Wilson Golf’s 2023 Dynapower lineup consists of two attractively priced, premium-level drivers, the Dynapower Carbon and Dynapower Titanium. While the Titanium will likely match the needs of a broader group of consumers, the Carbon has captured the most interest. Wilson’s use of advanced technologies like Dynapower AI and composite materials should ensure the Carbon is able to compete with many of 2023’s premier drivers.

Quick Take
The Dynapower Carbon has all the trappings of a modern, technologically advanced driver. The low-forward CG makes it best suited for better players, especially those with plenty of speed that are looking for lower spin off the tee.
Technology

The Carbon’s most notable technology piece is in its name. The composite (carbon) crown and toe-section of the sole gave Wilson a great deal of flexibility in where they were able to distribute weight in the club head. In the Carbon’s case, they chose to manipulate the center-of-gravity (CG) low and forward, not far behind the center of face. This placement encourages a more penetrating trajectory, lower spin, and a neutral ball flight. While those are all great things, they do come at a price when it comes to forgiveness and launch angle. Players that struggle with the right miss, with finding the center of the face, or those that don’t produce sufficient ball speed may find that they are better off with a driver that has a lower CG. However, there are many players that can benefit greatly from this technology, and they should be able to maximize their distance potential with the Dynapower Carbon.

Dynapower Carbon possesses a new, six-position adjustable hosel that allows for loft adjustments ranging from -1 to +2 degrees. In addition, these adjustments will impact face angle, resulting in up to a 750rpm difference in left/right spin. Fitting carts will be vital for consumers to find their ideal starting loft, as lofting up or down too much could seriously impact directional dispersion.

Wilson utilized Dynapower AI when deciding how to implement their new PKR2 dynamic face thickness. This is (thankfully) becoming a common design-tactic of club manufactures as they attempt to make off-center impacts less penal. While the Carbon isn’t designed or marketed as an overly-forgiving driver, this added feature should help players retain as much ball speed as possible when they miss the center of the face.
Aesthetics

In our preview article on the Dynapower Carbon, we relied on Wilson’s stock imagery to get a sense of how the driver looked. For the most part, our feelings haven’t changed much after seeing the club in hand. We described seeing flashes of modernity blended with a somewhat dated overall look, which remains a fair assessment. The carbon fiber weave on the crown contrasts with the extended, dark top line at address. However, when the light hits it from a slightly different angle, the contrast softens a bit and makes the head very appealing to the eye. We also mentioned that the sole design was somewhat busy, and it’s hard to argue that point with its various logos and fonts. On closer inspection, the carbon weave toe section is incredibly well done, though it seems like the slate gray midsection detracts a bit from the overall look.

Most importantly, however, The Dynapower Carbon does manage to convey the impression that it is a premium, high end driver in-hand. The transitions from the gray Lamkin Crossline 360 to the blue Ventus shaft to the head are nicely executed and should give prospective consumers confidence that this is a well-designed, high-performance club.
In its stock, neutral hosel position, the Carbon sits square to slightly flared open at the toe, which should make it appealing to many better players’ eyes. Making loft adjustments does change the face angle open or closed, depending on whether one is adding or subtracting loft. This is similar to how most adjustable drivers function, and while these changes aren’t extreme, those players that are sensitive to face-angle will want to keep this in mind. Luckily, the Carbon is available in 9, 10.5, and 12-degree heads, so finding a loft and face-angle combination that work should be easy.

The Carbon produces a firm and powerful sensation at impact, and the sound is slightly dulled by the construction of the head. While some modern carbon driver heads manage to almost feel squishy at impact, the Dynapower definitely does not, but the sound doesn’t approach anything we’d consider extreme. While matching the preferences of every consumer is an impossibility, Wilson has managed to build a driver that has a generally pleasing sound that should work for most people.
Performance
We tested the Dynapower Carbon driver in 9 degrees of loft with the stock 65g Mitsubishi Ventus Blue shaft.
It quickly became evident how well the Dynapower Carbon could perform for high swing-speed players. Ball speeds on center impacts were quite high and were better than expected on misses laterally across the face. Those looking to control spin and trajectory will enjoy the flat, boring trajectory created from slightly lower launch angles and very manageable spin rate. Unlike a driver with a very low and rearward center of gravity, the Dynapower Titanium for example, the Carbon isn’t designed to encourage extremely high launch angles and testing backed that up. Compared to a competitor’s driver in the game-improvement category, the Carbon consistently launched two degrees lower on center impacts. Though it’s cliché, it would be difficult to describe the trajectory as anything other than “penetrating”. Fitting will be very important here. Lower swing speed players will likely need to explore higher lofted heads to make sure they are able to maximize carry distance. As we would expect, launch angles were lowest and spin was highest with low-face impacts, though spin rates remained quite manageable. The opposite was true with impacts slightly above center, with a notable increase in launch and decrease in spin observed.

Before discussing forgiveness, it’s worth mentioning again that the Dynapower Carbon isn’t designed for players that miss the center often. The low, forward center-of-gravity promotes the aforementioned ball speed and trajectory benefits, but it also reduces stability with off-center impacts. Twisting of the head, especially on toe impacts, was evident visually and in the hands. While the PKR2 face did surprisingly well at maintaining ball speed and spin away from the center of the face, the reduction in MOI resulted in some penal directional misses. This illustrates the importance of fitting, as players that miss high or low more often shouldn’t see as much negative impact as those that live on the heel or toe.
Details

Dyanpower Carbon will be offered with five stock shaft options and a gray Lamkin Crossline 360 grip. In addition, fitting carts will have 5g, 9g, 12g, 16g and 20g weights available to dial in both swing weight and launch conditions.
The Dynapower Carbon is available in 9, 10.5, and 12-degree heads and the price is $499.




I need to hit this driver.
[QUOTE=”templeton80, post: 11355741, member: 53139″]
Like. 1400 spin crazy. And you know me.. that’s not me!!
[/QUOTE]
Is the low spin costing you in accuracy.
I’ve just seen reviews on YT by TXG and Sheils.
Both sites were blown away with the carbon model. I may just have to go and hit these.
[QUOTE=”annsguy, post: 11356006, member: 19928″]
Is the low spin costing you in accuracy.
[/QUOTE]
More so distance.
[QUOTE=”templeton80, post: 11356016, member: 53139″]
More so distance.
[/QUOTE]
I am happy for Wilson. They did something right……and meant to.
[QUOTE=”templeton80, post: 11356016, member: 53139″]
More so distance.
[/QUOTE]
Anything that low spin would be a killer when you miss. Need some major speed and launch to get this one out there.
This should get some folks to give it a hit[ATTACH type=”full”]9164211[/ATTACH]
I hit this on Saturday and I couldn’t crack 1800 spin with PGATSS range ball.
Was told my a Wilson Staffer there doing the fittings that they were told the magic numbers were 17/1700.
Was fit into a 10.5* with the Ventus Blue 6S. Nice sounding driver.
Fitter at the PGATSS told me he bought one – Never got the distances like he did with this Driver
I have a 1/2 Wilson Driver Fitting on Sunday.
Let’s see if I can get better numbers with V1x.
There are only a couple of places in NC who carry much Wilson. One is in Monroe NC. Young guy who recently bought this shop showed me spin numbers on his phone between a Paradym and DynaPwr.(Both odd names) Very close. He just got his fitting stuff from Wilson but was already selling it well.
I looked at this driver again. It gets better looking every time I see it. Might have to bite the bullet and test it out.
Peter Finch uploaded a video today, high ball and club speed and long drives indoors. But the face seems to have an issue.
[QUOTE=”JAM01, post: 11408922, member: 11876″]
Peter Finch uploaded a video today, high ball and club speed and long drives indoors. But the face seems to have an issue.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah just saw that. The face has an issue but as a long drive driver it seems to go a long ways. He does say non centered strikes are pretty penalized.
[MEDIA=youtube]JyVV9Z9aLOg[/MEDIA]
[QUOTE=”pumbaa, post: 11410624, member: 24169″]
Yeah just saw that. The face has an issue but as a long drive driver it seems to go a long ways. He does say non centered strikes are pretty penalized.
[MEDIA=youtube]JyVV9Z9aLOg[/MEDIA]
[/QUOTE]
Very SLDR like.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11410679, member: 1579″]
Very SLDR like.
[/QUOTE]
I couldn’t hit that thing for the life of me.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11410679, member: 1579″]
Very SLDR like.
[/QUOTE]
Perfect description.
Thought this thread needed reviving. Had one in hand yesterday. The carbon looks really good. Great set-up, nice and square. Any other reviews of late?
Anyone still playing this driver? Seems like some of the buzz has died down a little.
I’m really looking forward to trying this driver. Has anyone hit it besides [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] ?
[QUOTE=”J.B. Cobb III, post: 11586473, member: 50607″]
I’m really looking forward to trying this driver. Has anyone hit it besides [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] ?
[/QUOTE]
Maybe it can be part of your upcoming driver fitting
[QUOTE=”J.B. Cobb III, post: 11586473, member: 50607″]
I’m really looking forward to trying this driver. Has anyone hit it besides [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] ?
[/QUOTE]
Impossible to find around here.
Man, what could have been!? It was beautiful for about 3 swings!
[media=giphy]3o7abspvhYHpMnHSuc[/media]
This one stings a little still. I had high hopes.
[QUOTE=”J.B. Cobb III, post: 11607253, member: 50607″]
This one stings a little still. I had high hopes.
[/QUOTE]
It’s definitely better suited for the good swings. The good ones are really good though!
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 11625359, member: 1193″]
It’s definitely better suited for the good swings. The good ones are really good though!
[/QUOTE]
Dont miss it toe side though. Probably the most punishing driver I have hit on the toe this year.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 11625374, member: 3″]
Dont miss it toe side though. Probably the most punishing driver I have hit on the toe this year.
[/QUOTE]
You have that right. If you’re a toe-hooker, which I am, it’s just not going to work.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 11625359, member: 1193″]
It’s definitely better suited for the good swings. The good ones are really good though!
[/QUOTE]
If I had based my fitting off of initial impressions, I was prepared to walk out with it that day. 275 carry, It had the highest ball speeds and the lowest spin, felt great, sounded superb. But, the wheels fell off. One drive barely cracked 200 yards and spun just shy of 6000 rpms.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 11625375, member: 1193″]
You have that right. If you’re a toe-hooker, which I am, it’s just not going to work.
[/QUOTE]
The G430LST was super punishing there (as well as low) and this one along with a couple of others. But this was by far the hardest I tested in that area.
Bumping this thread…
I finally was able to get out and test the carbon last week. Man this thing is impressive! Easy to hit, sounds incredible and was keeping up on ball speed with a tsr3. I see a lot of comments about low spin, but it was spinning the same as tsr3. 12* and 2400 spin was hitting a perfect window on a 10.5* head. Was not a fitting, so curious to see what a proper fitted shaft would provide, but color me impressed to say the least. Damn good looking and performing driver Wilson has at the moment.
It was more forgiving than my ltdx ls off toe strikes, which I really enjoyed.
Anyone else get more time with it?
[QUOTE=”wam78, post: 12059270, member: 49571″]
Bumping this thread…
I finally was able to get out and test the carbon last week. Man this thing is impressive! Easy to hit, sounds incredible and was keeping up on ball speed with a tsr3. I see a lot of comments about low spin, but it was spinning the same as tsr3. 12* and 2400 spin was hitting a perfect window on a 10.5* head. Was not a fitting, so curious to see what a proper fitted shaft would provide, but color me impressed to say the least. Damn good looking and performing driver Wilson has at the moment.
It was more forgiving than my ltdx ls off toe strikes, which I really enjoyed.
Anyone else get more time with it?
[/QUOTE]
That’s interesting on the toe side strikes. I was so far on the opposite side comparing Aerojet to it. I lost a ton of speed on the monitor towards the toe. Handled the heel pretty well though.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12059295, member: 3″]
That’s interesting on the toe side strikes. I was so far on the opposite side comparing Aerojet to it. I lost a ton of speed on the monitor towards the toe. Handled the heel pretty well though.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah, the ltdx ls is not very friendly on high toe strikes. Problem for me is that is my miss. I always tend to put hot melt in my drivers toe side. Mainly need the added weight as I started playing driver at tour length. A little weight in the toe helps for sure.
Honestly, 2 things that impressed me the most with dynapower was the sound and ball speed. It sounds and feels powerful and was neck and neck with what I feel was the driver of the year the tsr3.
[QUOTE=”wam78, post: 12061209, member: 49571″]
Yeah, the ltdx ls is not very friendly on high toe strikes. Problem for me is that is my miss. I always tend to put hot melt in my drivers toe side. Mainly need the added weight as I started playing driver at tour length. A little weight in the toe helps for sure.
Honestly, 2 things that impressed me the most with dynapower was the sound and ball speed. It sounds and feels powerful and was neck and neck with what I feel was the driver of the year the tsr3.
[/QUOTE]
It definitely sounds good. And speed is decent, which makes sense considering where the weight is placed moving forward. I just didnt find it forgiving at all, laterally. Glad its working for you though.
Been playing the Dynapower Carbon for a couple of rounds now. Going from the ST-Z 220 to the Dynapower has been a boost to my driver consistency. What I have found is that my mishits have not been punished as hard. Reading the reviews about toe hits being punished pretty severely I haven’t been affected by that too much yet, but that could also be that those same mishits on the ST-Z 220 was just punishing me more. It will be interesting to see how the distance compares over the course of the season, but based on the launch monitor numbers this head is more optimal.
[USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] – really appreciate and like your writing. Well done.
The driver looks nice but doesn’t profile especially well for my game.
[QUOTE=”Ludin, post: 12348983, member: 50957″]
Been playing the Dynapower Carbon for a couple of rounds now. Going from the ST-Z 220 to the Dynapower has been a boost to my driver consistency. What I have found is that my mishits have not been punished as hard. Reading the reviews about toe hits being punished pretty severely I haven’t been affected by that too much yet, but that could also be that those same mishits on the ST-Z 220 was just punishing me more. It will be interesting to see how the distance compares over the course of the season, but based on the launch monitor numbers this head is more optimal.
[/QUOTE]
It’s got some serious power. And, a lot of performance for the price.
[QUOTE=”Ludin, post: 12348983, member: 50957″]
Been playing the Dynapower Carbon for a couple of rounds now. Going from the ST-Z 220 to the Dynapower has been a boost to my driver consistency. What I have found is that my mishits have not been punished as hard. Reading the reviews about toe hits being punished pretty severely I haven’t been affected by that too much yet, but that could also be that those same mishits on the ST-Z 220 was just punishing me more. It will be interesting to see how the distance compares over the course of the season, but based on the launch monitor numbers this head is more optimal.
[/QUOTE]
Really curious to know how the sound comparison is? Both have carbon heads so thinking somewhat similar. Is the Wilson more on the muted side?
[QUOTE=”73monte, post: 12350980, member: 65552″]
Really curious to know how the sound comparison is? Both have carbon heads so thinking somewhat similar. Is the Wilson more on the muted side?
[/QUOTE]
That’s a great freaking question and I honestly can’t tell you as I really didn’t pay attention. My main focus once I got the shaft in it was the ball flight along with the spin. The ST-Z 220 had a habit of generating too much spin both back and side spin. All I was looking for was a muted spin numbers in comparison with similar flight. I got that exactly with the Dynapower Carbon head.
[QUOTE=”73monte, post: 12350980, member: 65552″]
Really curious to know how the sound comparison is? Both have carbon heads so thinking somewhat similar. Is the Wilson more on the muted side?
[/QUOTE]
Wilson Dynapwr Carbon is probably the best sounding driver I hit this release cycle.
[QUOTE=”Thrillbilly Jim, post: 12351309, member: 50607″]
Wilson Dynapwr Carbon is probably the best sounding driver I hit this release cycle.
[/QUOTE]
Between the Wilson and the PXG Darkspeed Tour 1, I agree!
It’s a good start for them, but maaaaaaaaan it isn’t forgiving compared to most of the current releases. I did get some solid speed out of it, quite solid, but the lateral miss is not bueno.
I spoke to one of Wilson’s largest dealers who told me that Wilson was aware of the lack of forgiveness. He mentioned bulge and roll and I shook my head like I had a clue. Guess we will see with their early 2025 launches.
Low and forward traditionally meant less forgiveness, but other other OEM’s found ways to address the forgiveness issues. It seems a little lazy (?) of Wilson to go to market with a product that’s a bit behind.
[QUOTE=”tequila4kapp, post: 12352533, member: 9704″]
Low and forward traditionally meant less forgiveness, but other other OEM’s found ways to address the forgiveness issues. It seems a little lazy (?) of Wilson to go to market with a product that’s a bit behind.
[/QUOTE]
Is it behind though? I’m not sure that’s fair to Wilson.
It’s a massive step for them, a massive one. While it may not be at the top of the heap, other companies have made the same journeys. Look at Titleist with their TS process of releases or even Cobra since Bio Cell. It takes time, especially starting from very little.
[QUOTE=”annsguy, post: 12352497, member: 19928″]
I spoke to one of Wilson’s largest dealers who told me that Wilson was aware of the lack of forgiveness. He mentioned bulge and roll and I shook my head like I had a clue. Guess we will see with their early 2025 launches.
[/QUOTE]
I hope they know, every review on it gave that feedback haha ?
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12351972, member: 1579″]
It’s a good start for them, but maaaaaaaaan it isn’t forgiving compared to most of the current releases. I did get some solid speed out of it, quite solid, but the lateral miss is not bueno.
[/QUOTE]
They are lagging. If they’re competitive in terms of ball speed that’s a significant step forward though.
[QUOTE=”JohnSinVA, post: 12352608, member: 25956″]
They are lagging. If they’re competitive in terms of ball speed that’s a significant step forward though.
[/QUOTE]
It’s all about progress. This next release will tell a lot in that regard for them.
[QUOTE=”Thrillbilly Jim, post: 12351309, member: 50607″]
Wilson Dynapwr Carbon is probably the best sounding driver I hit this release cycle.
[/QUOTE]
Interested in your assessment? Still trying to get an idea on whether it’s more muted or mettalic? I know that everyone’s appreciation of the acoustic side is subjective though. Still not sure this if this driver is a fit for me. Personally, I think Wilson should have released a softer version of this model. Seems to be aimed at a very small pro like market. Not a segment that Wilson could really garner a lot of interest in.
[QUOTE=”73monte, post: 12353941, member: 65552″]
Interested in your assessment? Still trying to get an idea on whether it’s more muted or mettalic? I know that everyone’s appreciation of the acoustic side is subjective though. Still not sure this if this driver is a fit for me. Personally, I think Wilson should have released a softer version of this model. Seems to be aimed at a very small pro like market. Not a segment that Wilson could really garner a lot of interest in.
[/QUOTE]
They did. The non-carbon version is a larger fit for the masses with a bit more spin and shallower design.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12353943, member: 3″]
They did. The non-carbon version is a larger fit for the masses with a bit more spin and shallower design.
[/QUOTE]
Well aware. Was referring to “this model” meaning the carbon head. I’m sure the all ti version is a better fit for most, but totally unappealing to me personally. I’ve always found shallow drivers that are usually longer heal to toe are not for me. They all look sort of like a big pancake.
The Carbon driver has been reduced to $279.99! It’s cheaper than the Titanium version.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9289000[/ATTACH]