It may seem unfair to say it, but when discussing players distance irons, Tour Edge is not typically a name that comes to mind. Nonetheless, the Exotics iron lineup certainly merits recognition, as Tour Edge has become renowned for delivering strong performance at a more affordable price. After choosing not to release any Exotics irons for the 2024 season, Tour Edge made a significant impression by unveiling three irons in the 725 lineup. THP has already reviewed the two most forgiving models, E725 and X725, so now it’s time to take a closer look at the smallest iron profile in the line, C725.

Tech Talk
Tour Edge has built a reputation for their innovative use of advanced technologies in its Exotics line. With the C725 irons, the Tour Edge tackles a common challenge: incorporating advanced technology into a smaller iron head while maintaining the desired look and feel preferred by skilled players, or as Tour Edge refers to them, C (for competition) players.
Tour Edge incorporates speed-enhancing technologies into their clubs by using a hollow body design. This design features a military-grade Maraging Steel L-Cup Face, which is plasma-welded to a 17-4 stainless steel chassis. This combination of materials and design enables the face to be thinner than ever before, making it the thinnest face used in an Exotics iron, according to Tour Edge.

To boost consistency and increase ball speeds, Tour Edge has implemented a new 3D Diamond Face. This design utilizes varying depths and heights within diamond-shaped patterns to optimize performance. The Exotics line is known for employing a variable thickness pattern, and the C725 irons feature 92 of these mini-trampoline structures. While this number is lower than what is present in the E and X irons, it is not unexpected based on the profile of the iron head.
Looks – Tour Edge Exotics C725 Irons
Tour Edge has been refining the looks of the Exotics C irons for quite some time. Tour Edge has worked to slim it down since launching the C721 irons, which set the design mold for their recent player’s distance irons. For both the C722 and C723, we were told that the overall clubhead was 15% smaller than its predecessor. While there is no doubt those clubheads shrank, they still appeared slightly larger to the eye compared to other players’ distance models on the market, not a bad thing mind you.

With the C725, these irons may have undergone the most drastic-looking change that the Exotics irons undertook throughout this timeframe. Looks are always subjective, but behind the ball, the C725 might be the best-looking player’s distance iron that Tour Edge has ever made. Clearly, when Tour Edge says they are leaning more into the player’s preferred shape, they mean it.

There has been a noticeable change in the appearance of the “cavity,” and it seems that Tour Edge took a bold step with this design. A small section of carbon fiber has been added as part of the refinement, visually connecting the 725 iron range. Additionally, a 14-gram multi-material weight has been incorporated, which draws extra visual attention and helps lower and deepen the center of gravity within the clubhead. At the time of this writing, extra weights do not appear on the Tour Edge website, but the weight can be swapped out while partaking in a club fitting to help dial in swing weight. Overall, the look has sparked much discussion, but I appreciate that these irons bring an aggressive look to the bag.
Feel/Sound
Inside the hollow design of the C725 irons is VIBRCOR, Tour Edge’s TPU material that enhances the sound and feel of the iron. VIBRCOR helps mask the fact that these irons are hollow, giving the impression that they are more comparable to a solid head design. The real benefit lies in the sound produced. Having previously tested both the C722 and C723 irons, I found the advancements in sound between the two models impressive, with the latter offering a much more cohesive tone than the previous model. While working with the C725 irons, I found that the sound conveys a feeling of speed while maintaining a softer undertone at impact. What stands out is that this sound remains consistent unless contact is significantly off-target.
Performance – Tour Edge Exotics C725 Irons
Let’s talk about the performance, shall we? For testing purposes, we were able to get some swings to win with a C725 five, seven, and nine iron. While that is less than a complete set, it helped give a good representation of how these three areas of the set will play. All three irons were paired with a Dynamic Gold Mid 100 shaft, a delightful change from the Elevate 95 MPG shaft that has served as stock for the previous generations. Since we are still battling Old Man Winter up here in NY, testing was mainly conducted inside with the help of a SkyTrak+ launch monitor. /

Reviewing our seven-iron data, I averaged a carry of 165 yards with a swing speed of 82 MPH. That number is certainly at the top end of the spectrum for me when I look back at some other seven irons I’ve hit in the past. For reference, the longest average carry I have for seven in the last several months was 170 yards, which was achieved with a game improvement style iron and a loft three degrees stronger. To me, that helps illustrate that there is plenty of power potential here. Additionally, the spin numbers are well positioned, allowing me to control the ball’s flight and manipulate its trajectory if desired. The descent angle is also favorable, enabling the ball to stop comfortably on the green.
Long irons have never been my favorite, and these days, I consider the five iron to be classified as a long iron. Achieving carry numbers at 185 yards, with several in the data topping the 190 mark, is pretty good for someone who doesn’t regularly play such a club. Meanwhile, generating a peak height of 31 yards, which is just 2 yards shy of the seven-iron peak height, is particularly nice to see as it’s one of the reasons a five-iron isn’t consistently in the bag. Whenever a company enters the discussion about how irons have gotten smaller, part of me always worries about how that will appear in the long irons. I’m happy to report that visually, this club gave me no reason to be concerned.

Tour Edge lists the C725 irons as having a medium amount of forgiveness, and when compared to the E and X irons, it’s not going to pack as much friendliness as those two irons. However, among the three irons tested, there is more than enough forgiveness to get by if you are looking for something with a smaller shape than those other two Exotics models. Give credit to the L-Cup face and Tour Edge’s 3D diamond face, as the C725 irons handled all of my typical misses, which are low and toe side, without any drastic drop-offs in speed or carry distance.
Final Thoughts
Consider this a friendly reminder to stop and notice what Tour Edge is achieving with their Exotics iron lineup. Not only have the C725 irons improved in their profile, but they also pack in plenty of performance. As for the price, Tour Edge prices these irons at $128.99 per club, which adds up to $899.99 for a set of seven irons. With as much as they have packed in, that price tag makes these an incredible deal for those looking for players distance iron.
More information on the entire 725 line is available at www.touredge.com.
Those look really fun to hit. The sizing seems to really find a sweet spot for me.
I’ve kind of been waiting for this one being part of TEEm 2025. As much as I could probably use the forgiveness in the E725’s I’d take the C725’s in a heartbeat.
I’d love to put them up against my 923MHP’s but at first blush I’d say the C’s compare very favorably.
They’re certainly a different kind of look, not sure if I love that or not. But the data shows they can move a golf ball for sure, that’s a damn solid 7i.
Good stuff here Dean!
[QUOTE=”AuzzieMatt, post: 12962203, member: 54652″]
I’ve kind of been waiting for this one being part of TEEm 2025. As much as I could probably use the forgiveness in the E725’s I’d take the C725’s in a heartbeat.
I’d love to put them up against my 923MHP’s but at first blush I’d say the C’s compare very favorably.
[/QUOTE]
You said that with the fairway too, why not order what helps instead of what you want? LOL
[QUOTE=”jdtox, post: 12962377, member: 5944″]
You said that with the fairway too, why not order what helps instead of what you want? LOL
[/QUOTE]
[IMG alt=”Season 5 What GIF by The Office”]https://media3.giphy.com/media/BcMJvmwkmbyWpKkBj3/200.gif[/IMG]
Internet golfer, of course.
I enjoyed the read [USER=782]@ddec[/USER], and the irons really look like they performed well. 9 iron seemed to float a bit maybe, but the mid irons were very strong.
Lookswise, I’m digging the shaping and top line. The cavity isn’t my favorite, but it’s not bad by any means. Incredible value either way.
Great write up! I have my fingers crossed that TEEm Tour Edge gets a chance to try these out. The topline looks perfect.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12962414, member: 1193″]
I enjoyed the read [USER=782]@ddec[/USER], and the irons really look like they performed well. 9 iron seemed to float a bit maybe, but the mid irons were very strong.
Lookswise, I’m digging the shaping and top line. The cavity isn’t my favorite, but it’s not bad by any means. Incredible value either way.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah I was expecting a little more out of the 9 during that set. I’m sure I can probably work that out.
The cavity just seemed like a risk. The weight port makes people think of Apex Pro, and the badging seems to be pretty polarizing. But at address, man they delivered on the shape.
[QUOTE=”ddec, post: 12962462, member: 782″]
Yeah I was expecting a little more out of the 9 during that set. I’m sure I can probably work that out.
The cavity just seemed like a risk. The weight port makes people think of Apex Pro, and the badging seems to be pretty polarizing. But at address, man they delivered on the shape.
[/QUOTE]
Apex is what I thought of too. Personally, I don’t love the look on them either, but it’s a generally accepted design I suppose.
Either way, better feel, better shaping, and performance all under $1000. Impressive.
Not a bad looking iron. The screws and the plate on the cavity has players iron vibes. I wish I could get those peak heights haha
[QUOTE=”jdtox, post: 12962569, member: 5944″]
Not a bad looking iron. The screws and the plate on the cavity has players iron vibes. I wish I could get those peak heights haha
[/QUOTE]
I’ll trade you some peak height for your launch angles
[USER=782]@ddec[/USER] great review – may I ask what irons you play and how these compare to those?
I saw (as noted in a different thread) the X E and C irons last week, and posted a photo of them all side by side. I could play the Es I think and get used to them, but the Cs to me are just a very sexy club – maybe due to the differences in the them compared to the E and X. Maybe because my last 3 sets of irons have all be in the player’s distance category. To take it one notch further, I am playing WAYYYY more now than I did when I had a few of the other irons in my bag, and I think my ball striking is improving – a lot – I am continuing to work on my game and play 2-3 times a week plus some range time. I think I could rock the Cs and for comparison purposes (in reviewing) make a better case for reviews comparing similar irons and how they work for me.
This article now has me pondering (again) and obsessing (again) what would I choose if I were so lucky to have the opportunity as a member of TEEm Tour Edge 2025. So, thanks for that. I had it all figured out last week, now, not so much. I guess I will have to watch my handicap and if these are made available for us TTE Members make my decision accordingly.
Anyway, thanks again for a great write up.
[QUOTE=”JW Smoove, post: 12962792, member: 63219″]
[USER=782]@ddec[/USER] great review – may I ask what irons you play and how these compare to those?
I saw (as noted in a different thread) the X E and C irons last week, and posted a photo of them all side by side. I could play the Es I think and get used to them, but the Cs to me are just a very sexy club – maybe due to the differences in the them compared to the E and X. Maybe because my last 3 sets of irons have all be in the player’s distance category. To take it one notch further, I am playing WAYYYY more now than I did when I had a few of the other irons in my bag, and I think my ball striking is improving – a lot – I am continuing to work on my game and play 2-3 times a week plus some range time. I think I could rock the Cs and for comparison purposes (in reviewing) make a better case for reviews comparing similar irons and how they work for me.
This article now has me pondering (again) and obsessing (again) what would I choose if I were so lucky to have the opportunity as a member of TEEm Tour Edge 2025. So, thanks for that. I had it all figured out last week, now, not so much. I guess I will have to watch my handicap and if these are made available for us TTE Members make my decision accordingly.
Anyway, thanks again for a great write up.
[/QUOTE]
Last season I played JPX 923 Forged. Previous year I mixed and match C723 and ZX5 MKII. I think these would fall in the middle of those two in many categories.
[QUOTE=”ddec, post: 12962860, member: 782″]
Last season I played JPX 923 Forged. Previous year I mixed and match C723 and ZX5 MKII. I think these would fall in the middle of those two in many categories.
[/QUOTE]
Perfect – thanks – My last going back to 2021 are 225s, DPFs and Ai200s – I feel/felt like I play them all well – though admittedly I have issues – but was not playing nearly as much in the past as I am now. I do find subtle differences in distance with each though.
I may be an aberration, in irons (mostly), in that, my focus is generally better with a more demanding club than SGI or maybe even GI – where I sometimes (historically) just line up and swing – with players irons I would think about the shot.
The one constant though, I do NOT work the ball – that is not in my game plan (at least today), I am working of fixing/improving my regular swing which is a slight draw though.
Even though I’m not in the market for irons, I really enjoy reading about all the new releases. These irons are no exception.
[USER=782]@ddec[/USER] Nice to see you able to get some swings in battling Old Man Winter. ?
[QUOTE=”Bernoulli, post: 12962903, member: 42734″]
[USER=782]@ddec[/USER] Nice to see you able to get some swings in battling Old Man Winter. ?
[/QUOTE]
Things seem to be improving this week
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12962205, member: 1579″]
They’re certainly a different kind of look, not sure if I love that or not. But the data shows they can move a golf ball for sure, that’s a damn solid 7i.
Good stuff here Dean!
[/QUOTE]
Agreed, I’d love for TEE to refine the aesthetics, especially in the badge area as this carbon fiber look isn’t doing it for me and seems a touch dated. This is coming from someone who games c722 irons and enjoys them. IMO the badging looked best in the c721 set, and they’ve kind of underwhelmed since then.
Totally agree with you, I’m sure the tech is there, and these will perform for whomever takes the plunge. I really enjoy my c722s.
I’m always interested in what Tour Edge brings out, and although I’m really not a fan of the looks on these, everything else sounds like continued improvement from the previous releases. Looks are important, but if the performance is there I can get past issues with the appearance as long as it isn’t awful, which these aren’t.
Great article. Whenever I read up on TEE, I always think so much tech at a really affordable price point and these fall right there. The back definitely has some resemblance to an apex iron with the weight, but just looks a little less sleek to me. Would be curious if you have it to see how these look at address side by side with the predecessors to see how much they’ve changed it up.
Good stuff [USER=782]@ddec[/USER]. Performance seems to be there. Looks might need more refinement. Compared to others in that players-distance category, less is more.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12962205, member: 1579″]
They’re certainly a different kind of look, not sure if I love that or not. But the data shows they can move a golf ball for sure, that’s a damn solid 7i.
Good stuff here Dean!
[/QUOTE]
These are good looking irons for Tour Edge. The black weight in the back reminds me of the Apex series and TE continues to come in under a lot of competitors when it comes to price. Those that are really worried about price need to take a look at them.
[QUOTE=”ttucliffhanger, post: 12965328, member: 40538″]
These are good looking irons for Tour Edge. The black weight in the back reminds me of the Apex series and TE continues to come in under a lot of competitors when it comes to price. Those that are really worried about price need to take a look at them.
[/QUOTE]
They definitely have a kind of look.
Having seen these in person, throughout the bag – 4 – AW – look amazing at address. Thin top line, medium/squat blade length with the shorter irons.
I’ve not seen a club look so good at address that has a relatively friendly cavity behind it.
You can see a bit of the cavity behind the club at address with the 4 iron (like a lot of players distance irons), but no doubt have the look of a full players club at address.
Currently playing the Srixon ZX& (MK II), but I need more help generally.
This is a serious contender, probably leading the race.
The Callaway AI200 (Apex) has too thick of a top line and is about 30% dearer as well.
The only thing I’m a bit on the fence about is the back of the club look – sometimes intrigued with it, sometimes think it’s too busy with all that black.
Has anyone bought these and can someone provide a first hand review on forgiveness, workability, feel etc?
Srixon ZX7!