We all know that TaylorMade Golf has never been a brand to shy away from being different. From the era of white paint to currently hanging their hat on the carbon face, they are typically willing to step outside the box and challenge the “norm”.
The Qi35 driver definitely continues to show off that willingness to get outside the box. With an all new footprint in line with the Max model rather than the LS, it is a departure from recent years both physically and in terms of aesthetics. More information on those models can be found here.

Quick Take
It feels like TaylorMade is in an interesting place right now, specifically when it comes to balancing their core model driver between the Max and LS versions. This is the biggest departure we have seen from them yet in terms of shaping of the base version, bigger than ever, but done with a purpose to lower the CG while increasing MOI. Stability and consistency stand out as much as the shelf appeal while still bringing solid speed to the table, a design which should appeal to the average golfer with impressive playability all around.
The Education Zone – Evolving the Core Qi35
Obviously If you are reading this, then you are already aware that with Qi10 TaylorMade went on a journey for MOI. Not as much in the LS model, but the core and Max versions were built with bringing more stability to the table. In the Max specifically, that was achieved cracking the 10K benchmark. However, there is always a trade-off.

If you simply chase MOI, then naturally the Center of Gravity creeps upwards, and this will reduce the area of the face in which lower spin is possible. That was the battle last year, so, this year alterations have been made to pull that CG back down and thus the balance point of the heads as well.
In the case of the core model, the Qi35, the reduction in face, crown, and titanium ring weight all helped to check the boxes which TaylorMade felt they needed to. But, with the Qi35 this year, the decision was also made to increase the footprint size, putting it in line with the Max model. This was done to increase the MOI in the head, by changing the shape and removing any sliding weights, the mass was put lower in the head. All told, the Qi35 with heavy back has 9K MOI and 8.1K forward. The Qi10 was 8.4K, but also had a much higher CG which led to some spin and launch issues, and why so many opted for the LS last time around.
TaylorMade Qi35 Driver Performance
Before we get too into the weeds here, the reaction to the Qi35 look has been an interesting one to follow. With the fighter jet inspiration and chromium carbon fiber wrapped body, it seems this is a love it or loathe it look this year. Personally, I fall into the love it portion, specifically when it comes to shelf appeal as the finish and polish put on the Qi35 is pretty killer from that angle.

From the top though, this is definitely a departure for TaylorMade. The reasoning for taking on the footprint of the Max model makes sense, specifically on this hunt for more MOI and trying to alter the CG of the design. But, it is big if you are accustomed to the last several releases of TM core and LS drivers which all have that consistent look that is, quite frankly, expected. The did manage to keep the unique TaylorMade style shaping, but it is just, big, and the matte chromium carbon finish seems to exaggerate that a little at times as well.

In terms of this review, we received the 10.5 loft of the Qi35 head and installed a true Ventus Velocore shaft into it rather than the version which comes standard. Like the looks, the Carbon Twist Face still draws mixed responses, but in this reviewer’s opinion the feel of the Qi35 is not only classic TaylorMade, but it is all around one of the best feedbacks this release cycle if you find yourself in the camp that enjoys composite driven sound. Interestingly, this year with the shape change it did seem that the feedback was more blurred across the face similar to what occurred with the Qi10 Max, which certainly makes sense.
On the course, the launch was prevalent in the 10.5 head, but the spin was indeed much more manageable than expected. Honestly, as you will see in the data averages below, the spin levels of the head with the heavy weight in each orientation were very playable, and the RPM difference between the two meets expectations. Dispersion wise, the Qi35 stands out, it is like a faster and lower spinning Qi10 Max, which was of course a goal for TaylorMade.

There was no inherent flight bias seen during testing and it was in fact remarkably neutral. Twist Face remains built into the Carbon Face and does its intended job, though it is still not a one size fits all design premise, but for the golfer who fits the intent it can feel like a life saver at times. The head also impressed on vertical misses, and the change in design seemed to really earn its keep there.

If there was one catch for this reviewer, it was that the speed was not quite what was expected. Yes, part of that is the higher loft in terms of personal fit, but also the size of the head aerodynamically just seems to lead to a little more work needing to be efforted to maximize speed. Again, this is one source of feedback, but it is also what we saw with the Qi10 Max last year. The reality is that there are always some trade-offs, and here it seems to be top end ball speed potential in exchange for much more stability and spin consistency.
Final Thoughts
Overall, the Qi35 driver is efficient, which seems to be the trend within core models across manufacturers this year, as it should be. If you are one seeking top end ball speed generation, then the LS was always likely to be a better direction. However, for sheer playability, this is a good direction for TaylorMade to take the core model, and it will be interesting to see how they progress it from here.
The Qi35 is available in 9, 10.5, and 12 (RH only) degrees with +/- 2 degrees of adjustability through the adapter. Standard shaft options are the Fujikura Ventus Blue ’25 (5 A/R/S) and Mitsubishi Chemical Diamana T+ (60 R/S/X). Pricing on the driver is $599.99.
For more information visit their taylormadegolf.com.
Really enjoyed that and based on the data it gives you some great performance
Taylormade always does drivers right. This is a great release. It’s interesting that they went bigger and really tried to correct issues from last year.
good take on the speed drop as well. I think you hit it on the head when you noted the size is probably the reason.
i love the looks on these, and think they are definitely up there for the best looking driver this year.
Agree with the “love it or loathe it” part of the article in regards to the looks. I happen to fall into the loathe it camp. The core head looks way too big to me and I’m not a fan of the chromium (even though I did purchase the 3 wood).
Nice write up. As much as I enjoyed the sim2 and stealth, I have gravitated toward other MFGs the last few years… I love the look. Wouldn’t mind giving this a go.
Great write up. I just haven’t been able to get on board with TM drivers since the switch to carbonwood. Looks wise I think these are solid, but the sound/feel of that face is something I haven’t meshed with.
Nice write-up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]. Agree with the feedback off the face notes – I think they have improved the visual at address, but I can’t get down with the feel of it. The Max I demoed was incredibly stable-feeling though, and spit out some decent numbers for me.
Nice write up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]. Dang those numbers are incredibly solid.
Two guys i know who always hit a nice baby draw off the tee cave developed a right miss with the QI35 core model. Interesting. Kind of makes me want to look at them with my occasional bad hook days.
[QUOTE=”1860VS, post: 13072493, member: 71354″]
Two guys i know who always hit a nice baby draw off the tee cave developed a right miss with the QI35 core model. Interesting. Kind of makes me want to look at them with my occasional bad hook days.
[/QUOTE]
This is sometimes a product of higher MOI heads, it can impact each golfer differently.
That said, it’s not a fade based driver, it’s very neutral, even with the larger footprint
[QUOTE=”thscott05, post: 13072394, member: 83243″]
Agree with the “love it or loathe it” part of the article in regards to the looks. I happen to fall into the loathe it camp. The core head looks way too big to me and I’m not a fan of the chromium (even though I did purchase the 3 wood).
[/QUOTE]
Definitely a very polarizing driver from address.
It does look pretty badass hanging on a shelf though haha
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13072786, member: 1579″]
Definitely a very polarizing driver from address.
It does look pretty badass hanging on a shelf though haha
[/QUOTE]
agree!! I absolutely love the overall color and presentation of the core head but I dont like how it looks at address at all.
Performance is great and its very neutral as you reviewed. The results with Qi35 so far in range time have been better than Cobra Adapt LS but I greatly prefer looking at the Adapt LS at address.
Not a huge fan of the look, it’s like “we get it, there’s a lot of carbon”
Loved seeing the number difference with changing the weights…I agree with falling into the “love it” camp of the carbon design
I really like what Taylormade has gone for here…I don’t love the feel and feedback off of the carbon faces, but the shaping and design I think is really well done
[QUOTE=”MtlJeff, post: 13072813, member: 68350″]
Not a huge fan of the look, it’s like “we get it, there’s a lot of carbon”
[/QUOTE]
Like I said, love it or hate it.
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] do you feel like Taylormade feels the pressure of the other OEM’s making some big pushes in the driver department? I know they have their fan base, but this feels like almost the start of them slipping behind some others and they see a push is needed
[QUOTE=”bsbmike, post: 13072816, member: 8099″]
Loved seeing the number difference with changing the weights…I agree with falling into the “love it” camp of the carbon design
I really like what Taylormade has gone for here…I don’t love the feel and feedback off of the carbon faces, but the shaping and design I think is really well done
[/QUOTE]
The all black is the superior version. The chromium just looks odd
[QUOTE=”bsbmike, post: 13072847, member: 8099″]
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] do you feel like Taylormade feels the pressure of the other OEM’s making some big pushes in the driver department? I know they have their fan base, but this feels like almost the start of them slipping behind some others and they see a push is needed
[/QUOTE]
This might be polarizing to some….but…. Hahaha
I actually think they’re not making pushes, not true ones, and are instead just beating around the bush trying kitschy things like they are with the carbon aspect, and now the “chromium” look. Similarly, MOI is the catch all chase now, imo because it’s trendy in the industry.
I think they have become shockingly reactionary, and not driven on innovation like they once were. But
[QUOTE=”outlawx, post: 13072865, member: 74252″]
The all black is the superior version. The chromium just looks odd
[/QUOTE]
For some reason I actually really like the chromium…something about it
Maybe it’s the fighter jet aspect I get and I’m a plane nerd :ROFLMAO:
The bottom definitely nails the look but most of the fighter jets these days are black fiber that chromium look generates tooo much of a radar footprint.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13072866, member: 1579″]
This might be polarizing to some….but…. Hahaha
I actually think they’re not making pushes, not true ones, and are instead just beating around the bush trying kitschy things like they are with the carbon aspect, and now the “chromium” look. Similarly, MOI is the catch all chase now, imo because it’s trendy in the industry.
I think they have become shockingly reactionary, and not driven on innovation like they once were. But
[/QUOTE]
I mean this is the feeling I’ve had with them the past few releases…nothing they’ve done as of recent has had me super excited. And at least from my seat, yes, it did seem like years ago they would be leading the charge on trying innovative things and others would follow…I don’t know I just don’t remember the last time they put a driver out and I was like I HAVE to go hit that. Not the way I’ve felt about some recent ones from Callaway or Cobra, or even the GT line from Titleist