Golf changed faster in the last five years than it did in the previous twenty.
For decades, the sport openly worried about aging demographics, shrinking public facilities, declining participation, and whether younger audiences still cared about golf at all. Then, COVID happened and suddenly golf became one of the few social activities people could still do comfortably outdoors. Rounds exploded and tee sheets filled up. Courses that had spent years fighting for survival suddenly had demand again.
At almost the exact same time, golf culture itself started changing.

YouTube golf went mainstream. Simulator golf exploded. TopGolf emerged as a gateway into the sport. Social media personalities started influencing apparel trends, golf travel, equipment sales, and even how people behaved on the course. Golf became less formal, less intimidating, and far more social.
Somewhere in the middle of all of that, the term “bro golfer” became part of the modern golf lexicon. Depending on who you ask, that’s either one of the best things to happen to the game in years or the beginning of golf completely losing its identity.
What is a “bro golfer”?

A “bro golfer” is probably easiest to define by attitude more than skill level or age. It’s less about being a good golfer or bad golfer and more about treating golf as a social lifestyle experience rather than a traditional sport built around etiquette and structure.
The stereotype usually includes things like music on the course, hoodies and joggers, trendy golf-specific drinks, loud and modern apparel, social media clips and YouTube golf culture.
Of course, the term itself is also loaded. For some, “bro golfer” simply means younger players enjoying the game differently than previous generations. For others, it represents slow rounds, loud behavior, excessive drinking and a growing lack of respect for golf etiquette.
That tension is a big reason the conversation has become so polarizing in the first place.
Why Golf Needed New Players
For a long time, golf carried a reputation that many people simply didn’t connect with. It felt expensive, rigid, rule-heavy and socially uncomfortable for beginners. Plenty of people loved that structure. Plenty of others wanted absolutely nothing to do with it.
Modern golf culture changed the feel entirely. Suddenly golf looked fun. Not polished. Not exclusionary. Fun. It left the boardroom and entered the taproom. Some might even say it started to look cool.
You didn’t need tucked-in slacks and a country club membership to feel like you belonged anymore. You could wear a hoodie, play a quick nine with friends, listen to music, place a few bets, post clips online and make the round feel social instead of formal.
A huge number of younger golfers entered the game because it no longer felt intimidating. YouTube creators and social golf personalities reached audiences traditional golf media never dreamed of touching. Golf apparel companies became fashion lifestyle brands. Simulator leagues became normal. Public golf became busier than it had been in years.

That shift opened golf to an entirely different audience. Some may argue that came at a cost, but a lot of people who complain about modern golf conveniently forget that not very long ago, the sport was genuinely worried about its future.
Before the boom, courses were closing. Municipal golf struggled constantly. Conditions could border on unplayable due to shrinking budgets. Youth participation wasn’t exactly thriving, especially outside the country club set. Equipment companies spent years talking about how to attract the next generation, and those that didn’t adapt often disappeared.
Growth changed all of that.
Now golf travel is booming. Companies are investing heavily again. Public facilities are healthier financially. Women’s participation continues growing. More younger golfers are entering the game and finding new ways to enjoy it. Smaller companies are not only surviving but thriving because people are actually spending money on golf again.
That type of growth benefits almost everyone invested in the sport, even if people are frustrated by some of the side effects.
When Growth Creates New Problems
Yes, there absolutely are side effects. We don’t deny that some aspects of modern golf culture have crossed the line from relaxed into obnoxious. There’s a massive difference between making golf more welcoming and treating the course like a moving tailgate party.
Music is one thing. Two tethered Bluetooth speakers loud enough to hear two fairways over is another.

Having drinks during a round is nothing new. Golf has always had a social and alcohol component, but social media has absolutely crafted a version of golf culture where getting hammered on the course is almost presented as part of the experience itself. Add in weed culture becoming more visible in golf and some courses are starting to feel more like party venues than golf facilities. It’s not difficult to understand why certain golfers are frustrated.
That frustration becomes even stronger when paired with the reality of modern public golf.
In many larger cities, tee sheets are packed constantly. Weekend rounds drag past five hours. Greens fees continue climbing. Practice facilities are crowded. Courses are harder to access than they were just a few years ago.
For longtime golfers, especially public golfers, it can feel like the game they loved suddenly became crowded, expensive and harder to enjoy.
That’s where movements like “shrink the game” start coming from.
The phrase has become increasingly common online, especially on X, usually attached to complaints about overcrowding, etiquette, influencer golf culture, or impossible tee time situations. Some of it is clearly joking. Some of it
absolutely isn’t.
And while much of that movement comes across as elitist, some of the underlying frustration is understandable. Golf used to feel easier to access for the people already immersed in it.
The Real Debate Behind “Shrink the Game”
At the same time, there’s also an undeniable “old guys yelling at clouds” element mixed into some of these conversations too, because for some golfers, the problem is not pace of play or packed tee sheets. The problem is simply that golf no longer looks the way they think it should.
Hoodies bother them. Music bothers them. YouTube golf bothers them. Golf carts with speakers bother them. Social media golf culture bothers them. Younger golfers treating golf as entertainment instead of tradition bothers them. Heck, young people in general bother them. It’s a story as old as time itself.
Maybe that’s part of the reality everyone has to accept now: golf no longer belongs to one specific type of person.

Some people want quiet early morning rounds and the sounds of birds chirping. Some want gambling games, drinks, music and buddy-trip golf. Some treat golf as escape. Others treat it as social entertainment. Most golfers probably fall somewhere in the middle, but that’s what makes this conversation complicated.
The “bro golfer” didn’t ruin golf, but the traditionalists aren’t completely imagining the changes either. Golf became more welcoming, more social, and more culturally relevant. It also became louder, more crowded, more expensive and occasionally less respectful.
Both things can be true at the same time.
And the reality is that the future of golf probably depends on whether those groups can coexist without completely ruining the experience for one another. Or better yet, they settle into the middle ground, respectfully enjoying the game their way while accepting others.
Shrinking the game isn’t really the answer either. Historically, when golf contracts, it contracts hard. Courses disappear. Public facilities struggle. Smaller brands die. Practice centers close. The version of golf people nostalgically romanticize online often ignores how fragile the business side of the sport actually is.
Golf needed growth. Now it’s trying to figure out how to handle what comes with it and right now, it still feels like we’re figuring that out in real time.





[QUOTE=”amarkabove, post: 14207036, member: 75272″]
Wrong thread bro.
[/QUOTE]
I mean, considering the thread and context…maybe a couple bro golfers are having a contest that requires balls in the fairway…are you sure it was wrong thread?
I enjoyed the article. Saw I might be more of a bro golfer than I ever thought, would be interested to see how I look through the eyes of others.
I do see one downside of…well, our company calls it “street golf”. You can assume it involved lots of Titos, loud music (often dualing from two carts),and a mix of play from a guy who won’t break a hundred to a couple of guys who are going to shoot 68 more than they are going to shoot 75, lot of laughs, trash talk, betting that I don’t get i involved in (I have zero interest in betting 20 bucks, much less a mortgage payment or three), shouts when putts are made…or missed..
well, one time we were playing in a gated, high end area. The group was playing street golf as they like to call it, I think it would fall under the bro golf umbrella…we are on the green, easily able to hear Salt and Pepa blasting the ever classy lyrics, “Ah, push it, get up on this, ah, push it” as Mama and her 8 or 10 year old daughter bicycle around the corner…dude whose speaker it was sprinting over to the cart to change the station…I still laugh.
I presume many people in this thread would not. I don’t begrudge their take.
Here is the thing..our group, age-wise…I think the youngest is over 30. I am towards the older end in mid-50s.
The Bro golf thing has been with it, just now it has a name maybe?
And I have no side in it. I don’t drink. Don’t care if others do. When I play music it is because I am playing a solo round and have it on my earbuds. Don’t care if others blast music, play two speakers, or what they do.
One of the people at our recent experience had the “Look good, play good” rationale for tucking shirts…I happen to think tucked shirts look terrible on most people but don’t really care if others tuck, don’t tuck, half-tuck or something else…
I think there is room for all and honestly about the only ones that upset me in either direction are the ones who, as one example, have the “my round was ruined. I saw someone wearing jeans”
[QUOTE=”Meryn, post: 14207629, member: 86338″]
I don’t think it is a bad thing at all as long as it doesn’t get too out of hand.
[/QUOTE]
Begs the question “where’s the line” and who decides.
[QUOTE=”Gsea, post: 14207821, member: 69717″]
Begs the question “where’s the line” and who decides.
[/QUOTE]
I guess If I am playing with some bros I’ll decide where the line is for me. It really bothers me when people drink too much on the course. I don’t drink on the course. So that’s my line, stay sober! I’m fine with most other things like music or short shorts.
[QUOTE=”Gsea, post: 14207821, member: 69717″]
Begs the question “where’s the line” and who decides.
[/QUOTE]
I think ultimately it’s up to the courses to decide what they will and wont allow. Then the golfers will let them know how they feel about those decisions by either paying to play there or not doing so.
[QUOTE=”TWright, post: 14207871, member: 11048″]
I think ultimately it’s up to the courses to decide what they will and wont allow. Then the golfers will let them know how they feel about those decisions by either paying to play there or not doing so.
[/QUOTE]
It’s been my experience that the vast majority of courses are pretty reasonable and tolerant as to what they’ll allow. Chances are that if somebody is doing something egregious enough for the course to say something about it, they’re probably way out of line.
Enjoyed the article, and it raised some good points. However, the post covid golf boom didn’t suddenly result in some people getting drunk or high on the course. Heck, I’ve seen that for 40+ years. What it did was bring a lot more people in that made it more visible.
Really enjoyed this. I think it's the best article I have read on any golf forum in quite a while. At 58 years old I understand the need to "grow the game" but when it comes at the cost of having to deal with people that refuse to learn the proper etiquettes, I have no use for the term. Music or loud clothes don't bother me. What does is long rounds, 4 guys squatting on the green at the same time reading greens when they have no clue what they are looking at, carts that zig zag from one ball to the next, only to park right next to the green as the lazy asses in them are afraid to walk 30 yards. I also get tired of the "loud" golfers who have to talk so you can hear them from 3 holes over. I prefer the pre-covid golf compared to how the game is now.
[QUOTE=”Stribs, post: 14207217, member: 16603″]
I asked AI to create me a ‘bro golfer’….here is the result….for fun only.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1784648502913.png”]9450124[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Now do sky fister!
🤣
Great piece, Hawk
”…settle into the middle ground, respectfully enjoying the game their way while accepting others.”
That line is well said and applies to every divide we’ve created as a species.
I dont agree with what seems to be the gist here implying that golf was dying till only then saved by covid and the new bro golfers. I also dont agree with the golf intimidating thing.
Reason i say the first poart is because the whole "golf is dying" and or "whats wrong with golf" and grow the game concept at that time was nothing more than an illusion created by a previous greatest influx and over expansion the game ever seen since the one created decades earier via Jack and Arny.
It was the tiger boom (or influx). And just on side note for a moment. That wasnt simply just due to tiger alone but was a combo of Tiger and coincidental timing of the whole computer age explosion. Tiger and also that explosion of socail media and information highway at fingertips around the world just haoen to align together helping creating it all. He and it made for the greatest golf boom ever. Jack and Arny (at thier time) had one too which was also in coincidence with the TV broadcasting boom explosion of that era reaching households as never before. It was sort of the same thing. The player/s and also aligning coincidentally with a media boom of the given era. Different type but same scenarios.
Anyway…back to my topic response. The illusion golf had something wrong with it and was dying. The Tiger/modern www created influx was so massive that the game and in the industry associated with it over expanded. Everyone and anyone who could was taking financial advantage of an enormous fat cask cow influx. Building courses and golf communities all over the map, practice centers, instruction, new businesses popping up, makers of equipment advertising the next greatest latest boomerrocketlaunchermasterblaster clubs, club fitters, and etc….everyone was trying to draw the milk from the fat cash cow. But that was certain to eventually go back to normalcy. And when it did, the over expansion they created now had a void. Appearing as though golf was dying or something is wrong with the game. When in reality all it was doing was returning back to normalcy once the greatest influx fad fizzled out.
In the end there was nothing wrong with golf and it wasnt dying nor a desperate need to grow it. There were still more participation than there was before the influx. Had the influx never taken place nor the over expansion to draw fat cash cows milk , there never would been this illusion which created something that really didnt exist. Golf would just been normal and grew or not grown at the rate as always. Take the same participation after the influx phased out (when all were saying golf was dying) and compare that to before the influx began. And now remove the influx and the over expansion from the picture….you would see golf had actually grown and nothing was ever wrong.
So this is an issue i have wih the article because is based on an notion that golf was dying….. till it was then saved by the bro golfer. And I dont believe golf was dying. And it didnt need covid nor the bro golfer to save it. It would still exist and be just fine. Sure some places change for better or worse in given areas but even that is also normal thing that always took/takes place through time. .
My county opened two new courses (was 3 then became 5) during the influx . They too wanted to milk the fat cow and when the influx died they didnt close, They still very lucrative and remained so since. We didnt need the new bro golfer to save golf here.
I never found golf intimidating and i been playing before the tiger influx. I even tinkered some in the late 70's and bit more in the 80's. I was just a regular 20something of no high finances with divorced parents who hung out with my friends on the street corners and school yards. Juts an average young man livjng an average pay to pay life. I was never intimidated when took up golf and began hitting local courses whenh i could afford and had the time.
Why are etiquettes like behaviors and dress intimidating? I was raised to act with etiquette and respect for them. How in the world is that ever intimidating of a thing. I had expected ways of behaving and presenting myself when around elders and when vsiting relatives and grandparents and or going places with the family. Why or how is anything on a golf course ever so different or intimidating?
Wanting to fit in to anything and everything the way one sees fit to suit them is what the problem is. Thats not an intimidation thing, Its a not wanting to conform to expected etiquettes problem.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 14206876, member: 1579″]
Living in the heart of a true college party town, I see plenty of bro golfers given two courses here do 1200/year with cart memberships, but I see just as many angry olds too. It’s a never ending teeter totter of chaos.
One thing I have found though, the young are receptive to learning, and as they age, most of them do as they spend more time around the game. On the other side, it very much remains a lot of my way or the highway.
Finding that middle ground is key, and boy, is the footing there slippery 😂
[/QUOTE]
That is typically a younger characteristic that they absorb and learn, as that is there primary activity – schools / or learning skills on the job/
careers . The flip side is those that are recalcitrant & resistive to change, learning . That’s can be applied to bothe end of the age spectrum
[QUOTE=”amarkabove, post: 14206885, member: 75272″]
Oh god. Imagine the pace issues at a golf DMV.
[/QUOTE]
Hahaha but you can have a template and learn expectation , for if you have no idea , what is acceptable ?
[QUOTE=”amarkabove, post: 14206956, member: 75272″]
I can see the Far Side style comic in my head of someone at a counter calling the next number: 4, and everyone in the waiting room ducking.
[/QUOTE]
Brilliant , insight 👏👏👏👏😂😂😂😂😂😂👍🏻
Wow , lve read the vast majority of contributions ,from page 1 onward.
Couple of points , great discussion , and emanating from a contemporary pov [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER]
Bravo to all ,👏 for comprehensive replies and debate .
To me, it’s encapsulated in “ standards “ what they are , what your prepare to accept and empathy for the offence of others and what they equally consider as standards.
And relatedly – Not all change is progress , and not all progress is forward .
Much I agree with , and segments I don’t .
Golf is about , playing a game , but your sharing a space , and it’s not your property, respect yourself and others and property your on . Abide by what’s asked of you .
No less than many other facets of society , there’s norms and standards .
[QUOTE=”Hawkins, post: 14207162, member: 85341″]
That’s still not entirely true. Supply will always shift if there is demand. Private money (not private courses) goes to where demand is.
So if there truly is a supply issue then it will get resolved in some fashion over a reasonable time period. What we are seeing though is that for years supply outpaced demand, now it is shifting the other way.
[/QUOTE]
You’re correct but you’re missing the dynamic aspect of the land market. The market is telling us right now that the average price of a round needs to be 300ish (based on resort golf costs) to really be where current evaluations say a course is more profitable than track homes. This might even be a little skewed as places like the keep also offer real estate too. So you’re right the market is correcting to offer what’s profitable the problem again is how many people can afford $300 weekly tee times?
I finally read this. I guess I am a mix of Traditional and Bro Golfer.
I like music on the course and just installed a Bluetooth speaker in our cart, but I also don’t play it loud, I just wanted a speaker that I didn’t need to worry about keeping charged and I wanted it out of the way and to sound good.
I also don’t drink on the course very often. If I do, it’s a beer at the turn, but that’s it.
We love to have a good time and if you are drinking, betting, wearing your hoodie and jamming with your tunes, I will play with you, no problem. But I am not going to be involved in the drunken fight, if it happens. :LOL:
[QUOTE=”Bosco…, post: 14207999, member: 65357″]
Now do sky fister!
🤣
[/QUOTE]
would just be a pic of me so….
Again, just wanted to say that I appreciated all your thoughtful comments on this. I was hoping to capture both sides of this divisive topic, because I really do feel like the middle ground is where the best solutions lie. Golf is definitely changing, and there’s room for new styles and attitudes, assuming everybody can still maintain the things that makes the game unique.
Don’t like music on the course so if your a fairway over turn your music down why should I have to listen to it ? Wear your shirt in or out , hat backwards ok . Have all the fun you want to but I don’t want to be involved if your two fairways away just remember there other people on the course also .
Question to [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] ,is
Your view and initial curiosity , based upon what’s you’ve seen in US ? Or have you international evidence ? Is it a cultural thing ? Or fleeting wave ?
Don’t usually have a problem with the golf bro crowd, except when I’m behind them in line and they’re inevitably ordering 8 transfusions at the turn which take FOREVER to make, and/or not caring for the course.
[QUOTE=”Hitsnmisses, post: 14210845, member: 64316″]
Question to [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] ,is
Your view and initial curiosity , based upon what’s you’ve seen in US ? Or have you international evidence ? Is it a cultural thing ? Or fleeting wave ?
[/QUOTE]
This is really more about what I’ve seen in the US, along with social media.
[QUOTE=”wadesworld, post: 14210882, member: 13304″]
Don’t usually have a problem with the golf bro crowd, except when I’m behind them in line and they’re inevitably ordering 8 transfusions at the turn which take FOREVER to make, and/or not caring for the course.
[/QUOTE]
I thought the bro golfers all drank White Claws and High Noons. :LOL:
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 14211236, member: 1193″]
This is really more about what I’ve seen in the US, along with social media.
[/QUOTE]
Thanks mate .
Great article [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER]
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 14211271, member: 3386″]
I thought the bro golfers all drank White Claws and High Noons. :LOL:
[/QUOTE]
I’ve seen plenty of olds put both of those away around here too! 😂😂
Attire standards are not intimidating nor are they an exclusive thing. All they are , is a simply way to remind people that there is an expected level of behavior etiquettes while at/on the golf course or facility. And are something very easy to do.
Unfortunate when dealing with a lot of people and or certainly the masses in general there is a real percentage of them that do actually need to be reminded of maintaining good behavior etiquette some how. That is why in the many things we do where we go for enjoyment there are more and more rules and regulations and even laws put in place. People that ruin things for everyone cause the need for rules and regulations that then place some damper on all our enjoyment when we go places to do our things.
Used to be allowed to do this and or that and the other thing while at place x….now…cant do this anymore, that is limited and etc. Why? because behaviour lacking people ruin it for everyone. Poorly behaved people lacking etiquette and lacking any downright common coexisting social courtesies decorum have caused many rules be upgraded and or produced in the first place. So there is a need (unfortunately so) to let people now that a given level of behavior and etiquette is expected. One small way to do that without handing everyone a written document of pages on behavior and coexisting courtesies is to simply have a minor dress code. Its nothing more than a reminder of that which many people do actually unfortunately need to be told.
Sure..I and you can show up in tank top and flipflops and behave with etiquette. But dress up/down does raise/lower ones awareness even if just a little. When more laxed in dress we tend to lax our general behavior guard down a little. Two extremes wear a suit vs a tank and flopflops. In those two extreme environments we will likely have a little higher and or lower awareness for how we act and speak even if all on the better side. Problem is do that with people who do lack a lot and often lie on the worse side and that little difference can be very noticeable.
So all the minor dress code does is try to send a small message good etiquette behavior and decorum is expected. And so that all those there can expect that including yourself. If one feels intimidated by that or excluded by that or feel thats snobby , I dont know what to say. I mean your intimidated or feel excluded from the idea of presenting good decorum and etiquette behavior? And feel those who maintain such are snobby? Truth is no one is intimidated by that or excluded from that, nor is that snobby, but just rebelling against it. Maybe one just cant fit into that terrible horrible idea of good etiquette. And fine but not everything has to fit everyone the way they see fit.
Fantastic article @Hawk !
I was part of the Tiger golf boom back in the early 90s. I literally picked up the game in my early 20s because of him. As a black dude golf wasn't on my radar as something cool or fun to do until he arrived. When I'm not playing a league round, 90% of my golf is with a group of local golfers who've played together for over a decade in the same demographic. (the original bro golfers ✊🏾,lol.)
But it wasn't just minorities, young people of all backgrounds were picking up golf. Courses were packed. People complained of increased demand and prices.
I'd say the biggest difference between that era and current era is attitude. Back then, new golfers felt an overwhelming sense of pressure to 'fit in'. You wanted to look like you 'belonged' from ettitquette, to attire to how you carried yourself on the course.
Current bro culture golfers are more influenced (like many people) by social media and what they see online than what they experience in person. I know I'm going to sound like an old man, but there's a sense of 'entitlement' to do things 'their way' that rubs some people wrong.
By and large most people don't care what other golfers do as long as they respect the game, the course, and their fellow players. Playing music is fine (I do it myself). But playing it loud enough for someone to hear that's in another group is too loud. As the article said, drinking has always been part of the game. But don't get fall down drunk or take an eternity having the cart girl sell a cocktail she has to mix as four separate transactions. If you want to take videos/pictures on the course…don't hold things up.
That being said, my only real issue with the influx of new players is how hard it is to get tee times now. I live in the DFW area. And despite having dozens of public courses, it's a scramble as soon as times open to get a decent time. And costs are litterally 50% higher or more for weekend rounds.
I honestly don't get how bro golfer affords it. If golf cost this much (adjusted for 1990s dollars) in my twenties, I wouldn't have played nearly as much.
The one downside to this boom compaed to the 90s is the increase in demand is not resulting in an increase in supply. New courses were springing up like mushrooms back then. A lot of courses closed in the 2010s. With real estate and building costs being so high and recent history being brutal, it seems new course construction isn't happening.
[QUOTE=”mantan, post: 14211475, member: 51648″]
Fantastic article [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] !
I was part of the Tiger golf boom back in the early 90s. I literally picked up the game in my early 20s because of him. As a black dude golf wasn’t on my radar as something cool or fun to do until he arrived. When I’m not playing a league round, 90% of my golf is with a group of local golfers who’ve played together for over a decade in the same demographic. (the original bro golfers ✊🏾,lol.)
But it wasn’t just minorities, young people of all backgrounds were picking up golf. Courses were packed. People complained of increased demand and prices.
I’d say the biggest difference between that era and current era is attitude. Back then, new golfers felt an overwhelming sense of pressure to ‘fit in’. You wanted to look like you ‘belonged’ from ettitquette, to attire to how your carried yourself on the course.
Current bro culturet golfers are more influenced (like many people) by social media and what they see online than what they experience in person. I know I’m going to sound like an old man, but there’s a sense of ‘entitlement’ to do things ‘their way’ that rubs some people wrong.
By and large most people don’t care what other golfers do as long as they respect the game, the course, and their fellow players. Playing music is fine (I do it myself). But playing it loud enough for someone to hear that’s in another group is too loud. As the article said, drinking has always been part of the game. But don’t get fall down drunk or take an enternity having the cart girl sell a cocktail she has to mix as four separate transactions. If you want to take videos/pictures on the course…don’t hold things up.
That being said, my only real issue with the influx of new players is how hard it is to get tee times now. I live in the DFW area. And despite having dozens of public courses, it’s a scramble as soon as times open to get a decent time. And costs are litterally 50% higher or more for weekend rounds.
I honestly don’t get how bro golfer affords it. If golf cost this much (adjusted for 1990s dollars) in my twenties, I wouldn’t have played nearly as much.
The one downside to this boom compaed to the 90s is the increase in demand is not resulting in an increase in supply. New courses were springing up like mushrooms back then. A lot of courses closed in the 2010s. With real estate and building costs being so high and recent history being brutal, it seems new course construction isn’t happening.
[/QUOTE]
In my first response to this thread, I asked the question [I]how did the Covid boom compare to the Tiger boom? [/I]Yours is a good perspective. Thanks.
I didn’t get into golf until 2010 and my “mentor” was my son – who was very much a rules and etiquette guy. He had the greatest impact on how I behaved on the course. As you pointed out, I just wanted to fit in – or at least not stick out like a sore thumb.
Shortly afterwards, I joined a different golf forum, and that form of social media became a significant influence on how I acted. The opinion that pace of play issues was somehow caused by Covid golfers doesn’t hold water.
I think you nailed it by saying Covid simply brought more people playing relative to the number golf courses and not necessarily a higher [I]percentage[/I] of golfers doing the wrong things. The most egregious memories I have of other golfers being a-holes came about before Covid.