Could a product be best in class and you simply have missed it? The story of Scheyden Precision Eyewear (Pronounced SHAY-den) might be just that. The creators of glasses used by the best in the world, known by the best in the world, and unfortunately slipped by you. Possible?
Typically when the research begins for a Brand Story like this, it centers around a product. One that has shown growth, and through twists and turns comes out on the other side. Learning about Scheyden was a different animal altogether, because it really centers around a figure, and although you have most likely not heard of him, his brands have been recognizable and even a fixture in the golf world for a long time.

To understand Scheyden, we have to go back to the beginning, and that is about 35 years ago when West Coast Trends, Inc was founded by an entrepreneur by the name of Jeffrey Herold. It was about 35 years ago when Herold had an idea for a neoprene cover to protect golf clubs heads, which was an invention perfectly named, The Club Glove.
The Club Glove very quickly became one of the most popular options with golfers and Herold spent the next year designing what would later be known as “The Last Bag”. This of course is one of the most popular golf products ever created and certainly the most popular in golf travel.
Full Stop. Why are we speaking about golf travel and covers and Club Glove? We are getting there, stay with us.
In the late 90s, Herold followed another passion, flying, and due to the success of Club Glove, he was able to purchase a personal aircraft. This led to both a question and a solution. Enter Scheyden Eyewear. Struggling to find high-quality, functional sunglasses for use in the cockpit, Herold created a brand tailored to aviation enthusiasts.

Scheyden (pronounced SHAY-den) was a passion project. Built for quality. Created for use. Made for anybody that wanted better. Was it only a project built to ride alongside Club Glove or was there deeper motivation? Jeff Herold explains:
“Although flying is a personal passion, my greater drive lies in crafting top-tier products across various categories. Scheyden was born out of a desire to create the finest eyewear for aviation, a mission we accomplished by outfitting elite pilots, including several United States Air Force Thunderbird teams.”
What makes this eyewear different? What makes it unique? Being boutique can mean a lot of different things. In the case of Scheyden, it means independence that allows for prioritizing quality and the best materials in the world. Yes, that sounds like marketing, but it’s not wrong. Where products are made, what they are made out of and so much more is the great divide in the eyewear world and Scheyden is top notch at every step of the way.
With the distribution of Club Glove, Scheyden was off to a solid start and able to be seen on golf courses and other outlets. Known by pilots and tour professionals, the eyewear was adored by those that used them, but still relatively unknown by the masses, especially in golf, which has an influx of mass marketed brands such as Oakley and others.
Were their moments of doubt? Herold explains:
“Certainly, there have been challenging years where we barely broke even or even incurred losses with our boutique sunglass line. However, our unwavering commitment to quality and excellence has kept us moving forward.”
Despite being a leader in aviation, the golf and lifestyle sectors were not as robust. The Club Glove brand being led now by Acushnet changes all of that. The aviation segment is rather small compared to golf, and the company has never wavered on the idea that they make the best products in the world. With more resources available, they can focus their attention to design, quality and customer service for Scheyden overall.

At this point you are probably wondering what the big deal is. Eyewear is about style and protection, what makes one better than the other? Let’s start with the lenses, and rather than explain it, Jeff Herold shares his thoughts:
“There are several different lens polymers in the optical world that can be used, however the overwhelming majority of sunglass companies use polycarbonate to produce their lenses. We use a unique polymer out of Japan that has clarity similar to mineral Glass. Polycarbonate is a wonderful material as it is nearly unbreakable and in plentiful supply at a very economical price. The only undesirable characteristic of polycarbonate is, it lacks the optical clarity that many other materials offer in the industry. Here at Scheyden, we spent months formulating the perfect tint within the “visible light spectrum” for golf. Different lens tints can have unique effects on the human brain and how we see things. We feel that our golf specific lenses (LT33 and LT16) enhance both the golf course and the experience of playing the game better than any other lens technology in the industry. These lens tints are pleasant for multiple uses and are not limited to just the game of golf, though golf is what they we were initially designed for.”
They choose Japanese manufacturing, while so many other brands go with low cost alternatives. Why? In a nutshell, the craftsmanship in Japan is renowned in the optical industry for quality and precision. Working with artisans, their goals align on attention to detail. There are no short cuts.

What does any of this mean for the golfer? There are few players in the world of golf more known for their shades than David Duval. He is a recent convert to Scheyden after years wearing another brand. Duval isn’t the only one either, as it appears the number wearing them on various tours grows by the week. It comes down to a simple thought of quality and performance. Can your sunglasses offer this, and if not, why?
Scheyden Precision Eyewear believes they make the best in the world. They believe their lenses are not just different, but better and the overall package will make a believer out of golfers everywhere once they get a chance to try them. For more information on their products and styles, check out their website at www.scheyden.com.
We make par on 15
no birdies for other group
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12400580, member: 3″]
We make par on 15
no birdies for other group
[/QUOTE]
Forum yip!
Has anyone priced a pair with a prescription?
[QUOTE=”jdtox, post: 12400382, member: 5944″]
Any other thoughts than cool box?
[/QUOTE]
really similar shape to the Oakley Holbrook which has been my daily for years.
Little more slant into the cheek and slightly larger lens despite being a touch narrower.
Coverage and field of vision is good center and down. But of a gap up top due to the slant of the lenses and touches my cheek which I’m not a huge fan of. Nose piece feels great and was a big driver for me trying these. Hopefully it holds up. I can’t wear the Holbrook golfing because the plastic nosepiece get a bit of sweat on it and it moves all over.
Will get them outside here in the next few days.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9272097[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full”]9272109[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full”]9272110[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”CM Grind, post: 12400826, member: 52381″]
really similar shape to the Oakley Holbrook which has been my daily for years.
Little more slant into the cheek and slightly larger lens despite being a touch narrower.
Coverage and field of vision is good center and down. But of a gap up top due to the slant of the lenses and touches my cheek which I’m not a huge fan of. Nose piece feels great and was a big driver for me trying these. Hopefully it holds up. I can’t wear the Holbrook golfing because the plastic nosepiece get a bit of sweat on it and it moves all over.
Will get them outside here in the next few days.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_4853.jpeg”]9272097[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_4855.jpeg”]9272109[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_4851.jpeg”]9272110[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Who is this guy [USER=51186]@MarMill[/USER]
[QUOTE=”jdtox, post: 12400978, member: 5944″]
Who is this guy [USER=51186]@MarMill[/USER]
[/QUOTE]
Must be a Hacker
[QUOTE=”jdtox, post: 12400978, member: 5944″]
Who is this guy [USER=51186]@MarMill[/USER]
[/QUOTE]
[IMG alt=”Youre The Worst I Hate You GIF by Brooklyn Nine-Nine”]https://media1.giphy.com/media/iYK1uqbfkvDSE/200.gif[/IMG]
[QUOTE=”CM Grind, post: 12400826, member: 52381″]
really similar shape to the Oakley Holbrook which has been my daily for years.
Little more slant into the cheek and slightly larger lens despite being a touch narrower.
Coverage and field of vision is good center and down. But of a gap up top due to the slant of the lenses and touches my cheek which I’m not a huge fan of. Nose piece feels great and was a big driver for me trying these. Hopefully it holds up. I can’t wear the Holbrook golfing because the plastic nosepiece get a bit of sweat on it and it moves all over.
Will get them outside here in the next few days.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_4853.jpeg”]9272097[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_4855.jpeg”]9272109[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_4851.jpeg”]9272110[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
First time outside and they do well for “light” lenses. Promising for golf. Slightly heavier than the Oakleys i frequent. Initially seems really well built with hinges and such.
I’m going to jump in on these. Trying to decide on lenses
I’m also thinking of buying a pair, but i’ve spent a ton even for me lately. I might wait a couple of weeks
I am pretty sure i’ll get a pair at [I]some [/I]point.
Finally got to golf in these.
The lenses are really really good. No issues with vision or distortion hitting or putting. Still able to read breaks with them. All of Which I can’t say about any other sunglasses I’ve ever tried. I have the lighter ones and they are a bit darker Than I expected. Still Everything stays pretty bright through my green headcover was pretty muted which I thought was interesting.
And they stayed put when swinging.
By the end of the round I was still having to wipe the nosepiece a few times a hole for comfort and keeping sweat off the lenses.
Better than anything I’ve tried. Will see if I can keep with them.
I played 9 holes the other night with the family and had the US Open radio coverage on so I could follow along. I must have heard the radio spot for these sunglasses a dozen times during the 2 hours I was out there. Not sure if I’ve heard it before and just never thought of them, but now that I am actively paying attention and know more about the brand, I notice it more when the ad comes across the radio
I purchased a pair of these sunglasses awhile ago after having Oakleys for over three years. Their popularity on the Champions Tour caught my attention.
Despite thinking they look a bit cheaper than Oakleys and other higher end brands, I found that I really like them, and they’ve held up very nicely so far. The colors on the course really pop with them on. Everything is sharper. They feel very sturdy yet are fairly lightweight. The nose pads are the best I’ve ever tried. They are larger silicone pads that feel secure and show no signs of coming off. The wife says these look better on me than previous pairs, which is a win i suppose.
Living in Arizona, I opted for the dark lenses, but if you don’t usually wear sunglasses while golfing, I’d recommend going for the lighter lenses as the darker ones might be too much of an adjustment.
The looper, wingman, or CIA Titanium call me.
[QUOTE=”jjjgolf500, post: 12431310, member: 58608″]
I purchased a pair of these sunglasses awhile ago after having Oakleys for over three years. Their popularity on the Champions Tour caught my attention.
Despite thinking they look a bit cheaper than Oakleys and other higher end brands, I found that I really like them, and they’ve held up very nicely so far. The colors on the course really pop with them on. Everything is sharper. They feel very sturdy yet are fairly lightweight. The nose pads are the best I’ve ever tried. They are larger silicone pads that feel secure and show no signs of coming off. The wife says these look better on me than previous pairs, which is a win i suppose.
Living in Arizona, I opted for the dark lenses, but if you don’t usually wear sunglasses while golfing, I’d recommend going for the lighter lenses as the darker ones might be too much of an adjustment.
[/QUOTE]
Agree with you. If you’re not used to wearing sunglasses on the course, go with the lighter lenses.
These glasses are the real deal.
Took them off after 3 holes last time out.
Lenses are still impressive but just too much sweat and movement.
I need to get my eyes re-checked but these are definitely on my list of possible solutions now. I’d probably get the grabbers for golf. Great story behind these.
Looking through the site this morning to out my name in for testing, I thought it was interesting all their staffers are wearing some version of the CIA. I know that style is more of the standard you see on tour, but I feel like there are more casual styles being worn on tour than there used to be.
[QUOTE=”willplaysgolf, post: 12448844, member: 61852″]
Looking through the site this morning to out my name in for testing, I thought it was interesting all their staffers are wearing some version of the CIA. I know that style is more of the standard you see on tour, but I feel like there are more casual styles being worn on tour than there used to be.
[/QUOTE]
I noticed the same thing. I will add, I have a non-CIA pair for style reasons you noted, and they’ve been fantastic both on and off the course. No movement at all. I even wore them paddleboarding the other day and was slightly worried about losing them. Despite all the activity, I didn’t even realize I had them on movement wise.
[QUOTE=”CM Grind, post: 12400826, member: 52381″]
really similar shape to the Oakley Holbrook which has been my daily for years.
Little more slant into the cheek and slightly larger lens despite being a touch narrower.
Coverage and field of vision is good center and down. But of a gap up top due to the slant of the lenses and touches my cheek which I’m not a huge fan of. Nose piece feels great and was a big driver for me trying these. Hopefully it holds up. I can’t wear the Holbrook golfing because the plastic nosepiece get a bit of sweat on it and it moves all over.
Will get them outside here in the next few days.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_4853.jpeg”]9272097[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_4855.jpeg”]9272109[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_4851.jpeg”]9272110[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Really really like the looks of those!
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12431316, member: 1579″]
The looper, wingman, or CIA Titanium call me.
[/QUOTE]
The looper just looks awesome. Earlier in the thread [USER=19092]@xThor[/USER] mentioned maybe it was the bronze color (that he has never went for) as the problem, meaning bronze may be what is needed and [USER=3]@JB[/USER] said it might be. I typically don’t wear sunglasses on the course because it messes with my eyes and not trying bronze lenses has me thinking if that’s the issue. The looper look fricking awesome with the light bronze.
The case folds flat for travel/storage. ?
[ATTACH type=”full”]9279332[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”baylrballa, post: 12470859, member: 52381″]
The case folds flat for travel/storage. ?
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_5058.jpeg”]9279332[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
The glasses condense down to fit flat?
[QUOTE=”tequila4kapp, post: 12470871, member: 9704″]
The glasses condense down to fit flat?
[/QUOTE]
Still on my face. 😀
[QUOTE=”baylrballa, post: 12470859, member: 52381″]
The case folds flat for travel/storage. ?
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_5058.jpeg”]9279332[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
This is how my new May Jim’s case is. It’s a small thing but definitely handy to keep space down while you’re wearing them. Also provides more protection than the bag.