It is hard to believe that it was way back in October that Tour Edge released their new 725 lineup of Exotics drivers into the wild. Since then, there has clearly been a deluge of releases from every manufacturer in the industry, but more recent doesn’t mean better performing, does it?
We received both the Tour Edge Exotics E725 and C725 drivers in hand to put to the test and see just what they are bringing to the table in terms of technology and playability.

Quick Take – C725 and E725 Drivers
Tour Edge has constantly created drivers in their Exotics lineup which offer incredible performance and bang for your buck. However, they have also at times looked too unique for people and more recently the line between the two models blurred a bit. No more, this is arguably the most complete driver tandem ever from Tour Edge. Not only do they have a cleaner aesthetic, but they also have two fully differentiated models that compete with anything in the market from low spin to 10K.
The Education Zone
While we don’t want to get too far into the weeds when it comes to the technology which Tour Edge has implemented into their two drivers, there are some specific aspects which we would be doing everyone a disservice not to touch on, specifically Ridgeback. That said, if you want to go all the way in on things, be sure to go check out our detailed release article on the 725 drivers here.

Ridgeback Renovation
The biggest detail worth getting into tech wise with both the C725 and E725 driver is that Ridgeback is officially gone…at least in the way that we had come to know it. This is something that is interesting to see, as honestly it just seemed like the company was set on using the material differentiator that Ridgeback provided to make them stand out, for better or worse.
Now, don’t take that the wrong way, the use of the titanium spine in the crown of the 721, 722, and 723 drivers had real science behind it, specifically in how it added structural support. Not to mention, the look was unique, and whether you loved it or hated it visually, it differentiated them. The thing is, sometimes standing out that much isn’t for the best, and at times the outstanding bang for your buck performance that the Exotics drivers were producing never got a chance because of looks.

360 Ridgeback
This time around Tour Edge has moved to what they are calling “360 Ridgeback” where the central spine is no more. This was done because they found that by implementing a new titanium ring around the outer frame, they kept the same strength while allowing the head to be even more efficient in how it transfers energy. Bigger yet though is that removing that central piece of titanium and implementing a total carbon crown saved and astronomical amount of weight which could be redistributed.
That redistribution of weight from the Ridgeback Renovation meant also that both drivers could now utilize a new flight tuning system where adjustable weights are carved into the heads in a manner which we have never seen before. The C725 uses dual forward and rear weights (15g and 5g) while the E725 has a single weight (18g) in the extreme back perimeter. This combined with the adjustable hosel (+/- 2 degrees), new model specific Power Channel, and making their Diamond Face now three-dimensional continues the trend of Tour Edge innovating as much as anyone in the industry when it comes to their Exotics drivers.

We got to spend time with both models for this review, however, since the E725 driver was a 10.5 degree model while the C725 was 9.0, there will be no direct head to head comparison. However, to bring some continuity to the testing, both models were reviewed with the Project X Denali Blue 60 (6.5).
Performance
Tour Edge Exotics E725 Driver

Tour Edge’s official debut into the 10K arena is excellent. The E725 driver is the 460cc option of the two drivers and it is much more versatile in its playability than we anticipated. Given the size and weight placement of the head with the 18g flight tuning system track being in the furthest perimeter from the clubface, we expected to see a lot of launch and spin. Well, one of those two things proved true.
The 10.5 head was a launcher for me during testing, and as a high ball hitter by nature that was entirely expected. What was not expected though is how the spin didn’t get away from me. If you just glance at the data averages below and don’t take the time to see the rest of the picture, then you might skip on by, don’t do that! The fact that I was able to keep a 10.5 degree 10K head below 3,000 RPM is incredible. More impressive though is that on significant misses low on the club, I didn’t see the massive spin up you might expect.
| Ball Speed | Launch Angle | Spin | Peak Height | Carry Distance |
| 157.5 mph | 13.9° | 2886 rpm | 39 yds | 268 yds |
There is no getting around the reality that it is a large E725 driver head, however, the carbon crown cap and titanium frame look combined with a solid shape and blacked out overall aesthetic makes it a solid overall look at setup. Sound (feel) wise it is different than previous E models, there a little more depth to it, it’s unique feedback isn’t muted, but also avoids being loud. The 10.5 head did set up a little closed for me, and I saw a right-to-left tendency, but it wasn’t overdone.
What was overdone though is how shockingly forgiving the E725 driver is. Honestly, the spin I saw obviously helps keep the ball in play accuracy wise on misses, but the bigger thing is I felt like I could hit it anywhere laterally and get away with murder. Vertically, there wasn’t as much give, but it also didn’t have the massive spin peaks and valleys. All in all, this is a driver that everyone should try, especially if you are curious about high MOI designs, but want the most bang for your buck.
Tour Edge Exotics C725 Driver

If you take a trip back in time to the days of EXS, then you will find a driver from Tour Edge that was one of the most surprising powerhouses of anyone that year, the EXS Pro. The company followed that up with the C721 Pro when Ridgeback was introduced, but after that they honestly began to lose their low spin high power way. The models became more and more blurred with the C and E designs, but they have set that right this time around. The C725 is a monster, but the kicker is that it can be as tame, or as mean as you want it to be.
The C725 is a 445cc head, though at first glance you might not realize it. Like its sibling, the move to the full carbon crown with titanium ridgeback 360 ring framing is a really good look. Sure, the sole is a little on the plain side, but props to Tour Edge for showing restraint, the end result is a driver that won’t turn anyone off at first look and instead might just win people over. While I have seen some comments out there about the C725 being slightly closed, to my eye the 9.0 is dead neutral.

At setup, the C725 wants you to swing hard. The look is, in a word, complete. Best of all, the removal of the spine in favor of 360 Ridgeback meant 22% more carbon, and that means the most addicting sound at impact of any Tour Edge driver I can recall. It is not a dull carbon thud but no longer has the metallic undertone the C723/C722/C721 had. The club-head is firm and dense, without being hollow sounding. Truly there is nothing else that compares to it, it is unique, and it is addicting. While moving the weights from front to back (15g and 5g) does change that a bit, the big change there happens with the performance.
Heavy Weight Forward
| Ball Speed | Launch Angle | Spin | Peak Height | Carry Distance |
| 161.2 mph | 11.5° | 2221 rpm | 34 yds | 279 yds |
Heavy Weight Back
| Ball Speed | Launch Angle | Spin | Peak Height | Carry Distance |
| 159.4 mph | 12.6° | 2508 rpm | 36 yds | 275 yds |
As you will be able to see in the data averages, the C725 was hit in both weight orientations (forward and back) and the spin change was almost spot on the 300 RPM which Tour Edge claims. This is where the fitting versatility of the design shows out, as even with the heavy weight back the C725 did not encroach onto the E725, meaning two heads can cover three different realms with minimal overlap. That said, when the 15g is in the forward port, the low-spin animal was unleashed with the head being as fast as anything out there.

The most impressive thing during on course testing though, was the directional consistency. Regardless of the weight orientation, there was a neutral flight bias that allowed full workability while at the same time letting you get away with way more than you would expect. There is clearly something to the weight port locations on the design combined with the 3D Diamond Face and new Power Channel that has unlocked more playability from a 445cc head that you would expect.
The Details – C725 and E725 Driver
Tour Edge was never off with their Exotics driver releases, but this time around they are more on than ever before. Not only is the $399.99 price point for both heads unheard of in today’s market trends, both heads stand toe-to-toe with other current releases in their respective segments. This is a lineup that should be tried if you are looking for a driver in 2025, they do it all and do it well.
For more information on the Tour Edge Exotics C725 or E725 Driver models, check out their website at www.touredge.com.





I still game Exotic fairway woods that must be 8-10 years old. Had not found one of their drivers that was a fit. Maybe this will change with these releases.
i put my diamana tb into mine to explore…for science.
These look solid. No doubt they’d be fun to try especially during a fitting.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12926319, member: 1579″]
No worries, I’m always here to answer any questions!
First, JB was talking about E vs the Ping 430 10K, not E vs C, the C will offer more ball speed potential than the E based on CG location being more forward and overall design intent.
To the pic, thats the spot most would love to hit driver every time if their could, as long as we aren’t talking extremes. Slightly toe side and a little high is historically “the button” that drops spin but keeps speed high.
The C is still a 445cc driver, and it’s a low spin head. Yes, it’s got some forgiveness, but I really don’t want anyone to think it’s in the realm of the E there. The E is MASSIVELY forgiving.
At your speed, spin is not your enemy. Spin keeps the ball in the air to help optimize carry. Otherwise, if you start hunting speed and low spin, you’re going to get a lot of low liners. Which, might be great if you play where it’s always hard and fast and you can rely on roll. But if not, it can be a dangerous thing to flirt with.
I think some companies as well as launch monitors have at times caused us to lose sight of things, specifically spin. 2700-3000 is not high spin, and in fact, it can be optimal for a lot of people. But, speed is chased so often now that many think spin has to be as low as possible, which is cool in a monitor, but it’s often terrible on the course.
Efficiency above all else imo. One can sacrifice pure speed potential for a maximized efficiency setup for them and not lose distance, and in fact, gain it often times.
[/QUOTE]
Which factor makes a bigger difference for which model to choose?
Swing speed? Or ability/strike location?
I swing in the 103 range, but struggle with center contact. So spin is all over the place. Avg 2500 rpm. Launch 15.8*. Do you think there’s a downside going with the E model?
Your response to [USER=63219]@JW Smoove[/USER] probably answered my question. I’m just curious how each model would benefit 2 different swing speeds.
[QUOTE=”odom730, post: 12929168, member: 46310″]
Which factor makes a bigger difference for which model to choose?
Swing speed? Or ability/strike location?
I swing in the 103 range, but struggle with center contact. So spin is all over the place. Avg 2500 rpm. Launch 15.8*. Do you think there’s a downside going with the E model?
Your response to [USER=63219]@JW Smoove[/USER] probably answered my question. I’m just curious how each model would benefit 2 different swing speeds.
[/QUOTE]
How far from center is your miss typically? Minimal, or a lot of variance? Is your miss vertical, or horizontal across the face? The MOI of the E makes it a beast for those who miss laterally across the face, where if you tend to be high or low more, not heel and toe, then the C will appeal as you don’t need as much stability/MOI.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12929178, member: 1579″]
How far from center is your miss typically? Minimal, or a lot of variance? Is your miss vertical, or horizontal across the face? The MOI of the E makes it a beast for those who miss laterally across the face, where if you tend to be high or low more, not heel and toe, then the C will appeal as you don’t need as much stability/MOI.
[/QUOTE]
I don’t know exactly. I want to say high and low, but it could be all over. I’ll get some powder spray and narrow it down.
[QUOTE=”odom730, post: 12929194, member: 46310″]
I don’t know exactly. I want to say high and low, but it could be all over. I’ll get some powder spray and narrow it down.
[/QUOTE]
All good!
Clearly with a 15.8 launch angle out of a driver, height is not your issue. So there, I’d lean C, but, I still think where ones miss pattern is, is critical to deciding between these two heads. Because remember, the C absolutely has to be more demanding than the E based on MOI as well as the simple fact that it’s a low spin 445cc head.
They really do look damn good at setup imo.
Honestly, both heads are probably in the lead for sleeper of the release cycle for me. They’re top tier, and deserve more buzz, but the wave of other releases is large.
You are killing me with anticipation. I’m hoping we get the opportunity but I’m hopelessly stumped on maybe more distance with a still Very very forgiving head or just max forgiveness with maybe no added yards.
It will be a last minute decision, I’m putter sure.
[QUOTE=”JW Smoove, post: 12935483, member: 63219″]
You are killing me with anticipation. I’m hoping we get the opportunity but I’m hopelessly stumped on maybe more distance with a still Very very forgiving head or just max forgiveness with maybe no added yards.
It will be a last minute decision, I’m putter sure.
[/QUOTE]
The C is very playable, but I don’t know if I’d call it very very forgiving, it’s a low spin head, and there’s still a definitely level of demand there.
The E will fit far more golfers.
[QUOTE=”JW Smoove, post: 12935483, member: 63219″]
You are killing me with anticipation. I’m hoping we get the opportunity but I’m hopelessly stumped on maybe more distance with a still Very very forgiving head or just max forgiveness with maybe no added yards.
It will be a last minute decision, I’m putter sure.
[/QUOTE]
Right now, I’d be choosing the E, no question.
[QUOTE=”AuzzieMatt, post: 12936570, member: 54652″]
Right now, I’d be choosing the E, no question.
[/QUOTE]
I have probably 2-3 times a day waffled between them. Madness.
I think it will depend on the success or lack of that i have with the FWY.
The Diamana TB experiment worked
Email: SUPPORT @ DUNENECTARWEBEXPERT . C O M
Telegram: @DUNENECTARWEBEXPERT
I fell victim to a Business Email Compromise (BEC) scam and a cryptocurrency exchange fraud. The assistance I received from DUNE NECTAR WEB EXPERT during tracing and recovering my lost money back is 100%. Individuals have suffered significant financial losses from fraudulent activities like lotteries, compensation schemes, binary tradings, inheritance scams, cryptocurrency investment scams, and forex trading manipulations. The challenges extend beyond the initial investment; many victims face difficulties withdrawing their funds, with brokers demanding additional deposits before allowing withdrawals. Furthermore, the theft or loss of access to cryptocurrency wallets represents a growing problem. The decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies makes recovery particularly challenging, requiring specialized expertise to trace transactions and potentially recover stolen funds. Data breaches can lead to identity theft, financial losses, and reputational damage. DUNE NECTAR WEB EXPERT’s services extend beyond lost crypto asset recovery; they offer comprehensive data protection strategies. Their expertise in navigating the complexities of online fraud and data security makes them a valuable resource for anyone seeking to protect their digital assets and personal information. Their assistance in my case involved recovering my lost funds and providing guidance on securing my online accounts and preventing future scams. Their dedication and expertise are truly exceptional and they have my vote of confidence.
[QUOTE=”chile, post: 12936710, member: 54997″]
The Diamana TB experiment worked
[/QUOTE]
Care to share any details?
[QUOTE=”JW Smoove, post: 12936731, member: 63219″]
Care to share any details?
[/QUOTE]
60s about 1.5″ shorter than the stock length Denali Blue that came with the driver. I’m really comfortable with the length and feel of this shaft. I feel like I don’t have to adjust to it versus making the adjustment to the Denali Blue… Which was still fine but this is the security blanket… Maybe it was that CC fit me into this? I don’t know but it has worked well for me through a few heads (TSi/TSr 3, rogue ST Max/Max LS, LTDx LS)… Could just be voodoo…
[QUOTE=”JW Smoove, post: 12936585, member: 63219″]
I have probably 2-3 times a day waffled between them. Madness.
I think it will depend on the success or lack of that i have with the FWY.
[/QUOTE]
E.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12936747, member: 1579″]
E.
[/QUOTE]
Probably. I just wonder, heavy weight in back, good face contact decent swing = more distance?
I think I saw that the Cs moi was around 8500. The driver I’m presently using (with decent face contact) is supposedly about 9000.
Playing regularly, getting more fit, might a decent, albeit slower swing benefit? This is the main thing i mull over several times a day!
[QUOTE=”JW Smoove, post: 12936800, member: 63219″]
Probably. I just wonder, heavy weight in back, good face contact decent swing = more distance?
I think I saw that the Cs moi was around 8500. The driver I’m presently using (with decent face contact) is supposedly about 9000.
Playing regularly, getting more fit, might a decent, albeit slower swing benefit? This is the main thing i mull over several times a day!
[/QUOTE]
E.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12936849, member: 1579″]
E.
[/QUOTE]
Tell me more, if you can, based on my thoughts.
[QUOTE=”JW Smoove, post: 12936852, member: 63219″]
Tell me more, if you can, based on my thoughts.
[/QUOTE]
Less demanding, more rewarding all across the face. Ultra playable on all days, not just some. Also extremely efficient for what it is, and has the spin profile to benefit non-super fast swingers of the golf club.
The E fits the most golfers needs.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12937623, member: 1579″]
Less demanding, more rewarding all across the face. Ultra playable on all days, not just some. Also extremely efficient for what it is, and has the spin profile to benefit non-super fast swingers of the golf club.
The E fits the most golfers needs.
[/QUOTE]
Thank you sir! Officially leaning that way (probably was already) if these are offered, I’ll see where my game is at that time and decide accordingly.
Got to see and waggle these babies today, I’ll upload a side by side, (though with the club condom on) since I was in the store. They both look great, I think I could play either, though the added forgiveness of the E makes for an easier choice – which if offered will entail actually hitting both clubs (I hope). At address the differences are pretty subtle. As can be expected/known the C is deeper and smaller – but again, at address it’s not super noticeable.View attachment 9327259
So, fired up after seeing the actual clubs that, perhaps in anticipation, perhaps just blind hope, ordered some TEE shaft adapters, so if we do get to test them, I’ll be ready! I’ve got 3 candidates in mind (that i own). And honestly the stock Denali though in a different club thati demoed, also felt pretty good.
The C725 Driver is certainly the best value in golf price wise, but it is also one of the best all around performers.
I put the C back into the bag for one of my two rounds this morning and frankly, I hammered the crap out of it. Again and again, I was reminded of what I saw during my initial testing period for the homepage review.
To me, the look is really solid. It is the best looking head we have seen from TE honestly. Does it look like a blend of things we have seen on the market? Yes. Does it still look unique though? Yes. Does it benefit from not having the original ridgeback look? Absolutely yes.
The shape is comfortable, the face is deep, and the sound is solidly-unique. Its not hollow, it doesn’t resonate, but its got a composite nature to it that I personally enjoy.
I’ve got it at 9.0 with heavy forward and it currently has a Denali Blue 6.5. That combo yields HIGH ball flights for me that are consistently lower spinning than I expect. On the course the ball just KEEPS going. I hit a few of the longest tee shots I have in 2025 today with this one, and at the same time it let me get away with my current toe side miss.
This, to me, is a lot like the Srixon Max and the Honma 767’s in that they are INCREDIBLE drivers, it is just about if they can truly get in hands. I don’t care about BS ranking lists that other places use and where the C725 is ranked in that, I can flat out tell you straight forward that this is a FANTASTIC driver head.
Great read [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] i hope we are given the chance to play and compare these as well.
I know my time with C725 Fwy has so far been short, but I’ve been every bit as impressed. The C and E 725 line are the best looking clubs I’ve ever seen from TE. Not only do they look great and high end (if that matters) but a lot of tech is clearly viable as well and that’s just cool in itself.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13005603, member: 1579″]
The C725 Driver is certainly the best value in golf price wise, but it is also one of the best all around performers.
I put the C back into the bag for one of my two rounds this morning and frankly, I hammered the crap out of it. Again and again, I was reminded of what I saw during my initial testing period for the homepage review.
To me, the look is really solid. It is the best looking head we have seen from TE honestly. Does it look like a blend of things we have seen on the market? Yes. Does it still look unique though? Yes. Does it benefit from not having the original ridgeback look? Absolutely yes.
The shape is comfortable, the face is deep, and the sound is solidly-unique. Its not hollow, it doesn’t resonate, but its got a composite nature to it that I personally enjoy.
I’ve got it at 9.0 with heavy forward and it currently has a Denali Blue 6.5. That combo yields HIGH ball flights for me that are consistently lower spinning than I expect. On the course the ball just KEEPS going. I hit a few of the longest tee shots I have in 2025 today with this one, and at the same time it let me get away with my current toe side miss.
This, to me, is a lot like the Srixon Max and the Honma 767’s in that they are INCREDIBLE drivers, it is just about if they can truly get in hands. I don’t care about BS ranking lists that other places use and where the C725 is ranked in that, I can flat out tell you straight forward that this is a FANTASTIC driver head.
[/QUOTE]
Having the heavy weight forward and being playable says a lot to me. The TEE drivers are criminally underrated.
[QUOTE=”Jeff Spicoli, post: 13005643, member: 10545″]
Having the heavy weight forward and being playable says a lot to me. The TEE drivers are criminally underrated.
[/QUOTE]
They did SO well at making the C-driver more differentiated from the E this year, as last year the lines got REALLY muddy. This one is lower spin, but its shockingly forgiving at times laterally. One of those situations where you find yourself swinging a little harder every time to test it a little more hahaha
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13005654, member: 1579″]
They did SO well at making the C-driver more differentiated from the E this year, as last year the lines got REALLY muddy. This one is lower spin, but its shockingly forgiving at times laterally. One of those situations where you find yourself swinging a little harder every time to test it a little more hahaha
[/QUOTE]
That sounds fun. I want to hit one now. Dang it.
I spent some time with C725 tonight and I’ll admit it’s the first time in a while. I think they did such a good job on the shaping at address and the crown design. I had to put the heavy weight in the back because I was getting some really low spin, lower than where I want to be. For the sound, it’s really good when hit around the sweet spot, but it’s a little off for me when you catch it low or even toe side.
Does anyone else who has one of these find that the face looks really rounded at address?
[QUOTE=”ddec, post: 13006005, member: 782″]
I spent some time with C725 tonight and I’ll admit it’s the first time in a while. I think they did such a good job on the shaping at address and the crown design. I had to put the heavy weight in the back because I was getting some really low spin, lower than where I want to be. For the sound, it’s really good when hit around the sweet spot, but it’s a little off for me when you catch it low or even toe side.
Does anyone else who has one of these find that the face looks really rounded at address?
[/QUOTE]
I hadn’t really noticed, but now I’m going to have to go out and put it side by side with others and see hahaha
The spin aspect is something that stands out here, especially combined with how silly playable the C actually is.
In my heart of hearts, it really is one of the absolute best all around drivers I’ve tested this year.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13007119, member: 1579″]
I hadn’t really noticed, but now I’m going to have to go out and put it side by side with others and see hahaha
The spin aspect is something that stands out here, especially combined with how silly playable the C actually is.
In my heart of hearts, it really is one of the absolute best all around drivers I’ve tested this year.
[/QUOTE]
it could just be an illusion to me. But man I hit it side by side with GT2, Adapt X, and Ai Smoke and for some reason the face looks like it curves/bulges out a little more than the others.
[QUOTE=”ddec, post: 13007138, member: 782″]
it could just be an illusion to me. But man I hit it side by side with GT2, Adapt X, and Ai Smoke and for some reason the face looks like it curves/bulges out a little more than the others.
[/QUOTE]
You know I’m going to “the drawer” now today to look at this hahahaha
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13007145, member: 1579″]
You know I’m going to “the drawer” now today to look at this hahahaha
[/QUOTE]
I am fearful
I love some good bulge and roll on a driver head.
[I]does anyone know what the total head weight is with the stock weight?[/I]
[QUOTE=”AverageJoe, post: 13017740, member: 50849″]
[I]does anyone know what the total head weight is with the stock weight?[/I]
[/QUOTE]
Of which head?
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13017823, member: 1579″]Of which head?[/QUOTE]
Whoops My bad, the E725.
[QUOTE=”AverageJoe, post: 13018039, member: 50849″]
Whoops My bad, the E725.
[/QUOTE]
I can get that for you here in just a bit!
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13018141, member: 1579″]I can get that for you here in just a bit![/QUOTE]
Jman, appreciate you!
[QUOTE=”AverageJoe, post: 13018142, member: 50849″]
Jman, appreciate you!
[/QUOTE]
195g head w stock weight only, 202 if you include the adapter.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13018404, member: 1579″]195g head w stock weight only, 202 if you include the adapter.[/QUOTE]
Appreciate this! Thanks again Jman!
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13018404, member: 1579″]
195g head w stock weight only, 202 if you include the adapter.
[/QUOTE]
James, if i may, how does this compare to other current drivers, say core elyte, st-max 230?
It’s interesting down in this neck of the woods. Touredge (I have several of their clubs) has a reputation for being the senior club of choice. I liked their E722 line that I had bought several years ago but compared to the TSr2 that I got and Rogue just before that, it was just not as long and consistent for me. The further I tried to fly the ball, the less it seem to go. I wouldn’t mind giving this new one a looksie though.
[QUOTE=”JW Smoove, post: 13018729, member: 63219″]
James, if i may, how does this compare to other current drivers, say core elyte, st-max 230?
[/QUOTE]
Most drivers without adapters come in from 194-198, with 201-205 range
[QUOTE=”G8rJimbo, post: 13018735, member: 62520″]
It’s interesting down in this neck of the woods. Touredge (I have several of their clubs) has a reputation for being the senior club of choice. I liked their E722 line that I had bought several years ago but compared to the TSr2 that I got and Rogue just before that, it was just not as long and consistent for me. The further I tried to fly the ball, the less it seem to go. I wouldn’t mind giving this new one a looksie though.
[/QUOTE]
725’s are a whole different beast than the 22’s were. They’ve made strides
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13019023, member: 1579″]
725’s are a whole different beast than the 22’s were. They’ve made strides
[/QUOTE]
Even more reason for me to go hit some in the bay!
[QUOTE=”G8rJimbo, post: 13018735, member: 62520″]It’s interesting down in this neck of the woods. Touredge (I have several of their clubs) has a reputation for being the senior club of choice. I liked their E722 line that I had bought several years ago but compared to the TSr2 that I got and Rogue just before that, it was just not as long and consistent for me. The further I tried to fly the ball, the less it seem to go. I wouldn’t mind giving this new one a looksie though.[/QUOTE]
This is funny! A guy I play with often who is 39 bought an E725 to use this year. We were playing with another guy last week who started calling him Bernhard Langer because he was using a TEE driver.
Second time outside with my E725. Went to range today and was really pleased with my drives. Much more pleased with my drives than my irons and that NEVER happens!
[QUOTE=”Steve2100, post: 13019643, member: 57217″]
Second time outside with my E725. Went to range today and was really pleased with my drives. Much more pleased with my drives than my irons and that NEVER happens!
[/QUOTE]
How is it going performance wise? Ball flight higher or lower? More distance? Any forgiveness you have seen that is noteworthy?