When TaylorMade announces a new putter line, most golfers immediately think of the Spider, and why wouldn’t they? The Spider has a remarkable history, both in terms of sales and its success on major tours worldwide. It has played a significant role in seeing multiple golfers achieve that top spot in the world golf rankings, guys like Jason Day, Dustin Johnson, John Rahm, Rory McIlroy, and Scottie Scheffler.
With as much success as the Spider has achieved, it’s still not everyone’s cup of tea. Some golfers balk at the shape, the insert, or the price tag. With that golfer in mind, TaylorMade is introducing the new SYSTM2 putter line, aimed at those who may be leery of Spiders.
A Traditional Look with Modern Stability and Feel
The goal of the SYSTM2 putters is to create a family of putters that feature clean lines and a more traditional appearance, while also providing high stability and a soft feel. To achieve this, TaylorMade chose 304 stainless steel, a material known for its softer feel. According to the company, this also provides better distance control and feedback.

The use of 304 stainless steel allows for tighter machining tolerances, ensuring that each SYSTM2 putter meets the same high-quality standards as the others. To enhance stability, TaylorMade engineers employed MIM (metal injection molding) technology to precisely position weight in the head where it is most beneficial for the golfer. As a result, every SYSTM2 putter has weight distributed towards the heel and toe sections to produce more consistent results even when the strike is off-center.
TaylorMade SYSTM2 Precision-Milled Face
We’ve seen TaylorMade keep a selection of traditional-looking putters in their lineup alongside the Spider model. However, most of these traditional putters still feature the Pure Roll insert.
Instead, these putters feature a precision-milled, fly-cut face. After milling, grooves are optimally cut into the face using a saw cutter. These grooves enhance the sound, feel, and roll that golfers appreciate in a milled putter.

With its industrial design, the SYSTM2 putter combines a milled face, grooves, and Torx screws that connect the face to the body. From a face-on perspective, it looks like a blend of the TaylorMade TP Reserve putters and the Spider X Tour Proto.
Two-Tone Finish for Alignment and Durability
Every SYSTM2 putter features a two-tone finish that serves multiple purposes. For the front, TaylorMade has gone with a satin scratch silver that visually contrasts with the black PVD finish found on the rear. That satin scratch silver section has been treated with a hydro-blast finish to help maintain its premium look for a longer period of time.


With a clear separation of front and back sections, this not only helps give a pleasing aesthetic but also assists golfers in properly aligning their putter to the ball and could even help create a more consistent stroke.
We’ve had so many conversations over the years about how much proper alignment matters in achieving success, and TaylorMade believes that this combination of satin scratch silver and PVD black is one method to help unlock proper alignment.
TaylorMade SYSTM2 Hosel Options
Before we delve into the specific head designs that will be part of the new SYSTM2 family, let’s discuss the available hosel options. Given its position in the lineup, not every neck configuration will be present, so TaylorMade is focusing on two popular choices that will appeal to a wide range of golfers.

The first option is the L-Neck, more commonly known as the plumber’s neck, which is featured on all SYSTM2 putter models. The L-Neck hosel is ideal for golfers with an arcing stroke who prefer a putter with toe-hang.
Golfers who adopt a straight back, straight through stroke and wish to minimize face rotation should consider the single-bend hosel, which is exclusively available on the mallet models.

On the sole of each putter is a number that corresponds to the type of hosel used on that specific head. L-Neck putters are labeled 12, while the single-bend versions are labeled 72. If you look back at TaylorMade’s history of putters, you’ll see those two numbers have been used frequently in past releases.
“SYSTM2 represents our commitment to delivering putters that perform at the highest level while showcasing the craftsmanship and precision that define TaylorMade’s world-class performance equipment. By crafting each head from soft 304 stainless steel with precision milled faces and our signature two-tone finish, we’ve created a complete system for every golfer. Whether a player prefers a compact blade, needs the forgiveness of our wide-body Del Monte, or wants a traditional mid-mallet, SYSTM2 ensures that golfers can find the perfect putter to match their stroke.”
– Andrew Oldknow, Director of Product Creation, Putters.
TaylorMade SYSTM2 Models
Overall, there are five distinct head designs available, three blade and two mallet options. As noted earlier, all blade models feature the L-Neck design, while the two mallets offer the choice of L-Neck or single-bend hosels.
Blades

- Soto: Classic profile with rounded bumpers
- Juno: More squared-off, angular appearance
- Del Monte: Wide-body with deeper CG and higher MOI
Mallets

- Bandon: “Fanged” design for stability and alignment confidence
- Ardmore: Updated shape with an extended flange and curved bumpers
Pricing and Availability
TaylorMade’s SYSTM2 putters are now available for order for $249.99.
All models can be ordered for both right-handed and left-handed golfers, with the exception that the single-bend models of the Bandon and Ardmore are currently available only for right-handed players.
More information on the new SYSTM2 putters can be found at taylormadegolf.com.





Smart on TM to address a “value” audience here – not for me at the end of the day, but could see this being a great option for some. Great writeup [USER=782]@ddec[/USER] !
[IMG alt=”Im Not Maya Rudolph GIF by Saturday Night Live”]https://media1.giphy.com/media/3o7qDDNLf1TCfsCTyU/200.gif[/IMG]
Yea I’m with temp and chris here. Great value option, but not for me, they’re just kind of meh.
I like the look of the milling on the face. They don’t jump out at me, but I don’t hate them. My biggest question is, why would someone choose these over a similar Cleveland that comes with an All-In shaft stock?
Personally I would wait and save a little longer for a real Spider. These don’t do much for me.
[QUOTE=”ChrisATL, post: 13949729, member: 84220″]
Smart on TM to address a “value” audience here – not for me at the end of the day, but could see this being a great option for some. Great writeup [USER=782]@ddec[/USER] !
[/QUOTE]
No? You are a fan of milled so thought these might resonate more
Solid options at a good price point. I like that both the mallets have an option for the plumbers neck since so many mallets now just get a double bend. I could see this being a solid option for Taylormade fans that don't like the shape of the spider.
Great write up but the last TaylorMade putter I used was a Spider and that was over 10 years ago. Nothing from the looks of these make me want to jump up and put one in the bag.
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 13949763, member: 62865″]
No? You are a fan of milled so thought these might resonate more
[/QUOTE]
It’s more of a shape design for me. The Ardmore is the only shape that really speaks to me 🤷
Yeah. Not loving it but if it’s affordable and works, that’s a good thing.
Hmmm now this is interesting. I like the idea behind it and would like to see how they feel and size of the heads for the mallets. Half the issue I have with putters is mallet heads are smaller heel to toe than blades.
I think these look pretty nice. Never know until in hand, but one thumb up and one thumb awaits an in hand test.
I’m a bit meh though it’s funny in a time that’s so much mallet you see a line of mostly blade
Don’t TaylorMade still have Logan Olson on their staff? Did they not consult him at all on the looks department of these?
Using 304 instead of 303 seems very much like when Kobe switched his number to 24 because it was one more than 23.
Regardless of all of that, great write up [USER=782]@ddec[/USER]
[QUOTE=”amarkabove, post: 13949931, member: 75272″]
Don’t TaylorMade still have Logan Olson on their staff? Did they not consult him at all on the looks department of these?
Using 304 instead of 303 seems very much like when Kobe switched his number to 24 because it was one more than 23.
Regardless of all of that, great write up [USER=782]@ddec[/USER]
[/QUOTE]
303 can’t be welded so it’s more suited for one-piece milling. 304 allows them to use multi-material with the milled face.
I would agree that the price point is good but I don’t care for the aesthetics of this line, just doesn’t move the needle for me.
They don’t look bad. Not seeing anything that moves the needle. But if the putts drop that’s all that matters
I like this. The face looks great and I think a budget-friendly milled face putter is a win.
Is it just me or did anybody else assume these were component putters at first? I thought it was kind of a build your own thing with the similar look on the front portion of every putter.
I like the look of the Bandon as I’ve always been a fan of fang mallets but it’s also not something I’d even consider buying so not quite sure how these will sell
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13949949, member: 1193″]
I like this. The face looks great and I think a budget-friendly milled face putter is a win.
Is it just me or did anybody else assume these were component putters at first? I thought it was kind of a build your own thing with the similar look on the front portion of every putter.
[/QUOTE]
With the screws on the front? Yeah
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13949949, member: 1193″]
I like this. The face looks great and I think a budget-friendly milled face putter is a win.
Is it just me or did anybody else assume these were component putters at first? I thought it was kind of a build your own thing with the similar look on the front portion of every putter.
[/QUOTE]
The name lends itself to that assumption as well. It looks like it could very well be an entire “system” with interchangeable parts. I do like the industrial look of the milled face with the screws. It’d be cool if you could unscrew it and attach different bodies to each face.
[QUOTE=”Tywithay, post: 13949961, member: 14378″]
The name lends itself to that assumption as well. It looks like it could very well be an entire “system” with interchangeable parts. I do like the industrial look of the milled face with the screws. It’d be cool if you could unscrew it and attach different bodies to each face.
[/QUOTE]
That’s what I thought too. Saw the name, the first pics, and immediately assumed it was similar to the M Craft X series.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13949949, member: 1193″]
I like this. The face looks great and I think a budget-friendly milled face putter is a win.
Is it just me or did anybody else assume these were component putters at first? I thought it was kind of a build your own thing with the similar look on the front portion of every putter.
[/QUOTE]
That was my initial thought. Then I scanned the article for conformation.
That would be the only moderately ok reason for screws on the face.
Interesting move by TaylorMade here. Feels like they’re trying to hit that middle ground between a true milled blade and the forgiveness people expect from a Spider.
The 304 stainless + milled face combo is appealing, especially if it really does soften things up while keeping feedback. I do like the idea of pushing weight heel/toe with MIM too, that’s a smart way to add stability without going full high-MOI spaceship. Cobra is doing a real good job with the MIM in their putters.
The two tone alignment is probably the best part of this. Anything that helps you consistently square it up without overthinking is a win.
That said, nothing really jumps out. Shapes are solid but pretty standard-ish.
The 2 tone color scheme just isn’t doing it for me
Interesting. I really haven’t paid much attention to TaylorMade putters. Played a spider years ago, but never really consider them anymore. I don’t think I’d like the face on these, but I like options.
I do really like that they are giving us a non-insert face here instead of the pure roll. I know Spider is their bread and butter when it comes to putters, but I like having this option. I do wish there were a couple of other shapes and a flow/slant neck offering. Maybe in the future.
They have a very popular and proven putter, then decide to go backwards.
Ok.
[QUOTE=”Bosco…, post: 13950340, member: 65357″]
They have a very popular and proven putter, then decide to go backwards.
Ok.
[/QUOTE]
all about options. They need something other than Spider, which while popular, is not everyone’s favorite. Smaller shapes, milled face. It certainly makes their lineup more well rounded.
I mean, they’re still making it. But not everyone likes/wants a Spider shape, or they don’t want to shell out the premium for it, so why not make something for these players?
But, as was mentioned earlier, these will be a tough sell when Cleveland is in the same ballpark with a stock All-In shaft.
I don’t understand the screws on the face if you can’t interchange the back part
I’d give the Ardmore a run.
Great write-up, ddec!
I would definitely give these a try if I saw them in store, particularly the blades. I like the overall look and am curious how the face and milling feel.
Putted with them at my local store and really liked Ardmore L-Neck but I wish the head was heavier or came with a weight option.
Got to see some of these in person today and I’m a fan. Solid putter with what seems like a reasonable price. The plumbers neck 7 seemed to sit dead shut for me, but the double bend flavor sat perfectly. Would like to see the Soto, they didn’t have it.
Interesting line up. Don’t hate them, but don’t love them. Nice to see pricing where they’re at with how expensive a lot of options have gotten. Sound like solid options, but I’d have to see them in person to really know how I feel. Gonna have to find them at some point and give em a try.
Great write up! TMade on a hot streak with the putters
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13949949, member: 1193″]
I like this. The face looks great and I think a budget-friendly milled face putter is a win.
Is it just me or did anybody else assume these were component putters at first? I thought it was kind of a build your own thing with the similar look on the front portion of every putter.
[/QUOTE]
I kinda is though right? The two mallets seem to have the same face piece, just different backs, at least it looked that way in hand without calipers yesterday.
They felt really soft when rolling. Too pillowy for my tastes but if you like that feel these are worth trying.
I have never been an insert fan, so this is one I am going to test. I just got mine in today and will hopefully get to the putting green this week.