
Wilson Staff makes great players irons. Let’s just get that out of the way. It’s their niche, though sometimes we wonder why they don’t lean into that niche just a little harder. As the primary source of the brand’s Tour play, and known for their iconic looks, they deserve to be showed off. I remember the first set of Staff irons I unboxed, 2011’s FG Tour V2 set, and the excitement I felt that day was genuine. They probably overmatched my skill level, but I played them faithfully for a substantial amount of time and still can see all the little divots and marks that bag chatter imparted on them. If there’s a t-shirt with an FG Tour V2 on it out there, feel free to send it my way.
By now, we all know the history, and while we could wax poetic on Wilson’s storied past in golf, we’ll refrain. The story has been told so many times that you’ve surely heard it all before. Instead, let’s look at Wilson today, and what they’ve done with their newest players irons, the Staff Model Blade and Staff Model CB.

For a variety of reasons these types of irons rarely feature major technology stories, but there are some noticeable design changes from the line’s previous generation. Wilson decided to focus efforts on giving consumers two iron sets that could easily be built into a combo set. While the loft specifications of the earlier Staff Model iron sets were identical, most of you should (hopefully) know by now that loft alone doesn’t determine ball flight. Both new sets have been built with “common lines and weighting, similar aesthetic details and parallel performance attributes,” according to the company.
Both irons feature a throwback technology that was discussed heavily during last year’s reboot of the DynaPower franchise. It’s called Fluid Feel Hosel, which is essentially a redistribution of weight from the hosel to elsewhere on the iron. This, of course, gives Wilson the ability to fine tune not only the center of gravity, but also how the iron feels and launches. Most notably, Fluid Feel is going to move the sweet spot a little more toe side, closer to what we perceive as the center of the face.

The Fluid Feel Hosel trickles down into what Wilson is calling Precise Toe Weighting. The weight saved from the heel side has been positioned in the toe of the golf club. This has the effect of not only slightly repositioning the center of gravity, but it also impacts the face’s closure rate. The language Wilson uses to describe the feature is interesting. They say it, “allows the golfer to hold the club face open, eliminating the low left shot.” Typically, you’ll see companies phrase this in a way that describes a clubs “workability” instead of its ability to mitigate a certain miss. Regardless of how it’s worded, the bottom-line is that you should be able to hit fades with relative ease, or any type of shot for that matter. It almost makes us wonder if the “low-left” comments tie back to Wilson’s Tour staff, especially when we look at what the company has to say.
“Throughout the development process, we engaged our Wilson Advisory Staff across the TOUR so that we could deliver irons that will make them better shot shapers,” said Bob Thurman, Global General Manager of Golf and Vice President of Research & Development at Wilson. They’ve obviously done something right, as Padraig Harrington already has a Champions Tour win (by a whopping seven shots) with the Staff Model CB’s in the bag.
Both irons also feature what Wilson is calling Precision Milling, which the company says, “allows for longer ball-to-face contact for more consistent spin and increased stopping power in both iron offerings.” This appears to be a subtle application of milling, as the faces don’t seem overly textured. In fact, outward appearances present a very familiar Wilson Staff look, with smooth and shiny chrome surrounding a matte, grooved surface.
Staff Model CB

The new Staff Model CB irons offer accomplished golfers a player’s look at address, coupled with the added forgiveness of a cavity back iron. Designed with instant feedback and precision in mind, the sleek construction of these irons caters to golfers seeking increased forgiveness in their longer clubs.
- Precision Milled Cavity Back: Precise milling on the club face allows for longer ball-to-face contact resulting in more consistent spin and increased stopping power.
- Precise Toe Weighting: Precise weighting positioned on the toe allows the golfer to hold the club face open, eliminating the low left shot. The toe weighting also allows for maximum forgiveness while keeping ultimate control shot after shot.
- Fluid Feel Hosel: Adapted from our classic Wilson Dyna-powered irons, the Staff Model Blade design has been refined to eliminate unused weight within the hosel to redistribute it in areas to elevate performance.
- Pricing Information: $1,199.99 MSRP here available in 4-PW (2 & 3 & GW irons available through custom fit)
The Staff Model CB appears to have undergone the biggest facelift among the two new Wilson irons. The cavity has a significantly different look to it and there are a couple key technology components that seem to be gone. First, there is no longer a visible tungsten insert on the toe area. This indicates the entire structure of the iron has been redesigned, likely due to the Fluid Feel Hosel. It’s possible that the weight savings in the hosel reduced the need for the boost tungsten provides. Second, the Tri-Brace Stabilizer is no longer featured, leaving a much more classic looking cavity. The coffin-shaped cutout on the heel side illustrates the toe-biased weighting even more.

One visual component we will be especially interested to hear about from readers is the newly-blank Wilson Staff Shield. For such a small modification, this is an incredibly bold visual change. It almost gives an industrial look to the cavity. This minimalistic approach to branding reminds us of some smaller boutique brands in ways, which should be appealing to certain consumers. Still, with a brand like Wilson Staff that relies so heavily on the past, it’s unexpected.
Staff Model Blades

Continuing the rich history of Wilson forged blade irons, many of which have been played by the game’s greats, the new Staff Model Blades are based on the timeless design that has been admired over the years. The Forged 8620 Carbon Steel, one of the softest materials available, provides instant feedback and on demand workability.
- Precise Toe Weighting: Precise weighting positioned on the toe allows the golfer to hold the club face open, eliminating the low left shot. The toe weighting also allows for maximum forgiveness while keeping ultimate control shot after shot.
- Fluid Feel Hosel: Adapted from our classic Wilson Dyna-powered irons, the Staff Model Blade design has been refined to eliminate unused weight within the hosel to redistribute it in areas to elevate performance.
- Forged 8620 Carbon Steel + Precision Milling: The Staff Model Blade is forged from some of the softest materials available. The forged 8620 carbon steel provides instant feedback and on-demand workability. Precision milling on the face allows for longer ball-to-face contact resulting in more consistent spin and increased stopping power.
- Pricing Information: $1,199.99 MSRP available in 4-PW (2 & 3 irons available through custom fit)

From a looks perspective, we expect a lot of love from consumers for the new Staff Model blades. The chrome-overload notwithstanding, this is a clean, refined look that marries classic and modern lines. The half-coffin cutout again visualizes the toe-side bias Wilson has been communicating to us.
We love the strong, squared lines from hosel to heel, along with the bold, high-toe area. It’s classic Wilson shaping that has stood the test of time for a reason.
Specifications


Fitting information and Details
Wilson notes that this year’s Staff Model irons will be the first ones to utilize their new Wilson Fit AI fitting technology. This software works with Blast Golf motion sensors to recommend custom fitting specifications in as few as five swings and will be available at Wilson retailers beginning January 24, 2024.
- Price: $1,199 4-PW with 2 iron and 3 iron (Blade and CB) and GW (CB only) available for custom order.
- Stock Shaft: True Temper Dynamic Gold Mid 115
- Stock Grip: Golf Pride Z (no cord)
- More information at www.wilson.com
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12068869, member: 1193″]
I do think you’re right, at least on the latter point. I think nostalgia/brand identity plays a part for some people. I’d argue that it’s not very many though.
[/QUOTE]
Really good point. I’m older. Grew up playing Wilson. It taints on my feelings for the brand. They won’t pick up any market share unless they target younger golfers with money to spend . Nostalgia is one thing. Disposable income is another.
They look pretty good. I don’t think they are much different from the 5 year old irons they are replacing in the MB. Looks to me like they too that iron and said. Instead of straight. Adjust the milling pattern to have angles.. sell it!!
[QUOTE=”annsguy, post: 12068913, member: 19928″]
Really good point. I’m older. Grew up playing Wilson. It taints on my feelings for the brand. They won’t pick up any market share unless they target younger golfers with money to spend . Nostalgia is one thing. Disposable income is another.
[/QUOTE]
Yea. The thing about leaning on nostalgia is that we’re not far away from there not being any people playing/buying that remember the glory days.
In my case, I came into the game when Staff was having a little resurgence, and they’re always going to be in my mind to some degree. Better yet, they offered an incredible performance vs cost ratio back then. As a new player, the FyBrid and Ci7’s were affordable and really good golf clubs.
Circling back to the irons, there are tons of comments about how great they look.
Question for those that love the look of them. Will you be testing them out?
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12068927, member: 3″]
Circling back to the irons, there are tons of comments about how great they look.
Question for those that love the look of them. Will you be testing them out?
[/QUOTE]
I won’t be testing these irons. My skill level isn’t that good.
DynaPwr Forged, I will test along with the wedges.
[QUOTE=”annsguy, post: 12068961, member: 19928″]
I won’t be testing these irons. My skill level isn’t that good.
DynaPwr Forged, I will test along with the wedges.
[/QUOTE]
Don’t let that stop you. I played FG V2 for a whole season and it was a great experience.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12068927, member: 3″]
Circling back to the irons, there are tons of comments about how great they look.
Question for those that love the look of them. Will you be testing them out?
[/QUOTE]
I’m curious about this too.
I definitely hope we get to give them a run soon.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12069437, member: 1193″]
I’m curious about this too.
I definitely hope we get to give them a run soon.
[/QUOTE]
Based on the jarring number of responses, I think I have my answer sadly.
Pretty to look at, but so many good options that are really pushing a tech forward message. Or really any message.
I understand that these are more of an aspirational launch, for a lot of golfers, so maybe that changes with the next release.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12069441, member: 3″]
Based on the jarring number of responses, I think I have my answer sadly.
Pretty to look at, but so many good options that are really pushing a tech forward message. Or really any message.
I understand that these are more of an aspirational launch, for a lot of golfers, so maybe that changes with the next release.
[/QUOTE]
Yea, I was kind of getting the same feeling sadly.
I kinda thought coffin and half coffin were awesome ways to describe the cavity. Yes, I’m patting my own back. It’s a VERY cool look to me though.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12069458, member: 1193″]
I kinda thought coffin and half coffin were awesome ways to describe the cavity. Yes, I’m patting my own back. It’s a VERY cool look to me though.
[/QUOTE]
In diving in, what do you think the reasoning was to move on from a denser material like tungsten in the CB design, when so many other irons are moving towards it? Or better yet, not all designs in the class use it, but let’s examine a few others in a similar class.
Mizuno 243 – Multiple materials used including copper and chromoly.
Callaway Apex CB – Multi material using mim weights progressively
Srixon ZX7 MKII – Big sole design story and pureframe
Cobra KING CB – This might be the closest comparison
Titleist T100 – Multiple materials including tungsten
Obviously the list goes on, but if you are a fan, what’s the grab? Do they look better? Perhaps, that is subjective and super important.
The only other irons that I can remember reducing tech, so to speak, were the 620 CB. Compared to the 718CB, they took some of the offset out and removed the tungsten from the 5 through 7 iron, only keeping it in the 3 and 4 iron.
I personally prefer the 620 CB over the more techy T100, but I am probably in a pretty large minority with this opinion.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12069441, member: 3″]
Based on the jarring number of responses, I think I have my answer sadly.
Pretty to look at, but so many good options that are really pushing a tech forward message. Or really any message.
I understand that these are more of an aspirational launch, for a lot of golfers, so maybe that changes with the next release.
[/QUOTE]
I totally agree with the last paragraph. I’m not technical so can’t speak to that.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12068927, member: 3″]
Circling back to the irons, there are tons of comments about how great they look.
Question for those that love the look of them. Will you be testing them out?
[/QUOTE]
If I’m at Golf Galaxy and they have a demo club to try out, then yes I will give it a few swings in the simulator.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12068927, member: 3″]
Circling back to the irons, there are tons of comments about how great they look.
Question for those that love the look of them. Will you be testing them out?
[/QUOTE]
If I see them at a demo day I probably will. But sadly that’s about it.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12069486, member: 3″]
In diving in, what do you think the reasoning was to move on from a denser material like tungsten in the CB design, when so many other irons are moving towards it? Or better yet, not all designs in the class use it, but let’s examine a few others in a similar class.
Mizuno 243 – Multiple materials used including copper and chromoly.
Callaway Apex CB – Multi material using mim weights progressively
Srixon ZX7 MKII – Big sole design story and pureframe
Cobra KING CB – This might be the closest comparison
Titleist T100 – Multiple materials including tungsten
Obviously the list goes on, but if you are a fan, what’s the grab? Do they look better? Perhaps, that is subjective and super important.
[/QUOTE]
So, I did some research on this in preparation for the review. I came up with the exact same closest comparison being the Cobra CB. In some ways, you could even argue that Cobra dropped less of a technical story than Wilson is here. Cobra is really leaning on the looks, consistency and feel aspect, so their main technological point is their 5-Step forging process and materials. Both seem to talk about combo sets, though it seems like Wilson brushes on that more than actually encourages it. Cobra leans more into the flowing design of their two irons. Priced the same as well. If you look at those two in a vacuum, I guess you have something to directly compare. Maybe Taylormade too I guess.
However, bringing any of the others into the discussion and you really see a drop-off in what’s available. I have to think that the two most played on iron that list (on Tour) are probably the most technologically advanced as well.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12069540, member: 1193″]
So, I did some research on this in preparation for the review. I came up with the exact same closest comparison being the Cobra CB. In some ways, you could even argue that Cobra dropped less of a technical story than Wilson is here. Cobra is really leaning on the looks, consistency and feel aspect, so their main technological point is their 5-Step forging process and materials. Both seem to talk about combo sets, though it seems like Wilson brushes on that more than actually encourages it. Cobra leans more into the flowing design of their two irons. Priced the same as well. If you look at those two in a vacuum, I guess you have something to directly compare. Maybe Taylormade too I guess.
However, bringing any of the others into the discussion and you really see a drop-off in what’s available. I have to think that the two most played on iron that list (on Tour) are probably the most technologically advanced as well.
[/QUOTE]
I think you would find that to be correct, both in and out of contract players.
One other area of note with the Cobra is they were launched with a 3rd set, not just the two, which adds something to that story from a split mentality.
So it brings me back full circle. Does this set grab attention? Its similar to what I ask in most threads when there isn’t a larger swell. Outside of the heritage of the logo, is there a reason someone jumps in? I ask that genuinely because generally speaking, from an innovation, marketing, management and even ownership, nothing at Wilson now is the same as it was just a handful of years ago. So it has to be the logo, right? I think nostalgia with this brand, especially with this class of iron has to be the draw, because if they aren’t putting out a ton on it to create a larger buzz, the audience is already defined in some ways.
That is another area of departure I guess.
And then you have PING BluePrint S, which is an incredibly clean design that has quite a tech story. The two things aren’t mutually exclusive for sure.
These look sweet. Have had staffs in past. May go hit these if I can find a place to.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12068927, member: 3″]
Circling back to the irons, there are tons of comments about how great they look.
Question for those that love the look of them. Will you be testing them out?
[/QUOTE]
I do think they look good, but I know I won’t see them in person near me which makes that hard.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12069661, member: 1579″]
I do think they look good, but I know I won’t see them in person near me which makes that hard.
[/QUOTE]
In my area they are more plentiful in stores (not necessarily on courses), but Edwin Watts and WorldWide stores do a good job of providing lesser known options, which is nice. As does PGA Tour SuperStore.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12068184, member: 1193″]
I’ve kind of been waiting to get into this conversation I saw a comment leading me into it.
You are right that this segment of irons encourages the least amount of technology, but it’s certainly not void of technology, especially if you look at the irons that are getting the most Tour play. Sometimes that’s weighting, sometimes it’s sole design, forging processes, progressive CG, etc., etc. You do start getting a less traditional look, at least in the cavity, the deeper you go down the rabbit hole I guess.
Anyway, this was an interesting release to me, because it dropped a couple technologies that have been staples of Staff irons for a long time (tungsten weighting and framing behind the face). In its place is a throwback to FluidFeel Hosel, which was new technology in the 1960’s. I’m very curious why the went that route. That doesn’t mean they won’t perform of course, but what is there to seal a purchase compared to something like the T100, Apex CB, Mizuno 243, etc. ?
[/QUOTE]
You kind of talked about it in your article, but not sure I fully understand getting rid of a few of the design features in the CB.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12069662, member: 3″]
In my area they are more plentiful in stores (not necessarily on courses), but Edwin Watts and WorldWide stores do a good job of providing lesser known options, which is nice. As does PGA Tour SuperStore.
[/QUOTE]
We finally have a PGA SS So maybe that’ll be shot here soon. I’d like to experience them, but in the end, what would make someone pick these over say, a V6 which you could get for a song with a ton of tech in them. It’s all super confusing to me.
BUT, I do love trying players cb/mb’s haha
[QUOTE=”Jeff Spicoli, post: 12069667, member: 10545″]
You kind of talked about it in your article, but not sure I fully understand getting rid of a few of the design features in the CB.
[/QUOTE]
I mean, there’s different ways to do things, but it is definitely noteworthy for such a staple to go away like that. I want to say tungsten has been a fixture of their irons for close to 10 years.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12069486, member: 3″]
In diving in, what do you think the reasoning was to move on from a denser material like tungsten in the CB design, when so many other irons are moving towards it? Or better yet, not all designs in the class use it, but let’s examine a few others in a similar class.
Mizuno 243 – Multiple materials used including copper and chromoly.
Callaway Apex CB – Multi material using mim weights progressively
Srixon ZX7 MKII – Big sole design story and pureframe
Cobra KING CB – This might be the closest comparison
Titleist T100 – Multiple materials including tungsten
Obviously the list goes on, but if you are a fan, what’s the grab? Do they look better? Perhaps, that is subjective and super important.
[/QUOTE]
as a 223 player (currently), i’d be interested in comparing the two…although, the 243/245 probably pique my interest a bit more.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12069683, member: 1193″]
I mean, there’s different ways to do things, but it is definitely noteworthy for such a staple to go away like that. I want to say tungsten has been a fixture of their irons for close to 10 years.
[/QUOTE]
They always nail the looks of their players irons. I like the badging.
[QUOTE=”Jeff Spicoli, post: 12069713, member: 10545″]
They always nail the looks of their players irons. I like the badging.
[/QUOTE]
Me too. Very much so. I like the cavity design too.
Even though the comments have been light on this thread at least we’re talking about the product and not big box stores, box sets or how it was back in my day. I see that as progress. Lol
[QUOTE=”annsguy, post: 12070939, member: 19928″]
Even though the comments have been light on this thread at least we’re talking about the product and not big box stores, box sets or how it was back in my day. I see that as progress. Lol
[/QUOTE]
Careful, that might be like saying Beetlejuice too many times. 😉
I would love to hear anyone’s thoughts on these if they gamed the previous version.
[QUOTE=”Thrillbilly Jim, post: 12070986, member: 50607″]
I would love to hear anyone’s thoughts on these if they gamed the previous version.
[/QUOTE]
I gamed the previous version of the MB. One set was 3-p with s300 bent 2 degrees weak and other set was 4-p with Px 5.5 graphite,standard lofts. Very underrated iron in its class!!Easy to hit and soft as butter. They were, for me, a tad larger footprint than I like. Therefore I went back to my ole trusty FG17s that I just can’t get away from.
Will Wilson be sending clubs for THP to test.
[QUOTE=”annsguy, post: 12071055, member: 19928″]
Will Wilson be sending clubs for THP to test.
[/QUOTE]
Yes, we are expecting to see them soon. Pretty excited tbh ?
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12071082, member: 1193″]
Yes, we are expecting to see them soon. Pretty excited tbh ?
[/QUOTE]
Awesome, must be fun trying all this new stuff.
The world of cryptocurrency is exhilarating, a digital frontier where fortunes can be made and lost in the blink of an eye. But with great opportunity comes great risk, and nowhere is this truer than in the realm of lost or inaccessible crypto holdings. For me, this harsh reality hit home when I found myself staring at a cold wallet, frozen and seemingly devoid of the lifeblood it once held. Panic gnawed at me, visions of my digital assets swirling down a digital drain. In that moment of despair, I stumbled upon Daniel Meuli Web Recovery, a beacon of hope in the dark digital sea. Admittedly, trusting someone with access to your cryptocurrency is a leap of faith, akin to handing over the keys to your digital vault. But Daniel Meuli web recovery approached the situation not just with technical expertise, but with empathy and understanding. They spoke the language of crypto, not just in algorithms and protocols, but in the language of hope and possibility. They acknowledged the emotional weight of my predicament, the dreams, and the investments tied to those seemingly lost coins. The recovery process itself was a masterclass in transparency and communication. Every step was explained, every technical hurdle dissected, ensuring I was not just a client, but a partner in the journey. The team’s patience was unwavering, and their dedication was infectious. As days turned into weeks, frustration and doubt threatened to resurface, but their unwavering optimism kept me afloat. Finally, the moment arrived. The encrypted gates to my digital vault creaked open, and one by one, my cryptocurrency holdings materialized on the screen. Relief washed over me, tinged with a newfound respect for the invisible magic Daniel Meuli web recovery had performed. They hadn’t just recovered my assets; they had restored my faith in the digital world, in the power of human ingenuity and compassion. My experience with Daniel Meuli web recovery is not just a testament to their technical prowess but to their commitment to human connection. They understood that cryptocurrency isn’t just numbers on a screen; it’s the embodiment of hard work, dreams, and a leap of faith into the future. They treated my recovery not as a technical challenge, but as a personal mission, and for that, I am eternally grateful for Daniel Meuli web recovery. TELEGRAM : (@) DANIELMEULI
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12068927, member: 3″]
Circling back to the irons, there are tons of comments about how great they look.
Question for those that love the look of them. Will you be testing them out?
[/QUOTE]
[USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] I genuinely expected more to discuss testing them out as the time passed.
Im starting to wonder if some brands have become “in theory”.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12068927, member: 3″]
Circling back to the irons, there are tons of comments about how great they look.
Question for those that love the look of them. Will you be testing them out?
[/QUOTE]
I might hit them, but I’m more interested in the DYNAPWR Forged.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12083587, member: 3″]
[USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] I genuinely expected more to discuss testing them out as the time passed.
Im starting to wonder if some brands have become “in theory”.
[/QUOTE]
Yea, it’s very much a window shopping thing imo. Much hard to drop that $1200.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12083628, member: 1193″]
Yea, it’s very much a window shopping thing imo. Much hard to drop that $1200.
[/QUOTE]
I might hit a CB but know the Forged is closer to my ability. I guess those aren’t coming out for a while. I think JB’s comment may be on target.
[QUOTE=”annsguy, post: 12083771, member: 19928″]
I might hit a CB but know the Forged is closer to my ability. I guess those aren’t coming out for a while. I think JB’s comment may be on target.
[/QUOTE]
I’ve been thinking about the CB’s quite a bit. The Forged could be cool too though.
Great write up, I’m not the target golfer for these, but they look like the kind of irons that I wish I had the game to do them justice.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12068927, member: 3″]
Circling back to the irons, there are tons of comments about how great they look.
Question for those that love the look of them. Will you be testing them out?
[/QUOTE]
If I see them I’m thinning a few with them!
?
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12083628, member: 1193″]
Yea, it’s very much a window shopping thing imo. Much hard to drop that $1200.
[/QUOTE]
Since you mentioned that…
Will they be seen as “less than” since they haven’t quite hit the now popular $200/club pricing we’re seeing from other OEMs?
[QUOTE=”JohnSinVA, post: 12084369, member: 25956″]
Since you mentioned that…
Will they be seen as “less than” since they haven’t quite hit the now popular $200/club pricing we’re seeing from other OEMs?
[/QUOTE]
Yea, that’s an interesting question. I don’t think that will really be the factor that gives them that appearance.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12084452, member: 1193″]
Yea, that’s an interesting question. I don’t think that will really be the factor that gives them that appearance.
[/QUOTE]
My guess would be that golfers who consider “players” irons know what they are looking for performance wise. They probably have a brand preference which doesn’t include Wilson. Or you just don’t want to be the guy with Wilson in the bag. It might be harder to crack the better club consumer than the average guy/gal whether your Wilson, PXG or a DTC brand. It’s a good question and another issue for Wilson to overcome. My assumption has been that the blade and cb were eye candy for the majority of us and the DynaPower Forged would be the club they have to nail.
[MEDIA=youtube]S-MgcoB-TKg[/MEDIA]
[QUOTE=”Thrillbilly Jim, post: 12102566, member: 50607″]
[MEDIA=youtube]S-MgcoB-TKg[/MEDIA]
[/QUOTE]
I always like to watch the CC crew. Irons showed pretty well there, though I feel like Ian makes just about everything look great lol. He starts by saying he sucks with blades and then just stripes them.
Hoping these make their way to us soon.
[MEDIA=instagram]C2vEt2kL_wq[/MEDIA]
I will definitely test these. Played the V4 and Staff Model CB previously. Honestly wouldn’t buy a set new though. They will be basically half off on the used market later this year. WS doesn’t do well with resale value.
[QUOTE=”Thrillbilly Jim, post: 12112242, member: 50607″]
[MEDIA=instagram]C2vEt2kL_wq[/MEDIA]
[/QUOTE]
This is probably not an opinion shared by many, but I think they ruined a great, clean looking head with those aerobic socks masquerading as ferrules.