Many people probably think of the same prominent names when discussing laser rangefinders. Aside from some pop-up brands, the rangefinder market has become somewhat lethargic. Recently, THP has been highlighting Vortex Golf and their incredible transition from birdwatching to golf. I recommend checking out their brand story if you haven’t heard about their journey. As Vortex entered the golf market, they leveraged their optical expertise to create three different laser rangefinders. Today, we are focusing on the Blade Slope rangefinder.

Straight out of the box, the Blade Slope impresses with its rubberized comfort guard grip, ensuring a secure hold and providing an extra layer of protection against accidental falls or drops. Its compact size measures just under 4″ x 3″ and weighs only 6.6 ounces, making it easy to toss into a bag or even one’s pocket for those inconvenient cart path-only rounds.
The top of the rangefinder features a straightforward two-button system: one button for measuring distance and the other for accessing menu options. The measure button has four raised bumps to help you quickly identify the correct button for measuring distance. Both buttons have a soft touch and do not produce a noticeable click when pressed.

On the side of the rangefinder, a built-in magnet allows golfers to attach it to a golf cart for added convenience. Other accessories included in the box are a case, a carabiner clip, a battery, a magnetic ball marker, and a lens cloth.

Shooting Modes – Vortex Golf Blade Slope
Pinspotter Mode
One of Vortex’s three shooting modes is Pinspotter mode, a common feature in rangefinders. Although this is a standard mode, discussions about how effectively and quickly a rangefinder filters out background distractions to focus on the flag can often be overlooked. For the Blade Slope, if multiple objects are detected, the rangefinder will provide the distance to the nearest object. Once the flag is locked on to, an icon will appear on the screen, accompanied by a vibration for added feedback.
Slope Mode
When slope mode is enabled, golfers will see two distance numbers displayed on the screen. The top number indicates the actual yardage to the flagstick, while the bottom number shows the adjusted distance accounting for elevation changes. Next to the slope yardage, there is also a measurement indicating the degree of slope. This information can help understand how certain shots may perform in the future, even when slope mode is not activated. The numbers are accompanied by a + or – sign to indicate whether the shot is uphill or downhill, although that should be easy to assess without the need for the rangefinder.

Have you ever participated in a tournament governed by USGA rules and wondered whether someone in your group is violating the rules by using slope readings? If that person is using the Vortex Blade Slope, it will be easy to identify who is using slope mode. When slope mode is activated, two green LED lights on the side of the device will illuminate every time the measure button is pressed, and they will remain lit until the 10-second auto-shutoff feature activates. While this may seem like a minor feature, it provides a helpful visual cue for the user to turn off slope mode when playing in such events.
Scan Mode
To operate scan mode, hold down the measure button and slowly move the rangefinder from side to side. The advantage of this feature is that you don’t need to change any settings in the menu to activate it. However, please be aware that while using scan mode, the vibrational feedback will be automatically disabled. Vortex states that this mode is beneficial for golfers who want to identify the nearest and furthest points of a dogleg. It can also be helpful for assessing landing zones on forced carries.

Optics
We are noting similar points here as you’ve in our reviews of the Anarch and Blade rangefinders. The optics on the Blade Slope model do not disappoint. Over the past several years, I have tested many rangefinders, most of which were on the budget side. Were the optics acceptable? Yes, they served their purpose, but it becomes clear(no pun intended) that you step up in quality, as is the case with the Blade Slope’s Clear View optics.
While the Anarch model features an illuminated red display, the Blade Slope offers a more traditional black LCD. I had to adjust the diopter slightly to enhance the contrast of the black display, but once I did, everything looked great.

For those who enjoy comparing rangefinder specifications, the numbers for the Blade Slope hold up very well against the competition. It offers a 6x magnification with a reflective range of up to 1,400 yards. The range for lasering the flag is 350 yards, which should be plenty for 99% of golfers. There is also a minimum range of 6 yards, in case you are that golfer who wants to use it greenside. A word of advice: please don’t be that person.
One feature I find particularly useful is the ease of accessing the menu to adjust the modes and measurement options to suit my preferences. It’s quick and simple to enable or disable the pinspotter and slope modes. Additionally, the menu allows for customization of the reticle style displayed on the screen. There are three options available: a single circle, a circle crosshair, and a crosshair without the inner circle. My personal preference is the crosshair without the circle, as it’s a style I have used in the past.

Accuracy
Being in the middle of winter here in New York meant there were sadly no real opportunities for on-course testing with the Blade Slope. Instead, I took it to a local driving range that still had some distance markers, allowing me to compare its readings with those of other rangefinders I trust. As expected, the numbers were very similar, differing by no more than a yard.
During the pinspotter testing, I was pleased to see that the Blade Slope effectively filtered out background distractions, providing an accurate distance to the pin rather than to a tree several yards behind it. Once the flag was acquired, there was a slight vibrational feedback to confirm that the target was locked in. In scan mode, the yardages displayed on the screen changed quickly and accurately. For slope mode testing, we used various objects, such as trees and light poles in different locations, to simulate uphill and downhill pins. In every case, the results met expectations and did not raise any concerns about accuracy.
Warranty
Manufacturer warranties tend to get overlooked until that day something goes wrong, which leads to a frantic search of the company’s website for information. If you have purchased a rangefinder from one of the budget brands, the warranty and replacement policy may be inconsistent. This is where Vortex flexes its muscle with its VIP warranty and proves they have your back if something goes wrong with your device. On their website, Vortex outlines their VIP warranty and how it’s about you, the customer.

Battery
Considering all the specifications mentioned above, one crucial aspect still needs to be addressed: the battery. Increasingly, rangefinders are equipped with onboard rechargeable batteries. Vortex Slope is a bit old-school, sticking with the tried and true CR2 battery. When the battery level drops to around 25%, a low battery icon will appear on the screen as a gentle reminder. This icon will remain visible every time a yardage is measured until the battery is replaced. Alas, I did not immediately test this, but I will keep an eye on it during the season, as the Blade Slope will be the rangefinder attached to the bag.

Final Thoughts
Blade Slope is the middle sibling among the Blade and Anarch rangefinders. It provides one extra shooting mode compared to the Blade while still lacking the advanced features of the Anarch. Priced at $399.99 when purchased through Vortex’s website, it offers a good balance of quality and functionality. If red optics and image stabilization aren’t top priorities for you, the Blade Slope has more than enough options to meet your needs.
More information on the Blade Slope and other Vortex devices can be found at www.vortexgolf.com.





[QUOTE=”Papa 3-Putts, post: 13553243, member: 83388″]
Hark! I come home from my usual Friday afternoon round, and what do I find?
A box!
[ATTACH type=”full” width=”268px” alt=”IMG_4744.jpeg”]9386141[/ATTACH]
With some awesome stuff!!
[ATTACH type=”full” width=”282px” alt=”IMG_4746.jpeg”]9386142[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full” width=”271px” alt=”IMG_4747.jpeg”]9386143[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” width=”293px” alt=”IMG_4748.jpeg”]9386144[/ATTACH]
More info and photos to come…thanks THP and [USER=82894]@Vortex_Golf[/USER] for the opportunity to test this awesome product!
P.S. – It’s magnetic!!! I’m easily amused.
[/QUOTE]
All three models have a magnet!
[QUOTE=”Muchmore, post: 13553259, member: 56094″]
All three models have a magnet!
[/QUOTE]
Oh, I know. I’m just really excited about it. ?
Did yours show up [USER=3386]@BigMac[/USER] ?
Not yet, just checked the mailbox and my front porch a few minutes ago.
First round with the Vortex Blade Slope yesterday. Incredible…I’ll leave it at that for right now.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9386599[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”Papa 3-Putts, post: 13559408, member: 83388″]
First round with the Vortex Blade Slope yesterday. Incredible…I’ll leave it at that for right now.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_4750.jpeg”]9386599[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Tell me one thing at least lol
[QUOTE=”Muchmore, post: 13560187, member: 56094″]
Tell me one thing at least lol
[/QUOTE]
The optical clarity is absolutely off the charts – absolutely unbelievable. I can probably read the grain on the green from 250 yards+ out.
[QUOTE=”Papa 3-Putts, post: 13560242, member: 83388″]
The optical clarity is absolutely off the charts – absolutely unbelievable. I can probably read the grain on the green from 250 yards+ out.
[/QUOTE]
Love that! That’s been something that has blown my mind when it came to the Anarch. Love to see it’s just as good on the Blade Slope
[QUOTE=”Papa 3-Putts, post: 13560242, member: 83388″]
The optical clarity is absolutely off the charts – absolutely unbelievable. I can probably read the grain on the green from 250 yards+ out.
[/QUOTE]
[IMG alt=”Oh Yeah Yes GIF by United Fight League”]https://media3.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWJjY2ZjNTNjZHhvdjczYjBveTNhYWJmNDB0eGg5ZDhsZm4zeHp3aW1rYzJqYXdkeCZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/QtieFtKtUbrYoWfD4z/200.gif[/IMG]
[IMG alt=”Wait Goodbye GIF by Silicon Valley”]https://media4.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWJjY2ZjNTNjNHZzOTVic3liM2t6bnN3YWU4dXJudGR0dXk3bDJpajlyNWM3czAzOCZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/26BRuo6sLetdllPAQ/200.gif[/IMG]
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13561221, member: 3386″]
[IMG alt=”Wait Goodbye GIF by Silicon Valley”]https://media4.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWJjY2ZjNTNjNHZzOTVic3liM2t6bnN3YWU4dXJudGR0dXk3bDJpajlyNWM3czAzOCZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/26BRuo6sLetdllPAQ/200.gif[/IMG]
[/QUOTE]
Any news my man?
20 minutes ago…we have arrival. More to come in a few.
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13563669, member: 3386″]
20 minutes ago…we have arrival. More to come in a few.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_7237.jpeg”]9386861[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Awesome!
VORTEX BLADE SLOPE – INITIAL REVIEW
I was selected by THP to review the Vortex Blade Slope Laser Rangefinder. I just received the unit and this will be my first impressions and initial review of it.
By way of background, I’m a 63 year old mid-handicap (11-13) golfer and am somewhat distance challenged, so I should have plenty of opportunities to test this rangefinder from longer yardages. 😀 I golf 3 days per week year-round and usually log somewhere around 140 rounds per year, with most of my rounds being on the two courses at my home club.
I have previous experience with several different rangefinders from other companies – I have owned a Bushnell Tour V2 and V3, Shot Scope Pro L2 and Callaway 300 Pro, and have used several other brands/models owned by friends. I have been using the Callaway 300 Pro for nearly two years and have logged well over 200 rounds with it. I’m familiar with its use and comfortable with trusting the readings I get from it, so I will be taking it out and comparing readings with the Vortex Blade Slope, as well as ergonomics, speed of acquisition and ease of locking targets over the course of the review period.
In the shipping package was the Blade Slope rangefinder itself, a handwritten welcome card from Vortex Golf, and an AirTag holder with an attached lanyard:
The rangefinder comes with a CR2 lithium battery, a semi-hardshell case with both zippered and elastic closures and a magnetic ball marker attached to the front of the case, a carabiner to attach the case to your bag, a cleaning cloth, owner’s manual, and a certificate for a free Vortex golf hat. Nice bonus swag!
The AirTag holder comes with the rubberized holder itself and an assortment of stickers to decorate/disguise your AirTag so as to not make it immediately obvious what it is:
There are two attachment points on the body of the rangefinder just below the eyepiece on either side (attention: @G-Man, who asked for a photo of this in another thread), where you can attach the AirTag holder or any other lanyard you might desire to use:
The rangefinder fits nicely in my size XXL hand:
Next up I’ll take a closer look at the device itself, and some comparisons with the other two rangefinders I currently have on hand.
As someone who has used Vortex optics on my rifles for a long time, this company makes great products. They are ruggedly built and have great glass quality. Add their gold standard level warranty and you really can’t go wrong with this line of rangefinders. If my Nikon/Callaway ever bites the dust, this is the one I’m buying.
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13563903, member: 3386″]
speed of acquisition
[/QUOTE]
Super super interested in your thoughts here since I also have used the 300 Pro.
The case of the Blade Slope rangefinder is solid and feels textured and rubberized to the touch, making it both comfortable and secure in hand. There is a magnet on the opposite side of the case, which attaches strongly to ferrous surfaces – when I set it on my kitchen scale to weigh the rangefinder, it attached so strongly that I was able to pick up the scale with it. At the front of the device you can see the translucent LED portals, which light up green as an external indicator of the slope feature being in use:
The back end of the rangefinder has the eyepiece, with adjustable diopter and a pointer indicator to reference your preferred adjustment (visible at about the 1 o’clock position here). The lanyard attachment points are visible on either side beneath the eyepiece, and below that is the battery port for the CR2 battery which powers the device. Personally, I prefer rangefinders powered by a replaceable battery over those with built-in rechargeable batteries. If I forget to recharge it the device is unusable, whereas if the CR2 goes dead I can pull a spare out of my bag, replace it, and have it back in operation in seconds. I find I only have to replace CR2 Lithium batteries once a year or so, they last quite a long time. Lithium batteries are also optimal for devices like rangefinders because they have a very low discharge rate when not in use and won’t go dead and/or corrode in a relatively short time like standard alkaline batteries will.
Opening the battery port for replacement is simple – flip up the hinged tab (visible on the bottom with a cutout for access), unscrew the cover (which is sealed with a rubber o-ring), replace the battery and reverse the process:
On the business end of the rangefinder, we see the optical lens and laser emitter and receiver, with a frontal look at the two aforementioned translucent LED portals to show the use of slope mode. It will be clearly obvious to anybody around you that slope mode is in use, they are visible from the front or either side of the rangefinder and glow bright green. You can also see how the ruggedized case wraps around the front of the device to protect it from bumps/drops:
The top of the device has the Menu and Measure buttons, which are clearly labeled and easily accessed. The Measure button has 4 raised nubs on it so you can tell by feel that you’re pressing the correct button when you have it up to your eye. The Menu button accesses the ability to turn Slope Mode on/off, turn PinSpotting mode on/off, change the aiming reticle (three choices available), and select Yards or Meters for your measurements. A single press of the button brings up the Menu mode, and a two-second press will exit when you’re done. If no button is pressed for 30 seconds it will exit Menu Mode automatically.
To measure distance with the rangefinder, you quickly press the Measure button once to wake the rangefinder up, then press it again to obtain your measurement. If you hold the Measure button down, the rangefinder will go into Scan Mode, which allows you to scan around and take measurements to different points without having to press and re-press the button each time:
Overall it’s a very well built and solid device. Vortex is well known for a variety of outdoor optical devices including rifle scopes, binoculars and spotting scopes, and their experience and attention to detail clearly translate into their golf rangefinder product lines.
[QUOTE=”Muchmore, post: 13563980, member: 56094″]
Super super interested in your thoughts here since I also have used the 300 Pro.
[/QUOTE]
I’ll have them both out on the course on Friday and will definitely do some comparisons between them. (y) IIRC, you had some difficulties with the speed of the 300 Pro – it has worked well for me and is quick to acquire targets, so it will be interesting to see the difference, if any, between it and the Blade Slope.
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13564110, member: 3386″]
I’ll have them both out on the course on Friday and will definitely do some comparisons between them. (y) IIRC, you had some difficulties with the speed of the 300 Pro – it has worked well for me and is quick to acquire targets, so it will be interesting to see the difference, if any, between it and the Blade Slope.
[/QUOTE]
I actually think the 300 Pro was quick. The Anarch to me, lags behind both the Pro 300 and the NX10 in terms of target acquisition. I trusted the numbers on the Anarch more though
Briefly playing around with the Blade Slope from my front yard, I don’t believe range is going to be an issue on the golf course. I was able to measure to the side of a house 672 yards away at a +6° slope, and managed to acquire a palm tree at 1031 yards at a -3° slope. Those are measurements much longer than I’ll be ranging on a golf course. The house was an easy measurement because it’s a big target, and locked up immediately. The palm tree at that distance took a bit of breath control and steadying my arms against my body, but that’s a very small target at a very long distance – that’s over a half mile away.
Smaller targets at distances I’d commonly find on the golf course were easy – it effortlessly acquired targets like power poles, fence posts, etc. in the 250-400 yard range and the optics were very clear. I’ll have it out on the course Friday for some “real world” measurements in its intended environment.
AirTag installed in the holder, with one of Vortex’s stickers applied to the front. The AirTag is very secure in the holder, it would take some seriously bad handling to accidentally pop it out:
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13565746, member: 3386″]
AirTag installed in the holder, with one of Vortex’s stickers applied to the front. The AirTag is very secure in the holder, it would take some seriously bad handling to accidentally pop it out:
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_7250.jpeg”]9387032[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
I dig the stickers they gave you guys for the air tag. I haven’t seen it mentioned, does the air tag come with it or just the holder?
[QUOTE=”jdtox, post: 13568656, member: 5944″]
I dig the stickers they gave you guys for the air tag. I haven’t seen it mentioned, does the air tag come with it or just the holder?
[/QUOTE]
The AirTag holder comes with the holder itself and the stickers, the AirTag itself is not included.
Here are a few comparisons between the Vortex Blade Slope and the other two rangefinders I currently have on hand – the Callaway Pro 300 and Shot Scope Pro L2.
Physically they’re fairly similar in size, with the Shot Scope being the largest, the Callaway being the most compact, and the Blade Slope in between the other two in size:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9387358[/ATTACH]
Putting them on my trusty kitchen scale for a weigh-in (all with CR2 batteries installed for consistency), the Blade Slope comes in as the middleweight at 194g / 6.8 oz:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9387359[/ATTACH]
The Shot Scope is the heaviest of them all, tipping the scales at 206g / 7.3 oz:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9387360[/ATTACH]
The Callaway is the featherweight contender, at 162g / 5.7 oz:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9387361[/ATTACH]
The Blade Slope feels substantial in hand without feeling overly bulky or burdensome; its weight, along with the rubberized, textured surface, gives it the feel of a solid, well-built device which will stand up to the rigors of use. Given Vortex’s extensive experience in designing/building outdoor optics this is unsurprising, yet pleasantly reassuring.
All three of these rangefinders offer similar operational features:
[LIST]
[/LIST]
The Vortex Blade Slope is the only device of the three (and of any other rangefinders I personally know of) which uses lights to identify the use of slope mode. In both of the other devices compared here, slope mode use is indicated by a green colored tab visible at the external slope switch (visible in the photos above). Both of the other devices use mechanical, external switches to turn slope mode on/off; the Vortex Blade Slope requires you to activate or deactivate the feature internally via the Menu button.
Some form of external verification of slope mode status is an essential feature for competitive golfers, since usage of slope mode is disallowed in most competitions. Having the activation take place internally via the Menu is perhaps the safest option for those golfers, since there is no way it could be accidentally activated by inadvertently hitting the external switch as on the other two rangefinders – it would require a deliberate effort to enter the menu system of the Blade Slope device and turn it on. Furthermore, the bright green LED lights illuminating would be a dead giveaway that slope mode was activated and needed to be turned off prior to the beginning of competition.
I’ll have the Blade Slope out on the course for its first round today, and over the course of the next few weeks I’ll be testing the features while playing. I’ll also be bringing the other two rangefinders along at various times to compare/contrast them against each other in actual on-course usage.
Feel free to quote or tag me if you have any questions or things you’d like to see from my reviews of this rangefinder, I’ll be happy to jump in and answer them.
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13570493, member: 3386″]
Here are a few comparisons between the Vortex Blade Slope and the other two rangefinders I currently have on hand – the Callaway Pro 300 and Shot Scope Pro L2.
Physically they’re fairly similar in size, with the Shot Scope being the largest, the Callaway being the most compact, and the Blade Slope in between the other two in size:
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_7246.jpeg”]9387358[/ATTACH]
Putting them on my trusty kitchen scale for a weigh-in (all with CR2 batteries installed for consistency), the Blade Slope comes in as the middleweight at 194g / 6.8 oz:
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_7247.jpeg”]9387359[/ATTACH]
The Shot Scope is the heaviest of them all, tipping the scales at 206g / 7.3 oz:
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_7249.jpeg”]9387360[/ATTACH]
The Callaway is the featherweight contender, at 162g / 5.7 oz:
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_7248.jpeg”]9387361[/ATTACH]
The Blade Slope feels substantial in hand without feeling overly bulky or burdensome; its weight, along with the rubberized, textured surface, gives it the feel of a solid, well-built device which will stand up to the rigors of use. Given Vortex’s extensive experience in designing/building outdoor optics this is unsurprising, yet pleasantly reassuring.
All three of these rangefinders offer similar operational features:
[LIST]
[/LIST]
The Vortex Blade Slope is the only device of the three (and of any other rangefinders I personally know of) which uses lights to identify the use of slope mode. In both of the other devices compared here, slope mode use is indicated by a green colored tab visible at the external slope switch (visible in the photos above). Both of the other devices use mechanical, external switches to turn slope mode on/off; the Vortex Blade Slope requires you to activate or deactivate the feature internally via the Menu button.
Some form of external verification of slope mode status is an essential feature for competitive golfers, since usage of slope mode is disallowed in most competitions. Having the activation take place internally via the Menu is perhaps the safest option for those golfers, since there is no way it could be accidentally activated by inadvertently hitting the external switch as on the other two rangefinders – it would require a deliberate effort to enter the menu system of the Blade Slope device and turn it on. Furthermore, the bright green LED lights illuminating would be a dead giveaway that slope mode was activated and needed to be turned off prior to the beginning of competition.
I’ll have the Blade Slope out on the course for its first round today, and over the course of the next few weeks I’ll be testing the features while playing. I’ll also be bringing the other two rangefinders along at various times to compare/contrast them against each other in actual on-course usage.
Feel free to quote or tag me if you have any questions or things you’d like to see from my reviews of this rangefinder, I’ll be happy to jump in and answer them.
[/QUOTE]
Not shocked at all at the weight difference between the Pro 300 and the Blade Slope. The 300 was a featherweight like you said. I can’t wait to hear some comparisons after a couple rounds!
[QUOTE=”Muchmore, post: 13563980, member: 56094″]
Super super interested in your thoughts here since I also have used the 300 Pro.
[/QUOTE]
I’ll go into more detail in my next installment of the review once I sort today’s photos and write it up, but the short answer is that I think the acquisition time on the Blade Slope is *slightly* slower than the 300 Pro. I say *slightly* because I’m talking milliseconds, probably not something I could even measure, but I can feel it when I shoot them back to back with each other.
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13571302, member: 3386″]
I’ll go into more detail in my next installment of the review once I sort today’s photos and write it up, but the short answer is that I think the acquisition time on the Blade Slope is *slightly* slower than the 300 Pro. I say *slightly* because I’m talking milliseconds, probably not something I could even measure, but I can feel it when I shoot them back to back with each other.
[/QUOTE]
That’s interesting. I thought the Anarch was noticeably slower.
It’s still fast, but it’s the slowest of the rangefinders I’ve used. Not that that’s a bad thing. Too fast and I’m concerned I didn’t actually hit the pin so I quite appreciate it “taking it’s time”
[QUOTE=”Muchmore, post: 13571304, member: 56094″]
That’s interesting. I thought the Anarch was noticeably slower.
It’s still fast, but it’s the slowest of the rangefinders I’ve used. Not that that’s a bad thing. Too fast and I’m concerned I didn’t actually hit the pin so I quite appreciate it “taking it’s time”
[/QUOTE]
Interesting. I’m going to pay attention to this next time I use it. I’ve never really noticed it being significantly slower than anything else I’ve tried.
[QUOTE=”jdtox, post: 13571326, member: 5944″]
Interesting. I’m going to pay attention to this next time I use it. I’ve never really noticed it being significantly slower than anything else I’ve tried.
[/QUOTE]
Never more than a second, to be clear. Not enough to even be concerned about. Just slower than others
I had the Blade Slope out on the course for the first time yesterday. I also brought my Callaway Pro 300 to compare it against for accuracy and operation. I’ve used the Pro 300 for 2 years, compared it against multiple other rangefinders, and am fully confident in its accuracy, so it’s a useful standard to compare against.
I shot somewhere around 50-60 measurements throughout the round (it was a slow round, so I had plenty of time to play around with them) comparing the two against each other, and the accuracy of the Blade Slope was perfect – on almost every measurement it matched the Pro 300 exactly in both yardage and degree of slope, with a few exceptions where they were 1 yard apart (inconsequential, and well within an acceptable margin of error). The Blade Slope had no trouble acquiring pins, even with considerable background clutter, and the PinSpotter feature gives a tactile indicator of lock by 3 short bursts of vibration, and a flag symbol to indicate that it locked on the flagstick.
These are some of the flags which it had no trouble acquiring and locking on (note the background clutter in each of them):
This was the only pin it struggled to lock all day long – maybe because of the large, solid surfaces of the old clubhouse and new clubhouse under construction behind it:
The Scan feature works very well. You activate it by holding down the Measure button, then scanning the rangefinder around to various targets and watching the numbers change in the display as it acquires them. I was easily able to catch the face of a bunker located 234 yards downhill from me, and used it several times to scan trees along doglegs, cover distances over water, etc. It’s faster and more convenient than repeatedly pushing the Measure button at every target you want to measure.
You’re offered 3 reticle options in the viewfinder – Circle, Circle Crosshair, or Crosshair. They’re selectable by pressing the Menu button on top of the rangefinder, then using the Measure button to select, then Menu button to save. The reticles look like this (image from the Blade Slope User Manual):
The reticle display is clearly visible in the eyepiece, as are the yardage numbers, slope percentage and flag icon. A point of personal preference – in comparing the Pro 300 and Blade Slope, the Pro 300 uses much bolder/larger digits in its display and is easier for me to read. The digits/icons in the Blade Slope are smaller and thinner – still perfectly readable even for my old eyes which need reading glasses when sitting in front of a computer or reading product labels, but I do appreciate the darker, larger display in the Pro 300.
As I referenced upthread in a reply to @Muchmore, I also compared the speed of target acquisition between the Blade Slope and Pro 300 by repeatedly shooting them back to back. The Blade Slope was very slightly slower to lock target, but the difference is so small that it’s not even measurable – we’re talking milliseconds of difference. I could feel it, but if I wasn’t shooting the two of them back to back I’d never notice it. It’s plenty fast enough locking targets, well under one second, and on par with any other rangefinder I’ve ever used.
As I mentioned before, the Blade Slope has two green LED lights on the front of the unit to indicate when Slope Mode is activated. In actual use on the course I didn’t even notice them as far as any impact to my use of the device, but they’re clearly visible to those around you. They’re not obnoxious, but they’re there and you’re not going to get away with using Slope Mode in a tournament setting without it being detected. These pictures show what the LED lights look like in daylight when activated:
There has been some discussion about the AirTag holder, and whether it’s a hindrance/bother when using the rangefinder. I can safely say that the worries about it are completely overblown. When the rangefinder is hanging on the cart by the magnet you can either position the AirTag holder in front of or behind the rangefinder and it’s minimally even noticeable when the rangefinder is positioned with the eyepiece upward:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9387648[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full”]9387649[/ATTACH]
I chose to keep it positioned toward the inside (facing me in the cart), and the added bonus of that is that your hand traps the AirTag holder against the rangefinder when you grab it, completely eliminating any issue with it dangling or flopping around. It’s small and fits easily into your palm so it’s not inconvenient and doesn’t interfere with your hold or the operation of the rangefinder at all:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9387650[/ATTACH]
When you’re using it in that manner, you can’t even tell that the AirTag holder is there:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9387651[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13573538, member: 3386″]
You’re offered 3 reticle options in the viewfinder – Circle, Circle Crosshair, or Crosshair. They’re selectable by pressing the Menu button on top of the rangefinder, then using the Measure button to select, then Menu button to save. The reticles look like this (image from the Blade Slope User Manual):
[/QUOTE]
Which reticle have you settled on?
[QUOTE=”Muchmore, post: 13573608, member: 56094″]
Which reticle have you settled on?
[/QUOTE]
I like the Circle Crosshair best. I think it’s the most visible and easiest to put on the target. Which one do you use?
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13573882, member: 3386″]
I like the Circle Crosshair best. I think it’s the most visible and easiest to put on the target. Which one do you use?
[/QUOTE]
I tried circle crosshair, but am just on circle now
[QUOTE=”Muchmore, post: 13573889, member: 56094″]
I tried circle crosshair, but am just on circle now
[/QUOTE]
The nice thing is that they’re so easy to change if you want to play around with them. The Menu system is real easy to access with the dedicated Menu button and it’s a simple menu with clear options.
How many times have you been able to get the Blade Slope out so far @Papa 3-Putts ?
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13573946, member: 3386″]
The nice thing is that they’re so easy to change if you want to play around with them. The Menu system is real easy to access with the dedicated Menu button and it’s a simple menu with clear options.
[/QUOTE]
I’d like to expand on this a bit, especially after playing around with it a bit on the course. The menu system on the Blade Slope is very simple (Slope on/off, PinSpotter on/off, reticle selection (three choices) and yards/meters. They’re clearly marked and you cycle through them with successive pushes of the Menu button. It’s very simple to make changes while you’re out on the course and doesn’t require a manual to figure out what you’re doing.
For most of us it’s a ‘set and forget’ thing, but it’s nice if you want to try the different reticles, and it would really suck if you normally use Slope Mode and couldn’t figure out how to turn it off while you’re sitting on the first tee in a competition setting where it’s not allowed to be used. With the Blade Slope it’s obvious and only takes a couple seconds.
So far, three times on three different courses in three different types of environments.
1st round: Calm, overcast day in NE Tennessee. Sort of past peak as far as fall colors go, so the backdrops were mostly green and brown. The biggest indicator of how good the Vortex is came during this round – #17 is a par 3, slightly downhill and over a gully. My playing partner’s Bushnell picked up the pin at 151 actual, playing at 148. For me, this would either be a hard 8 iron or slightly choked down, smooth 7 iron. The Vortex picked the pin up at 143 actual, playing at 141 – now we’re at smooth, slightly choked down 8 iron….and a choice between my partner’s distance from his Bushnell and my distance from the Vortex that I was using for the first time. Since I’m testing the Vortex, I went with the Vortex distance – my pure 8 iron landed pin-high, 7 feet right of the hole, and spun back to about 12 feet. I missed the putt – I’m not Papa 1-Putts – but that moment right there, in the very first round, sold me on the Vortex, because I would have bombed the green if I had trusted my partner’s Bushnell distance.
No problems locking in on the pin (once I figured out how to do it…because who reads directions, right?). Even before I figured out how to scan and get a pin lock, I was getting accurate distances. I really like how it gives both the actual and the slope distance, along with the angle, on the display, like this:
Although this example image shows the circle, I prefer the circle with the crosshairs. I need all the help I can get.
2nd round: Bright and sunny, but very windy day. Course was on the western shore of Maryland, right on the Potomac River.
Between the 20 mph winds, gusting to 35-40 mph, the very bright sky, and several holes with the Potomac River in the backdrop – I think I only had one pin where the backdrop gave me issues with getting a lock on the pin…I got the distance I needed, just not a lock. I also did not have any issues with getting accurate distances on other shots, like fairways, bunkers, and other landmarks.
3rd round: This round was played at a links-style course in southeastern Virginia with some fellow THPers. Crystal clear sky, peak fall colors, tons of mounds, bunkers, and heavy rough.
Again, zero problems with getting distances and pin locks with the Vortex. Super clear optics – I haven’t really measured how long it takes to lock yet…I’ll work on that this week. I will also bust out the Voice Caddie Laser Fit rangefinder in my next round (probably Wednesday) to get some comparisons on accuracy and speed. Also, just like @BigMac mentioned – the AirTag dongle doesn’t bother me in the least…I have it in same spot on mine.
Now that I think about it – although I haven’t actually timed how long it takes to get a lock…there are several times where I found myself shooting it twice, simply because it locked so fast I wasn’t sure I was really on the target yet. Never a vastly different measurement.
So yeah…it locks in really fast.
[QUOTE=”Papa 3-Putts, post: 13576658, member: 83388″]
Now that I think about it – although I haven’t actually timed how long it takes to get a lock…there are several times where I found myself shooting it twice, simply because it locked so fast I wasn’t sure I was really on the target yet. Never a vastly different measurement.
So yeah…it locks in really fast.
[/QUOTE]
I was the same way with the Anarch. It’s super quick to lock onto the flag, plus the pulse feedback is just satisfying to me.
Since there’s been some talk about the PinSpotter feature on the Vortex rangefinders, that was something I specifically looked at and recorded during my round today. I recorded 18 approach shots (actually 4 of them were par 3 distances and one was to the pin from the tee box on a par 4, just to test the long distance capability). I took note of the flag color on each green (to see if it had problems with a particular flag color), the distance measured, and whether I got a PinSpotter lock (three short bursts of vibration and the flag icon illuminating in the display). I also verified each measurement against my GPS watch to make sure they were at least very close (with no expectation of an exact match, since all I’m getting on the GPS watch is F/M/B measurements). It was a sunny, bright day, approximately 88°F, and my round lasted from late morning until mid-afternoon.
These were my results:
Front 9
HoleParFlag ColorDistance MeasuredPinSpotter Lock? (Y/N)#14Blue165Yes#24Red176Yes#34White166NO#45Blue116Yes#53Red151 (par 3, from tee)Yes#64White54Yes#75Blue65NO#83Red123 (par 3, from tee)Yes#94White143Yes
Back 9
HoleParFlag ColorDistance MeasuredPinSpotter Lock? (Y/N)#104Blue129Yes#114Red162Yes#123White132 (par 3, from tee)Yes#134Blue197Yes#144Red392 (par 4, from tee)Yes#155White202Yes#164Blue170Yes#173Red120 (par 3, from tee)NO#184White132NO
Out of 18 total measurements, 14 of them achieved PinSpotter lock and 4 did not. #18 was the only flag which had a clear background with only sky behind it, all the others had some degree of background clutter (buildings, walls/fences, trees, grass, or some/all of the above. PinSpotter missed 2 white flags, 1 red flag and 1 blue flag. The flagsticks at my course have small sleeves of reflective material located about 2 feet below the flag, but I was focusing the reticle solely on the flag itself on each of the measurements.
I was driving a cart, and was bracing against the steering wheel for stabilization when shooting all the above measurements, for whatever that may or may not be worth. Of the 4 which did not achieve PinSpotter lock, 3 of them were correct distances (as verified by my GPS watch) even though they didn’t confirm it with vibration; the other one repeatedly showed a measurement to something in the background which was 30 yards longer than my GPS measurement and was obviously incorrect even to my eye.
So overall, 95% of the measurements were exactly correct, and PinSpotter achieved a confirmed lock on 78% of the targets shot.
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13577665, member: 3386″]
Since there’s been some talk about the PinSpotter feature on the Vortex rangefinders, that was something I specifically looked at and recorded during my round today. I recorded 18 approach shots (actually 4 of them were par 3 distances and one was to the pin from the tee box on a par 4, just to test the long distance capability). I took note of the flag color on each green (to see if it had problems with a particular flag color), the distance measured, and whether I got a PinSpotter lock (three short bursts of vibration and the flag icon illuminating in the display). I also verified each measurement against my GPS watch to make sure they were at least very close (with no expectation of an exact match, since all I’m getting on the GPS watch is F/M/B measurements). It was a sunny, bright day, approximately 88°F, and my round lasted from late morning until mid-afternoon.
These were my results:
[B]Front 9[/B]
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD][B]Hole[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]Par[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]Flag Color[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]Distance Measured[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]PinSpotter Lock? (Y/N)[/B][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#1[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Blue[/TD]
[TD]165[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#2[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Red[/TD]
[TD]176[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#3[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]White[/TD]
[TD]166[/TD]
[TD][B]NO[/B][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#4[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]Blue[/TD]
[TD]116[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#5[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]Red[/TD]
[TD]151 (par 3, from tee)[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#6[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]White[/TD]
[TD]54[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#7[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]Blue[/TD]
[TD]65[/TD]
[TD][B]NO[/B][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#8[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]Red[/TD]
[TD]123 (par 3, from tee)[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#9[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]White[/TD]
[TD]143[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[B]Back 9[/B]
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD][B]Hole[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]Par[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]Flag Color[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]Distance Measured[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]PinSpotter Lock? (Y/N)[/B][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#10[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Blue[/TD]
[TD]129[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#11[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Red[/TD]
[TD]162[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#12[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]White[/TD]
[TD]132 (par 3, from tee)[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#13[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Blue[/TD]
[TD]197[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#14[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Red[/TD]
[TD]392 (par 4, from tee)[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#15[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]White[/TD]
[TD]202[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#16[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Blue[/TD]
[TD]170[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#17[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]Red[/TD]
[TD]120 (par 3, from tee)[/TD]
[TD][B]NO[/B][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#18[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]White[/TD]
[TD]132[/TD]
[TD][B]NO[/B][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Out of 18 total measurements, 14 of them achieved PinSpotter lock and 4 did not. #18 was the only flag which had a clear background with only sky behind it, all the others had some degree of background clutter (buildings, walls/fences, trees, grass, or some/all of the above. PinSpotter missed 2 white flags, 1 red flag and 1 blue flag. The flagsticks at my course have small sleeves of reflective material located about 2 feet below the flag, but I was focusing the reticle solely on the flag itself on each of the measurements.
I was driving a cart, and was bracing against the steering wheel for stabilization when shooting all the above measurements, for whatever that may or may not be worth. Of the 4 which did not achieve PinSpotter lock, 3 of them were correct distances (as verified by my GPS watch) even though they didn’t confirm it with vibration; the other one repeatedly showed a measurement to something in the background which was 30 yards longer than my GPS measurement and was obviously incorrect even to my eye.
So overall, 95% of the measurements were exactly correct, and PinSpotter achieved a confirmed lock on 78% of the targets shot.
[/QUOTE]
Great test!
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13577665, member: 3386″]
Since there’s been some talk about the PinSpotter feature on the Vortex rangefinders, that was something I specifically looked at and recorded during my round today. I recorded 18 approach shots (actually 4 of them were par 3 distances and one was to the pin from the tee box on a par 4, just to test the long distance capability). I took note of the flag color on each green (to see if it had problems with a particular flag color), the distance measured, and whether I got a PinSpotter lock (three short bursts of vibration and the flag icon illuminating in the display). I also verified each measurement against my GPS watch to make sure they were at least very close (with no expectation of an exact match, since all I’m getting on the GPS watch is F/M/B measurements). It was a sunny, bright day, approximately 88°F, and my round lasted from late morning until mid-afternoon.
These were my results:
[B]Front 9[/B]
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD][B]Hole[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]Par[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]Flag Color[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]Distance Measured[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]PinSpotter Lock? (Y/N)[/B][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#1[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Blue[/TD]
[TD]165[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#2[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Red[/TD]
[TD]176[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#3[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]White[/TD]
[TD]166[/TD]
[TD][B]NO[/B][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#4[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]Blue[/TD]
[TD]116[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#5[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]Red[/TD]
[TD]151 (par 3, from tee)[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#6[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]White[/TD]
[TD]54[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#7[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]Blue[/TD]
[TD]65[/TD]
[TD][B]NO[/B][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#8[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]Red[/TD]
[TD]123 (par 3, from tee)[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#9[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]White[/TD]
[TD]143[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[B]Back 9[/B]
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD][B]Hole[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]Par[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]Flag Color[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]Distance Measured[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]PinSpotter Lock? (Y/N)[/B][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#10[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Blue[/TD]
[TD]129[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#11[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Red[/TD]
[TD]162[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#12[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]White[/TD]
[TD]132 (par 3, from tee)[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#13[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Blue[/TD]
[TD]197[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#14[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Red[/TD]
[TD]392 (par 4, from tee)[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#15[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]White[/TD]
[TD]202[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#16[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Blue[/TD]
[TD]170[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#17[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]Red[/TD]
[TD]120 (par 3, from tee)[/TD]
[TD][B]NO[/B][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#18[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]White[/TD]
[TD]132[/TD]
[TD][B]NO[/B][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Out of 18 total measurements, 14 of them achieved PinSpotter lock and 4 did not. #18 was the only flag which had a clear background with only sky behind it, all the others had some degree of background clutter (buildings, walls/fences, trees, grass, or some/all of the above. PinSpotter missed 2 white flags, 1 red flag and 1 blue flag. The flagsticks at my course have small sleeves of reflective material located about 2 feet below the flag, but I was focusing the reticle solely on the flag itself on each of the measurements.
I was driving a cart, and was bracing against the steering wheel for stabilization when shooting all the above measurements, for whatever that may or may not be worth. Of the 4 which did not achieve PinSpotter lock, 3 of them were correct distances (as verified by my GPS watch) even though they didn’t confirm it with vibration; the other one repeatedly showed a measurement to something in the background which was 30 yards longer than my GPS measurement and was obviously incorrect even to my eye.
So overall, 95% of the measurements were exactly correct, and PinSpotter achieved a confirmed lock on 78% of the targets shot.
[/QUOTE]
This is awesome data! Thanks!
[QUOTE=”Muchmore, post: 13577699, member: 56094″]
Great test!
[/QUOTE]
The scorecard looked like somewhat of a monstrosity with all the notes on it. :ROFLMAO:
(I circle pars, those aren’t all birdies)
[ATTACH type=”full”]9388066[/ATTACH]
Another round with the Blade Slope rangefinder today. I didn’t record the results, but it was roughly the same as Monday as far as lock/no lock with the PinSpotter. It locks them up fine for the vast majority of the targets I shoot, there’s just an occasional one that baffles it – which has been pretty common with the other rangefinders I’ve used as well, so nothing out of the ordinary for me there. I was passenger in the cart today so not using the steering wheel to brace, just holding my arms against my body while sitting in the cart. I compared a few shots today against my trusty Callaway 300 Pro, and also against my partners’ rangefinders on several shots. I have full confidence in the accuracy of the readings I’m getting from the Blade Slope.
The cart magnet holds the rangefinder very securely to the cart, even on the thin ‘A’ pillar/roof support. Our cart paths aren’t exactly the smoothest, and driving through our rough is….rough. Lots of bumps and jolts, in two rounds I haven’t seen the rangefinder even move a bit from hitting them, let alone fall off.
Optics are excellent. Once you have the diopter adjusted for your vision, everything is crystal clear. I play a TruTrack ball (I’m the only one in my group using one), and I can spot my ball and easily distinguish it from the others through the rangefinder once we’re out in the fairway. Vortex is known for their optics, and it’s obvious that they put their experience in the field to work when designing and building these rangefinders. I also like that the adjustable diopter offers enough resistance that it doesn’t get bumped out of focus when handling/using the rangefinder, taking it in/out of the case, etc. I’ve had this be an issue on past rangefinders and it’s a hassle to have to constantly readjust the diopter.
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13577665, member: 3386″]
Since there’s been some talk about the PinSpotter feature on the Vortex rangefinders, that was something I specifically looked at and recorded during my round today. I recorded 18 approach shots (actually 4 of them were par 3 distances and one was to the pin from the tee box on a par 4, just to test the long distance capability). I took note of the flag color on each green (to see if it had problems with a particular flag color), the distance measured, and whether I got a PinSpotter lock (three short bursts of vibration and the flag icon illuminating in the display). I also verified each measurement against my GPS watch to make sure they were at least very close (with no expectation of an exact match, since all I’m getting on the GPS watch is F/M/B measurements). It was a sunny, bright day, approximately 88°F, and my round lasted from late morning until mid-afternoon.
These were my results:
[B]Front 9[/B]
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD][B]Hole[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]Par[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]Flag Color[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]Distance Measured[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]PinSpotter Lock? (Y/N)[/B][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#1[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Blue[/TD]
[TD]165[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#2[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Red[/TD]
[TD]176[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#3[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]White[/TD]
[TD]166[/TD]
[TD][B]NO[/B][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#4[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]Blue[/TD]
[TD]116[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#5[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]Red[/TD]
[TD]151 (par 3, from tee)[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#6[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]White[/TD]
[TD]54[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#7[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]Blue[/TD]
[TD]65[/TD]
[TD][B]NO[/B][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#8[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]Red[/TD]
[TD]123 (par 3, from tee)[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#9[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]White[/TD]
[TD]143[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[B]Back 9[/B]
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD][B]Hole[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]Par[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]Flag Color[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]Distance Measured[/B][/TD]
[TD][B]PinSpotter Lock? (Y/N)[/B][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#10[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Blue[/TD]
[TD]129[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#11[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Red[/TD]
[TD]162[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#12[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]White[/TD]
[TD]132 (par 3, from tee)[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#13[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Blue[/TD]
[TD]197[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#14[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Red[/TD]
[TD]392 (par 4, from tee)[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#15[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]White[/TD]
[TD]202[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#16[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Blue[/TD]
[TD]170[/TD]
[TD]Yes[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#17[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]Red[/TD]
[TD]120 (par 3, from tee)[/TD]
[TD][B]NO[/B][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]#18[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]White[/TD]
[TD]132[/TD]
[TD][B]NO[/B][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Out of 18 total measurements, 14 of them achieved PinSpotter lock and 4 did not. #18 was the only flag which had a clear background with only sky behind it, all the others had some degree of background clutter (buildings, walls/fences, trees, grass, or some/all of the above. PinSpotter missed 2 white flags, 1 red flag and 1 blue flag. The flagsticks at my course have small sleeves of reflective material located about 2 feet below the flag, but I was focusing the reticle solely on the flag itself on each of the measurements.
I was driving a cart, and was bracing against the steering wheel for stabilization when shooting all the above measurements, for whatever that may or may not be worth. Of the 4 which did not achieve PinSpotter lock, 3 of them were correct distances (as verified by my GPS watch) even though they didn’t confirm it with vibration; the other one repeatedly showed a measurement to something in the background which was 30 yards longer than my GPS measurement and was obviously incorrect even to my eye.
So overall, 95% of the measurements were exactly correct, and PinSpotter achieved a confirmed lock on 78% of the targets shot.
[/QUOTE]
I had a similar experience during my 3 rounds today. Out of 54 holes, I had maybe 8 or 9 where the PinSpotter did not lock. Most of them where instances where there was other things in the background that may have interfered, but there were a couple where the backdrop was a clear blue sky. I seemed to have trouble picking up blue flags the most, and it picked up red flags the easiest.
I also brought my Voice Caddie Laser Fit out with me today to do some comparisons – I found that inside 150 yards, the differences were negligible, a yard or two if any, and exactly the same inside 75 yards. However, there was a larger disparity outside of 150 yards that grew larger the further out I went.
A couple of examples – on one hole, the GPS distance to the center of the green was 217 yards…it was a middle pin, so I shot the pin with both rangefinders to see how close they were to GPS. The Vortex gave me 219 yards to the pin, well within what the margin of error should be, considering the estimated pin distance with GPS. The Voice Caddie read the distance to the pin as 208 yards – 9 yards off the GPS distance, and 11 off the Vortex distance.
Finally, I shot a straightaway par 5 – the pin was in the front, but the green was very small, where the GPS yardage from the middle of the green couldn’t be more than 5 yards. The GPS distance was 478 yards to the middle…the Vortex gave me 472 yards…pretty dang close. The Voice Caddie – I shot it 4 times to be sure that’s what it was going to give me – read the distance as 442 yards to the pin…which would have been the middle of a pond in front of the green.
This isn’t meant to be framed as a knock on the Voice Caddie Laser Fit, especially considering that it costs $220 less than the Vortex -but the accuracy, clarity, and overall performance of the Vortex definitely justifies the cost.
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13573882, member: 3386″]
I like the Circle Crosshair best. I think it’s the most visible and easiest to put on the target. Which one do you use?
[/QUOTE]
I’ve also found myself utilizing the circle + crosshair option. I’m not sure why, but it just fits my eye best. I would’ve never thought about reticle options, but I’m enjoying having them now that I’ve used it.
[QUOTE=”Papa 3-Putts, post: 13583714, member: 83388″]
I had a similar experience during my 3 rounds today. Out of 54 holes, I had maybe 8 or 9 where the PinSpotter did not lock. Most of them where instances where there was other things in the background that may have interfered, but there were a couple where the backdrop was a clear blue sky. I seemed to have trouble picking up blue flags the most, and it picked up red flags the easiest.
I also brought my Voice Caddie Laser Fit out with me today to do some comparisons – I found that inside 150 yards, the differences were negligible, a yard or two if any, and exactly the same inside 75 yards. However, there was a larger disparity outside of 150 yards that grew larger the further out I went.
A couple of examples – on one hole, the GPS distance to the center of the green was 217 yards…it was a middle pin, so I shot the pin with both rangefinders to see how close they were to GPS. The Vortex gave me 219 yards to the pin, well within what the margin of error should be, considering the estimated pin distance with GPS. The Voice Caddie read the distance to the pin as 208 yards – 9 yards off the GPS distance, and 11 off the Vortex distance.
Finally, I shot a straightaway par 5 – the pin was in the front, but the green was very small, where the GPS yardage from the middle of the green couldn’t be more than 5 yards. The GPS distance was 478 yards to the middle…the Vortex gave me 472 yards…pretty dang close. The Voice Caddie – I shot it 4 times to be sure that’s what it was going to give me – read the distance as 442 yards to the pin…which would have been the middle of a pond in front of the green.
This isn’t meant to be framed as a knock on the Voice Caddie Laser Fit, especially considering that it costs $220 less than the Vortex -but [B]the accuracy, clarity, and overall performance of the Vortex definitely justifies the cost[/B].
[/QUOTE]
I know there have been some varied experiences shared here on this (and other Vortex threads) regarding performance of these rangefinders, but I have had a similar experience to yours. So far, I’ve had great success with my Anarch and have seen nothing other than consistent positives. The clarity of the optics has been top-notch and the accuracy has proven dependable to this point.
[QUOTE=”Redd, post: 13587139, member: 5622″]
I’ve also found myself utilizing the circle + crosshair option. I’m not sure why, but it just fits my eye best. I would’ve never thought about reticle options, but I’m enjoying having them now that I’ve used it.
[/QUOTE]
It’s nice to have the options, none of my previous rangefinders have offered that.
[QUOTE=”Redd, post: 13587150, member: 5622″]
I know there have been some varied experiences shared here on this (and other Vortex threads) regarding performance of these rangefinders, but I have had a similar experience to yours. So far, I’ve had great success with my Anarch and have seen nothing other than consistent positives. The clarity of the optics has been top-notch and the accuracy has proven dependable to this point.
[/QUOTE]
The image stabilization feature on the Anarch has to be awesome.