
Wilson Staff makes great players irons. Let’s just get that out of the way. It’s their niche, though sometimes we wonder why they don’t lean into that niche just a little harder. As the primary source of the brand’s Tour play, and known for their iconic looks, they deserve to be showed off. I remember the first set of Staff irons I unboxed, 2011’s FG Tour V2 set, and the excitement I felt that day was genuine. They probably overmatched my skill level, but I played them faithfully for a substantial amount of time and still can see all the little divots and marks that bag chatter imparted on them. If there’s a t-shirt with an FG Tour V2 on it out there, feel free to send it my way.
By now, we all know the history, and while we could wax poetic on Wilson’s storied past in golf, we’ll refrain. The story has been told so many times that you’ve surely heard it all before. Instead, let’s look at Wilson today, and what they’ve done with their newest players irons, the Staff Model Blade and Staff Model CB.

For a variety of reasons these types of irons rarely feature major technology stories, but there are some noticeable design changes from the line’s previous generation. Wilson decided to focus efforts on giving consumers two iron sets that could easily be built into a combo set. While the loft specifications of the earlier Staff Model iron sets were identical, most of you should (hopefully) know by now that loft alone doesn’t determine ball flight. Both new sets have been built with “common lines and weighting, similar aesthetic details and parallel performance attributes,” according to the company.
Both irons feature a throwback technology that was discussed heavily during last year’s reboot of the DynaPower franchise. It’s called Fluid Feel Hosel, which is essentially a redistribution of weight from the hosel to elsewhere on the iron. This, of course, gives Wilson the ability to fine tune not only the center of gravity, but also how the iron feels and launches. Most notably, Fluid Feel is going to move the sweet spot a little more toe side, closer to what we perceive as the center of the face.

The Fluid Feel Hosel trickles down into what Wilson is calling Precise Toe Weighting. The weight saved from the heel side has been positioned in the toe of the golf club. This has the effect of not only slightly repositioning the center of gravity, but it also impacts the face’s closure rate. The language Wilson uses to describe the feature is interesting. They say it, “allows the golfer to hold the club face open, eliminating the low left shot.” Typically, you’ll see companies phrase this in a way that describes a clubs “workability” instead of its ability to mitigate a certain miss. Regardless of how it’s worded, the bottom-line is that you should be able to hit fades with relative ease, or any type of shot for that matter. It almost makes us wonder if the “low-left” comments tie back to Wilson’s Tour staff, especially when we look at what the company has to say.
“Throughout the development process, we engaged our Wilson Advisory Staff across the TOUR so that we could deliver irons that will make them better shot shapers,” said Bob Thurman, Global General Manager of Golf and Vice President of Research & Development at Wilson. They’ve obviously done something right, as Padraig Harrington already has a Champions Tour win (by a whopping seven shots) with the Staff Model CB’s in the bag.
Both irons also feature what Wilson is calling Precision Milling, which the company says, “allows for longer ball-to-face contact for more consistent spin and increased stopping power in both iron offerings.” This appears to be a subtle application of milling, as the faces don’t seem overly textured. In fact, outward appearances present a very familiar Wilson Staff look, with smooth and shiny chrome surrounding a matte, grooved surface.
Staff Model CB

The new Staff Model CB irons offer accomplished golfers a player’s look at address, coupled with the added forgiveness of a cavity back iron. Designed with instant feedback and precision in mind, the sleek construction of these irons caters to golfers seeking increased forgiveness in their longer clubs.
- Precision Milled Cavity Back: Precise milling on the club face allows for longer ball-to-face contact resulting in more consistent spin and increased stopping power.
- Precise Toe Weighting: Precise weighting positioned on the toe allows the golfer to hold the club face open, eliminating the low left shot. The toe weighting also allows for maximum forgiveness while keeping ultimate control shot after shot.
- Fluid Feel Hosel: Adapted from our classic Wilson Dyna-powered irons, the Staff Model Blade design has been refined to eliminate unused weight within the hosel to redistribute it in areas to elevate performance.
- Pricing Information: $1,199.99 MSRP here available in 4-PW (2 & 3 & GW irons available through custom fit)
The Staff Model CB appears to have undergone the biggest facelift among the two new Wilson irons. The cavity has a significantly different look to it and there are a couple key technology components that seem to be gone. First, there is no longer a visible tungsten insert on the toe area. This indicates the entire structure of the iron has been redesigned, likely due to the Fluid Feel Hosel. It’s possible that the weight savings in the hosel reduced the need for the boost tungsten provides. Second, the Tri-Brace Stabilizer is no longer featured, leaving a much more classic looking cavity. The coffin-shaped cutout on the heel side illustrates the toe-biased weighting even more.

One visual component we will be especially interested to hear about from readers is the newly-blank Wilson Staff Shield. For such a small modification, this is an incredibly bold visual change. It almost gives an industrial look to the cavity. This minimalistic approach to branding reminds us of some smaller boutique brands in ways, which should be appealing to certain consumers. Still, with a brand like Wilson Staff that relies so heavily on the past, it’s unexpected.
Staff Model Blades

Continuing the rich history of Wilson forged blade irons, many of which have been played by the game’s greats, the new Staff Model Blades are based on the timeless design that has been admired over the years. The Forged 8620 Carbon Steel, one of the softest materials available, provides instant feedback and on demand workability.
- Precise Toe Weighting: Precise weighting positioned on the toe allows the golfer to hold the club face open, eliminating the low left shot. The toe weighting also allows for maximum forgiveness while keeping ultimate control shot after shot.
- Fluid Feel Hosel: Adapted from our classic Wilson Dyna-powered irons, the Staff Model Blade design has been refined to eliminate unused weight within the hosel to redistribute it in areas to elevate performance.
- Forged 8620 Carbon Steel + Precision Milling: The Staff Model Blade is forged from some of the softest materials available. The forged 8620 carbon steel provides instant feedback and on-demand workability. Precision milling on the face allows for longer ball-to-face contact resulting in more consistent spin and increased stopping power.
- Pricing Information: $1,199.99 MSRP available in 4-PW (2 & 3 irons available through custom fit)

From a looks perspective, we expect a lot of love from consumers for the new Staff Model blades. The chrome-overload notwithstanding, this is a clean, refined look that marries classic and modern lines. The half-coffin cutout again visualizes the toe-side bias Wilson has been communicating to us.
We love the strong, squared lines from hosel to heel, along with the bold, high-toe area. It’s classic Wilson shaping that has stood the test of time for a reason.
Specifications


Fitting information and Details
Wilson notes that this year’s Staff Model irons will be the first ones to utilize their new Wilson Fit AI fitting technology. This software works with Blast Golf motion sensors to recommend custom fitting specifications in as few as five swings and will be available at Wilson retailers beginning January 24, 2024.
- Price: $1,199 4-PW with 2 iron and 3 iron (Blade and CB) and GW (CB only) available for custom order.
- Stock Shaft: True Temper Dynamic Gold Mid 115
- Stock Grip: Golf Pride Z (no cord)
- More information at www.wilson.com
This end of their lineup always looks so good, little beyond my abilities wish the designs made it over to the GI like other companies manage to do.
Extremely well written article. I don’t have the skills for these clubs but I’m hopeful that they set the bar for the iron set just below these. Looking forward to what’s ahead.
Shoutout to Wilson for still offering a true 2 iron. Has to the almost the only option in the market, right?
Man their blades always seem to look really good.
I had the D7 Forged when they came out and really like those irons. These looks so good and reaffirms my soft spot for Wilson irons.
great article [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] ! Those are good looking irons, especially the blades.
Great write up [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] . These are 2 good looking sets of irons. Love the less is more vibe.
The CB’s have my interest. Nice article, Hawk.
Thanks for reading y’all.
Good stuff [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] ! These are tremendous looking. Love the modern look with the blank shield. Hopefully, Wilson will carry that look going forward.
Its a good looking set of irons that will do the exact job designed to do. Likely be forgotten about due to some reasons other than performance. The blade doesn’t look great to me.
Nice write up [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] They are certainly great looking irons – Classic look.
Listen, I don’t think there are many in this segment who make a better looking iron. I love them.
[IMG alt=”Crushing I Love You GIF by MOODMAN”]https://media3.giphy.com/media/H2u46cKU3VaXht6Iv9/200.gif[/IMG]
I would gladly welcome the early onset arthritis to play the Staff Model Blades.
Those are so clean looking. I’m not a huge fan of the blank shield look, but that’s a minor quibble. The CBs almost remind me a bit of the FG Tour F5 irons in the badging, and that’s a good thing.
Those CBs are nice!
Great write up, and these clubs are beautiful. Could not agree more that this should be their entire focus.
I’m a GI player, but might aspire to these if you tell me the right story, and position them correctly.
Great write up @hawk. My first set bought with my own $ were staffs back in 1973. Have a set of D7 but really want to give these in CB a look.
These look really clean. The shield without the W/S looks weird to me and I can’t decide if I like it or not. Shaping and lines look good, I bet they feel pretty good too.
[QUOTE=”jdtox, post: 12066482, member: 5944″]
These look really clean. The shield without the W/S looks weird to me and I can’t decide if I like it or not. Shaping and lines look good, I bet they feel pretty good too.
[/QUOTE]
I think as far as the shield goes, and the Wilson scripting for that matter, I just want them to commit and then lean into it. I actually love the shield and have grown to accept the scripting. Just hoping they don’t bail on both next time around.
Nicely done [S][USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] [/S] [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER]
Man when WIlson wants to push out this type of iron, they sure do make them look pretty.
My hot take is that Wilson makes the best looking traditional blades of them all.
Nice write-up [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] Loved the old Wilson Staff. This is my Staff 1 iron from the basement. Has the WS in the shield. I’ll practice with it every now and then.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9235769[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12067240, member: 1193″]
I think as far as the shield goes, and the Wilson scripting for that matter, I just want them to commit and then lean into it. I actually love the shield and have grown to accept the scripting. Just hoping they don’t bail on both next time around.
[/QUOTE]
I saw pictures of the repainted and wrapped Wilson Staff tour truck on IG. It has the new shield and script. I guess we will see if their committed once they launch the next line of woods. Hopefully they’ll use the new shield on hats, gloves, bags, umbrellas etc. I keep reading that they want to re-establish themself as a premium brand. Time they act like one. If I were them I’d dump red as the primary brand color. But that’s me.
[QUOTE=”annsguy, post: 12067977, member: 19928″]
I saw pictures of the repainted and wrapped Wilson Staff tour truck on IG. It has the new shield and script. I guess we will see if their committed once they launch the next line of woods. Hopefully they’ll use the new shield on hats, gloves, bags, umbrellas etc. I keep reading that they want to re-establish themself as a premium brand. Time they act like one. If I were them I’d dump red as the primary brand color. But that’s me.
[/QUOTE]
I’m actually shocked they have a tour truck. Is that PGA Tour or Euro? The staff is just a couple of guys and most irons only.
It’s got a Tennessee license plate. Your comment of tour players is well taken. [ATTACH type=”full”]9235788[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full”]9235790[/ATTACH]
[USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] those article photos almost need a NSFW tag. This is a gorgeous-looking pair, and I love that the visual flows so well between the two sets. I would happily bag those CB’s.
I’d love to test out one of the Staff Model CB 7 irons to my Mizuno MP20 MMCs. I really like the look of the CB.
I wonder if we’ve reached a point where Players Irons are the easiest irons to produce because they have the least amount of tech. So that maybe this is the sweet spot of the irons segment for some companies because they don’t have to spend on L&D, etc.
They always hit a home run with these but seem to fall flat with the messaging. I am not sure if they are relying on the hard core players who will be getting these or are doing some serious inventory control to maximize profits. Either way I love the look and design, but a little bit out of my playing ability.
This release has me excited for the DYNAPWR forged irons.
Little story from a few years ago. I was in a PGASS hitting different irons with a fitter and I was hitting Apex 21’s, previous models of the Srixon ZX5’s, etc… and the fitter said you want to try these Wilson Staff blades? And I just said, I can’t hit blades, I’m not good enough for those. He said just try them. I did, and I could hit those. I can now say that if I ever wanted to go blades I’d give Wilson a shot. They were soft, sweet, and just felt really good. If these newest ones are anything like the 2019 model or better, then they have got to be good.
Hot Take- I think Wilson should find a way to get these irons into Rick Sheils bag. Him gaming them will probably move the needle more than anyone else on their current roster.
I always keep praying Wilson would be bigger than they are . They make good stuff, just don’t market it well
The CB seems smaller in size than the blade to me. The Staffs are super easy to hit for the player they’re aimed at! Had the FG100 and the previous model as well. Highly underrated irons! Just wish the price point was a touch lower, although it seems competitive. Well done W/S, well done!
Great article, I know I can never resist strolling past the Wilson display & picking these up as they are so pretty. Look down & it’s another story.
The CB’s are very intriguing but I may be turned away by the ‘accomplished player’ part there ?
[QUOTE=”Thrillbilly Jim, post: 12068093, member: 50607″]
Hot Take- I think Wilson should find a way to get these irons into Rick Sheils bag. Him gaming them will probably move the needle more than anyone else on their current roster.
[/QUOTE]
Seems like Rick tries most new Wilson stuff. Going back to D vs D 2 he generally gives them a go.
[QUOTE=”Thrillbilly Jim, post: 12068087, member: 50607″]
This release has me excited for the DYNAPWR forged irons.
[/QUOTE]
Same here. These are sexy but way beyond my ability. The DP Forged hopefully have a lot of this offerings DNA
[QUOTE=”tequila4kapp, post: 12068070, member: 9704″]
I wonder if we’ve reached a point where Players Irons are the easiest irons to produce because they have the least amount of tech. So that maybe this is the sweet spot of the irons segment for some companies because they don’t have to spend on L&D, etc.
[/QUOTE]
I’ve kind of been waiting to get into this conversation I saw a comment leading me into it.
You are right that this segment of irons encourages the least amount of technology, but it’s certainly not void of technology, especially if you look at the irons that are getting the most Tour play. Sometimes that’s weighting, sometimes it’s sole design, forging processes, progressive CG, etc., etc. You do start getting a less traditional look, at least in the cavity, the deeper you go down the rabbit hole I guess.
Anyway, this was an interesting release to me, because it dropped a couple technologies that have been staples of Staff irons for a long time (tungsten weighting and framing behind the face). In its place is a throwback to FluidFeel Hosel, which was new technology in the 1960’s. I’m very curious why the went that route. That doesn’t mean they won’t perform of course, but what is there to seal a purchase compared to something like the T100, Apex CB, Mizuno 243, etc. ?
Buddy has the prior iteration and they are fantastic. Every time I play with him, I grab his sticks to hit.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12068184, member: 1193″]
I’ve kind of been waiting to get into this conversation I saw a comment leading me into it.
You are right that this segment of irons encourages the least amount of technology, but it’s certainly not void of technology, especially if you look at the irons that are getting the most Tour play. Sometimes that’s weighting, sometimes it’s sole design, forging processes, progressive CG, etc., etc. You do start getting a less traditional look, at least in the cavity, the deeper you go down the rabbit hole I guess.
Anyway, this was an interesting release to me, because it dropped a couple technologies that have been staples of Staff irons for a long time (tungsten weighting and framing behind the face). In its place is a throwback to FluidFeel Hosel, which was new technology in the 1960’s. I’m very curious why the went that route. That doesn’t mean they won’t perform of course, but what is there to seal a purchase compared to something like the T100, Apex CB, Mizuno 243, etc. ?
[/QUOTE]
I was very surprised to see them move away from the tungsten story compared to others on and hitting the market.
These are some really good looking irons. Nicely updated with a modern look. Well done Wilson Staff!
Nice looking irons except for the missing W/S in the shield. Even though it says staff on the blade I think it actually cheapens the overall iron, almost a discount department store type iron look….IMHO
Love to hear from the inside why Fluid Feel is coming back, appealing to that older generation ideal of a forged blade for the new generation or if it truly makes a change in how players can control the face better.
When I got back in the game in 2017, bought a set of V4s. Beautiful forged irons, loved them. Nice article, of course click on the Wilson site and the customize irons link (I’m looking at graphite choices) doesn’t work.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12068184, member: 1193″]
I’ve kind of been waiting to get into this conversation I saw a comment leading me into it.
You are right that this segment of irons encourages the least amount of technology, but it’s certainly not void of technology, especially if you look at the irons that are getting the most Tour play. Sometimes that’s weighting, sometimes it’s sole design, forging processes, progressive CG, etc., etc. You do start getting a less traditional look, at least in the cavity, the deeper you go down the rabbit hole I guess.
Anyway, this was an interesting release to me, because it dropped a couple technologies that have been staples of Staff irons for a long time (tungsten weighting and framing behind the face). In its place is a throwback to FluidFeel Hosel, which was new technology in the 1960’s. I’m very curious why the went that route. That doesn’t mean they won’t perform of course, but what is there to seal a purchase compared to something like the T100, Apex CB, Mizuno 243, etc. ?
[/QUOTE]
Superb feel and pure nostalgia!
Excellent write up [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER]
I would kill to have the skill level to play these (those blades are next level sexy). Regardless, something inside me wants to take a swing or 100 with an 8 iron. The cavity backs would probably be a little more “fun” but I have always wanted to swing a beautiful, proper blade iron………
Great article! I would like to try the CBs, and it’s pretty awesome that Padraig has already won with them!!
Incredibly clean. With so many product releases I hope these don’t get lost to the noise and news of everything else.
Amazingly underrated and so so clean. Big props to Wilson!
[QUOTE=”boggyman, post: 12068620, member: 39404″]
Superb feel and pure nostalgia!
[/QUOTE]
I do think you’re right, at least on the latter point. I think nostalgia/brand identity plays a part for some people. I’d argue that it’s not very many though.
Love or hate Wilson, their Staff Irons always look fantastic!!!!!!