During its annual PGA Tour stop at The Memorial, Titleist unveiled its latest lineup of drivers, generating high anticipation due to the success of its previous releases, including the TS, TSi, and TSR drivers. Those drivers were all developed as part of the Titleist Speed Project, which has been a massive success, resulting in them being the most-played driver on the PGA Tour for the past five years. Today, we can finally share the official details of the new Titleist GT drivers. There has been a lot of talk and speculation about this lineup, but one thing is for sure: Titleist continues to build on its momentum and, with a significant material change, shows no signs of slowing down.

“The GT line represents a monumental leap forward for Titleist driver design and engineering,” said Stephanie Luttrell, Director of Titleist Metalwood Product Development. The breakthroughs we made in material, construction, shaping, and design weren’t possible in prior generations. All the advancements found in GT are working in concert to create the highest-performing driver we have ever made.”
Titleist’s GT release marks a significant change as they move away from using a titanium crown and introduce a new era of drivers with a never-before-used crown material. Each driver in the GT lineup features a Seamless Thermoform Crown made of a Proprietary Matrix Polymer. Titleist realized that to enhance the speed of the TSR, they needed to move away from the all-titanium designs. This material change resulted in an approximately three times lighter crown, which unlocked significant internal weight changes. Furthermore, wrapping the crown around the edges and down to the sole provides the advantage of manipulating the center of gravity locations and lends itself to an incredibly clean and seamless look.

Titleist fans may be concerned about the impact of the new crown material on the classic Titleist driver sound. The industry’s shift towards carbon fiber/composite crowns has varied drivers’ sound profiles. For Titleist, maintaining their unique sound was a top priority for the R&D team. Thankfully, the new proprietary matrix polymer not only reduces weight but also possesses unique acoustic properties, enabling Titleist engineers to fine-tune the sound profile. This ensures that golfers will have a driver with exceptional sound and feel.
The new crown material allows for significant internal adjustments. Switching to a three-times lighter crown has created many new possibilities. Club designers always aim to remove limitations and explore countless options, and that’s precisely what occurred here. As a result, Titleist engineers developed a new Split Mass Construction, allowing them to place weight exactly where it’s most beneficial within the clubhead.
With Split Mass Construction, weight was divided up, with some being pushed low and forward to dial up the speed while the remainder found its way towards the back of the head to enhance stability and increase MOI. The positioning of internal weights differs across the three heads of the GT lineup, as they have three distinct profiles. This allows golfers to find the GT driver that offers them the best combination of launch, speed, and spin. With all the possibilities, the easiest way to determine which head works best for your game is to go and get fit.

Another change that was implemented due to the shift from titanium was the aerodynamic properties. Thanks to the new internal construction and weight distribution, Titleist was able to take a closer look at how aerodynamics will affect the clubhead throughout the swing. With improved shaping, particularly to the crown and sole curvature, Titleist optimized airflow and reduced turbulence and drag. According to Stephanie Luttrell, “The result is a significant gain in clubhead speed.”

Speaking of speed, Titleist takes advantage of two main face technologies to help produce intense ball speeds across the entire lineup. It starts with an upgraded titanium Speed Ring, stabilizing the clubface’s perimeter. A reinforced perimeter maximizes the COR and produces maximum ball speeds on shots that find the center of the face. For off-center contact, a Variable Face Thickness (VFT) helps maintain ball speeds while reducing the amount of distance loss.

“When we release a new product, it has to outperform the previous line,” said Josh Talge, Vice President of Titleist Golf Club Marketing. “For GT, it needed to be faster than TSR. It needed to be longer and straighter, and it had to sound better, look better, and feel better. GT delivers across the board without compromise.”
Titleist GT2
The GT2 driver maintains the same classification as previous releases. It is designed for golfers who seek a fast and forgiving driver that achieves a high launch and low spin. The GT2 features an upgraded Speed Ring and VFT, resulting in improved ball speeds across the face, and it offers maximum stability with its higher MOI design.

In developing the GT2, Titleist aimed to combine a confidence-inspiring shape with enhanced aerodynamics. The result is a 460cc clubhead with a longer front-to-back profile and a slightly shallower face height while incorporating more of the classic pear shape. This design is expected to appeal to a wide range of golfers, especially those who favor the shape of a GT3 but seek the extra forgiveness offered by the GT2. Additionally, there is a 9-gram weight positioned in the rear that can be swapped out to adjust both headweight and swingweight.
Standard Length: 45.5″
Lofts: 8°, 9°, 10°, 11° (RH/LH)
Titleist GT3
Titleist offers the GT3 for players who want maximum adjustability to fine-tune their distance and shot shape. One of the key changes is the Adjustable CG Track, which has been moved to a more forward position closer to the face. This track allows golfers and fitters to choose from five CG locations (H2, H1, N, T1, T2) to match their center of gravity position with their strike tendencies. Finding the best location on this track can help generate even more speed and ensure a more consistent ball flight. According to Titleist, the results are even more noticeable in the GT3 because of the forward location of the track.

Similar to the GT2, the GT3 features a 460cc clubhead, appearing as if it’s more compact and even more pear-shaped. Golfers should expect higher speeds than the TSR3, thanks partly to the improved aerodynamic shaping.
Standard Length: 45.5″
Lofts: 8°, 9°, 10°, 11° (RH/LH)
Titleist GT4
Titleist targets the better player with the GT4, designed for those with higher swing speeds who struggle to keep their spin rates under 3,000 RPM. The GT4 stands out with its mid-launch profile, providing a more penetrating ball flight and the ability to reduce spin. Unlike the GT2 and GT3, this driver head is 430cc, making it the most compact and classic-looking profile in the lineup.

Like the TSR4, the GT4 features two swappable weights, one located on the rear of the sole and the other closer to the face. Players looking to reduce spin the most can place the 11-gram weight forward and the 3-gram weight in the back. Meanwhile, those seeking a more stable/balanced setting can move the heavy weight to the rear.
Standard Length: 45.5″
Lofts: 8°, 9°, 10° (RH/LH)
Titleist offers a variety of shaft options, such as Project X Denali Red, Mitsubishi Tensei 1k Blue, Project X HZRDUS Black 5th Gen, and Mitsubishi Tensei 1K Black. Additionally, there is a premium Graphite Design option, including the Tour AD-VF, Tour AD-DI, and Tour AD-UB, which will cost an additional $200. If your preferred shaft is not listed, don’t worry, as Titleist has a deep selection of custom shafts to choose from.
Titleist GT drivers are currently available for fitting and will be hitting store shelves on August 23, 2024, for $649. Check out the selection at www.worldwidegolf.com.




Excited to try these!
Great write up. will be ordering one soon
These look GOOD.
My wallet really doesn’t need a new driver and TSR2 is still amazing for me, but my Titleist ho heart really does ?
[QUOTE=”ddec, post: 12518304, member: 782″]
it is odd. But hey, we are in a time now where Titleist is talking about a lighter crown and aerodynamics. That’s progress.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12518311, member: 1193″]
Agree 100%. It opens up so much for them now and down the road.
[/QUOTE]
I know, right? In 2 years they’ll release drivers that are on par with where TM and Callaway are today. Good stuff from titleist….
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12518220, member: 1193″]
Yea, I gotta know more. I want to go to the lab and wear a white coat. It’s really interesting stuff.
[/QUOTE]
It’s the very top question in my note with questions for the Experience.
[QUOTE=”Par5n2, post: 12518419, member: 79747″]
I know, right? In 2 years they’ll release drivers that are on par with where TM and Callaway are today. Good stuff from titleist….
[/QUOTE]
I myself wouldn’t put it like that. They’ve stayed in their own lane and gone at their pace. Yesterday I watched their 4 part series on the speed project and it was cool seeing their evolution. This continues down that path and opens up more possibilities.
Excited to try these, but based on the info, I imagine the GT2 and GT4 would be better fits than the 3. I was fit into the TSi3 an age ago so 2 generations afterwards, this will be a fun test.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9284422[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12518469, member: 3″]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_5032.jpeg”]9284422[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
The shaping almost makes the GT3 look closer in size to the 430cc GT4 than the 460cc we know it is. I like that.
[QUOTE=”ddec, post: 12518432, member: 782″]
I myself wouldn’t put it like that. They’ve stayed in their own lane and gone at their pace. Yesterday I watched their 4 part series on the speed project and it was cool seeing their evolution. This continues down that path and opens up more possibilities.
[/QUOTE]
I was definitely being a bit cheeky.
Seeing what I’ve seen from TM and Callaway th last 2 years, I was really hopeful that titleist (and their 2 yr cycles) would blow the industry off their rockers with this release. That’s just not the case. Tour reports have noted that this release is
– faster on off center strikes
– tighter spin deviation
There’s ZERO groundbreaking stuff there. Ooooh, a non-metal crown….
I was hopeful and titleist just hasn’t given me any reason to even go test it. I’ve had my backup gamer shaft sitting with a titleist adapter since before the memorial….hoping for something special. In that time, Callaway gave us the 3d max…a truly special driver.
[QUOTE=”Par5n2, post: 12518487, member: 79747″]
I was definitely being a bit cheeky.
Seeing what I’ve seen from TM and Callaway th last 2 years, I was really hopeful that titleist (and their 2 yr cycles) would blow the industry off their rockers with this release. That’s just not the case. Tour reports have noted that this release is
– faster on off center strikes
– tighter spin deviation
There’s ZERO groundbreaking stuff there. Ooooh, a non-metal crown….
I was hopeful and titleist just hasn’t given me any reason to even go test it. I’ve had my backup gamer shaft sitting with a titleist adapter since before the memorial….hoping for something special. In that time, Callaway gave us the 3d max…a truly special driver.
[/QUOTE]
Not even being willing to test it is certainly an interesting stance to take.
[QUOTE=”ryang13, post: 12518197, member: 67512″]
Great write-up [USER=782]@ddec[/USER]! Obviously I’ve been waiting for this one….patiently, and it was worth the wait. I’m very excited to get my mitts on these and to see if I end back up in a 2, or if the 3 is the ticket. I’ve had a great deal of success with the TSR, and it’s been a huge boost to my confidence off the tee box over the past year or so. [USER=53737]@OldandStiff[/USER] we may have to choose some new zesty trajectory music.
[/QUOTE]
I’m really excited to read your feedback on these during and after the exp.
[QUOTE=”Par5n2, post: 12518487, member: 79747″]
I was definitely being a bit cheeky.
Seeing what I’ve seen from TM and Callaway th last 2 years, I was really hopeful that titleist (and their 2 yr cycles) would blow the industry off their rockers with this release. That’s just not the case. Tour reports have noted that this release is
– faster on off center strikes
– tighter spin deviation
[B]There’s ZERO groundbreaking stuff there. Ooooh, a non-metal crown….[/B]
I was hopeful and titleist just hasn’t given me any reason to even go test it. I’ve had my backup gamer shaft sitting with a titleist adapter since before the memorial….hoping for something special. In that time, Callaway gave us the 3d max…a truly special driver.
[/QUOTE]
groundbreaking, flashy, knock your socks off…that’s not Titleist’s way.
[QUOTE=”amarkabove, post: 12518495, member: 75272″]
Not even being willing to test it is certainly an interesting stance to take.
[/QUOTE]
Testing new stuff starts to get tedious. I’m at the point where the needle has to get moved and this release sits in idle mode…
[QUOTE=”Par5n2, post: 12518512, member: 79747″]
Testing new stuff starts to get tedious. I’m at the point where the needle has to get moved and this release sits in idle mode…
[/QUOTE]
Everyone has their own stance and I’m cool with that, but I don’t think I’ve ever felt like testing new stuff is tedious :ROFLMAO:
[QUOTE=”Par5n2, post: 12518512, member: 79747″]
Testing new stuff starts to get tedious. I’m at the point where the needle has to get moved and this release sits in idle mode…
[/QUOTE]
It’s impossible to say that without testing it though. Taking one of the most consistent drivers out there and making it faster and tighter is not something I’d call “idle.” And sometimes being “groundbreaking” lead to things like faces flying off clubs.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12518469, member: 3″]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_5032.jpeg”]9284422[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
The nailed the looks in just about every way.
[QUOTE=”Par5n2, post: 12518487, member: 79747″]
I was definitely being a bit cheeky.
Seeing what I’ve seen from TM and Callaway th last 2 years, I was really hopeful that titleist (and their 2 yr cycles) would blow the industry off their rockers with this release. That’s just not the case. Tour reports have noted that this release is
– faster on off center strikes
– tighter spin deviation
There’s ZERO groundbreaking stuff there. Ooooh, a non-metal crown….
I was hopeful and titleist just hasn’t given me any reason to even go test it. I’ve had my backup gamer shaft sitting with a titleist adapter since before the memorial….hoping for something special. In that time, Callaway gave us the 3d max…a truly special driver.
[/QUOTE]
Do you buy a driver for performance or for a story? If it competes and can win what’s not to like, on the other hand just because their designs and changes aren’t flashy doesn’t mean they’re not huge upgrades.
Interesting to see them finally move away from the titanium crown. I wonder how much of that hold out was sound and waiting until the could get another material where they could still get the sound they wanted.
[QUOTE=”amarkabove, post: 12518471, member: 75272″]
The shaping almost makes the GT3 look closer in size to the 430cc GT4 than the 460cc we know it is. I like that.
[/QUOTE]
It does look that way. I do not have a preference yet, since shape is not a deal breaker, but there is a range of profiles here. Something to check out at address when testing.
I don’t think I’ve seen it mentioned in the release articles, but these are the same SureFit hosels from the past couple generations yeah?
I have to say that I’d almost want the GT3 just because of that cool slider in the front.
[QUOTE=”Golfers Anonymous, post: 12518529, member: 59233″]
Do you buy a driver for performance or for a story?
[/QUOTE]
That’s the best question I’ve heard asked on here in a while.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12518469, member: 3″]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_5032.jpeg”]9284422[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Really like the sole of the 4 for whatever reason ?. Probably is NOT the model I’ll be fit into but it’s a really pleasing shape.
[QUOTE=”ryang13, post: 12518621, member: 67512″]
Really like the sole of the 4 for whatever reason ?. Probably is NOT the model I’ll be fit into but it’s a really pleasing shape.
[/QUOTE]
I love everything about the look of the 4. There’s no way I’m getting fit into it with my occasional struggles to have a positive AoA, but man it looks good.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12518613, member: 1193″]
I have to say that I’d almost want the GT3 just because of that cool slider in the front.
[/QUOTE]
The cool slider on the back was cool too! Lol
I think the separation in the models will make people curious about the 3, or try harder to make it work, but that separation isn’t just in spin or looks. I mean when I first hit the 2 you’d be hard pressed as an observer to tell the difference between any of them. That was not the case with the 3.
[QUOTE=”OldandStiff, post: 12518636, member: 53737″]
The cool slider on the back was cool too! Lol
I think the separation in the models will make people curious about the 3, or try harder to make it work, but that separation isn’t just in spin or looks. I mean when I first hit the 2 you’d be hard pressed as an observer to tell the difference between any of them. That was not the case with the 3.
[/QUOTE]
Can you clarify that last statement a bit? I’m not sure I’m following you and I’m definitely interested.
[QUOTE=”Golfers Anonymous, post: 12518529, member: 59233″]
Do you buy a driver for performance or for a story? If it competes and can win what’s not to like, on the other hand just because their designs and changes aren’t flashy doesn’t mean they’re not huge upgrades.
[/QUOTE]
I’ve hit so much stuff the last few years. Drivers are getting better and better…but minorly incrementally better.
The gap between fast vs forgiving is closing. But not much stuff released is “special”. Heck, callaway had to release a tour only head, in limited quantities, to reach “special” status.
I personally believe that OEMs know how to make that super fast and super forgiving driver. I think they also know that as soon as they do, there’s nowhere else to go. So we get incremental improvements. That’s why I had hope with this release.
No doubt the driver will compete with the big boys. But I’m not looking to spend $600+ on something that competes. For that, it has to beat what’s in my bag. I just don’t see anything in this release that is different than anything else out right now. I’ll hit them soon since I already have a gamer shaft with the adapter. Maybe one of them will surprise me. But I have big time doubts.
Great write up [USER=782]@ddec[/USER]! Those are great looking drivers. I wonder just how much the club head speed improves with the new design.
[QUOTE=”Golfers Anonymous, post: 12518529, member: 59233″]
Do you buy a driver for performance or for a story?
[/QUOTE]
This states it in such a perfectly succinct way. The vast majority of objective testing showed that the TSR series stood up to any other offering available. The TSR3 may ave been the best driver that I have ever hit. In no way was Titleist lagging in any way in objective performance.
Plus, I actually think there is a story here. This new material is something that may be completely different than what otherwise is available. It sounds very interesting to me.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12518640, member: 1193″]
Can you clarify that last statement a bit? I’m not sure I’m following you and I’m definitely interested.
[/QUOTE]
Weight forward tends to make things a little more challenging and a little less consistent in terms of ball flights with a human hitting it. The 3 had more variation. The 2 seemed easy. Not that the 3 is inconsistent or anything, just that we are. We all have our choices to make on what’s ultimately going to benefit us most. I’m playing the 3, but I could play the 2 happily.
[QUOTE=”OldandStiff, post: 12518677, member: 53737″]
Weight forward tends to make things a little more challenging and a little less consistent in terms of ball flights with a human hitting it. The 3 had more variation. The 2 seemed easy. Not that the 3 is inconsistent or anything, just that we are. We all have our choices to make on what’s ultimately going to benefit us most. I’m playing the 3, but I could play the 2 happily.
[/QUOTE]
That makes perfect sense. I’m definitely not the target player for the 3 and would 100% end up in the 2.
To that end, I feel like I read the 2 was reshaped a bit to bring it more in line with what we’d expect from Titleist.
[QUOTE=”OldandStiff, post: 12518677, member: 53737″]
Weight forward tends to make things a little more challenging and a little less consistent in terms of ball flights with a human hitting it. The 3 had more variation. The 2 seemed easy. Not that the 3 is inconsistent or anything, just that we are. We all have our choices to make on what’s ultimately going to benefit us most. I’m playing the 3, but I could play the 2 happily.
[/QUOTE]
Do you have enough swings in to have an idea of spin difference between the 2 and the 3?
[QUOTE=”Par5n2, post: 12518650, member: 79747″]
I’ve hit so much stuff the last few years. Drivers are getting better and better…but minorly incrementally better.
The gap between fast vs forgiving is closing. But not much stuff released is “special”. Heck, callaway had to release a tour only head, in limited quantities, to reach “special” status.
I personally believe that OEMs know how to make that super fast and super forgiving driver. I think they also know that as soon as they do, there’s nowhere else to go. So we get incremental improvements. That’s why I had hope with this release.
No doubt the driver will compete with the big boys. But I’m not looking to spend $600+ on something that competes. For that, it has to beat what’s in my bag. I just don’t see anything in this release that is different than anything else out right now. I’ll hit them soon since I already have a gamer shaft with the adapter. Maybe one of them will surprise me. But I have big time doubts.
[/QUOTE]
Manufacturers would love if everyone bought new equipment every year but say themselves 5 or so years has to lapse to see substantial differences in performance from a numbers perspective. But cosmetically a shape may suit someone’s eye better or maybe the acoustics if they choose to go year to year. Overall in club design 1+1 won’t always equal 2. It could be considerably better or even worse but when new variables are added to AI and such different outcomes emerge, then when those emergences are added even more outcomes occur and it’s a continual process but the idea of them throttling innovation to keep the money coming isn’t as valid as many seem to think.
[QUOTE=”Golfers Anonymous, post: 12518733, member: 59233″]
Manufacturers would love if everyone bought new equipment every year but say themselves 5 or so years has to lapse to see substantial differences in performance from a numbers perspective. But cosmetically a shape may suit someone’s eye better or maybe the acoustics if they choose to go year to year. Overall in club design 1+1 won’t always equal 2. It could be considerably better or even worse but when new variables are added to AI and such different outcomes emerge, then when those emergences are added even more outcomes occur and it’s a continual process but the idea of them throttling innovation to keep the money coming isn’t as valid as many seem to think.
[/QUOTE]
I personally think it makes no sense for a manufacturer to hold back something that is ready for release at the time of release. The competition is keen and every OEM would want to claim any advantage that it has created. I just doesn’t make business sense, even more so, where Titleist releases on two year cycles. Its products have to hold up for two years against most OEMs who are claiming something new every 12 months.
[QUOTE=”OldandStiff, post: 12518636, member: 53737″]
The cool slider on the back was cool too! Lol
I think the separation in the models will make people curious about the 3, or try harder to make it work, but that separation isn’t just in spin or looks. I mean when I first hit the 2 you’d be hard pressed as an observer to tell the difference between any of them. That was not the case with the 3.
[/QUOTE]
I’m assuming there are some acoustic differences between the gt3 and gt2 with the weight track of the three right? Or do they both sound pretty similar in your experience?
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 12518752, member: 65950″]
I’m assuming there are some acoustic differences between the gt3 and gt2 with the weight track of the three right? Or do they both sound pretty similar in your experience?
[/QUOTE]
I can tell the difference. Again, I was fit into and am playing the 3, but I like the sound of the 2 a little more. They’re both great though. Satisfying. The material is really cool and it’s fun to see changes like that but still know what you’re hitting.
[QUOTE=”Tenputt, post: 12518729, member: 42964″]
Do you have enough swings in to have an idea of spin difference between the 2 and the 3?
[/QUOTE]
For me, yeah. It’ll be a little different for everyone depending on how they deliver it though.
Really interssting lineup. I like what they are doing here. Very interesting to me how they can use the polymers to tune sound. I appreciare they consider the soubd and go to the effort they do for consistency with it. I have never actually hit a Titleist driver. Might have to see if i can somewhere.
[QUOTE=”OldandStiff, post: 12518807, member: 53737″]
For me, yeah. It’ll be a little different for everyone depending on how they deliver it though.
[/QUOTE]
Understood. I was just trying to get a general idea of general gap between the two.
Great article [USER=782]@ddec[/USER]!
Firstly, GT is such a good name for a driver. I’m instantly drawn in just because of that. I’m really curious what the proprietary material is, but it sure is a cool design. And having the titanium ring around the face makes so much sense in my mind. Based on the writeup, I’d probably start with the GT2, and wonder how the GT3 would perform. Not sure I could handle the 430cc GT4.
Really nice stock shaft options too!
Sure been a minute since I played a Titleist driver… last I had was the 913 D2!
No question these are going to be popular. I think both 2 and 3 will find their way in a lot of bags. They look great and even with the material change they still sound like a Titleist driver which as we read was important. The tech story however to me seems like they are finally catching up to other brands in that dept. The talk of Aerodynamics and moving weight around we have heard before, the wrapping of the crown and lighter materials may be new to Titleist but not new to the driver category. That being said, its about time.
Great write-up [USER=782]@ddec[/USER]! It was jam packed with tech and design improvements! Very fun to read.
GT2 sounds like it fits my game, but the GT3 shaping catches my eye a little more. There is going to be SOOO much great stuff to dive into during the Titleist Experience!
[QUOTE=”jdtox, post: 12518961, member: 5944″]
No question these are going to be popular. I think both 2 and 3 will find their way in a lot of bags. They look great and even with the material change they still sound like a Titleist driver which as we read was important. The tech story however to me seems like they are finally catching up to other brands in that dept. The talk of Aerodynamics and moving weight around we have heard before, the wrapping of the crown and lighter materials may be new to Titleist but not new to the driver category. That being said, its about time.
[/QUOTE]
100%. Wonder how many eye roll and wtf emoji reactions you’ll get…
[QUOTE=”Par5n2, post: 12519013, member: 79747″]
100%. Wonder how many eye roll and wtf emoji reactions you’ll get…
[/QUOTE]
Cmon man. Shit like this isn’t necessary here. It’s okay to disagree with people on THP and do so civilly
[QUOTE=”OldandStiff, post: 12518807, member: 53737″]
For me, yeah. It’ll be a little different for everyone depending on how they deliver it though.
[/QUOTE]
I am tsking a mental note to grab some numbers between the 2 and 3 for my fitting to see the difference with my inconsistent swing. With the information given, other than ‘probably not the GT3’, I don’t have a good guess as to what I will fit into with an already high ball flight and sometimes, higher spin.
[QUOTE=”jdtox, post: 12518961, member: 5944″]
No question these are going to be popular. I think both 2 and 3 will find their way in a lot of bags. They look great and even with the material change they still sound like a Titleist driver which as we read was important. The tech story however to me seems like they are finally catching up to other brands in that dept. The talk of Aerodynamics and moving weight around we have heard before, the wrapping of the crown and lighter materials may be new to Titleist but not new to the driver category. That being said, its about time.
[/QUOTE]
Oddly enough when I was reading about the wrapping of the crown I was thinking of what Tour Edge did with C723 and how good that looked(ridgeback aside).
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12519021, member: 3″]
Cmon man. **** like this isn’t necessary here. It’s okay to disagree with people on THP and do so civilly
[/QUOTE]
Lol. Because a WTF emoji screams civility…right?
[QUOTE=”Par5n2, post: 12519044, member: 79747″]
Lol. Because a WTF emoji screams civility…right?
[/QUOTE]
I mean the person who used that emoji had a back and forth conversational tone few posts with you after that.
There’s no need to have a good guess. Just go in open minded and see how it shakes out! It’s not always what you’d expect.