Stop us if you’ve heard this story before. Wilson Golf, long known for their fantastic irons, are trying to make inroads in the metalwoods segment.
You know what? We’re going to stop ourselves. How many times have we read that same boring introduction in a Wilson metalwoods review? A sampling of all the major YouTube reviewers almost reads like a script. It’s boring. It’s played out.
It’s true though.
Wilson has made a concerted effort in the last couple of years to improve their metalwoods so they can compete among the larger equipment companies. It’s not easy to do that, especially when you look at the size of the R&D groups in Big Golf. Smaller OEM’s just don’t have those resources. Still, there are smaller companies out there that are competing on a technological level. In fact, one smaller company comes to mind as a market leader in technology, so it’s not impossible.
What makes a competitive driver in 2025?
The answer is both obvious and nuanced. Of course, a driver needs to “perform” to be relevant among its peers. You’ll often hear things like “drivers are all the same” or “they are all maxed out anyway”, but that’s just not true. There are companies and drivers that stand out in different performance metrics, whether we are talking about highly efficient faces, speed realized through aerodynamics, advanced adjustability, or incredible stability on off center shots. Some companies haven’t been shy about documenting their efforts to catch up with the market leaders and they are quick to publicly celebrate when they make meaningful advancements. It’s a thing. The bottom line is that to be competitive, a company must be able to win, or come close to winning, in a hitting bay.
Then we start looking at nuance. Does the driver look “good”, whatever that means? Does it sound good? Does the brand have a stigma that overshadows even the best performance? Will the consumer feel proud showing his buddies at the club his new driver? Is it priced high enough to seem premium and low enough to seem affordable? All these things matter, and while the peripheral categories tend to carry varying levels of weight with each individual, small companies are under even more pressure to get them right.
As you can see, it’s hard. Wilson may know this better than anybody. Their efforts to compete in the metalwoods segment are well documented over the last decade. In fact, we’d argue that there hasn’t been a company more willing to try different approaches than Wilson. In 2023 things just seemed a little different though. The company released a single driver that, at least in some verifiable metrics, said, “we can compete in the hitting bay”. The 2023 DYNAPWR Carbon was fast. It was low spin. In the right player’s hands it could absolutely send the ball. It sounded and looked pretty solid too. It was a driver that could compete, at least for some golfers. However, it really wasn’t made for the widest cross section of players that needed more forgiveness than it had to offer. While the other Wilson driver in the 2023 line, the DYNAPWR Titanium, did offer a viable option for the “average” golfer it just never got the same amount of love as the Carbon. From the outside looking in, it almost seemed like Wilson’s marketing strategy that pushed the Carbon upward had the effect of diminishing the image of the Titanium. Regardless, something happened in 2023. Wilson made a wave in metalwoods. A small wave, but a wave indeed.
Reputations aren’t built in a day, or within a single release cycle if we’re talking about the golf equipment industry. What direction would Wilson go with their successor line to DYNAPWR 2023? In late January 2025 we got our first hints of the company’s plans. The new 2025 DYNAPWR line was revealed, offering three distinct driver options, each of which managed to make us feel like the company was listening. Wilson took what was great about the original DYNAPWR Carbon and leaned into it even more with the DYNAPWR LS, a player’s driver that didn’t seek to occupy a gray area. It’s unabashedly fast, low spin, and fade biased. They refined the “Max” concept with the DYNAPWR MAX, their highest MOI driver to date. Maybe most excitingly, they gave us the goldilocks driver that seems to be the breadwinner for most companies: The high-tech driver that balances speed, forgiveness, adjustability, and aesthetics. It’s called the 2025 DYNAPWR Carbon.
Those waves? They are getting a little bigger.

Key Technologies – Wilson DYNAPWR Carbon
Normally we’d utilize this space in a review to deep dive into the various technologies Wilson incorporated into the DYNAPWR Carbon. We’ll do that, to some extent, but we’re also going to use this space to make a point.
Wilson needs to work on their messaging.
Frankly, the outlay of information from the company on the DYNAPWR metalwood line doesn’t match what we’ve come to expect from companies that are seeking to seriously compete for consumer dollars. The web page for DYNAPWR Carbon, which in our opinion may be the most impactful driver the company has ever sent to market, reads like it was constructed as an afterthought. Consumers today want to see what they are paying for. They want to know what the PKR-360 looks like. At the very least, they want more than a short sentence that casually describes it.
We say this because we care. Brag a little. The R&D team obviously put great effort into designing this line. Now it’s time for Show and Tell.

Anyway, going off the limited information out there, this is a basic rundown of what the DYNAPWR Carbon bring in terms of technology.
Carbon Fiber
First of all, as evidenced by the name “Carbon”, 58% of the body’s surface area is constructed of carbon fiber. This allows the discretionary weight that has been saved by using the lighter material to be used in areas of the club it can be of better use. Wilson notes that, even at 460cc, the Carbon sports a compact appearance at address. They’ve also invested a great deal of effort into dialing in the driver’s acoustics (sound at impact) and mention placing internal ribs throughout the body to accomplish this.

Adjustability
There are a couple ways to dial in a good fit with the DYNAPWR Carbon. First, the 6-way adjustable hosel provides the ability to tweak lofts. In truth, the level of adjustability here isn’t really in the same ballpark as we see from many companies today. It spans three degrees of loft (one down and two up) and can be dialed down in half degree increments. There aren’t any specific lie angle adjustments marked on the hosel, and we haven’t seen any official word on how loft changes impact lie angle either. While the ability to loft up and down is nice, at this point it’s really just an expectation. We’d love to see this adapter evolve to something more comprehensive in future releases.

Consumers today expect some level of adjustability beyond hosel changes and that capability most often comes in the way of movable weights. We sometimes think of adjustable weights in terms of moving ball flight horizontally, but it has other uses too. In the DYNAPWR Carbon’s case, its swappable weight system is primarily intended to alter trajectory and forgiveness. There are two weights, 6g towards the front of the driver and 12g positioned at the rear. In this configuration, the driver will offer the highest launch angle, most spin, and be the most forgiving. Conversely, when the heavy weight is positioned forward, ball speeds will increase a bit, the ball will fly lower, and the driver will be less forgiving. This system is especially useful when it’s integrated into a full line of drivers. It almost gives a “half-step” between the extreme player’s profile of the DYNAPWR LS for those players that may want lower spin but not a true fade bias.
PKR-360 Face

We mentioned the PKR-360 face earlier. Again, details aren’t really that plentiful, but this is Wilson’s take on variable face thickness. The company utilized machine learning to settle on the most efficient pattern of variable thickness. Simply stated, this should help maintain ball speed when you miss the center. Many companies have expanded this concept to help retain consistent spin rates on mis-hit balls, but we haven’t read anything to that effect from Wilson concerning PKR-360.
Finally, we come to Open Hosel Construction. We’ll just copy and paste Wilson’s description, because we aren’t sure what it really does or if you can even see it on the driver. The company describes it as, “Improved weight distribution allows for the removal of inefficient material and the creation of a stronger hosel infrastructure.” This obviously indicates some sort of relocation of mass, most likely from the heel area, but we can’t really dive into the specifics of how it truly functions.
Aesthetics – Wilson DYNAPWR Carbon

It’s hard to dispute that the 2025 DYNAPWR offers a noticeable improvement in looks and feel over the previous generation. While the 2023 version showed some promise, we can easily say that we prefer what we are seeing and hearing with the new driver. There really isn’t a single part of the club that doesn’t look better to us. The gray and black color scheme and overly busy sole have been replaced with a simple black focus and subtle highlights of white and silver. The matte gray crown is now a glossy black, which allows the depth and complex patterns of the carbon fiber to stand out. A splash of red frames the rear of the driver head at address, driving home Wilson’s classic color. A small “D” functions as an alignment aid, sitting directly at the front of the crown’s carbon panel.

True to Wilson’s description, the head itself does have a somewhat compact, and mostly traditional shape at address. We expect to hear plenty of praise from those that put the DYNAPWR Carbon behind a golf ball. It’s a shape that breeds confidence and is very attractive at almost every angle. The face sits neutral in the stock, “standard” setting, though we did notice a visual change in face angle when the loft was adjusted. When set to a loft of 11 degrees, the 9-degree DYNAPWR Carbon we tested sat two degrees closed. While not completely off-putting due to some slight curvature of the toe area, it’s noticeable. We recommend taking your desired loft and face angle into account when buying a head. For example, if you prefer a more open face, consider lofting a 10.5-degree head down to get there.

We briefly went over Wilson’s focus on nailing the sound and feel of 2025 DYNAPWR Carbon. We can say, without reservation, that they did in fact nail it. In fact, we wouldn’t be surprised to see it ranked at the top of the list of 2025 drivers in the feel category. The Carbon occupies the perfect middle ground between sometimes overly muted carbon drivers and their boisterous titanium counterparts. It’s just pleasant. Center impacts produce a wonderful mushy sensation of the ball compressing into the face and rocketing off it. Seriously, we hope you’ll take the opportunity to try it for yourself. Wilson’s R&D group did spectacular work here.
Performance – Wilson DYNAPWR Carbon
The biggest question mark when it came to the DYNAPWR Carbon’s performance was whether Wilson could make their “core” driver playable for a wide range of golfers. We mentioned that the 2023 version lacked the forgiveness needed to make it accessible for a large cross section of consumers, so that’s what we keyed on first. We were thrilled to see that the 2025 Carbon instantly showed it was playable for mid-handicaps in its stock weight configuration. Outdoor testing showed that it had a strong tendency to keep the ball on or near the fairway with poor swings. A simple example would be that rather than the out-of-play screaming low hook we sometimes saw from the 2023 DYNAPWR Carbon, we saw a ball that ended up 5-10 paces in the left rough. Swipey contact resulted in a controlled fading ball flight that found the fairway more often than not. Launch monitor testing showed average performance in maintaining consistent spin on mishits. There was a slight drop in spin with toe contact, but not nearly as bad as we saw with the 2023 version.

We suspect there is some subtle draw bias to the 2025 Carbon, though it could certainly be moved both directions. It needs to be noted that some of the leftwards tendency could have been caused by the closed face angle (we played the 9 degree driver lofted up to 11 degrees). Regardless, our miss was almost exclusively left. Again, we suggest considering potential loft adjustments and your preferred face angle at address when choosing a head. All things considered, the 2025 DYNAPWR Carbon proved to be more than forgiving enough to meet the needs of the masses.
In general, we found the 2025 Carbon to launch the ball lower and produce less spin than other comparable “core” drivers on the market. This difference wasn’t exactly huge, but in the area of 1-2 degrees and 200-300rpm less than some its competitors. Fitting needs vary, so take your specific desires into account when deciding on a loft. In general, we found ourselves noticing less carry distance than normal, but normal total distances (including roll) when playing outdoors. Ball flight trended lower for the most part, though again – swings vary. As always, try before you buy.

One last thing to note about performance is the impact of moving the heavy weight forward on the driver head. Again, this adjustment is designed to lower launch and decrease spin, and these changes should come at the cost of less forgiveness. Our testing showed this to be the case, with the weight forward orientation causing the driver to perform much more like the 2023 DYNAPWR Carbon. In other words, it became much less playable for mid handicaps. Ball speed dropped and spin rates seemed to plummet on off-center impacts, leading to a substantial loss of distance and control. Better players, or those that naturally produce too much spin, will find more use out of this setting than typical golfers.
The Details
The 2025 DYNAPWR Carbon driver retails for $549.99 in its stock configuration. Four options are available, as seen in the chart below.
The stock driver comes with a Fujikura Ventus TR Blue shaft and Lamkin Crossline 360 grip. Custom options are available, with a modest selection available at no extra cost. Custom orders can be placed on Wilson’s website, www.wilson.com.





As I mentioned in previous posts I really prefer the Wilson look at address of all 3. I do wish it was a matte finish but overall it shapes the ball the best to my eye
[ATTACH type=”full”]9339738[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full”]9339739[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full”]9339740[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full”]9339741[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full”]9339743[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full”]9339742[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”jfrigo1003, post: 13075058, member: 50601″]
As I mentioned in previous posts I really prefer the Wilson look at address of all 3. I do wish it was a matte finish but overall it shapes the ball the best to my eye
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_8450.jpeg”]9339738[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_8455.jpeg”]9339739[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_8451.jpeg”]9339740[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_8452.jpeg”]9339741[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_8456.jpeg”]9339743[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_8454.jpeg”]9339742[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Great comparison there. Much better looking than the Qi to me for sure.
Ok.
This one has kind of shocked me to my core a bit.
Removed the 5S Fentus and put a LINQ White in, and this head has got a little something something to it.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13097693, member: 1579″]
Ok.
This one has kind of shocked me to my core a bit.
Removed the 5S Fentus and put a LINQ White in, and this head has got a little something something to it.
[/QUOTE]
Yea I felt like a shaft change would bring it to life for you. The other one just feels generic to me. They could have made a better choice on that.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13097693, member: 1579″]
Ok.
This one has kind of shocked me to my core a bit.
Removed the 5S Fentus and put a LINQ White in, and this head has got a little something something to it.
[/QUOTE]
kinda crazy how good this head is right?
I really enjoy hitting this one. I have 10.5 opened down to 9.5 and the flight is perfect
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13097701, member: 1193″]
Yea I felt like a shaft change would bring it to life for you. The other one just feels generic to me. They could have made a better choice on that.
[/QUOTE]
I agree entirely. It’s honestly as good as anything I’ve hit this year.
[QUOTE=”jfrigo1003, post: 13097783, member: 50601″]
kinda crazy how good this head is right?
I really enjoy hitting this one. I have 10.5 opened down to 9.5 and the flight is perfect
[/QUOTE]
I’m hoping to get it back out this week to really test the change, I’ve got this one at 9.0 with heavy forward.
Installed the banned/lawsuit Aretera Grey into this one, which should be a lot of fun to try out this coming week.
I’m really settling in to this being my driver for the year. I swapped out a KBS TD for a TPT Nitro 16 LO and it has made a world of difference. The 10.5 loft opened up and lofted down to 9.5* is definitely my sweet spot with this head
I was hitting in the simulator last night vs Qi35 and I really preferred the DYNAPWR Carbon. It’s quick off the face, has pretty good forgiveness, and I actually like the sound of this one more
I still doubt Wilson will move the needle with this driver but I am loving mine. For 2025 I’ve bought 3 new model drivers, Cobra 3DP irons, Mizuno T1 wedges, 2 new Vessel bags, and endless amount of putters….the DYNAPWR Carbon has been my favorite purchase and it’s not even close
[QUOTE=”jfrigo1003, post: 13138779, member: 50601″]
I’m really settling in to this being my driver for the year. I swapped out a KBS TD for a TPT Nitro 16 LO and it has made a world of difference. The 10.5 loft opened up and lofted down to 9.5* is definitely my sweet spot with this head
I was hitting in the simulator last night vs Qi35 and I really preferred the DYNAPWR Carbon. It’s quick off the face, has pretty good forgiveness, and I actually like the sound of this one more
I still doubt Wilson will move the needle with this driver but I am loving mine. For 2025 I’ve bought 3 new model drivers, Cobra 3DP irons, Mizuno T1 wedges, 2 new Vessel bags, and endless amount of putters….the DYNAPWR Carbon has been my favorite purchase and it’s not even close
[/QUOTE]
Love to hear that. I felt like it would be a surprise favorite for some folks that gave it a try, just based on looks and feel alone. Seems like it’s performing well too. Glad they left that LS version out there on its own and let this one meet the needs of a wider group.
Would really like to hear more feedback regarding the sound of the Carbon model? The ’23 really sounds great, and has been a good back-up, but struggling with it being too low spin. If the sound of the ’25 is similar to the ’23, I might be all in.
[QUOTE=”73monte, post: 13139167, member: 65552″]
Would really like to hear more feedback regarding the sound of the Carbon model? The ’23 really sounds great, and has been a good back-up, but struggling with it being too low spin. If the sound of the ’25 is similar to the ’23, I might be all in.
[/QUOTE]
It’s different – better imo. A bit less muted.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13139257, member: 1193″]
It’s different – better imo. A bit less muted.
[/QUOTE]
You’ve got my undivided attention. Care to elaborate?
[QUOTE=”73monte, post: 13139167, member: 65552″]
Would really like to hear more feedback regarding the sound of the Carbon model? The ’23 really sounds great, and has been a good back-up, but struggling with it being too low spin. If the sound of the ’25 is similar to the ’23, I might be all in.
[/QUOTE]
It’s like [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] said, little less muted, little more pop at impact, which makes it seem more powerful in terms of feedback.
I plugged the lawsuit Aretera Grey 65X into this one and it’s a whole different ballgame for me.
At staff retreat using the stock setup there were some hiccups, mainly the dumb weather combined with knowing I had to be a little more deliberate with it.
Now, now I get to see what it’s capable of for me.
The added stability and stronger flight that I got today on the monitor was pretty eye opening.
The sound is right. The look is killer imo. It’s the most polished driver from Wilson in eons. But, it was seeing what it could do in a monitor situation that got me excited.
It’s not ultra low spin for me, which is awesome, it sat right in the 2400-2600 realm, with ball speeds almost equaling my best this year which have been with my Adapt X.
Then I realized the heavy weight was back on it still….
Flipped it and it came down to 2200-2400, and speed jumped about 1.5 mph on average for me.
I’ve got a lot of things to work with and focus on right now, but it was nice to step back to this finally and really see what it could do for me.
Super glad I stole it from [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] hahaha
some more head to head swings vs Qi35 and I really prefer the Wilson….. never did i think those words would come out of my mouth
Standing over the ball with the DYNAPWR Carbon gives me tons of confidence and I also really look forward to swinging it. There is nothing game changing with this driver but I havent been so excited to consistently use a particular club like this in a long time
Im really thinking about picking up a fairway wood now bc of how impressive the driver is
Just bumping this thread. Any others give this driver any thought?
I saw a used one in decent shape at the PGA store today and gave it a long ponder. And still am.
Well because of [USER=50601]@jfrigo1003[/USER] ’s posting here and seeing a used one in store, I went on eBay to compare pricing. I found a 9* model on eBay with the Mitsubishi Kai’li white extra stiff shaft that I used to have in a Mizuno St-Max and hit very well, and it was for even less than the one I saw in the store so I decided to pick one up as the backup driver. Always need one in the chamber to test and play with, right?
[QUOTE=”GoodGriefMan, post: 13233627, member: 78611″]
Well because of [USER=50601]@jfrigo1003[/USER] ’s posting here and seeing a used one in store, I went on eBay to compare pricing. I found a 9* model on eBay with the Mitsubishi Kai’li white extra stiff shaft that I used to have in a Mizuno St-Max and hit very well, and it was for even less than the one I saw in the store so I decided to pick one up as the backup driver. Always need one in the chamber to test and play with, right?
[/QUOTE]
Nice. Let us know how it goes.
[QUOTE=”GoodGriefMan, post: 13233627, member: 78611″]
Well because of [USER=50601]@jfrigo1003[/USER] ’s posting here and seeing a used one in store, I went on eBay to compare pricing. I found a 9* model on eBay with the Mitsubishi Kai’li white extra stiff shaft that I used to have in a Mizuno St-Max and hit very well, and it was for even less than the one I saw in the store so I decided to pick one up as the backup driver. Always need one in the chamber to test and play with, right?
[/QUOTE]
love to hear it!! I brought mine over the Qi35 out to Victoria National. Absolutely made the right decision
It sounds good, looks good, feels good, and flat out performs
[QUOTE=”jfrigo1003, post: 13233696, member: 50601″]
love to hear it!! I brought mine over the Qi35 out to Victoria National. Absolutely made the right decision
It sounds good, looks good, feels good, and flat out performs
[/QUOTE]
I had flirted with the Ping G440 LST earlier this year and saw some decent things. But I could not shake my fade, really struggled putting a draw on it. I know the adapter is fade biased…but it was shocking.
I’ve also had a few friends who were Qi10 players that are not happy they switched out to the Qi35. For whatever that’s worth.
But I’m glad to see Wilson back in with something. I hope they continue to grow!
[QUOTE=”GoodGriefMan, post: 13234004, member: 78611″]
I had flirted with the Ping G440 LST earlier this year and saw some decent things. But I could not shake my fade, really struggled putting a draw on it. I know the adapter is fade biased…but it was shocking.
I’ve also had a few friends who were Qi10 players that are not happy they switched out to the Qi35. For whatever that’s worth.
But I’m glad to see Wilson back in with something. I hope they continue to grow!
[/QUOTE]
The Wilson should be a good fit for you then. I found it to be a touch draw biased so i have mine opened/lofted down all the way which is better for me
[ATTACH type=”full”]9356117[/ATTACH]
Compared to the GT3 I currently game it’s a solid size. Weight wise it was closer to the GT2 than 3, but that’s not really a complaint. For a used one it was in good shape, and I was able to clean it up to get it looking new. Came with a 6x shaft, which is what I play today. But I will say it’s a very good looking club and I hope to be able to get out tomorrow to give it a test. 10.5* head, so I’ll have some moving around to do on it but I want to test this at stock and see what happens.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9356125[/ATTACH]
Did I mention it looks really good?
[QUOTE=”GoodGriefMan, post: 13239475, member: 78611″]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_5059.jpeg”]9356117[/ATTACH]
Compared to the GT3 I currently game it’s a solid size. Weight wise it was closer to the GT2 than 3, but that’s not really a complaint. For a used one it was in good shape, and I was able to clean it up to get it looking new. Came with a 6x shaft, which is what I play today. But I will say it’s a very good looking club and I hope to be able to get out tomorrow to give it a test. 10.5* head, so I’ll have some moving around to do on it but I want to test this at stock and see what happens.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_5058.jpeg”]9356125[/ATTACH]
Did I mention it looks really good?
[/QUOTE]
Though I’m not a big fan of glossy crowns, I think Wilson might have made the best looking release this year.
[QUOTE=”Tywithay, post: 13239526, member: 14378″]
Though I’m not a big fan of glossy crowns, I think Wilson might have made the best looking release this year.
[/QUOTE]
I’ve got a headcover on the way, but I like that as well. It’s a really good release.
When I started playing golf I had my dad’s original Wilsons from the 50’s as my starter. So I want them to make a return for sentimental value.
Alright [USER=50601]@jfrigo1003[/USER] I get your point. I had a customer call that got cancelled at the last minute, so I ended up with enough time to go hit 50 golf balls. So I brought my GT3 and the Carbon with and went hitting. Did my first 5 with the GT3 to make sure I knew and then switched.
And wow. It does pop off the face. 10.5* is too much for me, but I just tee’d lower and wasn’t losing that much distance. So I dropped it down a degree of loft and….shot for shot it competed with the GT3. Distance, feel. With the added improvement of I couldn’t go right as much as I can on a miss-hit. Really controlled.
It’s a lot of fun. Man. It sounds great. I would definitely be interested in this in a fairway wood as well.
[QUOTE=”GoodGriefMan, post: 13240394, member: 78611″]
Alright [USER=50601]@jfrigo1003[/USER] I get your point. I had a customer call that got cancelled at the last minute, so I ended up with enough time to go hit 50 golf balls. So I brought my GT3 and the Carbon with and went hitting. Did my first 5 with the GT3 to make sure I knew and then switched.
And wow. It does pop off the face. 10.5* is too much for me, but I just tee’d lower and wasn’t losing that much distance. So I dropped it down a degree of loft and….shot for shot it competed with the GT3. Distance, feel. With the added improvement of I couldn’t go right as much as I can on a miss-hit. Really controlled.
It’s a lot of fun. Man. It sounds great. I would definitely be interested in this in a fairway wood as well.
[/QUOTE]
I’ve really considered the fairway also! It looks great too but I haven’t had a chance to hit it
I had GT3 late last year and liked it but the misses were more penal and bigger drop off in distance
It really is a great driver! Still won’t get the recognition it should which is a shame, but I’m excited to call it my gamer the rest of the year
[QUOTE=”jfrigo1003, post: 13240472, member: 50601″]
I’ve really considered the fairway also! It looks great too but I haven’t had a chance to hit it
I had GT3 late last year and liked it but the misses were more penal and bigger drop off in distance
It really is a great driver! Still won’t get the recognition it should which is a shame, but I’m excited to call it my gamer the rest of the year
[/QUOTE]
I get the miss with the GT3. It’s my complaint. When it’s hit correctly, it’s something. A miss, it’s not so great. And as I’ve worked through my swing changes it’s not as bad as it was, but I still find its penalizing. This, even on a miss I felt like I wasn’t being killed. I’ll be taking it to Naperbrook for the Fathers Day outing on Saturday to put it through its pace.
It’s a really good driver. You’re right, even Golf Galaxy’s don’t carry these (but Naperbrook does, ha). I’d be interested in the fairway but it’s such a rare club for me to hit unless I’m playing Bolingbrook or one of the others. I’ll have a chance in Geneva, but that’s my only hang up.
Awfully impressive. From what I’ve read about the Dynapwr Irons to this now, and having played the Staff ball last year…hopefully this starts to change.
Played around with the weights and loft. Went back to stock, moved the heavy weight forward. Dropped it down half a degree and swung. Then dropped it thr full one and it hit the sweet spot. And even with it like that I still was getting really closed face hits and great contact. No fade. Bit of a draw.
Im a bit blown away by this. I want to explore other shafts with it, but for now the Kai’li White 60x has been a solid pairing.
I put a much lower launching and stiffer shaft in this head than [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] had in it and….
Holy shit is it low spinning now. I mean LOWWWWWWWWWW spinning. Its wild for me to see sub 2K regularly now, and it kind of scares me hahaha
That said, I still think this is one of the best looking and sounding releases of the year, and I love that for Wilson.
It actually makes me sad but I think my time has come to an end for the DYNAPWR Carbon. For my taste I still think this is the best looking at address and the sound is great as well. But now that I have a simulator at home and can hit balls whenever, I’m seeing a drop in ball speed vs the 3 other drivers I’ve hit. I was seeing very low efficiency numbers between 1.38 – 1.41 over and over. After moving back in to a TM Qi35 and then a Callaway Elyte TD Max I realized it’s not the SkyTrak, it sadly was the wilson. Both those other drivers returned efficiency numbers of 1.45 – 1.47. Ball speed jumped by as high as 12mph
[QUOTE=”jfrigo1003, post: 13304054, member: 50601″]
It actually makes me sad but I think my time has come to an end for the DYNAPWR Carbon. For my taste I still think this is the best looking at address and the sound is great as well. But now that I have a simulator at home and can hit balls whenever, I’m seeing a drop in ball speed vs the 3 other drivers I’ve hit. I was seeing very low efficiency numbers between 1.38 – 1.41 over and over. After moving back in to a TM Qi35 and then a Callaway Elyte TD Max I realized it’s not the SkyTrak, it sadly was the wilson. Both those other drivers returned efficiency numbers of 1.45 – 1.47. Ball speed jumped by as high as 12mph
[/QUOTE]
Oh wow. Did you see similar performance on the golf course too?
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13304069, member: 1193″]
Oh wow. Did you see similar performance on the golf course too?
[/QUOTE]
At first I thought everything was normal bc it was still a honeymoon phase and I really loved everything about it. When I would check Arrcos and see the distance I chalked it up to not playing much even tho the strike would feel like I killed it. My playing partners that I’m longer than ended up being the same distance away as me but I again told myself i havent played much the past few years and they must have hit their drive exceptionally well.
My last 2 rounds I played a Qi35 and saw about 15 more yards….at least according to Arrcos. Now on the SkyTrak I could not crack 155 ball speed with the Wilson. I even moved the heavy weight to the front. I would hit some balls that I swear were about as perfect as I could drive a golf ball and still see 155 speed. I figured ” oh the skytrak is struggling with higher speeds.” At first even the cobra DS Adapt LS would stay at 155 so i figured it wsa the skytraks problem. But this week the qi35 and elyte td max easily cleared 160 ball speed yet the wilson never got any faster
[QUOTE=”jfrigo1003, post: 13304380, member: 50601″]
At first I thought everything was normal bc it was still a honeymoon phase and I really loved everything about it. When I would check Arrcos and see the distance I chalked it up to not playing much even tho the strike would feel like I killed it. My playing partners that I’m longer than ended up being the same distance away as me but I again told myself i havent played much the past few years and they must have hit their drive exceptionally well.
My last 2 rounds I played a Qi35 and saw about 15 more yards….at least according to Arrcos. Now on the SkyTrak I could not crack 155 ball speed with the Wilson. I even moved the heavy weight to the front. I would hit some balls that I swear were about as perfect as I could drive a golf ball and still see 155 speed. I figured ” oh the skytrak is struggling with higher speeds.” At first even the cobra DS Adapt LS would stay at 155 so i figured it wsa the skytraks problem. But this week the qi35 and elyte td max easily cleared 160 ball speed yet the wilson never got any faster
[/QUOTE]
Great feedback.
[QUOTE=”jfrigo1003, post: 13304054, member: 50601″]
It actually makes me sad but I think my time has come to an end for the DYNAPWR Carbon. For my taste I still think this is the best looking at address and the sound is great as well. But now that I have a simulator at home and can hit balls whenever, I’m seeing a drop in ball speed vs the 3 other drivers I’ve hit. I was seeing very low efficiency numbers between 1.38 – 1.41 over and over. After moving back in to a TM Qi35 and then a Callaway Elyte TD Max I realized it’s not the SkyTrak, it sadly was the wilson. Both those other drivers returned efficiency numbers of 1.45 – 1.47. Ball speed jumped by as high as 12mph
[/QUOTE]
I recently had to move on from the ’23 DP Carbon. Came very close to opting for the ’25 DP carbon, but chose the Qi10 at $200 cheaper, combined with the fact that I’ve never had a Wilson driver that I’ve hit consistently well.
Your results help assure me that I made the right decision. Wilson makes some great gear, and I still think that the new Carbon is the best looking driver out there, but unless Wilson modifies their pricing, they’re simply not going to able to compete in the driver market. Esp. if the performance is even the least bit lacking.
Also, while not a TM fan generally, the Qi10 is fantastic so far.