We all know that TaylorMade Golf has never been a brand to shy away from being different. From the era of white paint to currently hanging their hat on the carbon face, they are typically willing to step outside the box and challenge the “norm”.
The Qi35 driver definitely continues to show off that willingness to get outside the box. With an all new footprint in line with the Max model rather than the LS, it is a departure from recent years both physically and in terms of aesthetics. More information on those models can be found here.

Quick Take
It feels like TaylorMade is in an interesting place right now, specifically when it comes to balancing their core model driver between the Max and LS versions. This is the biggest departure we have seen from them yet in terms of shaping of the base version, bigger than ever, but done with a purpose to lower the CG while increasing MOI. Stability and consistency stand out as much as the shelf appeal while still bringing solid speed to the table, a design which should appeal to the average golfer with impressive playability all around.
The Education Zone – Evolving the Core Qi35
Obviously If you are reading this, then you are already aware that with Qi10 TaylorMade went on a journey for MOI. Not as much in the LS model, but the core and Max versions were built with bringing more stability to the table. In the Max specifically, that was achieved cracking the 10K benchmark. However, there is always a trade-off.

If you simply chase MOI, then naturally the Center of Gravity creeps upwards, and this will reduce the area of the face in which lower spin is possible. That was the battle last year, so, this year alterations have been made to pull that CG back down and thus the balance point of the heads as well.
In the case of the core model, the Qi35, the reduction in face, crown, and titanium ring weight all helped to check the boxes which TaylorMade felt they needed to. But, with the Qi35 this year, the decision was also made to increase the footprint size, putting it in line with the Max model. This was done to increase the MOI in the head, by changing the shape and removing any sliding weights, the mass was put lower in the head. All told, the Qi35 with heavy back has 9K MOI and 8.1K forward. The Qi10 was 8.4K, but also had a much higher CG which led to some spin and launch issues, and why so many opted for the LS last time around.
TaylorMade Qi35 Driver Performance
Before we get too into the weeds here, the reaction to the Qi35 look has been an interesting one to follow. With the fighter jet inspiration and chromium carbon fiber wrapped body, it seems this is a love it or loathe it look this year. Personally, I fall into the love it portion, specifically when it comes to shelf appeal as the finish and polish put on the Qi35 is pretty killer from that angle.

From the top though, this is definitely a departure for TaylorMade. The reasoning for taking on the footprint of the Max model makes sense, specifically on this hunt for more MOI and trying to alter the CG of the design. But, it is big if you are accustomed to the last several releases of TM core and LS drivers which all have that consistent look that is, quite frankly, expected. The did manage to keep the unique TaylorMade style shaping, but it is just, big, and the matte chromium carbon finish seems to exaggerate that a little at times as well.

In terms of this review, we received the 10.5 loft of the Qi35 head and installed a true Ventus Velocore shaft into it rather than the version which comes standard. Like the looks, the Carbon Twist Face still draws mixed responses, but in this reviewer’s opinion the feel of the Qi35 is not only classic TaylorMade, but it is all around one of the best feedbacks this release cycle if you find yourself in the camp that enjoys composite driven sound. Interestingly, this year with the shape change it did seem that the feedback was more blurred across the face similar to what occurred with the Qi10 Max, which certainly makes sense.
On the course, the launch was prevalent in the 10.5 head, but the spin was indeed much more manageable than expected. Honestly, as you will see in the data averages below, the spin levels of the head with the heavy weight in each orientation were very playable, and the RPM difference between the two meets expectations. Dispersion wise, the Qi35 stands out, it is like a faster and lower spinning Qi10 Max, which was of course a goal for TaylorMade.

There was no inherent flight bias seen during testing and it was in fact remarkably neutral. Twist Face remains built into the Carbon Face and does its intended job, though it is still not a one size fits all design premise, but for the golfer who fits the intent it can feel like a life saver at times. The head also impressed on vertical misses, and the change in design seemed to really earn its keep there.

If there was one catch for this reviewer, it was that the speed was not quite what was expected. Yes, part of that is the higher loft in terms of personal fit, but also the size of the head aerodynamically just seems to lead to a little more work needing to be efforted to maximize speed. Again, this is one source of feedback, but it is also what we saw with the Qi10 Max last year. The reality is that there are always some trade-offs, and here it seems to be top end ball speed potential in exchange for much more stability and spin consistency.
Final Thoughts
Overall, the Qi35 driver is efficient, which seems to be the trend within core models across manufacturers this year, as it should be. If you are one seeking top end ball speed generation, then the LS was always likely to be a better direction. However, for sheer playability, this is a good direction for TaylorMade to take the core model, and it will be interesting to see how they progress it from here.
The Qi35 is available in 9, 10.5, and 12 (RH only) degrees with +/- 2 degrees of adjustability through the adapter. Standard shaft options are the Fujikura Ventus Blue ’25 (5 A/R/S) and Mitsubishi Chemical Diamana T+ (60 R/S/X). Pricing on the driver is $599.99.
For more information visit their taylormadegolf.com.





Really enjoyed that and based on the data it gives you some great performance
Taylormade always does drivers right. This is a great release. It’s interesting that they went bigger and really tried to correct issues from last year.
good take on the speed drop as well. I think you hit it on the head when you noted the size is probably the reason.
i love the looks on these, and think they are definitely up there for the best looking driver this year.
Agree with the “love it or loathe it” part of the article in regards to the looks. I happen to fall into the loathe it camp. The core head looks way too big to me and I’m not a fan of the chromium (even though I did purchase the 3 wood).
Nice write up. As much as I enjoyed the sim2 and stealth, I have gravitated toward other MFGs the last few years… I love the look. Wouldn’t mind giving this a go.
Great write up. I just haven’t been able to get on board with TM drivers since the switch to carbonwood. Looks wise I think these are solid, but the sound/feel of that face is something I haven’t meshed with.
Nice write-up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]. Agree with the feedback off the face notes – I think they have improved the visual at address, but I can’t get down with the feel of it. The Max I demoed was incredibly stable-feeling though, and spit out some decent numbers for me.
Nice write up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]. Dang those numbers are incredibly solid.
Two guys i know who always hit a nice baby draw off the tee cave developed a right miss with the QI35 core model. Interesting. Kind of makes me want to look at them with my occasional bad hook days.
[QUOTE=”1860VS, post: 13072493, member: 71354″]
Two guys i know who always hit a nice baby draw off the tee cave developed a right miss with the QI35 core model. Interesting. Kind of makes me want to look at them with my occasional bad hook days.
[/QUOTE]
This is sometimes a product of higher MOI heads, it can impact each golfer differently.
That said, it’s not a fade based driver, it’s very neutral, even with the larger footprint
[QUOTE=”thscott05, post: 13072394, member: 83243″]
Agree with the “love it or loathe it” part of the article in regards to the looks. I happen to fall into the loathe it camp. The core head looks way too big to me and I’m not a fan of the chromium (even though I did purchase the 3 wood).
[/QUOTE]
Definitely a very polarizing driver from address.
It does look pretty badass hanging on a shelf though haha
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13072786, member: 1579″]
Definitely a very polarizing driver from address.
It does look pretty badass hanging on a shelf though haha
[/QUOTE]
agree!! I absolutely love the overall color and presentation of the core head but I dont like how it looks at address at all.
Performance is great and its very neutral as you reviewed. The results with Qi35 so far in range time have been better than Cobra Adapt LS but I greatly prefer looking at the Adapt LS at address.
Not a huge fan of the look, it’s like “we get it, there’s a lot of carbon”
Loved seeing the number difference with changing the weights…I agree with falling into the “love it” camp of the carbon design
I really like what Taylormade has gone for here…I don’t love the feel and feedback off of the carbon faces, but the shaping and design I think is really well done
[QUOTE=”MtlJeff, post: 13072813, member: 68350″]
Not a huge fan of the look, it’s like “we get it, there’s a lot of carbon”
[/QUOTE]
Like I said, love it or hate it.
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] do you feel like Taylormade feels the pressure of the other OEM’s making some big pushes in the driver department? I know they have their fan base, but this feels like almost the start of them slipping behind some others and they see a push is needed
[QUOTE=”bsbmike, post: 13072816, member: 8099″]
Loved seeing the number difference with changing the weights…I agree with falling into the “love it” camp of the carbon design
I really like what Taylormade has gone for here…I don’t love the feel and feedback off of the carbon faces, but the shaping and design I think is really well done
[/QUOTE]
The all black is the superior version. The chromium just looks odd
[QUOTE=”bsbmike, post: 13072847, member: 8099″]
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] do you feel like Taylormade feels the pressure of the other OEM’s making some big pushes in the driver department? I know they have their fan base, but this feels like almost the start of them slipping behind some others and they see a push is needed
[/QUOTE]
This might be polarizing to some….but…. Hahaha
I actually think they’re not making pushes, not true ones, and are instead just beating around the bush trying kitschy things like they are with the carbon aspect, and now the “chromium” look. Similarly, MOI is the catch all chase now, imo because it’s trendy in the industry.
I think they have become shockingly reactionary, and not driven on innovation like they once were. But
[QUOTE=”outlawx, post: 13072865, member: 74252″]
The all black is the superior version. The chromium just looks odd
[/QUOTE]
For some reason I actually really like the chromium…something about it
Maybe it’s the fighter jet aspect I get and I’m a plane nerd :ROFLMAO:
The bottom definitely nails the look but most of the fighter jets these days are black fiber that chromium look generates tooo much of a radar footprint.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13072866, member: 1579″]
This might be polarizing to some….but…. Hahaha
I actually think they’re not making pushes, not true ones, and are instead just beating around the bush trying kitschy things like they are with the carbon aspect, and now the “chromium” look. Similarly, MOI is the catch all chase now, imo because it’s trendy in the industry.
I think they have become shockingly reactionary, and not driven on innovation like they once were. But
[/QUOTE]
I mean this is the feeling I’ve had with them the past few releases…nothing they’ve done as of recent has had me super excited. And at least from my seat, yes, it did seem like years ago they would be leading the charge on trying innovative things and others would follow…I don’t know I just don’t remember the last time they put a driver out and I was like I HAVE to go hit that. Not the way I’ve felt about some recent ones from Callaway or Cobra, or even the GT line from Titleist
Its kind of wild that both Scottie and Rory are holding out on putting the qi35 in play. I know Rory has the 35 in now due to his 10 being non-conforming. It is just interesting to note.
[QUOTE=”outlawx, post: 13211078, member: 74252″]
Its kind of wild that both Scottie and Rory are holding out on putting the qi35 in play. I know Rory has the 35 in now due to his 10 being non-conforming. It is just interesting to note.
[/QUOTE]
Honestly, I feel like the Qi35 gets negative feedback but for me when I am swinging well it is really good. I am still waiting on TM to send the weight kit so I can get the shaft cut down and fine tune it but I hit it further than anything else I have tried in the past. I don’t get why there is 0 hype and a lot of negativity.
[QUOTE=”Stryker, post: 13211087, member: 45755″]
Honestly, I feel like the Qi35 gets negative feedback but for me when I am swinging well it is really good. I am still waiting on TM to send the weight kit so I can get the shaft cut down and fine tune it but I hit it further than anything else I have tried in the past. I don’t get why there is 0 hype and a lot of negativity.
[/QUOTE]
It was not negative but I just saw Scottie’s WITB for the win and its qi 10 driver and 3 wood. He does have that 35 7wood.
[QUOTE=”outlawx, post: 13211095, member: 74252″]
It was not negative but I just saw Scottie’s WITB for the win and its qi 10 driver and 3 wood. He does have that 35 7wood.
[/QUOTE]
I didn’t mean your post was negative. More just looking at review or rankings posted on some sites. I mean several don’t have a single version of the Qi35 in the top 20-25 for the year and thats blasphemy in my opinion. Also, there is not a lot of love for it here either. Not saying there is a lot of negative here either but its not much comments at all.
[QUOTE=”Stryker, post: 13211107, member: 45755″]
I didn’t mean your post was negative. More just looking at review or rankings posted on some sites. I mean several don’t have a single version of the Qi35 in the top 20-25 for the year and thats blasphemy in my opinion. Also, there is not a lot of love for it here either. Not saying there is a lot of negative here either but its not much comments at all.
[/QUOTE]
Its kind of wild to. I would say pre-release it had the most appealing curb appeal. Just seems like this might have been an off release while everyone made some gains. Makes me think next years will be unbelievable.
[QUOTE=”outlawx, post: 13211117, member: 74252″]
Its kind of wild to. I would say pre-release it had the most appealing curb appeal. Just seems like this might have been an off release while everyone made some gains. Makes me think next years will be unbelievable.
[/QUOTE]
I find this years to be really good. Thats why I don’t get it. I tried another brand that is higher ranked on every site and it wasn’t even close for me. I feel like for some reason there is just a grudge against it that is not warranted.
Good day with the Qi35LS this afternoon. I will say it again, this driver is highly underrated. Par 4 #3 336 yards slightly uphill. Longest drive I ever hit on this hole. This was the result:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9354016[/ATTACH]
That bunker is right in front the right side of the green. I have been 30 yards short of that before but never there.
Par 4 #7 385 yards slightly downhill. Again probably the longest drive I have ever hit on this hole. Just a very slight pull just out the fairway to the left leaving me this in:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9354017[/ATTACH]
That’s 60 yards to the pin.
I also smoked it on both par 5s. A little too good on the first that goes up a steep hill to a 90* left dogleg. Went over the fairway and landed on the hillside just past leaving me 170 out with a ball steep above my feet. 7 put me on the fringe with a chip to 2’ for Bertie. The next one I hit a 9i for my second to a blind green up a steep hill. Didn’t get all the 9 and came up just short and left. Chipped to 3’ for another Bertie.
When I am doing my part, and today I most certainly was, the Qi35LS is a bomber. There is no way it should not be getting more attention than it does. I still don’t buy for a minute that so many online “rankings” don’t have a single Qi35 model rated until mid 20s or worse. Something with that is fishy as ball speeds and dispersion are excellent when you do your part.
Finally got everything in to do some work on the Qi 35 LS. We checked it before starting and it was at 46” in length, D5 swingweight. Had my guy trim it down to 45.25 playing length and we used the weight kit to bring the swingweight up to D4.
Squeezed in a quick 9 holes between rain today. 5/5 fairways hit with driver and each one pummeled straight down the middle or very baby draw. The random I was playing with basically said he couldn’t believe how consistent it was.
Ball flight looked perfect for launch and apex. It just seems to want to hang off the ground and go forever at the apex height. I know I wasn’t swinging my top speed today as I was a bit tired from not sleeping well last night but had no problem hitting some really long drives. Part of the distance not being quite there I also attribute to a ball change that may be a little to high on the compression number. I did hit one of the others in my regular rotation and it was definitely longer. Hopefully this trend continues as I definitely need more consistency off the tee in my life.
[QUOTE=”Stryker, post: 13217650, member: 45755″]
Good day with the Qi35LS this afternoon. I will say it again, this driver is highly underrated. Par 4 #3 336 yards slightly uphill. Longest drive I ever hit on this hole. This was the result:
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_3898.jpeg”]9354016[/ATTACH]
That bunker is right in front the right side of the green. I have been 30 yards short of that before but never there.
Par 4 #7 385 yards slightly downhill. Again probably the longest drive I have ever hit on this hole. Just a very slight pull just out the fairway to the left leaving me this in:
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_3899.jpeg”]9354017[/ATTACH]
That’s 60 yards to the pin.
I also smoked it on both par 5s. A little too good on the first that goes up a steep hill to a 90* left dogleg. Went over the fairway and landed on the hillside just past leaving me 170 out with a ball steep above my feet. 7 put me on the fringe with a chip to 2’ for Bertie. The next one I hit a 9i for my second to a blind green up a steep hill. Didn’t get all the 9 and came up just short and left. Chipped to 3’ for another Bertie.
When I am doing my part, and today I most certainly was, the Qi35LS is a bomber. There is no way it should not be getting more attention than it does. I still don’t buy for a minute that so many online “rankings” don’t have a single Qi35 model rated until mid 20s or worse. Something with that is fishy as ball speeds and dispersion are excellent when you do your part.
[/QUOTE]
Where the heck was this when I bet my coins?
[QUOTE=”outlawx, post: 13224876, member: 74252″]
Where the heck was this when I bet my coins?
[/QUOTE]
Haha not there at all. I had a terrible couple days with full driver. I did hit my mini well though.
I really like the original Qi35 much better than the Designer series that just came out. I let mine go only because I’m a veteran and wanted to get the Elyte Sandstorm when they came out. Out with the Epic look of green as I passed on them at the beginning as the Qi35 was the best looking driver at the time when they were released. It was a very nice driver as I also had a very nice Diamana BB shaft. Sold it for a very good price as I just don’t need or want 2 drivers that perform nearly identical. At least TM is sticking with the black carbon face instead of Red or Blue with their new releases but Gold or Platinum No thanks, Grey looks much better
Another massive day with the QI35 LS today. I hit mini driver on quite a few holes but I hit driver just as many. The Qi35 LS just keeps doing what I expect it to do. Long off the tee and making jaws drop.
18 today summed it all up. Par 5 a little downhill. About a 1/4 down starts a lake that runs the length of the right side. This while generally requires a tee shot with driver than a layup further down the fairway to be in range to cross the lake to the green. I have managed to hit that green under regulation exactly 1 time. It’s been a while ago but I believe it was driving iron or hybrids from 210-220 out or so. Again it’s been a while but I remember it being a long shot in.
Today my buddy was having struggles popping up his tee shot. Not sure I have ever seen him do this before (personally I think he had tee way too high) and ended up on the left side short of a bunker out there. No way he gets over the lake to the green and we know he has to lay up. I smoke my Qi35 LS starting it right between the fairway and lake. I lost it about halfway out but it was moving like a speeding bullet. Told my buddy I felt like it was going to draw just enough to reach the fairway.
We drive down to his ball and right as we pull up I see mine. It is laying in prime position about 3 yards from the right rough in the fairway and deep. When we get there, I range the flag deep in a large green over the lake at 164. Never seen anyone sitting in that position off the tee much less sniffed anything even close to that myself.
I am so much more confident with a driver in hand than I have ever been since adding the Qi35 LS to my bag. Sure I can still hit a wayward shot occasionally like anybody else but I don’t fear it or expect it. My misses are much more playable and I continue to be in awe of the distances I see in a regular basis.
I get there may not be a huge difference between the Qi35 lineup and the Qi10 lineup. But seriously how much real difference is there really each year compared to the previous version of any manufacturer. Sure there will be some. Not always for the better either. My point is I think too many people don’t give the Qi35 a chance. In all fairness, there wasn’t a ton of hype for the Qi10 either. I think the thought they are too similar is a mistake and more should be giving this lineup a real look.
You don’t think there was a ton of hype for the 10? Man, I feel like it was hyped pretty darn hard.
I think the bigger issue is TM is beginning to run into a stagnation problem with their drivers and a lot of their metal wood innovation as a whole.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13278972, member: 1579″]
You don’t think there was a ton of hype for the 10? Man, I feel like it was hyped pretty darn hard.
I think the bigger issue is TM is beginning to run into a stagnation problem with their drivers and a lot of their metal wood innovation as a whole.
[/QUOTE]
What I mean by hype is not advertising hype. I am referring to the amount of conversation about the products by everyday golfers.
It’s talked about a lot. Just not here on THP, which is understandable. I have tons of conversations about Taylormade stuff out on golf courses and on my TikTok lives.
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 13279051, member: 65950″]
It’s talked about a lot. Just not here on THP, which is understandable. I have tons of conversations about Taylormade stuff out on golf courses and on my TikTok lives.
[/QUOTE]
My comments are based on personal experiences. While I am glad yours has some talk of the TM equipment, I see little here and hear little elsewhere from every day golfers. Just seems odd to me just a couple years ago the conversations were much more apparent.
[QUOTE=”Stryker, post: 13279105, member: 45755″]
My comments are based on personal experiences. While I am glad yours has some talk of the TM equipment, I see little here and hear little elsewhere from every day golfers. Just seems odd to me just a couple years ago the conversations were much more apparent.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah that’s weird. Not at all my experience
[QUOTE=”Stryker, post: 13279105, member: 45755″]
My comments are based on personal experiences. While I am glad yours has some talk of the TM equipment, I see little here and hear little elsewhere from every day golfers. Just seems odd to me just a couple years ago the conversations were much more apparent.
[/QUOTE]
I think it goes to show exactly what I mentioned about stagnation.
It doesn’t help that they’re still chasing the SIM in a lot of aspects performance wise as well.
They need to innovate and differentiate, this years story was predominantly an aesthetic one.
They’re good drivers, but not great. I also think the move of making the core model the same footprint as the Max didn’t help them with their main audience.
I’m not talking advertising hype either fwiw.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13279131, member: 1579″]
I think it goes to show exactly what I mentioned about stagnation.
It doesn’t help that they’re still chasing the SIM in a lot of aspects performance wise as well.
They need to innovate and differentiate, this years story was predominantly an aesthetic one.
They’re good drivers, but not great. I also think the move of making the core model the same footprint as the Max didn’t help them with their main audience.
[/QUOTE]
Do you feel like the change in interest aligns with the switch to carbon faces? It does seem that has been more the focus of their development the past several generations. Is trying to develop that technology hurting them in other aspects of design being the main focus?
I mean I get different things work well for different people of course. But for me, this driver has been great. I tried a few others and nothing else was close.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13279131, member: 1579″]
I also think the move of making the core model the same footprint as the Max didn’t help them with their main audience.
[/QUOTE]
I’ll admit I hate the carbon faces so there probably wasn’t a world where I was buying one of these but this is absolutely my biggest gripe with this line. The core head is way too big for my taste.
[QUOTE=”Stryker, post: 13279171, member: 45755″]
Do you feel like the change in interest aligns with the switch to carbon faces? It does seem that has been more the focus of their development the past several generations. Is trying to develop that technology hurting them in other aspects of design being the main focus?
I mean I get different things work well for different people of course. But for me, this driver has been great. I tried a few others and nothing else was close.
[/QUOTE]
I think it’s a story that doesn’t resonate, combined by them having a LOT of failures with the initial versions of it. Then this year, you’re not pushing a real story that resonates.
It is imo the best looking driver release this cycle, but as I said in my review it’s also MASSIVELY Polarizing, a love it or hate it look. Then the footprint gets bigger of the model which fits the most.
I hit the core and LS well. They’re good, but they’re not other worldly, and you could tell from the start marketing and story wise that TM was pushing, they didn’t necessarily think it was either.
A non bold and non confident about their driver TM says a lot to me personally.
[QUOTE=”The Scott, post: 13279175, member: 83243″]
I’ll admit I hate the carbon faces so there probably wasn’t a world where I was buying one of these but this is absolutely my biggest gripe with this line. The core head is way too big for my taste.
[/QUOTE]
It polarized a LOT of people, as much as the looks in general.
Did not expect to get an extended test with the regular and LS heads this summer. Yay
Posting here as my equipment review for my round in the live round thread.
Took the Qi35 Max for its 3rd round ever yesterday. The previous two rounds were less than satisfactory with a lot of balls finding their way right. Not necessarily a direct s-word, but still spinning out right. Yesterday, however, was a much different story. I still missed a couple of fairways, I think 2 actually, but the overall results were so much better. Distance is also up some from the Qi10 Max that I’m upgrading from which I believe comes from less spin. Overall, very happy with the Qi35 Max yesterday. So far, it’s 1/3 on playability, but that’s a small sample size.
[QUOTE=”Michael.Sandoval33, post: 13400366, member: 79855″]
Posting here as my equipment review for my round in the live round thread.
Took the Qi35 Max for its 3rd round ever yesterday. The previous two rounds were less than satisfactory with a lot of balls finding their way right. Not necessarily a direct s-word, but still spinning out right. Yesterday, however, was a much different story. I still missed a couple of fairways, I think 2 actually, but the overall results were so much better. Distance is also up some from the Qi10 Max that I’m upgrading from which I believe comes from less spin. Overall, very happy with the Qi35 Max yesterday. So far, it’s 1/3 on playability, but that’s a small sample size.
[/QUOTE]
Wait you got a Qi35 Max when you’re about to get a new Callaway in 4 months? You really are a sicko hahaha and I mean that as a compliment. I love it!
[QUOTE=”The Scott, post: 13400387, member: 83243″]
Wait you got a Qi35 Max when you’re about to get a new Callaway in 4 months? You really are a sicko hahaha and I mean that as a compliment. I love it!
[/QUOTE]
Well I had the Qi10, but it got a small chip on the face and TaylorMade actually replaced it with the 35 which was unexpected. But I like your understanding of the situation better haha
Does anyone know if the club head weights on the QI35 are different between the Max and core model?
I picked up and demo’d the QI35 Max off of a used rack last night wih the Speeder stiff shaft on it and I could NOT find the club face at all. I’m not sure if I just dislike the Speeder shaft so much because of how light it is or if there are differences in the weight of the heads playing into it as well.
It felt completely different than my Ventus core model but I’m honestly considering buying it just so I can have the 9* Max head since it was used and I have some dick’s/golf galaxy rewards to use
My un
[QUOTE=”gmiller598, post: 13439608, member: 24338″]
Does anyone know if the club head weights on the QI35 are different between the Max and core model?
I picked up and demo’d the QI35 Max off of a used rack last night wih the Speeder stiff shaft on it and I could NOT find the club face at all. I’m not sure if I just dislike the Speeder shaft so much because of how light it is or if there are differences in the weight of the heads playing into it as well.
[/QUOTE]
A quick google search says single 34g in the Max and a 3g and 13g in core model. My guess would be your swing and that shaft don’t get along.
I have zero reason to move off my Qi35, but I will admit I am starting to get the itch for something new and different. This has been a really good driver for more, but will say the sound and feel is just okay. Performance great, but it doesn’t sing to me if you know what I mean. So for now it will be the gamer, but I would expect that to change sooner rather than later.