During its annual PGA Tour stop at The Memorial, Titleist unveiled its latest lineup of drivers, generating high anticipation due to the success of its previous releases, including the TS, TSi, and TSR drivers. Those drivers were all developed as part of the Titleist Speed Project, which has been a massive success, resulting in them being the most-played driver on the PGA Tour for the past five years. Today, we can finally share the official details of the new Titleist GT drivers. There has been a lot of talk and speculation about this lineup, but one thing is for sure: Titleist continues to build on its momentum and, with a significant material change, shows no signs of slowing down.

“The GT line represents a monumental leap forward for Titleist driver design and engineering,” said Stephanie Luttrell, Director of Titleist Metalwood Product Development. The breakthroughs we made in material, construction, shaping, and design weren’t possible in prior generations. All the advancements found in GT are working in concert to create the highest-performing driver we have ever made.”
Titleist’s GT release marks a significant change as they move away from using a titanium crown and introduce a new era of drivers with a never-before-used crown material. Each driver in the GT lineup features a Seamless Thermoform Crown made of a Proprietary Matrix Polymer. Titleist realized that to enhance the speed of the TSR, they needed to move away from the all-titanium designs. This material change resulted in an approximately three times lighter crown, which unlocked significant internal weight changes. Furthermore, wrapping the crown around the edges and down to the sole provides the advantage of manipulating the center of gravity locations and lends itself to an incredibly clean and seamless look.

Titleist fans may be concerned about the impact of the new crown material on the classic Titleist driver sound. The industry’s shift towards carbon fiber/composite crowns has varied drivers’ sound profiles. For Titleist, maintaining their unique sound was a top priority for the R&D team. Thankfully, the new proprietary matrix polymer not only reduces weight but also possesses unique acoustic properties, enabling Titleist engineers to fine-tune the sound profile. This ensures that golfers will have a driver with exceptional sound and feel.
The new crown material allows for significant internal adjustments. Switching to a three-times lighter crown has created many new possibilities. Club designers always aim to remove limitations and explore countless options, and that’s precisely what occurred here. As a result, Titleist engineers developed a new Split Mass Construction, allowing them to place weight exactly where it’s most beneficial within the clubhead.
With Split Mass Construction, weight was divided up, with some being pushed low and forward to dial up the speed while the remainder found its way towards the back of the head to enhance stability and increase MOI. The positioning of internal weights differs across the three heads of the GT lineup, as they have three distinct profiles. This allows golfers to find the GT driver that offers them the best combination of launch, speed, and spin. With all the possibilities, the easiest way to determine which head works best for your game is to go and get fit.

Another change that was implemented due to the shift from titanium was the aerodynamic properties. Thanks to the new internal construction and weight distribution, Titleist was able to take a closer look at how aerodynamics will affect the clubhead throughout the swing. With improved shaping, particularly to the crown and sole curvature, Titleist optimized airflow and reduced turbulence and drag. According to Stephanie Luttrell, “The result is a significant gain in clubhead speed.”

Speaking of speed, Titleist takes advantage of two main face technologies to help produce intense ball speeds across the entire lineup. It starts with an upgraded titanium Speed Ring, stabilizing the clubface’s perimeter. A reinforced perimeter maximizes the COR and produces maximum ball speeds on shots that find the center of the face. For off-center contact, a Variable Face Thickness (VFT) helps maintain ball speeds while reducing the amount of distance loss.

“When we release a new product, it has to outperform the previous line,” said Josh Talge, Vice President of Titleist Golf Club Marketing. “For GT, it needed to be faster than TSR. It needed to be longer and straighter, and it had to sound better, look better, and feel better. GT delivers across the board without compromise.”
Titleist GT2
The GT2 driver maintains the same classification as previous releases. It is designed for golfers who seek a fast and forgiving driver that achieves a high launch and low spin. The GT2 features an upgraded Speed Ring and VFT, resulting in improved ball speeds across the face, and it offers maximum stability with its higher MOI design.

In developing the GT2, Titleist aimed to combine a confidence-inspiring shape with enhanced aerodynamics. The result is a 460cc clubhead with a longer front-to-back profile and a slightly shallower face height while incorporating more of the classic pear shape. This design is expected to appeal to a wide range of golfers, especially those who favor the shape of a GT3 but seek the extra forgiveness offered by the GT2. Additionally, there is a 9-gram weight positioned in the rear that can be swapped out to adjust both headweight and swingweight.
Standard Length: 45.5″
Lofts: 8°, 9°, 10°, 11° (RH/LH)
Titleist GT3
Titleist offers the GT3 for players who want maximum adjustability to fine-tune their distance and shot shape. One of the key changes is the Adjustable CG Track, which has been moved to a more forward position closer to the face. This track allows golfers and fitters to choose from five CG locations (H2, H1, N, T1, T2) to match their center of gravity position with their strike tendencies. Finding the best location on this track can help generate even more speed and ensure a more consistent ball flight. According to Titleist, the results are even more noticeable in the GT3 because of the forward location of the track.

Similar to the GT2, the GT3 features a 460cc clubhead, appearing as if it’s more compact and even more pear-shaped. Golfers should expect higher speeds than the TSR3, thanks partly to the improved aerodynamic shaping.
Standard Length: 45.5″
Lofts: 8°, 9°, 10°, 11° (RH/LH)
Titleist GT4
Titleist targets the better player with the GT4, designed for those with higher swing speeds who struggle to keep their spin rates under 3,000 RPM. The GT4 stands out with its mid-launch profile, providing a more penetrating ball flight and the ability to reduce spin. Unlike the GT2 and GT3, this driver head is 430cc, making it the most compact and classic-looking profile in the lineup.

Like the TSR4, the GT4 features two swappable weights, one located on the rear of the sole and the other closer to the face. Players looking to reduce spin the most can place the 11-gram weight forward and the 3-gram weight in the back. Meanwhile, those seeking a more stable/balanced setting can move the heavy weight to the rear.
Standard Length: 45.5″
Lofts: 8°, 9°, 10° (RH/LH)
Titleist offers a variety of shaft options, such as Project X Denali Red, Mitsubishi Tensei 1k Blue, Project X HZRDUS Black 5th Gen, and Mitsubishi Tensei 1K Black. Additionally, there is a premium Graphite Design option, including the Tour AD-VF, Tour AD-DI, and Tour AD-UB, which will cost an additional $200. If your preferred shaft is not listed, don’t worry, as Titleist has a deep selection of custom shafts to choose from.
Titleist GT drivers are currently available for fitting and will be hitting store shelves on August 23, 2024, for $649. Check out the selection at www.worldwidegolf.com.




I’ll be honest, it is labelled a "WTF" emoji, but I used it more because on the facepalm nature of it in response to the snarky comment. I apologize if you thought I was being uncivil, that was not my intention, which I hoped was conveyed by my following posts.
[QUOTE=”Par5n2, post: 12519044, member: 79747″]
Lol. Because a WTF emoji screams civility…right?
[/QUOTE]
If you want to be a part of a thread, do so with commentary about the topic. THere is no need for this type of stuff. Have an issue with a member, take it to PM or contact a moderator.
[QUOTE=”amarkabove, post: 12519073, member: 75272″]
I’ll be honest, it is a “WTF” emoji, but I used it more because on the facepalm nature of it in response to the snarky comment. I apologize if you thought I was being uncivil, that was not my intention, which I hoped was conveyed by my following posts.
[/QUOTE]
and I WTF’d that post, just for my own humor.
Generational Technology is a bold claim for GT. Will really need to try these now.
[QUOTE=”Golfers Anonymous, post: 12519087, member: 59233″]
Generational Technology is a bold claim for GT. Will really need to try these now.
[/QUOTE]
I still think GT is also purposely chosen to invoke fast cars. It’s also on my list of questions.
[QUOTE=”amarkabove, post: 12519092, member: 75272″]
I still think GT is also purposely chosen to invoke fast cars. It’s also on my list of questions.
[/QUOTE]
I’m excited to hear the behind the scenes scoop on this one
In the Club Champion interview with Titleist on YT Titleist says it’s Generational Technology.
Great writeup [USER=782]@ddec[/USER]! I missed the launch fitting event here, but I’ll try to catch one at some point out of curiosity. They’ve made significant steps and it’ll be interesting to see how the aero form compares to others who prioritize it.
[QUOTE=”Golfers Anonymous, post: 12519100, member: 59233″]
In the Club Champion interview with Titleist on YT Titleist says it’s Generational Technology.
[MEDIA=youtube]VJIQuDBQTT0[/MEDIA]
[/QUOTE]
Yeah I know. In fact I said it a few pages back (while also saying I choose to believe it means Golden Ticket). What I was poorly trying to say is I think Titleist is also intentionally allowing it to have a double meaning, knowing that many people’s first thought when they hear “GT” is fast cars.
[QUOTE=”amarkabove, post: 12519133, member: 75272″]
Yeah I know. In fact I said it a few pages back (while also saying I choose to believe it means Golden Ticket). What I was poorly trying to say is I think Titleist is also intentionally allowing it to have a double meaning, knowing that many people’s first thought when they hear “GT” is fast cars.
[/QUOTE]
yeah it definitely works for all of those…esp Golden Ticket
[USER=782]@ddec[/USER] well done sir- appreciate the insight and information in your article.
Aesthetically I think they did well. I like what I see as clean lines and shaping and having a chance to hear [USER=2320]@Canadan[/USER] ‘s I feel like they’ve done well with the acoustics as well.
Tech wise they’re moving in the right direction, just seems like it may be at the Titleist pace versus what we see from some other OEM’s and that’s ok. Looks like another solid option for everyone when it comes to the top of the bag. Looking forward to hearing other’s feedback as we start to see these landing in bags this year.
[USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] how dare you.
[QUOTE=”ddec, post: 12519150, member: 782″]
[USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] how dare you.
[/QUOTE]
Did you have a little spike in blood pressure?
[USER=782]@ddec[/USER] tell me how excited you are to get this thing in your hands. For the second time this week I am insanely jealous of you.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12519153, member: 1193″]
Did you have a little spike in blood pressure?
[/QUOTE]
A little. I even smashed my keyboard
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12519155, member: 1193″]
[USER=782]@ddec[/USER] tell me how excited you are to get this thing in your hands. For the second time this week I am insanely jealous of you.
[/QUOTE]
I’m super excited and I expect it to be in play at Ballyhack next week. What I’m not excited about is hitting it next to [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]
917D2, the last Titleist driver I played. It was straight, but it was lagging in speed. The path they’ve been on has been really good since then. It’s always fun to get something in hand after learning about it, to see how it really performs in your own hands. I think this looks clean, and it’s a big step for Titleist. So I can’t wait for next week.
[QUOTE=”ddec, post: 12519166, member: 782″]
I’m super excited and I expect it to be in play at Ballyhack next week. What I’m not excited about is hitting it next to [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]
917D2, the last Titleist driver I played. It was straight, but it was lagging in speed. The path they’ve been on has been really good since then. It’s always fun to get something in hand after learning about it, to see how it really performs in your own hands. I think this looks clean, and it’s a big step for Titleist. So I can’t wait for next week.
[/QUOTE]
He always ruins things doesn’t he?
Maybe if you get a chance you can hop into a fitting center and get it dialed in one of these days.
[QUOTE=”ddec, post: 12519166, member: 782″]
I’m super excited and I expect it to be in play at Ballyhack next week. What I’m not excited about is hitting it next to [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]
917D2, the last Titleist driver I played. It was straight, but it was lagging in speed. The path they’ve been on has been really good since then. It’s always fun to get something in hand after learning about it, to see how it really performs in your own hands. I think this looks clean, and it’s a big step for Titleist. So I can’t wait for next week.
[/QUOTE]
I can’t hit it out of my own shadow right now brother. You’re ok. Haha
I touched base on these drivers in my fitting thread, but I wanted to like these soooo much. The drivers just look mean and they perform well all around. They were ultimately barely beat out by another brand, but just wanted to share some of the numbers that I saw across my current driver and the GT2 and GT3.
Current: Srixon ZX5 Mk II with Graphite Design M9003 (brown)
Titleist GT2 with Fujikura Ventus Blue (yellow)
Titleist GT3 with Fujikura Ventus Blue (light blue)
My dispersion was much tighter with the GT2, though I had a bit of a push going on. Both of the drivers looked incredible though, and I didn’t feel that the GT3 was significantly less forgiving than the GT2. The GT3 spun about 10% less for me and the carry and total distances were a bit higher than its counterpart. Both drivers flew higher and longer than my ZX5 Mk II.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12519170, member: 1193″]
He always ruins things doesn’t he?
Maybe if you get a chance you can hop into a fitting center and get it dialed in one of these days.
[/QUOTE]
always.
but then people would have to watch me hit.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12519176, member: 1579″]
I can’t hit it out of my own shadow right now brother. You’re ok. Haha
[/QUOTE]
[IMG alt=”Lies No GIF”]https://media4.giphy.com/media/EouEzI5bBR8uk/200.gif[/IMG]
Very much looking forward to sharing some feedback but it’ll have to wait until later this evening.
But I’ll tell you this, I think titleist made a great decision changing the name. It’s a new experience and one I have fully enjoyed to this point.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9284562[/ATTACH]
Shipped a few days ago and arriving tomorrow! Fitting was 7/18 so pretty quick turnaround really.
I‘m out of town for the next 5 days so it will be a bit before I get my hands on these, but will definitely report back. Super excited.
I don’t love the sole, but everything else about them looks great. Love the black and gold in the marketing images, really sleek. Would love to hit one. The old 975D is still in my top favorite drivers of all time. Haven’t gamed a Titleist since due to other things fitting me better, but I love the classic look on these at address. (Still prefer the matte Darkspeed finish, though.)
Cool clubs robot data.
Tsr2 faster out of heel and toe. Gt2 faster out of center. That’s interesting. Included paradym too…for reference against something else. Cool clubs apparently didn’t robot test the smoke max.
I’ve been playing the GT3 for a week or two now and have been very pleased with the performance. The GT2 was not a good match for me, three swings and we put that one down. I didn’t hate the 4, but I wasn’t crazy about the sound compared to the 3. Saw some of my best drives of the year this morning on the course.
[QUOTE=”lmh3, post: 12519551, member: 21009″]
I’ve been playing the GT3 for a week or two now and have been very pleased with the performance. The GT2 was not a good match for me, three swings and we put that one down. I didn’t hate the 4, but I wasn’t crazy about the sound compared to the 3. Saw some of my best drives of the year this morning on the course.
[/QUOTE]
What about the 2 made it a bad match out of curiosity?
More cool clubs data…CoG location and moi comparison to prior model
Gt3…big moi drop with CoG getting a lot closer to face.
These look really good and will get a chance at the bag next season.. but I expect that I will have a surprise in the driver spot next season.
After an outdoor session with these today I’m torn between which head to play. Initially I was leaning GT2 but the way the GT3 pounded the ball today makes me question everything
It was a very good swing day so forgiveness wasn’t tested too much. GT2 definitely kept its line straighter but GT3 was just as accurate.
GT3 noticeably launched lower.
Sidenote….. the new HZRDUS black gen 5 is very very good. Very little action in the shaft and wanted to stay straight. I think I prefer it over my new T1100 I’ve been playing
[ATTACH type=”full”]9284630[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full”]9284631[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full”]9284632[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full”]9284633[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”jfrigo1003, post: 12519739, member: 50601″]
After an outdoor session with these today I’m torn between which head to play. Initially I was leaning GT2 but the way the GT3 pounded the ball today makes me question everything
It was a very good swing day so forgiveness wasn’t tested too much. GT2 definitely kept its line straighter but GT3 was just as accurate.
[B][SIZE=4]GT3 noticeably launched lower.[/SIZE][/B]
[/QUOTE]
Yeah I can play the GT2 9* but it’s the 10* all day for me in the GT3.
[QUOTE=”jfrigo1003, post: 12519739, member: 50601″]
After an outdoor session with these today I’m torn between which head to play. Initially I was leaning GT2 but the way the GT3 pounded the ball today makes me question everything
It was a very good swing day so forgiveness wasn’t tested too much. GT2 definitely kept its line straighter but GT3 was just as accurate.
GT3 noticeably launched lower.
Sidenote….. the new HZRDUS black gen 5 is very very good. Very little action in the shaft and wanted to stay straight. I think I prefer it over my new T1100 I’ve been playing
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_5550.jpeg”]9284630[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_5551.jpeg”]9284631[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_5553.jpeg”]9284632[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_5552.jpeg”]9284633[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Love the way that 3 looks at address. Would you say the 3 was more of a mid-flight?
PMP. Titleist has a plastic crown. Never saw that one coming. TSR was so good! Hard to believe they could improve so much, but it looks like they have.
[QUOTE=”jfrigo1003, post: 12519739, member: 50601″]
After an outdoor session with these today I’m torn between which head to play. Initially I was leaning GT2 but the way the GT3 pounded the ball today makes me question everything
It was a very good swing day so forgiveness wasn’t tested too much. GT2 definitely kept its line straighter but GT3 was just as accurate.
GT3 noticeably launched lower.
Sidenote….. the new HZRDUS black gen 5 is very very good. Very little action in the shaft and wanted to stay straight. I think I prefer it over my new T1100 I’ve been playing
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_5550.jpeg”]9284630[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_5551.jpeg”]9284631[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_5553.jpeg”]9284632[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_5552.jpeg”]9284633[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
man I’m digging the shapes here.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12519566, member: 1193″]
What about the 2 made it a bad match out of curiosity?
[/QUOTE]
Numbers were way off high spin and launch and turned over way too much. Same shaft in the GT3 with weight in T1 brought everything into ideal windows.
Great write-up on some great looking drivers. I still haven’t hit a Titleist driver and with these and the TSr’s, that really needs to change
I’m such a nerd. I’m fascinated with the use of this polymer in the crown. Would love to learn more about it.
Can’t wait to see what everyone gets fitted into these look ????
Need to give these a tryout next time they are at the club, they sound great from many aspects. Buddy of mine got fit last week and they finally took orders yesterday so he has to wait 3 weeks but he was happy how it matched up with his TSR. He said biggest improvement was in tighter dispersion.
[QUOTE=”ryang13, post: 12519782, member: 67512″]
Love the way that 3 looks at address. Would you say the 3 was more of a mid-flight?
[/QUOTE]
Paired with the new Gen 5 HZRDUS Black it was closer to low flight than mid. If i had to guess i would say it was launching around 10* compared to GT2 around 12*
[QUOTE=”ddec, post: 12519959, member: 782″]
man I’m digging the shapes here.
[/QUOTE]
both shapes have a noticable difference at address. I ditched TSR2 last year bc it looked chunky and long front to back. GT2 is dramatically improved and looks more like TSR3 did
[QUOTE=”jfrigo1003, post: 12520208, member: 50601″]
both shapes have a noticable difference at address. I ditched TSR2 last year bc it looked chunky and long front to back. GT2 is dramatically improved and looks more like TSR3 did
[/QUOTE]
One benefit of the new crown material it sounds like.
This is an interesting shift from Titleist. I’m curious to see what everyone who played the TSR generation is seeing as far as improvement. I’m also not going to let that $50 price increase go by either. I would be curious how the GT2 stands up to a DARKSPEED X at $100 less as the Cobra driver clearly beat the TSR2 for me. I personally think it’s a bad time to bring the most expensive driver ever to market, but what do I know?
Titleist makes such solid equipment.
Will likely give these a test run against me TD Max. Guessing I’d be more of a GT2 guy given my propensity for lower spin. Nice to hear the shaping is a bit different from TSR2. The TSR2 was great but the shape always threw me off a little.
Great stuff here and will be great to hear the guys talk about these! That itty bitty 4 is hot though.
I had an awesome opportunity a while back to go through the fitting process with the great guys here in the Ohio region. What I’ve really enjoyed about the process is seeing the guys draw comparisons to what made their last driver great, while finding ways to propel this driver forward.
My fitting was great because I hit first and learned second. Pretty blind going into it knowing only what I know from pictures, and my familiarity to the TSR lineup from my time with TSR4. My natural preconception was that I would be fit into the ‘4’ head based on strike and spin needs.
We started with GT2 which went about how I expected, although a little bit more enjoyable than i remember from my TSR fitting. I was impressed by the overall shape, but I don’t tend to jive with the longest head, and was eager to get into the other two. I can see why so many people love this shape, and I think what they have done to it for GT2 is really well done.
Moving into the GT3, I’ll be honest I was surprised. At first glance it doesn’t have quite the same overall footprint at address, and for me that’s a real win. (maybe it does, but it certainly presented more satisfying to me). As we started hitting it, I was absolutely shocked at the sound quality off the head. It’s SUPER rich when you make great contact with a square clubhead, and I’d argue one of the best sounding drivers Titleist has ever produced. My journey to the 4 was abruptly halted and my attention shifted to trying to maximize the 3 while gaining more knowledge on the aero styling goals the team had for it.
When we got to the GT4, I knew it would be a solid fit. The tighter overall lines, the depth of the head, and the sound all really fit into a great window for the golfer who can connect in the center of the face and generates plenty of spin. I think it’s quite evident that Titleist has taken a balanced approach to these heads and not gone too much to the extreme on spin or launch etc – I think it opens the door to making fewer concessions to fit into the head that works well.
After much tinkering and debate, we determined that GT3 presented as the best option for my game. Doing a tiny bit of ball speed chasing, we were into the 170s and slowly ticking upwards which is very fun. I’m still battling a bit of an inside move with the path, so it’s on me to maximize the head potential over time, and I look forward to sharing that experience in here.
Spending some time after my fitting with Rod Koch, I had a chance to see some of the design philosophies that have been incorporated into the GT lineup. I asked pretty pointedly why the name shift, and his perspective was that they felt there was enough in this head to present it as a new beast, not just an incremental step in the TSR story.
It is quite clear that the aero focus on the head was a primary goal of the design team, and the benefits of this new material (that sounds insane when you listen to it fall as a single slab) support the weight placement in the places that maker. It was also fun to see the internals and the stabilizing bars that run along the sole of the driver internally, as well as the continuation of the great face material they are using.
As a final feature to focus on, I’m really excited to have the weight “elevator” in a driver so I can recklessly tinker to perfect my shots.
[QUOTE=”Canadan, post: 12520485, member: 2320″]
I had an awesome opportunity a while back to go through the fitting process with the great guys here in the Ohio region. What I’ve really enjoyed about the process is seeing the guys draw comparisons to what made their last driver great, while finding ways to propel this driver forward.
My fitting was great because I hit first and learned second. Pretty blind going into it knowing only what I know from pictures, and my familiarity to the TSR lineup from my time with TSR4. My natural preconception was that I would be fit into the ‘4’ head based on strike and spin needs.
We started with GT2 which went about how I expected, although a little bit more enjoyable than i remember from my TSR fitting. I was impressed by the overall shape, but I don’t tend to jive with the longest head, and was eager to get into the other two. I can see why so many people love this shape, and I think what they have done to it for GT2 is really well done.
Moving into the GT3, I’ll be honest I was surprised. At first glance it doesn’t have quite the same overall footprint at address, and for me that’s a real win. (maybe it does, but it certainly presented more satisfying to me). As we started hitting it, I was absolutely shocked at the sound quality off the head. It’s SUPER rich when you make great contact with a square clubhead, and I’d argue one of the best sounding drivers Titleist has ever produced. My journey to the 4 was abruptly halted and my attention shifted to trying to maximize the 3 while gaining more knowledge on the aero styling goals the team had for it.
When we got to the GT4, I knew it would be a solid fit. The tighter overall lines, the depth of the head, and the sound all really fit into a great window for the golfer who can connect in the center of the face and generates plenty of spin. I think it’s quite evident that Titleist has taken a balanced approach to these heads and not gone too much to the extreme on spin or launch etc – I think it opens the door to making fewer concessions to fit into the head that works well.
After much tinkering and debate, we determined that GT3 presented as the best option for my game. Doing a tiny bit of ball speed chasing, we were into the 170s and slowly ticking upwards which is very fun. I’m still battling a bit of an inside move with the path, so it’s on me to maximize the head potential over time, and I look forward to sharing that experience in here.
[/QUOTE]
These are great thoughts Dan! What were the end specs on the GT3 for you?
[QUOTE=”Canadan, post: 12520485, member: 2320″]
I had an awesome opportunity a while back to go through the fitting process with the great guys here in the Ohio region. What I’ve really enjoyed about the process is seeing the guys draw comparisons to what made their last driver great, while finding ways to propel this driver forward.
My fitting was great because I hit first and learned second. Pretty blind going into it knowing only what I know from pictures, and my familiarity to the TSR lineup from my time with TSR4. My natural preconception was that I would be fit into the ‘4’ head based on strike and spin needs.
We started with GT2 which went about how I expected, although a little bit more enjoyable than i remember from my TSR fitting. I was impressed by the overall shape, but I don’t tend to jive with the longest head, and was eager to get into the other two. I can see why so many people love this shape, and I think what they have done to it for GT2 is really well done.
Moving into the GT3, I’ll be honest I was surprised. At first glance it doesn’t have quite the same overall footprint at address, and for me that’s a real win. (maybe it does, but it certainly presented more satisfying to me). As we started hitting it, I was absolutely shocked at the sound quality off the head. It’s SUPER rich when you make great contact with a square clubhead, and I’d argue one of the best sounding drivers Titleist has ever produced. My journey to the 4 was abruptly halted and my attention shifted to trying to maximize the 3 while gaining more knowledge on the aero styling goals the team had for it.
When we got to the GT4, I knew it would be a solid fit. The tighter overall lines, the depth of the head, and the sound all really fit into a great window for the golfer who can connect in the center of the face and generates plenty of spin. I think it’s quite evident that Titleist has taken a balanced approach to these heads and not gone too much to the extreme on spin or launch etc – I think it opens the door to making fewer concessions to fit into the head that works well.
After much tinkering and debate, we determined that GT3 presented as the best option for my game. Doing a tiny bit of ball speed chasing, we were into the 170s and slowly ticking upwards which is very fun. I’m still battling a bit of an inside move with the path, so it’s on me to maximize the head potential over time, and I look forward to sharing that experience in here.
[/QUOTE]
Kinda crazy to me that you are finding the sound so good after such a big change in design. Great to hear that.
[QUOTE=”ryang13, post: 12520496, member: 67512″]
These are great thoughts Dan! What were the end specs on the GT3 for you?
[/QUOTE]
Final fit was the 9 degree head.
We actually had a really fun experiment going from the 10 degree to the 8 degree and my brain is so dumb that if I saw the loft (on the 10) I was more likely to hit down on it to square it up. I think they launched almost the same because of it hahahaha – so dumb.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12520498, member: 1193″]
Kinda crazy to me that you are finding the sound so good after such a big change in design. Great to hear that.
[/QUOTE]
I’m excited for more people to get a chance to hit them, because on the button they are SUPER rewarding to the ears.