Every few years, Mizuno makes it clear that a specific category has their full attention. For 2026, that category is drivers.
Mizuno has never lacked pedigree in metalwoods. Long before the JPX name became synonymous with irons, Mizuno was pushing boundaries with titanium construction, internal weighting, and face engineering at a time when many companies were still finding their footing in the category. The company’s history with drivers may not always dominate the marketing conversation, but it has consistently been rooted in material science and structural integrity rather than trend chasing.
That approach has not changed. What has changed is the urgency.
During a recent product demo call, Walker Slaton, Manager of Golf Product for Mizuno USA, made it clear that this year represented a deliberate shift in focus. Drivers were not treated as a supporting piece to the iron lineup. They were a priority.
“This was a big year for us in drivers,” Slaton said. “We went back to what Mizuno has always done best, which is start with materials and engineering, not just shape or adjustability.”
That mindset is what led to the creation of the JPX ONE and JPX ONE SELECT drivers. Rather than chasing extremes in size, spin reduction, or movable weight complexity, Mizuno centered the entire design process around a new material platform that would allow them to build speed, consistency, and feel into the head from the inside out.
The result is a driver family that looks understated at address but is anything but simple under the hood. JPX ONE and JPX ONE SELECT are not about reinventing how a driver looks or how it adjusts. They are about refining how a driver behaves at impact, especially across a wider range of strike locations and swing speeds.

From our perspective, this feels like a return to form for Mizuno in the metalwood space. With JPX ONE, Mizuno is once again telling a materials first story, and Nanoalloy is the centerpiece of that narrative.
What follows is a deeper look at the shared technology that defines both drivers, how JPX ONE and JPX ONE SELECT diverge in purpose, and why Mizuno believes this platform represents the strongest driver lineup they have produced in years.
Nanoalloy: The Material That Makes JPX ONE Possible
Nanoalloy is not a tuning feature in the JPX ONE drivers. It is the foundation of the entire design. Mizuno did not start with shape, adjustability, or weighting and then decide where Nanoalloy fit. According to Walker Slaton, the opposite happened.
“Nanoalloy dictated what this driver could be,” Slaton said. “Once we committed to using it, the rest of the engineering decisions followed.”

The use of Nanoalloy at Mizuno actually started in their softball division, and its use in bats was integral in the upward adoption and performance trends the company has seen at the NCAA level.
At its core, Nanoalloy is a nylon-based material infused with nano scale particles that are evenly dispersed throughout the structure. These particles dramatically increase tensile strength while preserving elasticity. That combination is critical. Nanoalloy allows Mizuno to push strength higher while still enabling controlled flex. In a static state, the material is extremely rigid and strong, but at high impact speeds it becomes extremely flexible. Because of this, Nanoalloy has the net effect of making golf balls perform like higher compression versions of themselves, increasing speed.
Key Advantages of Nanoalloy
Early released pictures of the JPX ONE series had many internet sleuths proclaiming Mizuno had entered into the world of composite driver faces, but as you can see that isn’t the case. Also, it’s important to note that, unlike some composite-faced drivers, the Nanoalloy isn’t glued to the body of the driver. A forged titanium face is welded to the body, ensuring strength and durability, while providing a familiar feel. The Nanoalloy is then integrated directly on top of that Titanium framework.

That integration matters because traditional face construction methods often create stiffness at attachment points. Those stiff zones interrupt energy transfer and can create inconsistent ball speeds across the face. By incorporating Nanoalloy on to the face structure, Mizuno maintains uniform flex characteristics from center to perimeter.
From a performance standpoint, this allows the face to flex more efficiently on strikes that are high, low, or slightly off center. It is one of the primary reasons Mizuno has seen tighter launch and spin windows during testing rather than just isolated peak ball speed gains.
“We saw more consistency shot to shot,” Slaton said. “Not just faster numbers, but more predictable numbers.”
Another key advantage of Nanoalloy is durability at reduced thickness. Because the material is significantly stronger than conventional steels, Mizuno was able to thin the face in specific zones without compromising longevity or structural integrity. That thinning increases face deflection while still meeting durability requirements for high swing speed players.

Many modern drivers rely on aggressive face thinning but then have to compensate elsewhere with internal stiffening structures. Nanoalloy reduces the need for those compensations, which keeps the energy transfer cleaner and more direct.
Nanoalloy also plays a role in acoustics. A face that flexes uniformly produces a more consistent sound profile. The JPX ONE drivers have a muted, solid impact sound that reinforces strike quality without masking feedback. That sound is not accidental. It is a byproduct of material behavior rather than internal sound tuning alone.
“This material lets us control feel and sound naturally,” Slaton said. “We are not trying to fix it after the fact.”
Ultimately, Nanoalloy is what allows Mizuno to deliver speed, stability, and feel without chasing extreme shapes or excessive adjustability. It is a materials first solution, and it aligns directly with how Mizuno has approached iron design for decades.
Mizuno JPX ONE Drivers Shared Performance Architecture
Both the JPX ONE and JPX ONE SELECT drivers share the same Nanoalloy face platform and internal construction philosophy. The differences between the two models come from center of gravity placement and head geometry rather than changes in face material or structure.

The internal rib system is tuned to manage sound and vibration. Mizuno has always treated acoustics as a performance element, not an afterthought. The JPX ONE drivers are designed to produce a solid, muted sound that reinforces strike quality without masking feedback.
Aerodynamically, the heads are shaped to promote speed without exaggerated visual elements. Mizuno avoided sharp trailing edges or extreme shaping in favor of a profile that remains stable throughout the swing.

“Our goal was efficiency,” Slaton said. “We wanted golfers to swing freely without feeling like they had to manipulate the club to get performance.”
That philosophy carries through the entire line.
JPX ONE: Stability, Speed, and Forgiveness Without Complexity
The standard JPX ONE driver is built around the idea that most golfers do not need more adjustability. They need better results from more of the face.
Mizuno designed JPX ONE to be the most stable and forgiving head in the lineup, prioritizing consistency over manipulation. This is a driver for golfers who want to swing freely, trust the club to do its job, and avoid chasing settings round to round.

The full benefit of Nanoalloy is most obvious here. By integrating the Nanoalloy structure directly into the crown and sole junction, Mizuno was able to remove discretionary mass from the top of the head and reposition it low and back. That shift increases MOI while still allowing the face to flex efficiently at impact. The result is ball speed retention on misses that would normally bleed distance, especially low on the face.
Walker Slaton emphasized that point.
“We saw much tighter ball speed numbers across the face than we had previously. Not just center strikes but misses that players actually make.”
JPX ONE also features a neutral internal weighting configuration designed to produce a mid launch with controlled spin for the broadest range of players. This is a driver that will appeal strongly to golfers who prioritize confidence at address and repeatable performance. The shape is clean, traditional, and free of visual distractions. It sets up square and does not ask the player to make adjustments to their swing to accommodate the head.

JPX ONE Specifications
- Head size: 460cc
- Loft options: 9.5°, 10.5°, 12° (±2º)
- Lie angle: 59° – 62°
- Length: 45.75 inches
- $599
Stock Shafts and Grip
- MCA Tensei 1K Black, MCA Tensei 1K Blue, Project X Denali Frost Blue, UST Mamiya Helium Nanocore
- Tour Velvet Cord Gray
JPX ONE SELECT: Tuned Performance for Speed and Control
While JPX ONE is about broad forgiveness, JPX ONE SELECT is about targeted performance.

Mizuno developed ONE SELECT for players who generate more speed and want tighter control over launch and spin without moving into an overly demanding head. It retains the same Nanoalloy driven construction but applies it differently through internal weighting and face tuning.
In ONE SELECT, weight is positioned slightly more forward compared to the standard JPX ONE. That change lowers spin and adds ball speed for players who already deliver the club consistently. The head still offers forgiveness, but it trades a small amount of MOI for improved energy transfer and a flatter flight window.
According to Slaton, this was intentional.
“We did not want SELECT to feel like a completely different family. It’s the same DNA, just tuned for players who need more control rather than maximum help.”
The face structure in ONE SELECT is also subtly optimized for higher speed impacts. The Nanoalloy support allows the face to maintain structural stability under faster loads, reducing unwanted spin variation and improving directional consistency when players go after it.
Visually, ONE SELECT sets up similarly to JPX ONE but appears slightly more compact from heel to toe. That visual cue alone will appeal to better players who associate compact shaping with control and precision.

ONE SELECT bridges an important gap. It gives stronger players access to Mizuno’s newest driver materials without forcing them into a low forgiveness or ultra-low spin design that punishes small misses.
JPX ONE SELECT Specifications
- Head size: 460cc
- Loft options: 9.5°, 10.5° (±2º)
- Lie angle: 56.5° – 59.5°
- Length: 45.75 inches
- Price: $599
Stock Shafts and Grip
- MCA Tensei 1K Black, MCA Tensei 1K Blue, Project X Denali Frost Blue, UST Mamiya Helium Nanocore
- Tour Velvet Cord Gray
Performance
We had a short time to work with the JPX ONE driver using the SkyTrak MAX. Indoor sound is sometimes difficult to gauge, but our impression was that the JPX ONE produced a satisfying impact sound like we’d expect from a Titanium face and carbon-faced driver. It was slightly metallic and crisp, without being either overly muted or high pitched.
Launch angles and spin rates trended towards the “mid” range that Mizuno claims, with moderate variations produced from different impact location. As we’d hoped from the Nanoalloy face, ball speeds tended to stay in a strong range on many different impact locations. Hosel adjustments were simple and produced changes in flight windows and shot shape as we expected. While we look forward to getting the JPX ONE on the golf course soon, it’s performance in the hitting bay was very solid.
Final Thoughts
The Mizuno JPX ONE and JPX ONE SELECT drivers do not feel like a one off release or a short term experiment. They feel like Mizuno planting a flag back in the metalwood conversation using the same principles that built their reputation in irons. Materials first. Engineering driven.
Nanoalloy is the headline, but the bigger takeaway is how disciplined Mizuno was in using it. Instead of chasing extreme shapes or layering on complexity, they used the material to solve real problems golfers face with drivers: inconsistent ball speed, unpredictable launch windows, and the tradeoff between forgiveness and control.
For more information on the Mizuno JPX ONE and JPX ONE SELECT drivers, visit www.mizunogolf.com.






[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13765825, member: 1579″]
This really excites me to hit it eventually
[/QUOTE]
well, you’ll be at Victoria National with Mizuno for our content trip, so I’m sure you will definitely get some swings in ha ha
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 13765827, member: 3″]
well, you’ll be at Victoria National with Mizuno for our content trip, so I’m sure you will definitely get some swings in ha ha
[/QUOTE]
That’s certainly the hope!!!
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 13765785, member: 3″]
this is actually a really good way to put it.
I very much like the sound personally.
It reminds me a bit of epic flash, which was a bit polarizing, but when you sent it, it sounds so freaking good
[/QUOTE]
Oh man, I love the sound of the Epic Flash! This makes me even more excited to try it.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 13765701, member: 3″]
FWIW no THPer has shared other info. In fact I would argue you launched it low at under 11 too.
I think as [USER=5944]@Lord Tox[/USER] mentioned once he lofted up a degree he was bombing it
[/QUOTE]
If he is lofting up then most of us probably could use a little more loft as well
It looks really good at address.
I’ve hit it at stated loft of 9° the first two times, but the next time I’m going to try it 1° up and see what I see. The flight so far has been more piercing and it is launching in that 10°- 12° window, so if going up a degree can help optimize then it’s worth checking out.
i hit the one today, not the select. 10.5 loft, stock tensei blue stiff. my driver swing is not in a good place, and it’s worse indoors. the color, fit and finish is outstanding. shape was ok, not my favorite. i tested pretty much everywhere on the face, obviously my swing is to blame but i wonder if a different shaft would help me swing more consistently. i would say the shot shapes were pretty much what i expected. ball speed was good for me, nothing out of the ordinary. good strikes were higher spin than i expected, though. extreme toe was more playable than i see with the gt2. i really liked the sound/feel. maybe ever so slightly more muted than the gt2, but not too dissimilar and certainly not muted carbon.
i’d like to get my driver swing back in a good spot and re-test this and the select.
Well doesn’t look like we will get to see Marco Penge bomb any with the JPX this year. Signed with PXG for this season. 🤢
Fitting is set for 1:45 tomorrow a local club in town.
I also wanted to add that I did get to hit a few today with it. Not the optimal shaft for me though. The set up ball looks really good. It makes the driver look quite large which as someone who tests all areas of the face is a bonus.
I am currently most curious about this driver this year.
Does anyone know what the heads weigh in at? Was curious if they are in the +200gram range.
Well I’m starting to warm up to the idea…..
[QUOTE=”Raiderboost, post: 13779217, member: 55623″]
I also wanted to add that I did get to hit a few today with it. Not the optimal shaft for me though. The set up ball looks really good. It makes the driver look quite large which as someone who tests all areas of the face is a bonus.
[/QUOTE]
Denali Frost?
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 13779351, member: 65950″]
Denali Frost?
[/QUOTE]
Yeah it was. I need the high launch high spin though as I’m very low spin.
[QUOTE=”Raiderboost, post: 13779163, member: 55623″]
Fitting is set for 1:45 tomorrow a local club in town.
[/QUOTE]
Can’t wait to hear how it goes.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13780349, member: 1193″]
Can’t wait to hear how it goes.
[/QUOTE]
I just hope I can find my driver swing today. It’s been pretty bad in the Sim the last couple times. I have had some times recently where I played and my driving was so much better on the course than in the sim. I kind of think it seeing the actual ball flight in real life helps me quite a bit.
[QUOTE=”Raiderboost, post: 13779431, member: 55623″]
Yeah it was. I need the high launch high spin though as I’m very low spin.
[/QUOTE]
Seems like a tough matchup for a lot of us. I really hope the location by me gets in some more shaft options. It’s the only one they had when I tested it last week. I’d love to test it with a more suitable shaft based off what I saw with the mismatched Frost it could be very good properly optimized.
[QUOTE=”Raiderboost, post: 13780398, member: 55623″]
I just hope I can find my driver swing today. It’s been pretty bad in the Sim the last couple times. I have had some times recently where I played and my driving was so much better on the course than in the sim. I kind of think it seeing the actual ball flight in real life helps me quite a bit.
[/QUOTE]
Hard to get comfortable in doors for many of us in general.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13780415, member: 1193″]
Hard to get comfortable in doors for many of us in general.
[/QUOTE]
Big fact.
To this day I still fight it, and I swing indoors a LOT
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 13780404, member: 65950″]
Seems like a tough matchup for a lot of us. I really hope the location by me gets in some more shaft options. It’s the only one they had when I tested it last week. I’d love to test it with a more suitable shaft based off what I saw with the mismatched Frost it could be very good properly optimized.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah I’m hoping my buddy is able to get a few more shafts this morning before it. He said they did not give him much of a selection. Kind of surprising since he’s actually working for Mizuno doing it. The club I’m doing it at is the higher end club in town. It wouldn’t be anything for those members to fork out extra for an upgraded shaft option.
I hit JPX ONE today.
Beautiful Driver for sure.
10.5° head with the Tensei K1Regular Flex.
Sound and Feel was fine for me.
Decent Numbers for me.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9405016[/ATTACH]
TBH – I had better numbers with the XXIO 14.
Im sure its been posted, but do these use the same adapters as the STz 230 etc ?
[QUOTE=”Ajcoop20, post: 13781797, member: 15643″]
Im sure its been posted, but do these use the same adapters as the STz 230 etc ?
[/QUOTE]
Yes.
It was a fun day getting to hit the JPX One along with the 7w and new irons. He didn’t have any high launch/high spin shafts so I hit the Tensei 1K Blue 65 and the Denali Frost. I didn’t really have the issue with low launch that some here mentioned. I actually hit a few pretty high for me. Most all of them were launching at or equal to my Max K which has the Denali Red and is loft up and closed just a bit.
I definitely was picking up a little ball speed from the Max K by about 3-4 mph. The launch monitor was a full swing and was sometimes spitting out some weird numbers. It seemed like the spin and carry were quitep low as I hit a couple that seemed to launch and carry well but the numbers didn’t seem to match.
It did seem pretty straight as most of my good hits were straight to a baby fade vs a small to medium fade with my Max K.
The sound and feel on the face were both excellent. A couple other people who I saw hit them both made that comment was well after hitting 1-2 shots with it. I do think I liked the feel of it over the Max K. I wish the launch monitor was better so I could have seen more accurate numbers for the comparison.
It will be fun to test them side by side in the sim, on the range, and ultimately in the course.
Here some pics next to my Max K.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9405067[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full”]9405068[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full”]9405069[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”Raiderboost, post: 13782641, member: 55623″]
Here some pics next to my Max K.
[ATTACH=full]9405067[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]9405068[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]9405069[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Man I love the look of that!
That’s a pretty solid increase in ball speed but a little concerning if spin gets too low. But, getting in to that shaft profile you mentioned should help a bit.
[QUOTE=”KEV, post: 13782660, member: 36767″]
Man I love the look of that!
That’s a pretty solid increase in ball speed but a little concerning if spin gets too low. But, getting in to that shaft profile you mentioned should help a bit.
[/QUOTE]
To be fair it’s something I struggle with on the Max K. I’m quite low spin on the driver. Another guy I saw hitting it in the Sim yesterday was not having any trouble with low spin.
Had a chance to hit the JPX One. Not a huge fan of the sole, but the face is very cool to see and the crown looks like a classic gloss crown, but with the deep navy blue that shows when it catches the light. Really nice, subtle incorporation of blue into the crown.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9405648[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full”]9405649[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full”]9405650[/ATTACH]
I knew I should be expecting a bit of a metallic sound at impact, but that first swing still took me by surprise. It was pretty fun to hear that crispy metallic sound.
Ive never gamed a Mizuno driver and it’s been a while since I’ve even swung one, but the JPX One, based on just a few swings, is definitely worth looking at more closely. It was right up there in terms of speed with the other drivers I hit. Not the absolute fastest, but 100% on par. I hit the 9* and did not experience the low launch that a couple people had mentioned.
First swing was a good one and between the sound and result, all I said to myself was “wow”.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9405653[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 13765785, member: 3″]
this is actually a really good way to put it.
I very much like the sound personally.
It reminds me a bit of epic flash, which was a bit polarizing, but when you sent it, it sounds so freaking good
[/QUOTE]
The Epic Flash was one of my favorite drivers for sound ever. It was explosive sounding. Interesting comparison there.
PGA Show eBay’ing?
Maybe….
👀
SELECT!
This will be hit soon. This week. Slightly disappointed that initial feedback seems to indicate that it’s not going to be the fastest release this year.
The more I see these, the more I want to hit them. Secretly I hope they perform the best for me when I go for a driver fitting.
I would like to try this one but I don’t think any place has any left handed demo heads in my area across GG, PGASS and a local shop that sells a ton of mizuno stuff.
The ST-Max was straight in my limited time trying one but wasn’t dialed in for my swing. Would really be curious if this one could compete for me.
I still can’t get over the fact of how good this driver looks in pictures. I really need to go find it in the wild.
[QUOTE=”MikeG, post: 13796493, member: 15992″]
The more I see these, the more I want to hit them. [B]Secretly I hope they perform the best for me when I go for a driver fitting.[/B]
[/QUOTE]
Me too if I’m honest.
The forecasted weather this weekend is likely putting a stop to my driving up to Watts in Memphis to hit them. 🙁
But, it will happen soon.
[QUOTE=”Parrot, post: 13797001, member: 48815″]
The forecasted weather this weekend is likely putting a stop to my driving up to Watts in Memphis to hit them. 🙁
But, it will happen soon.
[/QUOTE]
weekend looking brutal for the SE
To see evidence of long drivers to be optimally fit at 11 or 12* is wild to me. I like seeing that kind of difference in clubhead design/performance.
Wheeeeew.
Hot hot.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9406991[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full”]9406992[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13800435, member: 1579″]
Wheeeeew.
Hot hot.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_1014.jpeg”]9406991[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_1015.jpeg”]9406992[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Nanoalloy…🤤