You would be hard pressed to find a club type in which all companies follow specific trends more than with hybrids. What we see in the present day is a far cry from the iron-like options of yesteryear. Tour Edge however, believes there is a place for both and with the 725 release, they are sticking to that idea of providing something for everyone.

Quick Take
You will not see two more different hybrid options under one brand. The E725 is staggering in its wide range playability, while the C725 is likely the most player driven design in all of golf. There isn’t a better example of why Tour Edge continues to offer two different options for each club-head in the Exotics releases than these hybrids. Each is a uniquely designed tool for a specific player type, and each check all of the boxes they could hope for. Not to mention, no one does bang for your buck like Tour Edge.
Performance
Tour Edge Exotics E725 Hybrid

As you may have already gathered, the E725 hybrid is the bigger of the two options this for Tour Edge, however the profile honestly isn’t all that different size wise from the E723 we reviewed last year. It isn’t a super large hybrid, but it is in that “tweener” realm, although that seems to be becoming more the trend in the industry right now. The carbon crown with 360 Ridgeback frame helps to create a more balanced size at setup, but the move to matte this year makes the biggest difference.

Of the two hybrids, the E725 is the bonded option, so the only adjustability here is with the Flight Tuning System that uses a single 10g weight placed in the middle-back of the clubhead at a unique angle. According to Tour Edge this meant a 10% lower CG, but also more stability. On the monitor, this all equated to a very playable setup with ample spin for a 19-degree option, though that spin did keep the distance perhaps a bit tamer than anticipated, it also meant that the downrange dispersion was quite good during testing.

At impact, the E725 is a lot of fun. There is a crisp, crunchy feedback which avoids being overly bright, it avoids being metallic and overly dense. On the course, the sound made it even more fun to hit, because every strike just feels like it jumps off the face. All that in mind, the Diamond Face 3D might be the biggest star here as shots low, towards the heel, or toe-side kept impressive spin numbers as well as direction. One thing to keep in mind, though it isn’t really a draw biased head, the size and shaping makes it easy to get the toe through impact, so it also isn’t anti-left.
Forgiving. Repeatable. Fun. The E725 certainly brings all of those things to the table.
Tour Edge Exotics C725 Hybrid

The C725 hybrid is scary if you aren’t prepared for what you are getting into. Not scary in terms of how it performs, but rather that it is a daunting visual if you aren’t prepared for it. There is not a more “player” driven hybrid profile out there in the opinion of this reviewer. In all honestly, it is a direct throwback to the days of Adams hybrids in size and the face shape. You see, though we have seen some companies come with their versions of a square-toe iron like hybrid face, this is the closest we have seen to what Adams was doing so many years ago.

With that in mind, it also means that this is a design with a very specific audience. It is as compact as they come, sure, and it also has a bit of a triangular flow to it at address, but it is that face shape as well as depth that separates things. You have to hit this hybrid like an iron. During testing, the more iron like the strike, the better the performance benefits. However, if you are a picker of the golf ball with your hybrids, it might be best to look towards the E725. Also, as an added bonus, the C725 hybrid does utilize Tour Edge’s +/- 2-degree hosel adapter system.
What you will see in the data averages matched perfectly experiences on the course as the C725 hybrid brings a flatter trajectory to the table which really has it working to the apex. That isn’t to say that the ball flight is low, it is simply getting to its peak in a much different way than the E725 did for me. Given the size and emphasis on being iron like, it shouldn’t be a surprise that the sole design which uses Tour Edge’s Ryzersole shaping cuts through turf and rough well during descending angles of attack.

The feedback at impact does have a slight metallic “pop” to it, but the overall sensation is as solid as the ball flight which confident strikes result in. While it is not what you would call a “forgiving” hybrid, it does offer more playability than most long irons given its added size and placement of mass. In the end, if you seek an iron replacement that isn’t oversized but still offers the iron-like ability to flight and work the ball, then the C725 sits in its own realm among other player’s hybrids.
The Details – E725 and C725 Hybrid
Though the drivers and fairways will inevitably get the most eyeballs on them from golfers when it comes to the Exotics offerings from Tour Edge, this is an area which they are quietly excelling. Despite having many of the same technological bells and whistles at the biggest OEM’s, Tour Edge has kept the 725 hybrids at an unheard of $199.99 price point. With looks, tech, and ample options for players of all types, the company has done it once again.
For more information on either of these hybrids or the entire Tour Edge product lineup, check out their website at www.touredge.com.
Great article [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] These are some really good looking hybrids and the numbers you provided seemed really solid! I wish Tour Edge was more available in my area to test out. Sadly, it feels like the only time I see these clubs is if my local shops have some in their used racks. I would love to give these a shot at the 3 hybrid spot I’m looking to fill in my bag this year.
That is a staggering difference between the 2 models. Just a quick glance on the website and they don’t even look like they are same type of club.
I love that C hybrid shape. So well done if looking to transition from irons into larger clubs.
That price point is just unheard of for clubs with this kind of technology. I’m not looking for hybrids at the moment but the price alone makes me want to test the E.
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] you are spot on about the Adams look of the C based on the pictures in the article. You’d be think the Adams hybrids were the c725’s grandfather!
I know TE sometimes does this with the Hot Launch lines, and maybe the X725 iron set kind of covers this, but I would love to see what they could do in an Exotics hybrid in the 6 or 7 hybrid loft range. Just sounds fun.
That e series almost seems like it’s a UW style. More a mix of hybrid and fw where as the C series as mentioned in the review looks a whole lot like the old Adams stuff and we all know how those things performed.
Don’t need to fill this spot in my bag but if I did these would be on the list to try out for sure.
Great write up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]
Tour Edge still amazes me at putting out a great product that performs as well as they do at the price point they have.
My heart says C but my head says E. I think I’m changing direction a little and going for forgiveness because I can’t work a ball worth a damn, so why not have something easy to hit a long way instead.
These hybrids look so good. I know which model I would choose. Tour Edge is such an interesting company. They just make golf clubs that perform well. I can’t wait to start testing their clubs.
You mentioned it in the article, but it’s hard not to compare them to Adams Golf when they were at their peak. Making quality clubs and using tech that easily works and matches or even outperforms the bigger companies.
Price is right.
I’d lean towards E of course. That profile from Tour Edge has always been very, very strong for me. Can’t say there’s much I personally love about the shaping of the C, but I can see where some people might find it very useful for their game.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12931238, member: 1193″]
Price is right.
I’d lean towards E of course. That profile from Tour Edge has always been very, very strong for me. Can’t say there’s much I personally love about the shaping of the C, but I can see where some people might find it very useful for their game.
[/QUOTE]
The C is….scary. Hahaha
It’s so so so compact.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12931824, member: 1579″]
The C is….scary. Hahaha
It’s so so so compact.
[/QUOTE]
I imagine it’s even smaller in person. That shape just gives me line drive vibes lol
[QUOTE=”pumbaa, post: 12931139, member: 24169″]
That e series almost seems like it’s a UW style. More a mix of hybrid and fw where as the C series as mentioned in the review looks a whole lot like the old Adams stuff and we all know how those things performed.
Don’t need to fill this spot in my bag but if I did these would be on the list to try out for sure.
[/QUOTE]
Honestly, it’s really not. It’s a pretty standard sized hybrid based on the trends today. It’s also not trying to be that tweener design, rather just a hybrid that works for the majority of golfers needs. It’s a fun club, their hybrids always are though imo.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12931834, member: 1579″]
Honestly, it’s really not. It’s a pretty standard sized hybrid based on the trends today. It’s also not trying to be that tweener design, rather just a hybrid that works for the majority of golfers needs. It’s a fun club, their hybrids always are though imo.
[/QUOTE]
I guess the pictures make it look a little bigger. If my 5i keeps being a punk I might have to go hybrid in that spot.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12931827, member: 1193″]
I imagine it’s even smaller in person. That shape just gives me line drive vibes lol
[/QUOTE]
It’s funny you say that, I still have a mental block of super small hybrids for that very reason. When I was a low baller just in the game I tried an Adams PNT, and I killed all the worms in Oklahoma. That lives in my mind to this day ?
[QUOTE=”bigbov, post: 12931070, member: 41109″]
That is a staggering difference between the 2 models. Just a quick glance on the website and they don’t even look like they are same type of club.
[/QUOTE]
Its more stark at setup too.
I love tiny hybrids, but the C is not for the weak minded hahahaha
The E though is an absolute blast to hit
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12931928, member: 1579″]
Its more stark at setup too.
I love tiny hybrids, but the C is not for the weak minded hahahaha
The E though is an absolute blast to hit
[/QUOTE]
My first thought was… C is for you and the E is for me.
And another one. What a great article thanks [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]. For those of us who have returned to hybrids this is timely.
Like many have said, the price point is eye opening, in a good way. The peanut c model is scary small but adjustable. The e looks great has an appealing/confidence inspiring size and is not draw biased.
I have s strong feeling i know what I’d choose, but, one wonders.
[QUOTE=”JW Smoove, post: 12932087, member: 63219″]
And another one. What a great article thanks [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]. For those of us who have returned to hybrids this is timely.
Like many have said, the price point is eye opening, in a good way. The peanut c model is scary small but adjustable. The e looks great has an appealing/confidence inspiring size and is not draw biased.
I have s strong feeling i know what I’d choose, but, one wonders.
[/QUOTE]
Imo, the C is going to be for a super small percentage of golfers, fwiw.
I was thinking similarly though not as extreme as “super small” the moment i saw the C. I do believe your are correct in your assertion, though i with you weren’t.
[QUOTE=”JW Smoove, post: 12932223, member: 63219″]
I was thinking similarly though not as extreme as “super small” the moment i saw the C. I do believe your are correct in your assertion, though i with you weren’t.
[/QUOTE]
I’d honestly say 10-15%
That is a combination of the fact that a most amateurs really struggle with having to hit a hybrid like an iron (down and through the turf) rather than picking the ball, the C, you have to hit like an iron….as well as the fact that it is super small and super workable. I just don’t believe most golfers need that. But, I sure am glad that someone is still producing this style, and at 199, that cool as heck.
Great write up. Love seeing Tour Edge releases and what new things they are doing.
Love the price, love the looks, a must try!
These look great. The profile and size of both are appealing to my eye. Add them to the list of Tour Edge hybrids I want to try.
The c723 hybrid is fantastic and if if they have improved even slightly with the 725 they are going to be tough to beat. Love the shape and size, going matte is also a huge plus for me. Great article [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER], do you have any in hand pics?
[QUOTE=”MH, post: 12934385, member: 38594″]
The c723 hybrid is fantastic and if if they have improved even slightly with the 725 they are going to be tough to beat. Love the shape and size, going matte is also a huge plus for me. Great article [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER], do you have any in hand pics?
[/QUOTE]
All of the pics in the article are taken in hand ??
Or is there something in particular you’re looking for?
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12934400, member: 1579″]
All of the pics in the article are taken in hand ??
Or is there something in particular you’re looking for?
[/QUOTE]
Curious if you have the c723 on hand and can take an address pic beside the c725?
[QUOTE=”MH, post: 12934980, member: 38594″]
Curious if you have the c723 on hand and can take an address pic beside the c725?
[/QUOTE]
I do not, sorry! But the shaping/size is pretty much identical.
Does the weight create more bias in a smaller head or more beneficial in a driver?
[QUOTE=”MH, post: 12935527, member: 38594″]
Does the weight create more bias in a smaller head or more beneficial in a driver?
[/QUOTE]
Here in the C it’s predominantly about getting CG low and hitting swing weights.
There’s larger the footprint of a club, the more impact weight ports at perimeters and in specific locations have. As the head gets smaller, it gets much more precise.
Now, put it all in the toe or heel, you’ll create bias, but here it’s about keeping to neutral
[QUOTE=”MH, post: 12935527, member: 38594″]
Does the weight create more bias in a smaller head or more beneficial in a driver?
[/QUOTE]
Crap, I deleted it when I was trying to mass edit because i misunderstood at first. Ugh. Hahaha
Anywho, in a small head like this, there won’t be as much impact as bigger heads and putting weight at perimeters. Howwwwweeeever, this is such a workable head, I found it to do a good job at dialing in my standard flight more.
For me, moving it toe side just helped me keep the face a little more square and not release so hard.
I found the weights in the drivers to have a bigger impact on launch/spin, but here in the C hybrid it was much more effective for directional flight.
Good write-up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] ! Hybrids have become a bigger part of my bag over the last 2 years so definitely going to try these out!!!
I bought the E when it first came out with a HZRDUS Black shaft. It is very straight and forgiving but not the longest. I love the look as well. Very dependable club. Highly recommend for mid to high handicappers.
[QUOTE=”MrVanillaGorilla, post: 12936533, member: 77273″]
I bought the E when it first came out with a HZRDUS Black shaft. It is very straight and forgiving but not the longest. I love the look as well. Very dependable club. Highly recommend for mid to high handicappers.
[/QUOTE]
I think a really important part of these (and I tried to show it in the homepage review) is that they are NOT low spin hybrids. So while they offer distance, they aren’t chasing that wild west of low spin and max distance bomber hybrids as much as other companies are.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12936547, member: 1579″]
I think a really important part of these (and I tried to show it in the homepage review) is that they are NOT low spin hybrids. So while they offer distance, they aren’t chasing that wild west of low spin and max distance bomber hybrids as much as other companies are.
[/QUOTE]
100% facts. Possibly the first hybrid I’ve owned that stops within 5 to 8 yards of landing. It is very predictable for me.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12932477, member: 1579″]
I’d honestly say 10-15%
That is a combination of the fact that a most amateurs really struggle with having to hit a hybrid like an iron (down and through the turf) rather than picking the ball, the C, you have to hit like an iron….as well as the fact that it is super small and super workable. I just don’t believe most golfers need that. But, I sure am glad that someone is still producing this style, and at 199, that cool as heck.
[/QUOTE]
Do you think the struggle for an amateur is hitting this loft/length club? Or the style of the club?
Meaning would an amateur struggle just as much with a driving iron than this style hybrid because the look of an iron means they know they have to swing it like an iron.
[QUOTE=”odom730, post: 12936597, member: 46310″]
Do you think the struggle for an amateur is hitting this loft/length club? Or the style of the club?
Meaning would an amateur struggle just as much with a driving iron than this style hybrid because the look of an iron means they know they have to swing it like an iron.
[/QUOTE]
Great question, I’m interested to know myself. I had a 4 iron style utility club, loved it, but i never got the most from it, i think my swing speed contributed to that. I wonder how much swing speed in addition to hitting like an iron might factor in with the C.
As someone who has loved the Hy-Wood the past few years, the E series is right up my alley. I do like having a little adjustment capabilities in a hybrid, but in this case, I think the massive forgiveness is well worth the tradeoff based on early impressions.
Funnily enough, in this club, I’d be in the E without a second thought.
I know, makes no sense.
[QUOTE=”odom730, post: 12936597, member: 46310″]
Do you think the struggle for an amateur is hitting this loft/length club? Or the style of the club?
Meaning would an amateur struggle just as much with a driving iron than this style hybrid because the look of an iron means they know they have to swing it like an iron.
[/QUOTE]
Its hard to say, but the main issue there is even less mass to move around and get the CG lower to help facilitate the intended ball flight. I think too, the big thing is most amateurs start trying to pick the ball no matter what long club they have in hand, you know? The C doesn’t do well there, neither to most irons, but the larger E fairway is really good with that impact type.