We have spent the last few days combing through some data that suggests that over 85% of missed approach shots are left short. This could be for a number of reasons including
Poor Contact
Not hitting it as far as we think we do
Playing to a front pin yardage rather than giving enough room for minor misses.
Fear of going too far
We hear a lot of talk on the forum about random balls flying too far, etc. Yet if our stats are accurate, those percentages are quite small. Looking at my own personal data, it appears as though when I miss the green, I only go long on approach shots 6% of the time.
Where do you think your own game falls in this spectrum of stats?
View attachment 8993738
I’ve guess I’ve got the fear of missing long. Or it’s a fat shot and I chunk it.
If I was aiming at that green I would club up (maybe twice) every single time. At my course greens are elevated and slanting toward the approach shot. Everything long is short sided with a slope running away from you on the recovery. Short misses are almost always an easy chip into a slope. Short is smart here.
I think.i have a good handle on how far I hit my clubs…it’s just poor execution I think
I am guessing that the average golfer miss-hits their shots more often then hitting them pure. When that happens you get reduced distance (bladed skulls not included) and shots coming up short.
Reminds me of the story:
Student: "How he can I generate backspin and spin it back."
Teacher: "how often do you hit it past the hole?"
Student: "Never"
Teacher: "So why do you want to spin it back?"
I have also improved my strike consistency, and average and flushed distances are closing on each other. Those differences are largest in the longer irons.
My stats show that I miss short more often than I hit the green. For me it’s mostly a combination of mishits and fear of going too far. On my home course, missing long is far more penal than missing short on most of the greens, so if I have a choice of clubbing up and risking the deep miss or clubbing down and risking the short miss, I’ll almost always take the short miss.
On a hole like the one pictured in the OP/article, I’d be more likely to club up and take the chance with a long miss (assuming there’s no bunker hidden back behind the green). I’d rather be chipping out of the back rough than hitting out of that front bunker. If there is a bunker behind the green, I’d aim to the right side and either hit the green or miss short right and have at least a chance at an up and down. I have a lot more control with my chipping than I do with bunker shots.
1. Being below the hole is beat into our minds from when we are young.
2. People want to think they hit it farther than they do.
My miss is short right when I do.
I would say the reason the vast majority of amateurs leave it short, is they are playing each shot based on best case potential. Flushing a 9 iron will carry 145 yards, one hop & stop leaving me a tap-in birdie. There a many mishits that will leave the ball short & really only one, a bladed iron, that will go long…
I rarely ever go long according to my Garmin stats. I can confidently say I come up short with my miss because of poor contact. But counting my right and left miss, I’m usually pretty spot on with my distance(accuracy notwithstanding ). Just comes down to contact for me
That story is exactly why I wonder about so many golfers emphasizing maximum greenside spin when choosing a ball. The vast majority of us don’t hit the ball well enough or consistently enough to generate significant spin, and the vast majority of us don’t have the ability to control how much spin we put on the ball and match that with how far past the hole we hit it. Sure, it looks cool to zip one back on the green or get a drop and stop – but for most recreational golfers, trying to do that is going to hurt your game more than help it. Land it short with a lot of spin and it’s going to zip back and make your putt longer; land it long and not get as much spin as you planned and it’s going to roll out and make your putt longer. It’s another example in golf of trying to emulate the pros when most of us shouldn’t be trying to emulate the pros.
Next time you watch the pros play, pay attention to how many times their ball zipping back leaves them a longer putt versus how many times it leaves them closer to the hole. And those are pros, who have distance and spin control that most of us can only dream about.
Instead of always going for the flag stick, I will survey the hazards, pin placement, slope of the green, etc. Then, based on that, take a line that gives me the best shot at a 2 putt. 1 putt is always ideal, but if it’s a long approach, I don’t have many one putts. If I can minimize hazards, and maximize results, that’s what i’ll aim to do.
So no hazards, go for the pin.
Water or sand, avoid it at all costs, even if that leaves you a long putt
Putt uphill, if given a choice.
Since most of the courses I play don’t have lots of hazards, it affords me the ability to go for most greens. My contact is usually consistent, but direction not as much. Obviously will go short on a chunk, or long on a blade. I’ll be tracking it this year, so can’t wait to see what perception vs reality is.
View attachment 8993753
I just don’t have to worry as much about wind.
on my minimal arccos data, similar to most that have been posted.
10% long
38% short
32% gir
15% left
7% right
2nd reason, which is becoming less common, is not being able to reach the green in 2 shots. Yesterday, a hole that normally plays down wind, was into the wind with a hazard short. Would have required about a shot flying 190 in the air and at that distance with the conditions I felt better punching a short iron and then having a wedge in.
3rd reason, at the course I play most of my rounds, you would much rather miss short than long so if I am between 2 clubs, I am usually taking the shorter one.
the vast majority of the times I come up short are just not hitting the ball solidly, but the other 2 are also a factor for me personally.
My misses might be smaller than average, but they still follow a predictable pattern when looking at shot charts. Short right to long left, just pretty balanced between them and usually miss long and short combined about the same as one of the lateral directions. Distance is easier than direction for me.
I also check in fairly regularly on my shot charts, and if there’s a recent trend I don’t like, I usually work on correcting that issue. That probably helps keep them a little more balanced over the long haul too.
Yep …. you’re mental alright
Reason #1 – not enough club, amateur golfers or at least me remember the one time they hit that club XXX distance and not that 9 other times it was shorter
Reason #2 – Red Flag, why aim for the largest part of the green behind the flag (sarcasm) I can only be short of the red flag… ends up in the apron – skulls a chip runs another long chip…two putts… strokes are adding up quickly…
Takes one to know one…..
I tend to miss short, but often (especially if the green design allows for a run-up), that’s by design.
I often look to run shots on since I don’t generate a ton of spin.
Good strategy !
I play 5-6 courses regularly each year. I can’t think of many holes at all where it’s safe to miss long.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
I have thought about this recently and still don’t factor it in to my approach shot. Aiming for the back of the green or over is probably the best scoring strategy for me. The problem is the most frustrating miss is when I hit a great shot and really catch a ball flush and have it go over the green. I can live with a poor shot missing the green but I hate missing on good strikes.