Stop us if you’ve heard this story before. Wilson Golf, long known for their fantastic irons, are trying to make inroads in the metalwoods segment.
You know what? We’re going to stop ourselves. How many times have we read that same boring introduction in a Wilson metalwoods review? A sampling of all the major YouTube reviewers almost reads like a script. It’s boring. It’s played out.
It’s true though.
Wilson has made a concerted effort in the last couple of years to improve their metalwoods so they can compete among the larger equipment companies. It’s not easy to do that, especially when you look at the size of the R&D groups in Big Golf. Smaller OEM’s just don’t have those resources. Still, there are smaller companies out there that are competing on a technological level. In fact, one smaller company comes to mind as a market leader in technology, so it’s not impossible.
What makes a competitive driver in 2025?
The answer is both obvious and nuanced. Of course, a driver needs to “perform” to be relevant among its peers. You’ll often hear things like “drivers are all the same” or “they are all maxed out anyway”, but that’s just not true. There are companies and drivers that stand out in different performance metrics, whether we are talking about highly efficient faces, speed realized through aerodynamics, advanced adjustability, or incredible stability on off center shots. Some companies haven’t been shy about documenting their efforts to catch up with the market leaders and they are quick to publicly celebrate when they make meaningful advancements. It’s a thing. The bottom line is that to be competitive, a company must be able to win, or come close to winning, in a hitting bay.
Then we start looking at nuance. Does the driver look “good”, whatever that means? Does it sound good? Does the brand have a stigma that overshadows even the best performance? Will the consumer feel proud showing his buddies at the club his new driver? Is it priced high enough to seem premium and low enough to seem affordable? All these things matter, and while the peripheral categories tend to carry varying levels of weight with each individual, small companies are under even more pressure to get them right.
As you can see, it’s hard. Wilson may know this better than anybody. Their efforts to compete in the metalwoods segment are well documented over the last decade. In fact, we’d argue that there hasn’t been a company more willing to try different approaches than Wilson. In 2023 things just seemed a little different though. The company released a single driver that, at least in some verifiable metrics, said, “we can compete in the hitting bay”. The 2023 DYNAPWR Carbon was fast. It was low spin. In the right player’s hands it could absolutely send the ball. It sounded and looked pretty solid too. It was a driver that could compete, at least for some golfers. However, it really wasn’t made for the widest cross section of players that needed more forgiveness than it had to offer. While the other Wilson driver in the 2023 line, the DYNAPWR Titanium, did offer a viable option for the “average” golfer it just never got the same amount of love as the Carbon. From the outside looking in, it almost seemed like Wilson’s marketing strategy that pushed the Carbon upward had the effect of diminishing the image of the Titanium. Regardless, something happened in 2023. Wilson made a wave in metalwoods. A small wave, but a wave indeed.
Reputations aren’t built in a day, or within a single release cycle if we’re talking about the golf equipment industry. What direction would Wilson go with their successor line to DYNAPWR 2023? In late January 2025 we got our first hints of the company’s plans. The new 2025 DYNAPWR line was revealed, offering three distinct driver options, each of which managed to make us feel like the company was listening. Wilson took what was great about the original DYNAPWR Carbon and leaned into it even more with the DYNAPWR LS, a player’s driver that didn’t seek to occupy a gray area. It’s unabashedly fast, low spin, and fade biased. They refined the “Max” concept with the DYNAPWR MAX, their highest MOI driver to date. Maybe most excitingly, they gave us the goldilocks driver that seems to be the breadwinner for most companies: The high-tech driver that balances speed, forgiveness, adjustability, and aesthetics. It’s called the 2025 DYNAPWR Carbon.
Those waves? They are getting a little bigger.

Key Technologies – Wilson DYNAPWR Carbon
Normally we’d utilize this space in a review to deep dive into the various technologies Wilson incorporated into the DYNAPWR Carbon. We’ll do that, to some extent, but we’re also going to use this space to make a point.
Wilson needs to work on their messaging.
Frankly, the outlay of information from the company on the DYNAPWR metalwood line doesn’t match what we’ve come to expect from companies that are seeking to seriously compete for consumer dollars. The web page for DYNAPWR Carbon, which in our opinion may be the most impactful driver the company has ever sent to market, reads like it was constructed as an afterthought. Consumers today want to see what they are paying for. They want to know what the PKR-360 looks like. At the very least, they want more than a short sentence that casually describes it.
We say this because we care. Brag a little. The R&D team obviously put great effort into designing this line. Now it’s time for Show and Tell.

Anyway, going off the limited information out there, this is a basic rundown of what the DYNAPWR Carbon bring in terms of technology.
Carbon Fiber
First of all, as evidenced by the name “Carbon”, 58% of the body’s surface area is constructed of carbon fiber. This allows the discretionary weight that has been saved by using the lighter material to be used in areas of the club it can be of better use. Wilson notes that, even at 460cc, the Carbon sports a compact appearance at address. They’ve also invested a great deal of effort into dialing in the driver’s acoustics (sound at impact) and mention placing internal ribs throughout the body to accomplish this.

Adjustability
There are a couple ways to dial in a good fit with the DYNAPWR Carbon. First, the 6-way adjustable hosel provides the ability to tweak lofts. In truth, the level of adjustability here isn’t really in the same ballpark as we see from many companies today. It spans three degrees of loft (one down and two up) and can be dialed down in half degree increments. There aren’t any specific lie angle adjustments marked on the hosel, and we haven’t seen any official word on how loft changes impact lie angle either. While the ability to loft up and down is nice, at this point it’s really just an expectation. We’d love to see this adapter evolve to something more comprehensive in future releases.

Consumers today expect some level of adjustability beyond hosel changes and that capability most often comes in the way of movable weights. We sometimes think of adjustable weights in terms of moving ball flight horizontally, but it has other uses too. In the DYNAPWR Carbon’s case, its swappable weight system is primarily intended to alter trajectory and forgiveness. There are two weights, 6g towards the front of the driver and 12g positioned at the rear. In this configuration, the driver will offer the highest launch angle, most spin, and be the most forgiving. Conversely, when the heavy weight is positioned forward, ball speeds will increase a bit, the ball will fly lower, and the driver will be less forgiving. This system is especially useful when it’s integrated into a full line of drivers. It almost gives a “half-step” between the extreme player’s profile of the DYNAPWR LS for those players that may want lower spin but not a true fade bias.
PKR-360 Face

We mentioned the PKR-360 face earlier. Again, details aren’t really that plentiful, but this is Wilson’s take on variable face thickness. The company utilized machine learning to settle on the most efficient pattern of variable thickness. Simply stated, this should help maintain ball speed when you miss the center. Many companies have expanded this concept to help retain consistent spin rates on mis-hit balls, but we haven’t read anything to that effect from Wilson concerning PKR-360.
Finally, we come to Open Hosel Construction. We’ll just copy and paste Wilson’s description, because we aren’t sure what it really does or if you can even see it on the driver. The company describes it as, “Improved weight distribution allows for the removal of inefficient material and the creation of a stronger hosel infrastructure.” This obviously indicates some sort of relocation of mass, most likely from the heel area, but we can’t really dive into the specifics of how it truly functions.
Aesthetics – Wilson DYNAPWR Carbon

It’s hard to dispute that the 2025 DYNAPWR offers a noticeable improvement in looks and feel over the previous generation. While the 2023 version showed some promise, we can easily say that we prefer what we are seeing and hearing with the new driver. There really isn’t a single part of the club that doesn’t look better to us. The gray and black color scheme and overly busy sole have been replaced with a simple black focus and subtle highlights of white and silver. The matte gray crown is now a glossy black, which allows the depth and complex patterns of the carbon fiber to stand out. A splash of red frames the rear of the driver head at address, driving home Wilson’s classic color. A small “D” functions as an alignment aid, sitting directly at the front of the crown’s carbon panel.

True to Wilson’s description, the head itself does have a somewhat compact, and mostly traditional shape at address. We expect to hear plenty of praise from those that put the DYNAPWR Carbon behind a golf ball. It’s a shape that breeds confidence and is very attractive at almost every angle. The face sits neutral in the stock, “standard” setting, though we did notice a visual change in face angle when the loft was adjusted. When set to a loft of 11 degrees, the 9-degree DYNAPWR Carbon we tested sat two degrees closed. While not completely off-putting due to some slight curvature of the toe area, it’s noticeable. We recommend taking your desired loft and face angle into account when buying a head. For example, if you prefer a more open face, consider lofting a 10.5-degree head down to get there.

We briefly went over Wilson’s focus on nailing the sound and feel of 2025 DYNAPWR Carbon. We can say, without reservation, that they did in fact nail it. In fact, we wouldn’t be surprised to see it ranked at the top of the list of 2025 drivers in the feel category. The Carbon occupies the perfect middle ground between sometimes overly muted carbon drivers and their boisterous titanium counterparts. It’s just pleasant. Center impacts produce a wonderful mushy sensation of the ball compressing into the face and rocketing off it. Seriously, we hope you’ll take the opportunity to try it for yourself. Wilson’s R&D group did spectacular work here.
Performance – Wilson DYNAPWR Carbon
The biggest question mark when it came to the DYNAPWR Carbon’s performance was whether Wilson could make their “core” driver playable for a wide range of golfers. We mentioned that the 2023 version lacked the forgiveness needed to make it accessible for a large cross section of consumers, so that’s what we keyed on first. We were thrilled to see that the 2025 Carbon instantly showed it was playable for mid-handicaps in its stock weight configuration. Outdoor testing showed that it had a strong tendency to keep the ball on or near the fairway with poor swings. A simple example would be that rather than the out-of-play screaming low hook we sometimes saw from the 2023 DYNAPWR Carbon, we saw a ball that ended up 5-10 paces in the left rough. Swipey contact resulted in a controlled fading ball flight that found the fairway more often than not. Launch monitor testing showed average performance in maintaining consistent spin on mishits. There was a slight drop in spin with toe contact, but not nearly as bad as we saw with the 2023 version.

We suspect there is some subtle draw bias to the 2025 Carbon, though it could certainly be moved both directions. It needs to be noted that some of the leftwards tendency could have been caused by the closed face angle (we played the 9 degree driver lofted up to 11 degrees). Regardless, our miss was almost exclusively left. Again, we suggest considering potential loft adjustments and your preferred face angle at address when choosing a head. All things considered, the 2025 DYNAPWR Carbon proved to be more than forgiving enough to meet the needs of the masses.
In general, we found the 2025 Carbon to launch the ball lower and produce less spin than other comparable “core” drivers on the market. This difference wasn’t exactly huge, but in the area of 1-2 degrees and 200-300rpm less than some its competitors. Fitting needs vary, so take your specific desires into account when deciding on a loft. In general, we found ourselves noticing less carry distance than normal, but normal total distances (including roll) when playing outdoors. Ball flight trended lower for the most part, though again – swings vary. As always, try before you buy.

One last thing to note about performance is the impact of moving the heavy weight forward on the driver head. Again, this adjustment is designed to lower launch and decrease spin, and these changes should come at the cost of less forgiveness. Our testing showed this to be the case, with the weight forward orientation causing the driver to perform much more like the 2023 DYNAPWR Carbon. In other words, it became much less playable for mid handicaps. Ball speed dropped and spin rates seemed to plummet on off-center impacts, leading to a substantial loss of distance and control. Better players, or those that naturally produce too much spin, will find more use out of this setting than typical golfers.
The Details
The 2025 DYNAPWR Carbon driver retails for $549.99 in its stock configuration. Four options are available, as seen in the chart below.
The stock driver comes with a Fujikura Ventus TR Blue shaft and Lamkin Crossline 360 grip. Custom options are available, with a modest selection available at no extra cost. Custom orders can be placed on Wilson’s website, www.wilson.com.





Great write up [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER]! You’re absolutely correct, consumers in many instances want to read about what they may be buying. Wilson may have short sold that.
Interesting article on what is definitely the best looking Wilson driver to date.
Creating a low spin playable driver as a core model is something that I think is pretty compelling.
This could be an early sleeper pick for underrated and I think they have a winner on their hands.
I love the looks of this driver. Traditional shaped, they did it right. Is the ventus a true ventus shaft? for $549 with a real ventus this could be a steal of a driver if so.
Great review [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER]
I love the looks of this driver. Hopefully Wilson reads your review and takes some of it to heart. I agree that there just isn’t really much information on this driver direct from the manufacturer. This is one I want to hit at some point, even though I don’t need a new driver.
First Wilson driver I like the look of since ever I believe. Will be interesting to see how they do going up in price as they now are at Cobra and others level in cost and all of a sudden just the price savings is no longer a selling point and they will be judged primarily on performance. If truly a Ventus TR Blue it’s a big selling point but I’d like verification on that first as they still maintain that box set brand in the back of my mind when I started golf. They are moving that thought further and further away but like I wrote above this one solely relies on performance alone at that price and time will tell in the fitting bays.
Dug into their shaft matrix and it looks like the stock TR is a made for shaft as the True Ventus TR is a 350 up charge.
[QUOTE=”JTinMO, post: 13018691, member: 68067″]
I love the looks of this driver. Traditional shaped, they did it right. Is the ventus a true ventus shaft? for $549 with a real ventus this could be a steal of a driver if so.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=”Golfers Anonymous, post: 13018709, member: 59233″]
Dug into their shaft matrix and it looks like the stock TR is a made for shaft as the True Ventus TR is a 350 up charge.
[/QUOTE]
GA is right. They offer the upcharge Ventus for custom orders.
Great article.
Honestly, the webpage reads like it was generated with some AI instead of a marketing team. Great looking driver, but if I’m honest, I can’t give Wilson a serious thought just because of their recent (lack) of history. It would be like McGregor coming out with a new driver claiming to be competitive. BUT…only one way to find out.
Have to admit reading through this article [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] made me want to try this out. Wilson hasn’t had a good looking driver in years and this one I think this one checks a lot of boxes. Also I like how you called them out.
But what about the open hosel construction!?
[QUOTE=”jdtox, post: 13018728, member: 5944″]
Have to admit reading through this article [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] made me want to try this out. Wilson hasn’t had a good looking driver in years and this one I think this one checks a lot of boxes. Also I like how you called them out.
[/QUOTE]
I think you’d like it quite a bit. I’ll make sure you get to try it when we play golf soon.
As for the last part, it has to be said. We want an overload of details!
Their reputation with drivers is a huge hurdle for me. The only way I’m buying one of these is used at a heavy discount, especially when I can buy a like new Paradym AI Smoke from CPO for $270. I like Wilson more than most having played their irons from 2003 to 2013 but I bought a Wilson driver several years ago and it was not good enough to make it into my bag.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13018741, member: 1193″]
I think you’d like it quite a bit. I’ll make sure you get to try it when we play golf soon.
As for the last part, it has to be said. We want an overload of details!
[/QUOTE]
Yes! Need to hit it, for science!
[QUOTE=”tahoebum, post: 13018743, member: 10440″]
Their reputation with drivers is a huge hurdle for me. The only way I’m buying one of these is used at a heavy discount, especially when I can buy a like new Paradym AI Smoke from CPO for $270. I like Wilson more than most having played their irons from 2003 to 2013 but I bought a Wilson driver several years ago and it was not good enough to make it into my bag.
[/QUOTE]
I understand that viewpoint 100%. I’d encourage you to at least give it a try if you see it in a hitting bay. It’s got some good things going on that might surprise you.
It is a good looking driver for sure. At the 549 price point I’m not sure it hits a spot where people are going to say wow. Companies that try to pass off a built for shaft with the Ventus name. Adding the TR to it makes it even worse in my mind. Will all driver releases be judged against the new Cobra release of the FF33 adapter.
[QUOTE=”blugold, post: 13018736, member: 3249″]
But what about the open hosel construction!?
[/QUOTE]
I think it’s the same idea that Ping used on the G440 this year, but the article is spot-on that Wilson provided very little.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13018766, member: 1193″]
I understand that viewpoint 100%. I’d encourage you to at least give it a try if you see it in a hitting bay. It’s got some good things going on that might surprise you.
[/QUOTE]
I’ll certainly try it. The lower spin you mention in the article is a good fit for me.
[QUOTE=”tahoebum, post: 13018783, member: 10440″]
I’ll certainly try it. The lower spin you mention in the article is a good fit for me.
[/QUOTE]
Weight forward really drove it down for me.
[USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] another great review. I’d agree, OEMs need to talk to the tech, i think we had some similar though not “harsh” comments on the DPF irons. There were words (power holes) that perhaps could have been described better or named better.
Just how less playable was the heavy weight forward on heel misses?
And, this driver does not offer tinkering for draw/fade. I wonder how that compares to most other OEM core drivers.
Great review [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] ! People do not realize how much R&D it takes to go to the next level. I think it is important for a golf company to offer different styles of their products. In this case, Wilson’s (3) drivers is the way to go. Appealing to the high and low handicappers.
For me, I would go with the with DYNAPWR Max. I am a high handicap player and I need the most forgiveness and stability that I can get. Definitely a beautiful driver.
Question to the group – do you think that at some point Wilson will have to rebrand the logo into something more ‘new’ / ‘modern’? Wilson is trying to make a comeback, but do they need to do this to obtain competitive advantage? For example, KIA changed the logo and the style of its cars.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9333990[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”JW Smoove, post: 13018823, member: 63219″]
[USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] another great review. I’d agree, OEMs need to talk to the tech, i think we had some similar though not “harsh” comments on the DPF irons. There were words (power holes) that perhaps could have been described better or named better.
Just how less playable was the heavy weight forward on heel misses?
And, this driver does not offer tinkering for draw/fade. I wonder how that compares to most other OEM core drivers.
[/QUOTE]
For me, the weight forward just amplified everything when I put a bad strike. More directional missing, lower height, etc.
I don’t recall a specific heel strike to relate to you unfortunately. It’s just not a miss I have that often.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13018827, member: 1193″]
For me, the weight forward just amplified everything when I put a bad strike. More directional missing, lower height, etc.
I don’t recall a specific heel strike to relate to you unfortunately. It’s just not a miss I have that often.
[/QUOTE]
Thank you sir. Appreciate the reply.
[QUOTE=”jazi95, post: 13018825, member: 61749″]
Great review [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] ! People do not realize how much R&D it takes to go to the next level. I think it is important for a golf company to offer different styles of their products. In this case, Wilson’s (3) drivers is the way to go. Appealing to the high and low handicappers.
For me, I would go with the with DYNAPWR Max. I am a high handicap player and I need the most forgiveness and stability that I can get. Definitely a beautiful driver.
Question to the group – do you think that at some point Wilson will have to rebrand the logo into something more ‘new’ / ‘modern’? Wilson is trying to make a comeback, but do they need to do this to obtain competitive advantage? For example, KIA changed the logo and the style of its cars.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1742300443850.png”]9333990[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
I think the “Wilson” logo and removing W/S from their shield logo was their attempt to do exactly that. Not sure if it was a hit or a miss, but seems like they have decided on a direction.
alright, first thoughts;
I went straight to the website to check out how they presented the drivers by comparison to the awesome photos in the review, and holy wow what an annoying process. First I had to press and hold click to confirm I wasn’t a bot, then I had to ‘accept’ cookie nonsense, and then a pop up offering 10% off that takes up the entire screen.
I’m not even in the door yet boys, relax.
[QUOTE=”Canadan, post: 13018857, member: 2320″]
alright, first thoughts;
I went straight to the website to check out how they presented the drivers by comparison to the awesome photos in the review, and holy wow what an annoying process. First I had to press and hold click to confirm I wasn’t a bot, then I had to ‘accept’ cookie nonsense, and then a pop up offering 10% off that takes up the entire screen.
I’m not even in the door yet boys, relax.
[/QUOTE]
Blech.
In a world of tech punching you in the face, and brilliant imagery taking center stage, this is a huge miss on features. Text on a white background is about as spec sheet as it can get, and if you’re drawing comparisons to others, misses the mark.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9333993[/ATTACH]
Now for some good;
The pictures shared by [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] on the THP homepage make this driver look competitive. It’s a bit of a carbon competition right now in golf, and showing it off, even it’s the shiny finish makes it ridiculously difficult to photo – and I think these photos absolutely nailed a premium presentation. Something that stock just doesn’t get it done with.
I love the shaping, the contrast between carbon and frame is strong, and the sole configuration seems to have a lot of meaningful shaping, features, and weights. This is really great to see.
[QUOTE=”Canadan, post: 13018878, member: 2320″]
Now for some good;
The pictures shared by [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] on the THP homepage make this driver look competitive. It’s a bit of a carbon competition right now in golf, and showing it off, even it’s the shiny finish makes it ridiculously difficult to photo – and I think these photos absolutely nailed a premium presentation. Something that stock just doesn’t get it done with.
I love the shaping, the contrast between carbon and frame is strong, and the sole configuration seems to have a lot of meaningful shaping, features, and weights. This is really great to see.
[/QUOTE]
I cannot begin to express how difficult it is to photograph this driver’s crown lol. Maddening.
It looks so good though. Really love the look at address.
This is the best looking driver this year. Also, it’s the straightest driver I tried. Carbon model was on the low spin side. Seems more user friendly versus the previous version.
Sounds like they really nailed the sound with this one, which is AWESOME. Total make or break for me out of the gate.
I also love the idea that having multiple models, they shifted the primary head option to suit more golfers. That’s smart.
I can’t wait to get into a during bay with this. Great looking and from all accounts is a great driver.
[QUOTE=”Canadan, post: 13018889, member: 2320″]
Sounds like they really nailed the sound with this one, which is AWESOME. Total make or break for me out of the gate.
I also love the idea that having multiple models, they shifted the primary head option to suit more golfers. That’s smart.
[/QUOTE]
The latter is where they missed biggest in 2023. I’m glad they adjusted.
Such a great looking driver. And it seems as though the sound matches the looks. It’s on the to-do list.
Nice work, [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER]
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13018947, member: 1193″]
The latter is where they missed biggest in 2023. I’m glad they adjusted.
[/QUOTE]
The way I see it, drivers should come with options, but they need to serve a purpose.
Based on what is available, there needs to be something low spin, there needs to be something forgiving, and there needs to be a blend of the two.
Great writeup as always [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER]. It’s a great looking driver… but I don’t know how many would pay $549 for that, especially when they can’t get a lot of info about it.
The intro about the broken record is true though. The next Wilson driver I like will be the first. And I say that as someone whos owned nearly every D line of irons since the Di11 (plus some C300s at one point too) until the last few releases, their drivers are never anywhere close to other OEMs in performance and value. Don’t want to beat a dead horse, but their messaging and CONSISTENCY needs to be there for people to want to try this driver.
[QUOTE=”Canadan, post: 13018967, member: 2320″]
The way I see it, drivers should come with options, but they need to serve a purpose.
Based on what is available, there needs to be something low spin, there needs to be something forgiving, and there needs to be a blend of the two.
[/QUOTE]
I think the real winner for them is that, but also that they are doing the tweener builds between all three with the swappable weights. You get a total of six distinct fitting options that way.
[QUOTE=”russtopher, post: 13018972, member: 14253″]
Great writeup as always [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER]. It’s a great looking driver… but I don’t know how many would pay $549 for that, especially when they can’t get a lot of info about it.
The intro about the broken record is true though. The next Wilson driver I like will be the first. And I say that as someone whos owned nearly every D line of irons since the Di11 (plus some C300s at one point too) until the last few releases, their drivers are never anywhere close to other OEMs in performance and value. Don’t want to beat a dead horse, but their messaging and CONSISTENCY needs to be there for people to want to try this driver.
[/QUOTE]
I hope you try it, because it’s 100% worth trying.
Very well done article. Your thoughts mirror my first impression of the Carbon. Fantastic looking, but pretty low spin and seemingly draw biased. Being a low spin guy with a hook miss, this was a pretty awful setup for me.
[QUOTE=”formula8, post: 13019061, member: 41435″]
Very well done article. Your thoughts mirror my first impression of the Carbon. Fantastic looking, but pretty low spin and seemingly draw biased. Being a low spin guy with a hook miss, this was a pretty awful setup for me.
[/QUOTE]
I would have loved to try the higher lofted head to bump up that spin and launch without closing the face.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13019098, member: 1193″]
I would have loved to try the higher lofted head to bump up that spin and launch without closing the face.
[/QUOTE]
For sure, closed face on a draw biased head isn’t great for a certain segment. I tried a 10.5 at standard and it still wasn’t enough.
Great writeup [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] ! This is a great looking driver and to keep the spin down in a core model is great for a lot of players. One of the dad’s on my daughter’s travel team was fit into the core model and he loves it. He is a big Titleist guy also.
[QUOTE=”ttucliffhanger, post: 13019177, member: 40538″]
Great writeup [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] ! This is a great looking driver and to keep the spin down in a core model is great for a lot of players. One of the dad’s on my daughter’s travel team was fit into the core model and he loves it. He is a big Titleist guy also.
[/QUOTE]
Oh, that’s pretty cool to hear!
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13019179, member: 1193″]
Oh, that’s pretty cool to hear!
[/QUOTE]
Yeah he was raving about it and was just amazed as he tried the new GT line as well during his fitting and the Wilson beat it out for him. He said at first he hesitated due to not knowing a ton about the driver and the fact that it wasn’t Titleist, but he said he trusted the fitter and he really really likes the new Wilson.
[QUOTE=”ttucliffhanger, post: 13019202, member: 40538″]
Yeah he was raving about it and was just amazed as he tried the new GT line as well during his fitting and the Wilson beat it out for him. He said at first he hesitated due to not knowing a ton about the driver and the fact that it wasn’t Titleist, but he said he trusted the fitter and he really really likes the new Wilson.
[/QUOTE]
Appreciate you sharing that. Like I said in the review, I think they can get some wins in the bay with certain players and swings right now.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13019208, member: 1193″]
Appreciate you sharing that. Like I said in the review, I think they can get some wins in the bay with certain players and swings right now.
[/QUOTE]
Abosolutely man. As [USER=3]@JB[/USER] stated, and I agree with him that this could be a sleeper for some people this year.
Nice write up [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER]. This driver looks like a blend of TSR and the Stealth. It’s a good looking club.
As someone who wants to learn as much as possible regarding new release equipment, I enjoyed reading the write up [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER]. As someone who has been playing golf for more than half a century, I like to see products from Wilson.
I’ve never hit a Wilson driver and this makes me want to change that. They have put out a fantastic looking driver this year.
I appreciate all you reading and commenting.
[QUOTE=”Canadan, post: 13018862, member: 2320″]
In a world of tech punching you in the face, and brilliant imagery taking center stage, this is a huge miss on features. Text on a white background is about as spec sheet as it can get, and if you’re drawing comparisons to others, misses the mark.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1742301782915.png”]9333993[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Wilson could lean into that with some sort of “substance over style” type messaging. “We don’t need fancy graphics with a driver this good” or something.