giving up playing a softer ball.
I once had the chance to interact with Dean Snell and this was pretty much my question for him. I am a 20 cap with slow driver swing speed. Should I be using a urethane covered ball vs ionomer. His response was it was more important to play a urethane ball since high handicappers hit fewer greens in regulation so we need a ball that responds better around the green.
Use a ball that gives you the best combination of distance, dispersion and spin, period.
I believe everyone can benefit from a premium urethane ball. But it has to be the proper one. I have a mid cap acquaintance on a league that despite giving him 13 strokes on 9 holes, I beat like a drum splitting fairways around doglegs and knocking down pins in a match using a Chrome Tour X. So he bought some. Couldn't find the course much less the fairway with them off the tee, they are one of the spinnier balls off the driver out there. What offers one player control off the tee gives others uncontrollable curving flight…. The next week I gave him a couple Tour B RX to try and they worked. so he bought more and they improved his game immensely compared to the two piece surlyn crap he was playing, with no discernable loss of distance off the tee (how can you measure when there is no real consistency from shot to shot? lol) he couldn't keep a ball on the green from short irons thru wedges with the surlyn. The Tour B RX actually gave him a chance, and he grew more confident, making chips and pitches without decelerating through the ball.
[QUOTE=”Grip9, post: 14353973, member: 85952″]
Use a ball that gives you the best combination of distance, dispersion and spin, period.
[/QUOTE]
Curious, did you watch or listen to the episode? This is what is discussed, fresh off ball fitting.
[QUOTE=”ClaytonP, post: 14348236, member: 75086″]
No, total waste of money when Maxfli is winning on tour. You can get them for less than half the price.
[/QUOTE]
I was going to say the same thing. I get the Maxfli balls for my son and I have played them. They are extremely good for the money.
I do think you should play the best ball you can afford but the Maxflis are really good at a good price. It is important to play the same ball or same family of ball consistently. I can swap between the Srixon Zstar diamond and the PV1X and play well with both. I don’t change in the middle of the round though. I play the same ball for the whole round.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 14354009, member: 3″]
Curious, did you watch or listen to the episode? This is what is discussed, fresh off ball fitting.
[/QUOTE]
Yep. Also, I do a yearly ball fitting at Golf Galaxy for @$20. This year they used Ping’s Ballnamic Fitting which is ball brand agnostic. I was fit into four balls to select from on course; Chrome Tour, Wilson Staff Model and X & Bridgestone Tour B X. Chrome Tour was my final selection. The prior year I was using Callaway Chrome Soft.
A 15 is likely good enough from 150 in to benefit from a tour ball. Paying $60 seems crazy when there are a lot of other alternatives from $20-$40 a dozen. I buy whatever ball I can get for around $2-$3 a ball. I’m currently playing Z-Star Diamond but I also like the Maxfli Tour line. The most important thing for any golfer is to play the same type of ball for consistency.
Yes they should, I own Acushnet stock so 2 dozen would be better.