Stop us if you’ve heard this story before. Wilson Golf, long known for their fantastic irons, are trying to make inroads in the metalwoods segment.
You know what? We’re going to stop ourselves. How many times have we read that same boring introduction in a Wilson metalwoods review? A sampling of all the major YouTube reviewers almost reads like a script. It’s boring. It’s played out.
It’s true though.
Wilson has made a concerted effort in the last couple of years to improve their metalwoods so they can compete among the larger equipment companies. It’s not easy to do that, especially when you look at the size of the R&D groups in Big Golf. Smaller OEM’s just don’t have those resources. Still, there are smaller companies out there that are competing on a technological level. In fact, one smaller company comes to mind as a market leader in technology, so it’s not impossible.
What makes a competitive driver in 2025?
The answer is both obvious and nuanced. Of course, a driver needs to “perform” to be relevant among its peers. You’ll often hear things like “drivers are all the same” or “they are all maxed out anyway”, but that’s just not true. There are companies and drivers that stand out in different performance metrics, whether we are talking about highly efficient faces, speed realized through aerodynamics, advanced adjustability, or incredible stability on off center shots. Some companies haven’t been shy about documenting their efforts to catch up with the market leaders and they are quick to publicly celebrate when they make meaningful advancements. It’s a thing. The bottom line is that to be competitive, a company must be able to win, or come close to winning, in a hitting bay.
Then we start looking at nuance. Does the driver look “good”, whatever that means? Does it sound good? Does the brand have a stigma that overshadows even the best performance? Will the consumer feel proud showing his buddies at the club his new driver? Is it priced high enough to seem premium and low enough to seem affordable? All these things matter, and while the peripheral categories tend to carry varying levels of weight with each individual, small companies are under even more pressure to get them right.
As you can see, it’s hard. Wilson may know this better than anybody. Their efforts to compete in the metalwoods segment are well documented over the last decade. In fact, we’d argue that there hasn’t been a company more willing to try different approaches than Wilson. In 2023 things just seemed a little different though. The company released a single driver that, at least in some verifiable metrics, said, “we can compete in the hitting bay”. The 2023 DYNAPWR Carbon was fast. It was low spin. In the right player’s hands it could absolutely send the ball. It sounded and looked pretty solid too. It was a driver that could compete, at least for some golfers. However, it really wasn’t made for the widest cross section of players that needed more forgiveness than it had to offer. While the other Wilson driver in the 2023 line, the DYNAPWR Titanium, did offer a viable option for the “average” golfer it just never got the same amount of love as the Carbon. From the outside looking in, it almost seemed like Wilson’s marketing strategy that pushed the Carbon upward had the effect of diminishing the image of the Titanium. Regardless, something happened in 2023. Wilson made a wave in metalwoods. A small wave, but a wave indeed.
Reputations aren’t built in a day, or within a single release cycle if we’re talking about the golf equipment industry. What direction would Wilson go with their successor line to DYNAPWR 2023? In late January 2025 we got our first hints of the company’s plans. The new 2025 DYNAPWR line was revealed, offering three distinct driver options, each of which managed to make us feel like the company was listening. Wilson took what was great about the original DYNAPWR Carbon and leaned into it even more with the DYNAPWR LS, a player’s driver that didn’t seek to occupy a gray area. It’s unabashedly fast, low spin, and fade biased. They refined the “Max” concept with the DYNAPWR MAX, their highest MOI driver to date. Maybe most excitingly, they gave us the goldilocks driver that seems to be the breadwinner for most companies: The high-tech driver that balances speed, forgiveness, adjustability, and aesthetics. It’s called the 2025 DYNAPWR Carbon.
Those waves? They are getting a little bigger.

Key Technologies – Wilson DYNAPWR Carbon
Normally we’d utilize this space in a review to deep dive into the various technologies Wilson incorporated into the DYNAPWR Carbon. We’ll do that, to some extent, but we’re also going to use this space to make a point.
Wilson needs to work on their messaging.
Frankly, the outlay of information from the company on the DYNAPWR metalwood line doesn’t match what we’ve come to expect from companies that are seeking to seriously compete for consumer dollars. The web page for DYNAPWR Carbon, which in our opinion may be the most impactful driver the company has ever sent to market, reads like it was constructed as an afterthought. Consumers today want to see what they are paying for. They want to know what the PKR-360 looks like. At the very least, they want more than a short sentence that casually describes it.
We say this because we care. Brag a little. The R&D team obviously put great effort into designing this line. Now it’s time for Show and Tell.

Anyway, going off the limited information out there, this is a basic rundown of what the DYNAPWR Carbon bring in terms of technology.
Carbon Fiber
First of all, as evidenced by the name “Carbon”, 58% of the body’s surface area is constructed of carbon fiber. This allows the discretionary weight that has been saved by using the lighter material to be used in areas of the club it can be of better use. Wilson notes that, even at 460cc, the Carbon sports a compact appearance at address. They’ve also invested a great deal of effort into dialing in the driver’s acoustics (sound at impact) and mention placing internal ribs throughout the body to accomplish this.

Adjustability
There are a couple ways to dial in a good fit with the DYNAPWR Carbon. First, the 6-way adjustable hosel provides the ability to tweak lofts. In truth, the level of adjustability here isn’t really in the same ballpark as we see from many companies today. It spans three degrees of loft (one down and two up) and can be dialed down in half degree increments. There aren’t any specific lie angle adjustments marked on the hosel, and we haven’t seen any official word on how loft changes impact lie angle either. While the ability to loft up and down is nice, at this point it’s really just an expectation. We’d love to see this adapter evolve to something more comprehensive in future releases.

Consumers today expect some level of adjustability beyond hosel changes and that capability most often comes in the way of movable weights. We sometimes think of adjustable weights in terms of moving ball flight horizontally, but it has other uses too. In the DYNAPWR Carbon’s case, its swappable weight system is primarily intended to alter trajectory and forgiveness. There are two weights, 6g towards the front of the driver and 12g positioned at the rear. In this configuration, the driver will offer the highest launch angle, most spin, and be the most forgiving. Conversely, when the heavy weight is positioned forward, ball speeds will increase a bit, the ball will fly lower, and the driver will be less forgiving. This system is especially useful when it’s integrated into a full line of drivers. It almost gives a “half-step” between the extreme player’s profile of the DYNAPWR LS for those players that may want lower spin but not a true fade bias.
PKR-360 Face

We mentioned the PKR-360 face earlier. Again, details aren’t really that plentiful, but this is Wilson’s take on variable face thickness. The company utilized machine learning to settle on the most efficient pattern of variable thickness. Simply stated, this should help maintain ball speed when you miss the center. Many companies have expanded this concept to help retain consistent spin rates on mis-hit balls, but we haven’t read anything to that effect from Wilson concerning PKR-360.
Finally, we come to Open Hosel Construction. We’ll just copy and paste Wilson’s description, because we aren’t sure what it really does or if you can even see it on the driver. The company describes it as, “Improved weight distribution allows for the removal of inefficient material and the creation of a stronger hosel infrastructure.” This obviously indicates some sort of relocation of mass, most likely from the heel area, but we can’t really dive into the specifics of how it truly functions.
Aesthetics – Wilson DYNAPWR Carbon

It’s hard to dispute that the 2025 DYNAPWR offers a noticeable improvement in looks and feel over the previous generation. While the 2023 version showed some promise, we can easily say that we prefer what we are seeing and hearing with the new driver. There really isn’t a single part of the club that doesn’t look better to us. The gray and black color scheme and overly busy sole have been replaced with a simple black focus and subtle highlights of white and silver. The matte gray crown is now a glossy black, which allows the depth and complex patterns of the carbon fiber to stand out. A splash of red frames the rear of the driver head at address, driving home Wilson’s classic color. A small “D” functions as an alignment aid, sitting directly at the front of the crown’s carbon panel.

True to Wilson’s description, the head itself does have a somewhat compact, and mostly traditional shape at address. We expect to hear plenty of praise from those that put the DYNAPWR Carbon behind a golf ball. It’s a shape that breeds confidence and is very attractive at almost every angle. The face sits neutral in the stock, “standard” setting, though we did notice a visual change in face angle when the loft was adjusted. When set to a loft of 11 degrees, the 9-degree DYNAPWR Carbon we tested sat two degrees closed. While not completely off-putting due to some slight curvature of the toe area, it’s noticeable. We recommend taking your desired loft and face angle into account when buying a head. For example, if you prefer a more open face, consider lofting a 10.5-degree head down to get there.

We briefly went over Wilson’s focus on nailing the sound and feel of 2025 DYNAPWR Carbon. We can say, without reservation, that they did in fact nail it. In fact, we wouldn’t be surprised to see it ranked at the top of the list of 2025 drivers in the feel category. The Carbon occupies the perfect middle ground between sometimes overly muted carbon drivers and their boisterous titanium counterparts. It’s just pleasant. Center impacts produce a wonderful mushy sensation of the ball compressing into the face and rocketing off it. Seriously, we hope you’ll take the opportunity to try it for yourself. Wilson’s R&D group did spectacular work here.
Performance – Wilson DYNAPWR Carbon
The biggest question mark when it came to the DYNAPWR Carbon’s performance was whether Wilson could make their “core” driver playable for a wide range of golfers. We mentioned that the 2023 version lacked the forgiveness needed to make it accessible for a large cross section of consumers, so that’s what we keyed on first. We were thrilled to see that the 2025 Carbon instantly showed it was playable for mid-handicaps in its stock weight configuration. Outdoor testing showed that it had a strong tendency to keep the ball on or near the fairway with poor swings. A simple example would be that rather than the out-of-play screaming low hook we sometimes saw from the 2023 DYNAPWR Carbon, we saw a ball that ended up 5-10 paces in the left rough. Swipey contact resulted in a controlled fading ball flight that found the fairway more often than not. Launch monitor testing showed average performance in maintaining consistent spin on mishits. There was a slight drop in spin with toe contact, but not nearly as bad as we saw with the 2023 version.

We suspect there is some subtle draw bias to the 2025 Carbon, though it could certainly be moved both directions. It needs to be noted that some of the leftwards tendency could have been caused by the closed face angle (we played the 9 degree driver lofted up to 11 degrees). Regardless, our miss was almost exclusively left. Again, we suggest considering potential loft adjustments and your preferred face angle at address when choosing a head. All things considered, the 2025 DYNAPWR Carbon proved to be more than forgiving enough to meet the needs of the masses.
In general, we found the 2025 Carbon to launch the ball lower and produce less spin than other comparable “core” drivers on the market. This difference wasn’t exactly huge, but in the area of 1-2 degrees and 200-300rpm less than some its competitors. Fitting needs vary, so take your specific desires into account when deciding on a loft. In general, we found ourselves noticing less carry distance than normal, but normal total distances (including roll) when playing outdoors. Ball flight trended lower for the most part, though again – swings vary. As always, try before you buy.

One last thing to note about performance is the impact of moving the heavy weight forward on the driver head. Again, this adjustment is designed to lower launch and decrease spin, and these changes should come at the cost of less forgiveness. Our testing showed this to be the case, with the weight forward orientation causing the driver to perform much more like the 2023 DYNAPWR Carbon. In other words, it became much less playable for mid handicaps. Ball speed dropped and spin rates seemed to plummet on off-center impacts, leading to a substantial loss of distance and control. Better players, or those that naturally produce too much spin, will find more use out of this setting than typical golfers.
The Details
The 2025 DYNAPWR Carbon driver retails for $549.99 in its stock configuration. Four options are available, as seen in the chart below.
The stock driver comes with a Fujikura Ventus TR Blue shaft and Lamkin Crossline 360 grip. Custom options are available, with a modest selection available at no extra cost. Custom orders can be placed on Wilson’s website, www.wilson.com.





[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13019300, member: 1193″]
I appreciate all you reading and commenting.
[/QUOTE]
I appreciate you hitting and writing
Thanks for the review [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] .Really nice looking driver. Never tried a Wilson club.
I enjoyed the review. Seems like the marketing Dept still has a ways to go but even it’s better than it was a few years ago. The product looks great.
[QUOTE=”jdtox, post: 13018728, member: 5944″]
Have to admit reading through this article [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] made me want to try this out. Wilson hasn’t had a good looking driver in years and this one I think this one checks a lot of boxes. Also I like how you called them out.
[/QUOTE]
I may try to run down an LS version to compare to the DS Adapt. Problem is, can’t get Wilson where I live.
[QUOTE=”hedley_lamarr08, post: 13020002, member: 37622″]
I may try to run down an LS version to compare to the DS Adapt. Problem is, can’t get Wilson where I live.
[/QUOTE]
What about the Dick’s by you? They’re listed on Wilson’s website
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 13018669, member: 3″]
Interesting article on what is definitely the best looking Wilson driver to date.
Creating a low spin playable driver as a core model is something that I think is pretty compelling.
This could be an early sleeper pick for underrated and I think they have a winner on their hands.
[/QUOTE]
Even if they have a winner will enough people give it a try at the price point?
[QUOTE=”Pops, post: 13020249, member: 56070″]
Even if they have a winner will enough people give it a try at the price point?
[/QUOTE]
Is there a correct price point? Too low and their cheap. Too high and they’re out of their mind.
[QUOTE=”blugold, post: 13020268, member: 3249″]
Is there a correct price point? Too low and their cheap. Too high and they’re out of their mind.
[/QUOTE]
Not sure that’s why I asked. Given the chance to go DS-Adapt or Dynaprw carbon at same price point it’s Cobra every time. Thats just me. Maybe others are different.
[QUOTE=”Canadan, post: 13018862, member: 2320″]
In a world of tech punching you in the face, and brilliant imagery taking center stage, this is a huge miss on features. Text on a white background is about as spec sheet as it can get, and if you’re drawing comparisons to others, misses the mark.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1742301782915.png”]9333993[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Yeah, this is kind of a botched roll out
[QUOTE=”blugold, post: 13020201, member: 3249″]
What about the Dick’s by you? They’re listed on Wilson’s website
[/QUOTE]
Nope. Big 5 is all.
[QUOTE=”Pops, post: 13020276, member: 56070″]
Not sure that’s why I asked. Given the chance to go DS-Adapt or Dynaprw carbon at same price point it’s Cobra every time. Thats just me. Maybe others are different.
[/QUOTE]
I know it’s a hypothetical, but what if you hit it in the fitting bay and the Dynapower blows the DS out of the water?
I think that’s one of [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] ‘s best points. If you see one and are already hitting drivers, swing the Dynapower and see what happens.
[QUOTE=”blugold, post: 13020291, member: 3249″]
I know it’s a hypothetical, but what if you hit it in the fitting bay and the Dynapower blows the DS out of the water?
I think that’s one of [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] ‘s best points. If you see one and are already hitting drivers, swing the Dynapower and see what happens.
[/QUOTE]
For many of us here we might grab it and try it. For many guys walking into you name it retail they are more than likely drawn to the big names or even pushed to them.
Just seems that Wilson might have missed a chance to increase the size of their splash with the Carbon driver.
I read this one a couple of times today because I love the story that [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] was able to tell with it. Also his intro was a great mix of straight and sassy talk.
From the first time hearing about this one it showed that Wilson had some real potential here and it sounds like much of that potential has been realized.
[QUOTE=”Pops, post: 13020311, member: 56070″]
For many of us here we might grab it and try it. For many guys walking into you name it retail they are more than likely drawn to the big names or even pushed to them.
Just seems that Wilson might have missed a chance to increase the size of their splash with the Carbon driver.
[/QUOTE]
Seeing how much traffic the home page gets, maybe more people read the review and give it a go.
[QUOTE=”blugold, post: 13020393, member: 3249″]
Seeing how much traffic the home page gets, maybe more people read the review and give it a go.
[/QUOTE]
Between it and [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] getting it out on socials.
[QUOTE=”ddec, post: 13020321, member: 782″]
I read this one a couple of times today because I love the story that [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] was able to tell with it. Also his intro was a great mix of straight and sassy talk.
From the first time hearing about this one it showed that Wilson had some real potential here and it sounds like much of that potential has been realized.
[/QUOTE]
Thank you. I felt pretty damn good about this one. You know how that goes.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13020549, member: 1193″]
Thank you. I felt pretty damn good about this one. You know how that goes.
[/QUOTE]
Absolutely and I loved it.
Great looking driver with some real potential to win some fitting battles…but I wonder if it will even be an option at very many shops.
Too bad the marketing and go to market strategy isn’t improving as much as the R&D / product development
I’ve been a Wilson fanboy for years. Since their attempt to reinvent themselves, they’ve had several hits and misses. The C300 line was by far their best with the exception of the driver. Wilson just can’t seem to get a decent driver to market at all in fact.
The Cortex was in interesting try, and it was really great looking, but way overpriced and only an average performer.
The ’23 Carbon has been their best effort, and I have it as a back-up. The new line looks to be a logical progression. More models, with the Carbon being more suited for a wider array of players.
As [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] pointed out in his excellent article/review, the biggest knock is their adapter. Way, way behind, and as I learned from having the ’23, good luck finding additional weights.
Looking forward to seeing how the new line will fare. Will they be discounted before the end of the year, or gain a following or at least a cult following. For now I’m sticking with the ’23.
I think the driver looks fantastic and it sounds like it performs well also but I just have a hard time seeing how this becomes a big breakout for them. Being priced identically to Cobra and Srixon and higher than Tour Edge and Mizuno for instance makes me question how many people will really buy this club. Even in fittings diehards like the people here might be interested but for the average guy coming in off the street I just don’t think Wilson is even gonna get hit in many fittings to even have a chance to win.
Was driving all darn day yesterday so I didn’t have a chance to sit down and read this one until now.
[USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] you absolutely crushed it.
This is so well done, and so sand thorough…and honest when it comes to the brand. It also tells me yes, I do need to hit this one this year.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13021333, member: 1579″]
Was driving all darn day yesterday so I didn’t have a chance to sit down and read this one until now.
[USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] you absolutely crushed it.
This is so well done, and so sand thorough…and honest when it comes to the brand. It also tells me yes, I do need to hit this one this year.
[/QUOTE]
Thank you! You’ll hit it soon.
I have a genuine question. I feel like with smaller brands, we tend to see a resemblance to prior models from larger brands. In this case, it’s the Sim 2. Is that at all a coincidence?
Edit: Okay, just looked at it on the website and maybe it’s not so similar.
[QUOTE=”BuffaloPlunger, post: 13021360, member: 59303″]
I have a genuine question. I feel like with smaller brands, we tend to see a resemblance to prior models from larger brands. In this case, it’s the Sim 2. Is that at all a coincidence?
Edit: Okay, just looked at it on the website and maybe it’s not so similar.
[/QUOTE]
Probably at some level. I’m sure things sort of sink into the general consciousness too if that makes sense.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13021375, member: 1193″]
Probably at some level. I’m sure things sort of sink into the general consciousness too if that makes sense.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah I think I get what you’re saying. There’s only so many formulas/designs that work
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13021349, member: 1193″]
Thank you! You’ll hit it soon.
[/QUOTE]
[IMG alt=”remake dynamite GIF”]https://media4.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWJjY2ZjNTNjbTFxeXVnem12eXV0eG9jaGMxNTRrZ3NraDA1cXo0ZWt1bmwwbDNlZSZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/H6k4xzJV3vjZm/200.gif[/IMG]
Great write up, [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER]. It is a good looking head in person, though I haven’t hit them. As others have said, I’d have a hard time not going Cobra for the same price, unless it really wowed me in a head-to-head fitting. It has seemed to perform well in data from Cool Clubs testing (and others). Certainly a move in the right direction for Wilson.
This release of the carbon and ls models look absolutely incredible! If you get the chance, take a peek at the fairways as well. They freaking nailed the shape on the woods with this cycle. Great write up [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] Loved the detail and honest info. Thank you!
Really love how square the carbon looks at address. Will be fun to test a 10.5 head cranked down.
[QUOTE=”wam78, post: 13025548, member: 49571″]
This release of the carbon and ls models look absolutely incredible! If you get the chance, take a peek at the fairways as well. They freaking nailed the shape on the woods with this cycle. Great write up [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] Loved the detail and honest info. Thank you!
Really love how square the carbon looks at address. Will be fun to test a 10.5 head cranked down.
[/QUOTE]
Appreciate the comment! Let us know if you get a chance to try it out.
Interesting comment on this one from a shaft person yesterday that is doing some testing for an upcoming product.
[I]”The Carbon Dynapwr is one of the fastest heads I have tested this year. It isnt all that forgiving, but keeping up toe to toe with fastest is something I didnt expect”[/I]
after a month plus of saying how underrated this driver is I finally pulled the trigger and ordered one yesterday.
Bought the Carbon model in a 10.5 with plans to open it 2 notches since my tendency was to hit draws in the stock 9* head.
[QUOTE=”jfrigo1003, post: 13042760, member: 50601″]
after a month plus of saying how underrated this driver is I finally pulled the trigger and ordered one yesterday.
Bought the Carbon model in a 10.5 with plans to open it 2 notches since my tendency was to hit draws in the stock 9* head.
[/QUOTE]
Love that. Do anything different with the shaft or got with the Ventus?
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13042765, member: 1193″]
Love that. Do anything different with the shaft or got with the Ventus?
[/QUOTE]
Ordered with KBS TD. I was fit to it 4 years ago and it’s always been a safety blanket for me. I’ve played better shafts that I overall like more and get better distance with but the KBS TD has always had the best consistency and accuracy for me
I have a backup KBS TD in the Qi35 that I’m going to test against the new KBS PGW and see how it all works out
Plan is to test the Wilson and Qi35 head to head using KBS TD then swapping the Qi35 in to the PGW once it arrives. Having the sim setup at home now is going to be so much more efficient to test equipment!
[QUOTE=”jfrigo1003, post: 13042779, member: 50601″]
Ordered with KBS TD. I was fit to it 4 years ago and it’s always been a safety blanket for me. I’ve played better shafts that I overall like more and get better distance with but the KBS TD has always had the best consistency and accuracy for me
I have a backup KBS TD in the Qi35 that I’m going to test against the new KBS PGW and see how it all works out
Plan is to test the Wilson and Qi35 head to head using KBS TD then swapping the Qi35 in to the PGW once it arrives. Having the sim setup at home now is going to be so much more efficient to test equipment!
[/QUOTE]
Yea that’s awesome. I like that you’ll have a setup you’re familiar with to test it and test it against the Qi. Not that I am anti-Qi, but I prefer the look of the DPC crown by a pretty big margin.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13042787, member: 1193″]
Yea that’s awesome. I like that you’ll have a setup you’re familiar with to test it and test it against the Qi. Not that I am anti-Qi, but I prefer the look of the DPC crown by a pretty big margin.
[/QUOTE]
I LOVE the color of the Qi35 but shaping wise it might be my least favorite of the core model OEM heads. I also have a DS Adapt LS. Of the 3 heads I’ll own I would say I prefer the Wilson look at address the most followed closely by Cobra
[QUOTE=”jfrigo1003, post: 13042810, member: 50601″]
I LOVE the color of the Qi35 but shaping wise it might be my least favorite of the core model OEM heads. I also have a DS Adapt LS. Of the 3 heads I’ll own I would say I prefer the Wilson look at address the most followed closely by Cobra
[/QUOTE]
Wow thats a bold statement for Wilson.
[QUOTE=”jfrigo1003, post: 13042810, member: 50601″]
I LOVE the color of the Qi35 but shaping wise it might be my least favorite of the core model OEM heads. I also have a DS Adapt LS. Of the 3 heads I’ll own I would say I prefer the Wilson look at address the most followed closely by Cobra
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=”jdtox, post: 13042834, member: 5944″]
Wow thats a bold statement for Wilson.
[/QUOTE]
Definitely is a bold one, but I think you’ll understand when you see it. Killer looking driver.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13042870, member: 1193″]
Definitely is a bold one, but I think you’ll understand when you see it. Killer looking driver.
[/QUOTE]
What kind of shaft will you have in it?
[QUOTE=”jdtox, post: 13042879, member: 5944″]
What kind of shaft will you have in it?
[/QUOTE]
Ventus Blue in S.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13042888, member: 1193″]
Ventus Blue in S.
[/QUOTE]
Excellent
I gotta say…
I like this driver a lot.
So much that I took it from [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER]
(He actually let me, I didn’t really steal it ?)
It’s the best looking driver Wilson has ever made imo. The sound, I love. The launch seems good for me, though I really want to see it on monitor, and with a different shaft setup that fits my swing a little better.
I’m extremely excited to get to tinker around with it.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13072904, member: 1579″]
I gotta say…
I like this driver a lot.
So much that I took it from [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER]
(He actually let me, I didn’t really steal it ?)
It’s the best looking driver Wilson has ever made imo. The sound, I love. The launch seems good for me, though I really want to see it on monitor, and with a different shaft setup that fits my swing a little better.
I’m extremely excited to get to tinker around with it.
[/QUOTE]
Did they add a little spin on the last version? The last was the lowest spinning lowest launching driver maybe ever..
[QUOTE=”Templet0n, post: 13072920, member: 53139″]
Did they add a little spin on the last version? The last was the lowest spinning lowest launching driver maybe ever..
[/QUOTE]
This is just the core Carbon, not the LS, so I didn’t find it knuckling at all. Monitor will obviously reveal more on that though.
I’m betting the Carbon LS is more of the same from last year with that low spin.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13072927, member: 1579″]
This is just the core Carbon, not the LS, so I didn’t find it knuckling at all. Monitor will obviously reveal more on that though.
I’m betting the Carbon LS is more of the same from last year with that low spin.
[/QUOTE]
Ah gotcha. I have not looked closely at the Wilson heads yet this year. I was thinking like the previous model. There was the core, and then the carbon head that was the LS.. My mistake.. Thanks!
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13072904, member: 1579″]
I gotta say…
I like this driver a lot.
So much that I took it from [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER]
(He actually let me, I didn’t really steal it ?)
It’s the best looking driver Wilson has ever made imo. The sound, I love. The launch seems good for me, though I really want to see it on monitor, and with a different shaft setup that fits my swing a little better.
I’m extremely excited to get to tinker around with it.
[/QUOTE]
The Max might be better. ????
[QUOTE=”Thrillbilly Jim, post: 13073266, member: 50607″]
The Max might be better. ????
[/QUOTE]
Looking? I don’t think so. I think the carbon crown and sole are pretty superior visually, it’s finally a Wilson driver that looks like it belongs. The max to me is just another Wilson driver in that category.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13073327, member: 1579″]
Looking? I don’t think so. I think the carbon crown and sole are pretty superior visually, it’s finally a Wilson driver that looks like it belongs. The max to me is just another Wilson driver in that category.
[/QUOTE]
No, Carbon looks better. But, performance wise, the Max gave me better numbers than the Carbon.
[QUOTE=”Thrillbilly Jim, post: 13073539, member: 50607″]
No, Carbon looks better. But, performance wise, the Max gave me better numbers than the Carbon.
[/QUOTE]
Design wise, I don’t see that being the case for me, but, it’s cool to see how different designs can work for different swings.
Had a chance to hit this yesterday. Wow. Props to Wilson for making one of the best challenging drivers out there. Not sure I can find a single fault or complaint with it. Just awesome.
I saw the Dynapwr Carbon driver today but I never has the time to hit it as I only popped in to purchase 2 dozen TP5x golf balls, I must say that the 9 degree head looked amazing at address as it sat a touch open and its easily one of the best looking drivers on the market in 2025, just before leaving the store I spoke to a guy who also plays at our club and he had just been in for a driver and fairway wood fitting and he told me the performance and forgiveness of the Dynapwr Carbon way exceeded his expectations and he is currently playing a TSR2 but today he was fitted into the Dynapwr Carbon 9 degree driver and the GT3 16.5 fairway wood both with Project X Hzrdus Black 5G shafts (60 6.5 and 70 6.5).