Mini Driver Mania remains in full effect for the golf industry in 2025. While the staying power is still yet to be determined, with more brands jumping into the conversation, TaylorMade wants to remind golfers that they’ve been the constant for the Mini.
The past couple of versions saw the brand dip their toes into nostalgia with the BRNR designs, and they were well received. This time though? TaylorMade is diving all the way in, banking not just on visual nostalgia, but technological nostalgia as well.
The R7 Quad is back, it’s just more Mini this time.

TaylorMade Golf R7 Quad Mini Driver
Given the smaller size of a Mini Driver, when you want to innovate and push the bounds, it can be difficult. This is where TaylorMade found themselves after the BRNR. It felt like other than perhaps a carbon face, all their prime tech had been implemented.

Where to go then? The easy answer is, of course, adjustability. However, TaylorMade thought to continue the nostalgia train and look to the past for inspiration. That is where the R7 Quad comes in. The driver was released in way back in 2004 and was a smash hit with over 30 worldwide wins as well as a major that year. A key component to that success was the adjustability it brought.
“The R7 Quad Mini Driver is one of those projects that got everyone excited from the initial concept, and being able to bring back one of the most iconic clubs in TaylorMade history (R7Driver) was a dream come true. We couldn’t be more excited to continue setting the pace in the Mini Driver category.”
Chandler Carr, TaylorMade Product Manager, Product Creation

By using a QUAD weighting system with four different precision weight ports, fine tuning for personal fit took on a new meaning, that is precisely what they have sought to now bring to the Mini Driver. The R7 Quad Mini Driver uses two 13g and 4g weights that can be moved in multiple orientations within the dual ports in the rear as well as the forward part of the head. In all, there are six primary combos which will allow maximum manipulation of the CG to let the user hit the windows they need most. Of course, there will also be additional weights available for purchase to bring even more tuning possibilities in.

Beyond the weighting and classic R7 theme which has been applied to the head (not to mention a true throwback headcover as well) there is still more technology. Twist Face remains, still working in tandem with a reshaped Speed Pocket to enhance speed, spin, and direction. As for new, TaylorMade is now implementing their Infinity Carbon Crown, this increases the composite used up top, so more weight could be redistributed low. Not to mention, it let them go for a more seamless look from address.

The Details
No doubt the nostalgia aspect of the R7 Mini Driver will lead to some love it or leave it conversation by golfers, but you cannot deny the company is at least having a little fun with it. As with their past Mini Drivers, this will be offered in 11.5 (RH/LH) and 13.0 (RH) degrees and uses the TM adapter for even more loft adjustability. The club is paired with a specially designed Fujikura “Speeder MD” (X, S, SR) that showcases throwback graphics as well.
The R7 Quad Mini Driver is priced at $479.00. Pre-order will be available 4/15/25 with product hitting retail 5/1/25. For more information visit their website at taylormadegolf.com
Have mixed thoughts on this. I think it looks great and love the movable weight. On the other hand still no carbon face. TaylorMade insists the carbon faces are better so why not have one in the minis? Either way, I’m not really in the market for a mini anyway.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13097592, member: 1579″]
Yup, it really feels that way.
But you know, what better place to do that than mini? Hahahaha
[/QUOTE]
I think it’s the perfect place to do it.
[QUOTE=”thscott05, post: 13097597, member: 83243″]
Have mixed thoughts on this. I think it looks great and love the movable weight. On the other hand still no carbon face. TaylorMade insists the carbon faces are better so why not have one in the minis? Either way, I’m not really in the market for a mini anyway.
[/QUOTE]
Because carbon isn’t faster, but due to story telling they have laid the path for, they can’t do away from it in drivers and are stuck there.
I do think it would add to the story, even if it didn’t add to the speed.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13097605, member: 1579″]
Because carbon isn’t faster, but due to story telling they have laid the path for, they can’t do away from it in drivers and are stuck there.
I do think it would add to the story, even if it didn’t add to the speed.
[/QUOTE]
Haven’t they also said they can’t yet do a carbon face on a smaller than 460cc head because of the adhesion process?
[QUOTE=”amarkabove, post: 13097618, member: 75272″]
Haven’t they also said they can’t yet do a carbon face on a smaller than 460cc head because of the adhesion process?
[/QUOTE]
That would be one story. Hahaha
We did see how long it took to get right on driver. With more perimeter strikes bound to happen on a smaller face area, it wouldn’t shock me.
The point is, to make that your “thing”, essentially their entire personality (even though they talk about it less than ever with 35) and to not implement it down the line, tells me a lot.
Great write up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]
Looking forward to hitting this alongside the Titleist and callaway options for mini driver
[QUOTE=”anthonyt, post: 13097638, member: 80933″]
Great write up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]
Looking forward to hitting this alongside the Titleist and callaway options for mini driver
[/QUOTE]
Same. Hahaha!
Thank ya!
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13097626, member: 1579″]
That would be one story. Hahaha
We did see how long it took to get right on driver. With more perimeter strikes bound to happen on a smaller face area, it wouldn’t shock me.
The point is, to make that your “thing”, essentially their entire personality (even though they talk about it less than ever with 35) and to not implement it down the line, tells me a lot.
[/QUOTE]
Exactly! I’ll admit I’ve never been a huge TM fan but have given all 4 generations of carbon faces a chance now and hate the feel (or lack of I should say). Their refusal to use this supposedly revolutionary process in other clubs makes me distrustful of the whole thing even more.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13097568, member: 1579″]
Thankfully they finally figured out they watered down the TP branding effect. Hahaha
I think we don’t see that for another cycle or two, then they dip back into that nostalgia to try and help sales as well.
[/QUOTE]
As long as it’s not a marketing slap a logo on and they get some actual tour feedback as well.
I still have my r7 425, this is like it’s kid ? I wonder if the weights are compatible.
May finally be getting a mini. This thing looks great and brings back a lot of memories!
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 13097166, member: 3″]
They do love the throwbacks for their mini driver.
I would have liked to see their carbon face done here, as I think the size can allow for that implementation, but that doesn’t increase speed, and with MWT coming back from the dead, you can move the weight where necessary. Its a fun drop and I think TM fans will like it.
[/QUOTE]
Agree with this, especially was hoping to see the carbon face in it, but it’s a cool throwback to that driver. Great writeup [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] !
[QUOTE=”kiwichris, post: 13097764, member: 57426″]
As long as it’s not a marketing slap a logo on and they get some actual tour feedback as well.
[/QUOTE]
TP hasn’t done that for ages though sadly.
damn it this looks really good. The R7 was the first real driver I owned and loved it. I might have to dig into this one a little deeper.
Great writeup James. Never played a R7 back in the day but really like the looks and tech involved with this one. Would love to give it a try.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13097940, member: 1579″]
TP hasn’t done that for ages though sadly.
[/QUOTE]
That is sad
Great article. The in hand pics from the RBC look incredible.
I went in to my club’s pro shop today to pick up some repair orders, and my pro showed me the R7Quad Mini he just got. It’s pretty clean looking for sure, sets up nicely behind the ball. The adjustable weights will appeal to many. I prefer the way the Titleist GT280 sets up FWIW but that’s obviously a personal thing. Will be interesting to find out how this one performs vs. the older BRNR models, and the GT280.
I would like to hit it but I don’t think it will replace my BRNR minis.
[QUOTE=”MGoBlue, post: 13098558, member: 53320″]
I went in to my club’s pro shop today to pick up some repair orders, and my pro showed me the R7Quad Mini he just got. It’s pretty clean looking for sure, sets up nicely behind the ball. The adjustable weights will appeal to many. I prefer the way the Titleist GT280 sets up FWIW but that’s obviously a personal thing. Will be interesting to find out how this one performs vs. the older BRNR models, and the GT280.
[/QUOTE]
This is interesting
[MEDIA=youtube]dpJD85bT0mU[/MEDIA]
[QUOTE=”MSEASU, post: 13098650, member: 46570″]
This is interesting
[MEDIA=youtube]dpJD85bT0mU[/MEDIA]
[/QUOTE]
Yes interesting indeed. The elyte seems to launch moonshots. Notably lower spin rates with the GT280. Would have loved to see them compare the three off the deck.
I don’t understand the throwback stuff, but they seem to do it well. That weighting system is also pretty damn sweet!
Great write up! Th pictures have me really wanting to get my hands on one and couple that with the fact that I wanted an R7 and a Superquad when they came out and being just married with and junior enlisted in the military I sadly never acquired one. This may have to change what with this gem!
[QUOTE=”MGoBlue, post: 13098748, member: 53320″]
Yes interesting indeed. The elyte seems to launch moonshots. Notably lower spin rates with the GT280. Would have loved to see them compare the three off the deck.
[/QUOTE]
280 is a sneaky monster. But I’ll have a lot more on that soon.
Love the look of this! I played the R7 TP driver back then while working in a golf store and ended up selling it to a guy on the golf course for $400. 🙂
They look nice but if the 4 weight port worked so well back in the day then why did TM do away with that design. The twist face and speed pocket has been around for several years now as that is old news so other than cosmetics there is nothing ground breaking. I remember the stock shaft for the BRNR, I hated it but I’m sure it will sell but I’m glad I ended up with the Elyte Mini as they have all the same features that the driver has and the whole Elyte line up is a big hit. Looking forward to a Mini driver shootout
This is fun. Would give it a go. I think my dad had an R7 of some sort back in the day.
Been looking a Mini since my Driver regularly drives me nuts. This one is speaking to me. Love my old R7 Superquad.
Great write up @Jmam.
I really like the looks of this one. Love the reversible covers that TM has done for their minis recently.
This looks fantastic, first mini-driver I’ve looked at and thought, yeah, I need one of those in the bag,
Wonder what they will do next year? SLDR Mini?
[QUOTE=”TheNorfolkGolfer, post: 13100170, member: 78387″]
This looks fantastic, first mini-driver I’ve looked at and thought, yeah, I need one of those in the bag,
Wonder what they will do next year? SLDR Mini?
[/QUOTE]
An R9 Mini might be cool. Maybe they’ll just shrink the whole catalog and bring them out one by one.
[QUOTE=”TheNorfolkGolfer, post: 13100170, member: 78387″]
This looks fantastic, first mini-driver I’ve looked at and thought, yeah, I need one of those in the bag,
Wonder what they will do next year? SLDR Mini?
[/QUOTE]
They have already done the SLDR mini, I personally love the throwback themes with new tech and look forward to seeing what they do next
I hit this in the store today. Seems to have some pop. I like the size and top line.
Anybody that has hit it, did you mess with weights at all? Also curious how the stock shaft offering felt. I couldn’t help myself but to order one. I actually swapped to a Perforce V2 6S shaft, tipped 0.5″. I’m not swinging very hard lately or I would have just gone 6x.
I’m considering getting the 11.5. I so love my 13.5 original BRNR. One thing I love about it is the much maligned ProForce 65 — it’s so smooth. But the 11.5 with a Tensei or Velocore Blue might be the end all be all.
I understand sorta why they can’t put a carbon face on a smaller club but if the 4 weight ports were such a big hit back with the R7 driver why did they leave that design only to now bring it back. They had 3W’s with 4 positions for weights so is this the end of the carbon face drivers. Why not bring back a newly designed R7 driver. Our is this just a flash in the pan. I really like my Qi35 driver as the R7 looks good and seems to perform very well but their stock shafts are a no go. I went with the Elyte Mini as it has the same features as the bigger brother as it may not look as cool as the R7 but their previous model was a big hit and so hard to find as I feel like both models will be a big hit. One other issue is when I ordered the Elyte Mini I got the Custom Aretera shaft for $100 and TaylorMade charges $320 so it was a no brainer.
[QUOTE=”JimmyDee, post: 13097171, member: 16050″]
Great write-up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] . Having owned and played an R7 TP Superquad for a number of years until face cracked I really am into the nostalgia look. At address the driver looks awesome and flipping it over it looks even better. The entire look just brings back memories of some of my best driving years.
I read elsewhere a bit about the shaft graphics and look forward to more info around this topic.
[/QUOTE]
I have a friend with the Big boy Tp version he’ll probably be selling.
Still not a mini driver fan, but I actually dig the throwback to the R7.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13097379, member: 1579″]
I’m glad everyone is enjoying the article!
I’m one who likes the nostalgia, I’ve also had the most personal success with TM’s versions of mini drivers, so I really hope to get one in hand.
It’ll be interesting to see though, after the last two just being rehashes, with so many new entries to the segment if there is a performance step forward here, or just a visual step once again.
[/QUOTE]
I would guess except for the moveable weights (I still have a ton of them, including some tour only), it’s about the same as the others. I personally had most or all the different variations (EBay was so good then) but my favorite was a Superdeep with a ShaqX shaft. That thing dropped some serious bombs out there.
That being said I have the TSR2+ and it just seems more versatile with great performance off the ground. I may be wrong, but seems like a fad to me.