Quick Take
The Wilson Staff Model Wedges are more workhorse than one trick pony. While they are likely to grab your attention with their clean looks, they will keep your attention with the performance. Also available in a high-toe design, Wilson has released a quality update to its tour wedge line that is worthy of a swing.
It has been several years since Wilson last updated its tour wedges, and by the looks of things, Wilson got it dead right, mostly. The Staff Model Wedges are stunning, clean, and a number of other superlatives, and whoever designed them deserves (in my humble opinion) some recognition. But do the aesthetics translate into performance on the course? I spent more than a month testing one to find that out.
I want to give a bit of background on my history with Wilson wedges to color this review a bit. I spent about half a season playing an FG Tour Traction Control wedge and then a full year with a few PMP wedges. As much as I liked each one, I never truly loved them. While I cannot explain exactly why, they just never felt right and never gave me the confidence I wanted. I think those concerns are a thing of the past and Wilson has a great wedge on its hands with the Staff Model Wedges, although they are not without short comings (more on that later).
The performance and feel of the Wilson Staff Model Wedges are fantastic. Honestly, I was seeing very high spin numbers on full shots (over 10,000 rpms), which delivered consistent carry distance and a lot of stopping power. The quality spin numbers carried over on more finesse, partial swing shots (although obviously much lower) thanks in part to the machine-engraved scorelines on the precision milled face. Best of all, I had surprisingly high confidence in full swings despite using a 56-degree wedge for the review, which is typically not a full swing club for me. Most importantly, I was able to easily flight shots and move the launch window up and down with ease. If you can do it, these wedges can deliver.
I also thought the changes to the stock shaft offerings were for the better, as I felt like the new stock setup (with True Temper Dynamic Gold 120 shafts) was incredibly easy to square. It could be that the change to the DG 120 shaft is a better pairing for me but I found myself hitting the Staff Model Wedges much closer to pins (and yes, I brought the PMP out for some head-to-head comparisons). I never felt like I was fighting the club and it just seemed to square up at impact better.
So yeah, like I said, the Wilson Staff Model Wedges are workhorse wedges that deliver the performance in a compact, beautiful package. The sound and feel at impact are also pleasing – both crisp and soft thanks to the forged 8620 carbon steel. There isn’t much to dislike as long as you like the single grind option. I think that is where Wilson sold itself a little short.
With only a few lofts (and even fewer if you are a lefty), a single grind option, and a single finish, the Staff Model Wedges do not have many of the options that golfers using other brands have grown accustom to seeing. Whether it is trying to match up the wedge to playing conditions or giving a little sole relief to open the face around the greens, there are other options that many people might want or need to see.
That said, if you are someone who likes the standard grind that Wilson is offering, the Wilson Staff Model Wedges are fantastic all around and I would strongly suggest you give them a try if you are in the market. Ultimately, it comes down to each individual golfer (and perhaps their fitter) to decide if the one-grind-fits-all Wilson Staff Model Wedge is right for them. And for what it is worth, I plan to have one or two lower lofted wedges in the bag at some point this year in the PW or GW spot.
Although they are a bit outside of the scope of this review, Wilson also expanded its wedge offerings by releasing its first high lofted, high-toe wedge in the Wilson Staff Model Wedge HT. Although we did not receive one for review, the High-Toe design may provide the additional option for some golfers if the standard Staff Model Wedges lacks the versatility needed to show off your creativity around the greens.
In sum, Wilson’s Staff Model Wedges are simply fantastic at what they do and should appeal to a majority of golfers. Great looking, great feeling, and great performing wedges but with a lack of options to customize them to your game and not the other way around. You can learn more about the Wilson Staff Model Wedges here, or join the conversation in the forum.
The Details
Available: In stores and online now
Price: $129.99
Shaft: True Temper Dynamic Gold 120 steel shafts
Grip: Golf Pride Tour Velvet
Lofts: Staff Model Wedges – RH: 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, and 60-degree; LH: 52, 56, and 60-degree
Staff Model High-Toe: 56, 60, and 64-degree
I do wonder how much the lack of options might impact people giving them a try?
I think the casual golfers won’t notice and will try them if they are in store. It might affect some of the Internet golfers (like me) but it might not be as big of a deal. Time will tell
I don’t disagree with that
I am guessing they are a bit more readily available for you guys? I honestly can’t remember seeing a Wilson wedge in the stores near me, although they are available on the website for the same store
Solid write up on them, it’s an interesting move/direction for Wilson.
I haven’t seen one in stores yet but I’m sure that will change as time goes on.
Agreed. I loved what I saw and the performance but I really like more sole options. Maybe the HT solves it, but I’m not certain
I wish…. it is more of an S.
Looks like a full grind, maybe some relief along the rear of the sole.
I also noticed they kicked off the low lofts between preview and launch. Originally had a 48, but no longer. No high, no low.
Basically, yeah. Right down the middle
Their press release and specs on their website still have all the 48* info too, you just can’t buy it.
That seems like a bit of an oversight on their part. Frustrating too, like come on man get it right, it’s your own website.
This is where I am at. While if I imagine a "classic wedge look" it’s this club’s shape that pops in my head, in a day of fittings and custom grinds available at similar price points, I am not sure which market these are for. The "one bounce, one color" approach yells "drive by sales at Dicks" versus marketing to a more upscale golfer who is willing to pay more to get exactly what they want.
You may be right. I think one or two could make it in my bag as well. I really liked the performance and looks (one of those matters more than the other, but I won’t say which)
Wilson nailed the looks. I’m surprised it’s the single finish, I think they’ve done raw better than anyone the last few years. Great pricepoint and I really like the offering of the DG 120 shaft.
Curious to read THPer feedback from someone who games this and the high toe and if they do complement each other.
I hit this on the range with JB a few weeks ago, and everything about it just came out really high and soft. I’m sure that’s great around the green, but for some of us would like to take full swings with our wedges it was a pretty big head scratcher
Care to clarify? I might be reading it wrong – I like a high and soft wedge regardless unless it’s a low runner with lots of spin.
No, like… I couldn’t hit the 60 degree wedge more than 70yds. Everything just came out floaty and not compressed.
Thats a death sentence right there
It reminded me a lot of the U grind MD 2 wedge. I tried everything to like that thing and it was awful for me. Got rid of that thing so quick after a lot of waiting for it
I think they have a good looking wedge at a good price. Will I see many of these in bags? Nope, but I’m glad another company is putting out good looking wedges.
Ah, yea that is not good at all. You have it on a LM? Wonder how the spin is for you compared to say Molten and his 10k numbers
Interesting. What degree were you hitting?
Over 10k, baby. G can spin a ball thanks to way overactive hands and terrible form!
You have similar problems as Michael did?
Negative, but was aiming at the 75yd flag and what wasn’t getting there with it, was waving to it with my 58
60
I did not, although on course yardage didn’t match exactly to the LM. (You know, wind and cold doing what they do). I was seeing 95-100 on the LM in perfect, 80 degree conditions. Closer to 85-90 on course but I didn’t have any similar issues unless i missed it.
I’m not certain I could hit the 60 with a full swing.
is it weird that after both of your comments I really want to try these lol
This is thread is officially the #MondayMind**** Thread ?
No, I don’t think we are there yet. But soon, very soon