Nostalgia is an incredibly powerful thing and companies across almost every industry know it. Whether it’s the revamped Ford Bronco or Netflix’s That 90’s Show, it’s easy to find comfort in things we’ve enjoyed in the past. Surely aware of this, Forethought Golf purchased the Snake Eyes Golf brand in 2022 and has recently dropped a full line of clubs, accessories, and apparel. Many will remember Snake Eyes for its exceptional irons and wedges in the late 1990’s. Like many other brands from that period, it eventually became a retailer’s house brand. Unfortunately, this path sometimes carries consequences when it comes to reputation that are hard to overcome. While nostalgia is great at grabbing attention, golf consumers typically have strong expectations when it comes to regular technological advancement, and right or wrong, house brands will always face challenges when it comes to how they are perceived. Whether the new owners of Snake Eyes will be able to leverage the popularity of the brand’s name with their new line remains to be seen, but at first glance their three new iron sets cover a wide range of player-types. Their 685OS irons, strongly focused on distance and forgiveness, are built with mid to high handicappers, especially those who are looking to save some money, in mind.

Unfortunately, information from the company is extremely limited when it comes to technological features of the 685OS irons. We are often spoiled with comprehensive details when it comes to how clubs are designed, and we love to share that information with our readers, but in this case not much is available. The company’s website only goes so far as to mysteriously say that this 2022 line “was meticulously created by one of the industry’s top designers.” We’d love to know more about this enigmatic designer and hope to one day be able to share even more with our readers.

Information from Snake Eyes Golf
The Snake Eyes 685OS Irons are the most powerful iron in the Snake Eyes family. The perimeter weighted wide sole iron design allows the center of gravity to be low & back allowing you to hit higher and straighter shots. The Cup face technology provides additional forgiveness and maximum distance on off-center hits. Available in RH & LH.
Aesthetics

The 685OS irons present a somewhat utilitarian look that fans of simpler styling should appreciate. Often, irons in the value segment suffer from poor finishing choices made by the manufacturer. One of the most egregious faults we see is cheap chrome plating. While it’s hard to explain in writing, the eyes can easily the see the difference between a quality chrome finish and one that is lacking. Snake Eyes avoided this pitfall well by giving the 685OS irons a satin finish that is really well done. The soft, glare-reducing brushed finish was one of the first things we noticed, and it added a decent amount of curb appeal to what might otherwise have been an uninspired first impression.
As one would expect from an iron with OS in its name, this is an oversized iron, but while “OS” can carry with it some negative connotation, there isn’t anything about the size or shape to indicate this is anything other than a standard game improvement iron. Those comfortable with other brands’ irons in this segment should find themselves right at home.

As shown in the pictures of the 6 iron, 8 iron, and pitching wedge above, the 685OS have a substantial topline void of the beveling or softening many companies use to conceal thickness. Even with what appears to be a very wide topline, the blade is only slightly elongated, which lends a hint more compactness than one might expect. Additionally, the amount of offset sits nicely in the sweet spot between too little and too much. In all, we found quite a bit to like about the 685OS at address.
Progressive sole widths provide increasing turf-interaction forgiveness as the clubs’ lofts increase. The pitching wedge’s sole is the widest, and it displays some slight rounding with just a hint of softness on the leading edge. While we don’t expect it to provide the same level of performance we see from some of the more advanced sole designs out there, steep swings should find plenty of help with slightly heavy contact.

Though Snake Eyes touts the 685OS’s cup-face design, there isn’t any visual indication of its existence on the sole. This is an unfortunate design choice, as visual technology reminders are a key satisfier in the game-improvement segment. Consumers have long indicated their desire to see the technology they’ve paid for.
From the back, we see a substantial cavity with ample perimeter weighting, especially low and toe-side. Even without the company providing any detail, it’s easy to see that the 685OS irons will provide easy launch and forgiveness on strikes around the face. The cavity also reveals what we’d consider the only truly poor design choice – the cavity badging.

It’s easier to see in hand, but pictures should illustrate what we are saying here. It’s evident that the badging is just a thin piece of glued-on material and it’s not hard to imagine it falling off. The bright, chrome finish contrasts with the head’s fantastic satin finish and manages to make an otherwise nice-looking iron seem dated.
After reading about the cup-face design, we did have some preconceived notions about how the 685OS would feel at impact. Feel free to insert your own cliched descriptor, but cup faces can be firm, clicky, tingy, or pingy to name a few. Thankfully, this wasn’t the case at all with the 685OS. If anything, we’d describe them as somewhat dull and muted at impact, which isn’t a bad thing in this corner of the market. It does lead us to wonder exactly how this cup face has been implemented, or if it even exists at all, but we will take Snake Eyes’ word that it does.
Performance
Though the company’s information says that their steel shaft offering is proprietary, the 4-PW set of irons we tested came with 120g KBS Tour shafts. This is a somewhat interesting choice considering the irons’ target golfer, but it does indicate the company offers some sort of custom build option.

This is a strong-lofted iron, which translated to pleasingly high ball speeds that were right in line with two similar iron sets. At the same time, the extreme perimeter weighting helped launch the ball 1.5-2 degrees higher than those iron sets on average, even with the heavier KBS Tour shaft. All of this resulted in carry distances at or above expectations throughout the set.
Spin, or should we say lack of spin, is often a point of concern when it comes to irons like the 685OS. This is an occasional consequence of the technologies that provide all the distance and forgiveness we crave. Fortunately, observed spin rates (recorded with Titleist ProV1x RCT balls) were well within an acceptable range, even well into the middle of the set. While testing doesn’t suggest the 685OS are going to perform like some of the High Launch sets that are growing in popularity for vertically challenged golfers, everything we saw suggests most golfers should be able to hit the ball high enough to reasonably hold a green.

Just as we expected, the deep cavity and face design provided an exceptional level of forgiveness for most off-center impact locations. Ball speed retention was key here, with shots straying ½” to ¾” horizontally being almost indistinguishable from center impact. Low face shots were also handled nicely, with the deep CG helping provide a respectable launch angle. In all, the 685OS irons masked poor swings as well as could be expected.
Details
- Shaft Option: Proprietary Snake Eyes Steel & UST Recoil 65g Graphite
- Make-up: Multiple Options Available
- Customizable shaft length & lie options
- $599
Club | Loft | Lie | Length | Swing Weight | Bounce |
4 | 19° | 61.0° | 39.25″ | D1 | 4.0 |
5 | 22° | 61.5° | 38.50″ | D1 | 5.0 |
6 | 25° | 62.0° | 37.75″ | D1 | 6.0 |
7 | 29° | 62.5° | 37.25″ | D1 | 7.0 |
8 | 33° | 62.0° | 36.75″ | D1 | 8.0 |
9 | 38° | 63.0° | 36.25″ | D1 | 9.0 |
PW | 43° | 63.5° | 36.00″ | D1 | 9.0 |
GW | 48° | 64.0° | 35.75″ | D1 | 9.0 |
Retailer list is available from their website at www.snakeeyesgolf.com.
Thanks for sharing Hawk. Never heard of those before.
On your picture of the 6/8/PW the top line looks kind of thick – is that accurate or is the boxy look historically their go-to?
Man my Dad still has an old SnakeEyes set in his garage. These look like a good option for my Dad. I’ll have to let him know that SnakeEyes are are back. He used to be a big fan.
[QUOTE=”Daluteh, post: 11320592, member: 59803″]
Thanks for sharing Hawk. Never heard of those before.
On your picture of the 6/8/PW the top line looks kind of thick – is that accurate or is the boxy look historically their go-to?
[/QUOTE]
Yea, it’s a big top line for sure. Some of that is just squared-off edges that make it more prominent, but there’s no denying it’s thick.
Probably the most oversized thing on the irons. For the most part, they are nicely shaped for this segment.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9158920[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”TJRyska, post: 11320593, member: 64369″]
Man my Dad still has an old SnakeEyes set in his garage. These look like a good option for my Dad. I’ll have to let him know that SnakeEyes are are back. He used to be a big fan.
[/QUOTE]
I think he’d be about as close to their target consumer as anybody. No qualms saying he should check them out. Quality seemed good, aside from the badging.
At that price there is a market for them. At that size they can double back as a standard garden tool if need be.
The price immediately jumps out. They honestly don’t look bad and give another option. Interested to learn more from this entire brand launch as I have fond memories.
Pretty decent looking iron overall. Price is super competitive. I’m guessing they’re trying to compete in the DTC market?
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 11320595, member: 1193″]
Yea, it’s a big top line for sure. Some of that is just squared-off edges that make it more prominent, but there’s no denying it’s thick.
Probably the most oversized thing on the irons. For the most part, they are nicely shaped for this segment.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”5990950D-7D51-402D-A20C-2ECD695A6281.jpeg”]9158920[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
The lines are definitely crisp and they could roll them some to hide some of the thickness. That being said, I used to have a set of Snake Eyes irons when I was a kid and liked them. Wish I still had them for keep sake to be honest, but nice to see the offering. I don’t know that I’d get a set of these now, especially seeing how prominent the thick top line is.
All this old brand resurgence. Wonder if they will find success.
like was mentioned nostalgia is power. But just how much so?
My pops had a set of these back in his playing days that I remember fondly. As others have already said there’s a place for them and I hope Forethought finds success with them. Thanks for the write up [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER]
[QUOTE=”J.B. Cobb III, post: 11320643, member: 50607″]
Pretty decent looking iron overall. Price is super competitive. I’m guessing they’re trying to compete in the DTC market?
[/QUOTE]
From what I’m seeing, they are working with a couple retailers, Rock Bottom and Golf Headquarters.
Thanks for reading all. I don’t want this to come across wrong, but I think saying “they aren’t bad at all” is a pretty good endorsement. The price point starts to bleed into previous-generation and used OEM products, so name recognition and nostalgia is going to be a big deal for them.
Great write-up Hawk. Despite the quite thick top line, these are not bad looking irons overall IMO. Given the consumer friendly price point, name recognition and assumed playability, I could see them as a popular choice for higher handicappers and those starting out in the game.
Still have a LH set of these:
Snake Eyes were a thing 30 years ago. Then not sure but they were still around but not really marketed. You could always find them available at a few of the secondary golf component places. Why would anyone go this route when you could go to Maltby and get better for same price or less. Just my opinion.
I agree with [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] that given the look and target audience of the irons I think the stock shaft is a miss. If they wanted to go KBS I think the Tour LIte would have been a better fit.
[QUOTE=”Chef23, post: 11320777, member: 48542″]
I agree with [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] that given the look and target audience of the irons I think the stock shaft is a miss. If they wanted to go KBS I think the Tour LIte would have been a better fit.
[/QUOTE]
Their website is incredibly lacking when it comes to information, but they say they offer a different stock steel shaft, so I’m not really sure why they came with KBS Tours. The graphite option is the 65g Recoil.
[QUOTE=”Chef23, post: 11320777, member: 48542″]
I agree with [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] that given the look and target audience of the irons I think the stock shaft is a miss. If they wanted to go KBS I think the Tour LIte would have been a better fit.
[/QUOTE]
I would go a different way and say that given the target, outside of a brand name, i’m not sure the shaft matters. My opinion anyway.
So here’s where a solid writeup can make a difference. I went into reading the article with a preconceived “meh” opinion, and the pics had me feeling slightly more positive… but not much. Reading that they came with KBS 120s had me scratching my head, I would have figured Max 85s would have been the better choice given the target audience. However, reading about the performance and then seeing the price had me like
[media=giphy]13ZHjidRzoi7n2[/media]
So kudos to [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] for the article and review.
[QUOTE=”russtopher, post: 11320811, member: 14253″]
So here’s where a solid writeup can make a difference. I went into reading the article with a preconceived “meh” opinion, and the pics had me feeling slightly more positive… but not much. Reading that they came with KBS 120s had me scratching my head, I would have figured Max 85s would have been the better choice given the target audience. However, reading about the performance and then seeing the price had me like
[media=giphy]13ZHjidRzoi7n2[/media]
So kudos to [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] for the article and review.
[/QUOTE]
I appreciate the comment, [USER=14253]@russtopher[/USER] :drinks:
Funny thing is I had the same range of feelings between the time I found out they were coming to when I actually gave them some swings.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 11320803, member: 3″]
I would go a different way and say that given the target, outside of a brand name, i’m not sure the shaft matters. My opinion anyway.
[/QUOTE]
I understand that but wouldn’t you want to put something out there that had a chance of being a good combination. I understand that people buying might not realize the difference but could benefit from a different shaft.
The first target audience are those who know the brand. Given that those people probably don’t swing 120’s anymore, it would have been logical for them to have something more amenable to that target. 65g Recoils or if a lite Nippon.
Again guys, the KBS Tours aren’t the stock offering according to their website. I’m not sure why the set I reviewed came with them.
My brother played some Snake Eyes hybrids back in the day. Haven’t heard anything of this brand in a long time. They don’t look that bad.
Good article on clubs, never had a set. But heard a lot about them.
Nice writeup on these, [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER]. I mostly remember Snake Eyes for their wedges, but I think they’re doing a good job of capturing the nostalgia with the familiar design/brand logo. As you said, the price point combined with the name recognition/nostalgia might make them a great draw for their intended market segment. The satin finish looks good and although I’m not a fan of the thick, squared off topline, it shouldn’t be a deterrent for who they’re primarily marketing them to.
I found this paragraph in particular to be interesting:
[QUOTE]Though Snake Eyes touts the 685OS’s cup-face design, there isn’t any visual indication of its existence on the sole. This is an unfortunate design choice, as visual technology reminders are a key satisfier in the game-improvement segment. Consumers have long indicated their desire to see the technology they’ve paid for.
[/QUOTE]
It’s interesting because I see a lot of complaints here on THP about irons being “over decorated” with badges and stamping, it seems like many lunatic fringe golfers prefer a cleaner design without all the visual technology reminders – but again, those golfers don’t seem to be the marketing segment that Snake Eyes is aiming for.
There are plenty of clubs in the SGI category, but not many at that price point. That alone should give them some foothold in that niche, as long as the quality and performance of the clubs is good, which seems to be the case from your experience with them.
[QUOTE=”Chef23, post: 11320828, member: 48542″]
I understand that but wouldn’t you want to put something out there that had a chance of being a good combination.
[/QUOTE]
I genuinely think it’s assumption that they wouldn’t. Lighter steel can mean lighter to flex as those aren’t entirely independent of each other.
They came with an extremely popular shaft over the last decade and Im not sure going extremely light doesn’t eliminate a side that might immediately say “too light”.
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 11321005, member: 3386″]
Nice writeup on these, [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER]. I mostly remember Snake Eyes for their wedges, but I think they’re doing a good job of capturing the nostalgia with the familiar design/brand logo. As you said, the price point combined with the name recognition/nostalgia might make them a great draw for their intended market segment. The satin finish looks good and although I’m not a fan of the thick, squared off topline, it shouldn’t be a deterrent for who they’re primarily marketing them to.
I found this paragraph in particular to be interesting:
It’s interesting because I see a lot of complaints here on THP about irons being “over decorated” with badges and stamping, it seems like many lunatic fringe golfers prefer a cleaner design without all the visual technology reminders – but again, those golfers don’t seem to be the marketing segment that Snake Eyes is aiming for.
There are plenty of clubs in the SGI category, but not many at that price point. That alone should give them some foothold in that niche, as long as the quality and performance of the clubs is good, which seems to be the case from your experience with them.
[/QUOTE]
The first iron that comes to mind when I think of highlighting a cup face (PWRSHELL to be specific) would be Cobra’s Forged Tec. It’s subtle, but a great visual of what’s going on.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9158975[/ATTACH]
Great article – I always thought the Snake Eyes logo was the coolest in sports (at least when they came on the scene). I even bought a few shirts with that logo – and did not play any of their stuff – it was then too pricy. Glad to see they are back – in whatever iteration.
Just picked up a set for $250 at Rock Bottom Golf. Mine came with graphite shafts. I figured at that price I’ll give them a shot. I’m 65 & not as flexible as I used to be, so it’s game improvement irons for me at this stage of my life.
[QUOTE=”Brad, post: 12069108″]
Just picked up a set for $250 at Rock Bottom Golf. Mine came with graphite shafts. I figured at that price I’ll give them a shot. I’m 65 & not as flexible as I used to be, so it’s game improvement irons for me at this stage of my life.
[/QUOTE]
Very solid price for a set of irons. I think you’ll like them.
We’re always looking for a bargain. Seems all the GI clubs are built with high flight and distance in mind. It’s getting to the point where the short game and holding the greens are the things that will differentiate which brand is the best. The “you get what you pay for” is still in play. Love my Tour Edge EXS220, but holding the green is a challenge.