If there is one thing that Robin Arthur, founder of Xcaliber Shafts, has never been afraid of, it is being different. In fact, I’m not sure we have seen someone so willing to dare to be different in this segment, but that is just my take. One such example of this willingness is the impending release of a new iron shaft design which Xcaliber is calling the “Rapid Taper”.
To be frank, there is nothing like this out there, and I do mean nothing. Nor have we ever seen Robin this excited.
THP was able to get a pre-release sample in to do some work with and see just how the performance stacks up.
Quick Take
No hype, no hyperbole, no fluff…just performance. A 75g iron shaft designed to fit a breadth of swing speeds that held up and then some with a unique feel. The Rapid Taper offers shockingly consistent launch, playable spin, and a jump in ball speed that was eye opening.
The Rapid Taper Design
This one is out there.
Robin Arthur has been working on this one for several years now, a concept that he developed in his mind while thinking about the way a bull-whip works for the build up and release of energy, due in no small part to the shape of the whip and the size transition from handle to tip. The uniqueness of this design really cannot be questioned. While Xcaliber started first with their “RT Spin” release, the real work and focus has been on the iron shafts as well as a wood design. To give more credence to the unique factor at play here, Robin Arthur was just granted his patent for the design.

The Rapid Taper is a build that according to Xcaliber has 2.9° torque, a 75g weight, and is playable up to 125 MPH swing speeds. Also, within this is that they are marketing them to be an option for all different swing tempo styles and a mid-high launching design. Another point to mention, THP was able to get our hands on this one early, as such, the shaft I tested is absent the final graphics and ion finish which based on teasers we have seen, will be as unique as the shape itself.
Unique Package – Unique Performance
Speaking of that unique shape, this is absolutely wild in hand. Even though I had seen the RT Spin wedge shafts in the past, I was still surprised when looking down at this one since the longer length shows off the shape more, I can only imagine how wild the wood shafts will look. As for the testing, I chose to install this one in the new Cobra Forged Tec 4-Utility which plays at 22.5° loft. The reason for this was two-fold, seeing as I had only one shaft to work with for me it made the most sense to test the claims of launch and speed in a longer club that I typically find harder to elevate, it also allowed me to use an adapter for easy install.

Right into the meat and potatoes, I did my testing on the Foresight GC2 and that data will be included in this article. To understand what is going on there I want to first touch on the claims from Xcaliber. According to the company their internal testing of swing speeds ranging from 97 to 125 MPH yielded ball speed increases from 2.5 to 5 MPH, every single person tested saw an increase. Not to mention, increased launch with the mid-high profile while not sacrificing spin numbers.
Well, as it turns out, in my testing I fall in line with pretty much all of that. In order to try to ensure a fair comparison to the stock setup of the Forged Tec 4U, I recorded two sessions, one hitting the stock setup first, and the other flipping the order. The reason here was simple, I wanted it clear in my head that warm-up/fatigue was not a contributing factor. In the first go-round I saw a 5.5 MPH average ball speed increase, the second time was a 4.2 MPH increase. Add into these, that despite different days yielding different swings as is usually the case for us mere mortals, the speed, spin, launch, peak, and descent angles were all an improvement from the stock graphite offering.

Now, to address a couple of things, yes, there was a 10g difference in shaft weight from the stock graphite offering, and that can account for some speed differences, but in my opinion not as much of a jump as was seen. While I know most will look at the speed and be as blown away by that as I was, the fact that I saw extreme playability out of a low lofted iron consistently was what stood out most to me. Not only in terms of launch and peak, but the fact that the spin and descent angles afforded me the ability to hit it into greens during testing as opposed to keeping it a tee dominant option.

Here is the reality, there is a lot of performance intrigue here for me, and while I wish we had the opportunity to work with a full set of shafts as opposed to just one club, the return of information is pretty clear to me. Another thing I want to touch on is the feel and consistency. The bullwhip analogy has a lot of merit here because through the swing I could really feel a release through transition, but I want it clear that this did not, for me, sacrifice dispersion or accuracy. In fact, the repeatability I saw stood out more than maybe even the ball speed.

By now, if you have been around THP a while and kept up with Xcaliber, you know that they march to their own beat. Robin Arthur is downright giddy about this Rapid Taper design and rightfully so, but the issue now becomes balancing the desire to offer a higher tier product lineup while also balancing keeping it accessible to golfers. Price wise, these are an unknown as that will be dealer specific, and being entirely honest this is my biggest concern when it comes to the product. Performance is there, but now there has to be an emphasis on getting it into the hands of people without pricing themselves out before they even get started.
The Details
Availability: Summer/Fall 2020
Price: Dealer Set
Flex: L, A, R, S
Weight: 75g




Great write-up James,
This sounds like really interesting tech and great numbers from the shaft. Hopefully in the forum you’ll add some top down views at address as I’m curious how that rapid taper profile would look.
Extremely interesting.
Ok that’s some crazy deja vu.. gave it a read, must have slipped past a section and I was thinking “wtf what club was this on” then went back and saw it
Great article and really interesting concept, makes quite a bit of sense. Would definitely want to try this out in a driving iron or something as you did
Another outstanding review James. Very intrigued by the information you shared about them and, as a strict graphite user, would love to me able to try them for myself some day.
Holy heck that looks wild and now I’m downright giddy about it. Those number jumps (more on that in the other thread, folks) are reason enough to give these a real try when they come out.
And, I really love how comments on home page reviews automatically get posted in the appropriate forum threads. Another fantastic feature of the significantly upgraded system the forum uses.
Wow cool design and a cool result.
I have been very impressed by the xCaliber shafts that I got from JB and put in my Srixon 545s. I am going to order two more to round out the set. My experience with them make me very excited to try this new shaft.
[QUOTE=”93civiccpe, post: 9240959, member: 41068″]
Great write-up James,
This sounds like really interesting tech and great numbers from the shaft. Hopefully in the forum you’ll add some top down views at address as I’m curious how that rapid taper profile would look.
[/QUOTE]
[ATTACH type=”full”]8934385[/ATTACH]
Thanks James for the review. Really excited about this product. As you stated where and how one can get fitted could be problematic. But we THP’ers are resourceful.:cool:
Great article. 5mph is super significant! And, the fact dispersion wasn’t a factor is mind blowing. Love a smaller company making great products at competitive prices!
Great review. I’d like to get my hands on that
Great review. Seems like a winner from all angles. Do they have any timeframe for a wood version?
Nice write up James. Exciting stuff coming from xcaliber and it’s great to see.
It reminds me of the Taylormade bubble shaft from +/- 2010? What’s old is new again! Interesting.
[QUOTE=”tider992010, post: 9241186, member: 2198″]
It reminds me of the Taylormade bubble shaft from +/- 2010? What’s old is new again! Interesting.
[/QUOTE]
Initial looks are similar, I assure you though closer look and performance these are very different. And I say that as one who has never been afraid to call people out for rehash releases
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] is it enough to get people to take a serious look at these or will people write them off as another gimmick? Your data was impressive and surprising!
Great review. [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] how was it looking down the club for you? I can see from the picture to me it might be a little weird seeing that much taper.
How was dispersion compared to stock shaft?
[QUOTE=”J.B. Cobb III, post: 9241212, member: 50607″]
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] is it enough to get people to take a serious look at these or will people write them off as another gimmick? You data was impressive and surprising!
[/QUOTE]
That’s the million dollar question.
Based on the initial reaction and comparison by some to the bubble shaft (which I expected, it’s the easiest similar visual for people to point to) I’m afraid some will lean the way of writing off.
For me, it’s enough that I’m leaving it in my 4U and not touching it. I also saw enough I would enjoy working with a full set, just to see the data throughout.
[QUOTE=”redneckwop, post: 9241238, member: 55400″]
Great review. [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] how was it looking down the club for you? I can see from the picture to me it might be a little weird seeing that much taper.
[/QUOTE]
Hasn’t phased me. The first time there’s an “oh wow” moment, but since I don’t stare at my hands during the swing there’s nothing odd about it imo.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 9241617, member: 1579″]
Hasn’t phased me. The first time there’s an “oh wow” moment, but since I don’t stare at my hands during the swing there’s nothing odd about it imo.
[/QUOTE]
That makes a lot of sense.
[QUOTE=”Golfever, post: 9241635, member: 11044″]
That makes a lot of sense.
[/QUOTE]
Thankfully the taper is up high enough it’s out of the visual at address.
I will say, it does look pretty wild and crazy at first when you pull it from the bag. But, the results…I’m truly impressed.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 9241642, member: 1579″]
Thankfully the taper is up high enough it’s out of the visual at address.
I will say, it does look pretty wild and crazy at first when you pull it from the bag. But, the results…I’m truly impressed.
[/QUOTE]
Your photo demonstrates that well…I didn’t expect the rapid taper to be so close to the grip and I think it would be easier to get used to than I initially expected
[QUOTE=”shanewu, post: 9241910, member: 38120″]
Your photo demonstrates that well…I didn’t expect the rapid taper to be so close to the grip and I think it would be easier to get used to than I initially expected
[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I think the pic also hopefully makes people drop the whole bubble shaft comparison too. But I get it, we always look for what is most similar to something new.
[QUOTE=”GolfTravelDude, post: 9241173, member: 53356″]
Great review. Seems like a winner from all angles. Do they have any timeframe for a wood version?
[/QUOTE]
I believe that one is still in development at the moment.
Nice write up James. Like was said in the other thread, be really interested to see how this would play out across an entire iron set. Wondering if the impacts on the lower irons is less on the ball speed and more on the spin rate as ball speed translates to spin as the angle increases. I have to wonder if that might be the diamond in the rough on these assuming my theory holds true through the set.
[QUOTE=”Sox_Fan, post: 9240984, member: 9583″]
And, I really love how comments on home page reviews automatically get posted in the appropriate forum threads. Another fantastic feature of the significantly upgraded system the forum uses.
[/QUOTE]
We are REALLY excited about it too because it makes answering questions so much easier and it’s easier to track.
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] – With your game, would you use them in a full set or do you see it as a specialty shaft?
[QUOTE=”Molten, post: 9242090, member: 22040″]
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] – With your game, would you use them in a full set or do you see it as a specialty shaft?
[/QUOTE]
I would love to try them in a full set. Would give them a go in a heartbeat.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 9242104, member: 1579″]
I would love to try them in a full set. Would give them a go in a heartbeat.
[/QUOTE]
[media=giphy]wNlks0ID1igO4[/media]
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 9242104, member: 1579″]
I would love to try them in a full set. Would give them a go in a heartbeat.
[/QUOTE]
I was thinking the exact thing. So, so glad to hear that answer
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 9241044, member: 1579″]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”5BF0D719-7FAD-4618-9319-44779C3B4539.jpeg”]8934385[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Interesting and not off-putting at all. Thanks James!
[QUOTE=”93civiccpe, post: 9242191, member: 41068″]
Interesting and not off-putting at all. Thanks James!
[/QUOTE]
Happy to help, it’s a unique look.
Honestly, I know the plan is to put ion paint on these too, But I fear a fade paint job like the rest of the line making the transition stand out more to the user, and not in a positive way. I like how the black sort of lets it blend and flow better.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 9242364, member: 1579″]
Happy to help, it’s a unique look.
Honestly, I know the plan is to put ion paint on these too, But I fear a fade paint job like the rest of the line making the transition stand out more to the user, and not in a positive way. I like how the black sort of lets it blend and flow better.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I’m curious about the effect when it has paint / details. They could try to hide it but I feel whatever they do will probably make it pop.
Having seen this at the PGA Show and having my mind blown with the looks its definitely awesome to see some real world numbers. [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] is correct that it will be compared to the bubble shafts of the past because that is the first thing several people mentioned and Robin was not amused, while the shape may bring that to mind initially it is different. and he was very excited about these shafts for sure. Will it catch on who knows but nothing wrong with something different! Great review.
Very cool Tech here. Do you think they would benefit from offering increased weight option? How will a 75 g iron shaft affect swing weight. I mean I would I would have all kinds of tempo issues with that light of a shaft
Wow! Thanks James!
Folks I’m really humbled by all the responses. After 3 years of trying a huge array of different iterations (taper rate and length, location, stiffness distributions…) I think we’re finally onto something here that is, as I love quoting Eli Callaway, “Pleasingly Different and Demonstrably Superior”. I figured a lot of folks would see this as another gimmick like the Bubble (sorry…it was…) so I was determined to provide y’all with something up to one of my mentor’s mantras. And the wood is going to be treated no differently. I have something good right….but the benchmark is high way up there now. I’m not going to rush it so stay tuned.
NOW, it’s getting them out of China which is now becoming increasingly difficult. I’ll keep everyone posted. I am trying to get together a few more test shafts for JMan to test as a partial set. Hoping to get some back to do so…well I’m trying…prying those shafts outta folks hands are becoming a task in itself…
Blessings to all for continued good health!!!
[QUOTE=”X.Man, post: 9242831, member: 8871″]
Very cool Tech here. Do you think they would benefit from offering increased weight option? How will a 75 g iron shaft affect swing weight. I mean I would I would have all kinds of tempo issues with that light of a shaft
[/QUOTE]
Heavier options have definitely been considered all along. Maybe an 85, but definitely a 95 and 105 gm versions. I already have the designs ready but getting R&D shaft samples from China right now is on their back burners – getting out existing orders have obviously higher priorities. I’m hoping this summer I can start.
To address your tempo concern, I think you’re going to be surprised. For everyone I’ve tested they had no idea the weight of the shaft. And my only instructions were not to change their swing at all (I didn’t even point out the geometry….they noticed themselves pretty quickly). For everyone who had really high swing speeds and played steel in their irons, when I told them the rt shafts weighed around 75 grams….not a single player believed me. WTF++…was a very typical reaction…;). But I’m not saying slight tempo changes aren’t required for everyone of course…but we haven’t experienced it
R
Hopefully they’ll get back on track and you’ll be able to get these things out. I’m interested to know more and see how it compares in a shaft shootout against other competitors!
[QUOTE=”Robin Arthur, post: 9243528, member: 22682″]
Heavier options have definitely been considered all along. Maybe an 85, but definitely a 95 and 105 gm versions. I already have the designs ready but getting R&D shaft samples from China right now is on their back burners – getting out existing orders have obviously higher priorities. I’m hoping this summer I can start.
To address your tempo concern, I think you’re going to be surprised. For everyone I’ve tested they had no idea the weight of the shaft. And my only instructions were not to change their swing at all (I didn’t even point out the geometry….they noticed themselves pretty quickly). For everyone who had really high swing speeds and played steel in their irons, when I told them the rt shafts weighed around 75 grams….not a single player believed me. WTF++…was a very typical reaction…;). But I’m not saying slight tempo changes aren’t required for everyone of course…but we haven’t experienced it
R
[/QUOTE]
I can’t wait to see these in production and try them out!
[QUOTE=”Robin Arthur, post: 9243504, member: 22682″]
Wow! Thanks James!
Folks I’m really humbled by all the responses. After 3 years of trying a huge array of different iterations (taper rate and length, location, stiffness distributions…) I think we’re finally onto something here that is, as I love quoting Eli Callaway, “Pleasingly Different and Demonstrably Superior”. I figured a lot of folks would see this as another gimmick like the Bubble (sorry…it was…) so I was determined to provide y’all with something up to one of my mentor’s mantras. And the wood is going to be treated no differently. I have something good right….but the benchmark is high way up there now. I’m not going to rush it so stay tuned.
NOW, it’s getting them out of China which is now becoming increasingly difficult. I’ll keep everyone posted. I am trying to get together a few more test shafts for JMan to test as a partial set. Hoping to get some back to do so…well I’m trying…prying those shafts outta folks hands are becoming a task in itself…
Blessings to all for continued good health!!!
[/QUOTE]
Thanks for the kind words Robin
I know some people see bubble shaft (I dont).
What I see is DG Spinner in that it is a quick taper early on from the handle.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 9244090, member: 3″]
I know some people see bubble shaft (I dont).
What I see is DG Spinner in that it is a quick taper early on from the handle.
[/QUOTE]
Definitely see that a ton in the initial taper, just doesn’t have the taper back to bigger that the spinner had.
[QUOTE=”Robin Arthur, post: 9243528, member: 22682″]
Heavier options have definitely been considered all along. Maybe an 85, but definitely a 95 and 105 gm versions. I already have the designs ready but getting R&D shaft samples from China right now is on their back burners – getting out existing orders have obviously higher priorities. I’m hoping this summer I can start.
To address your tempo concern, I think you’re going to be surprised. For everyone I’ve tested they had no idea the weight of the shaft. And my only instructions were not to change their swing at all (I didn’t even point out the geometry….they noticed themselves pretty quickly). For everyone who had really high swing speeds and played steel in their irons, when I told them the rt shafts weighed around 75 grams….not a single player believed me. WTF++…was a very typical reaction…;). But I’m not saying slight tempo changes aren’t required for everyone of course…but we haven’t experienced it
R
[/QUOTE]
I was wondering the same thing about heavier weights. I’d be open minded to trying 75g based on Jman’s experience and what you’ve said about other testers but without trying them, 95 and 105 really interest me.
[QUOTE=”X.Man, post: 9242831, member: 8871″]
Very cool Tech here. Do you think they would benefit from offering increased weight option? How will a 75 g iron shaft affect swing weight. I mean I would I would have all kinds of tempo issues with that light of a shaft
[/QUOTE]
Swing weighted out easily. I was impressed.
You’ve seen me swing, the aggression is real, no issues.(y)
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 9244193, member: 1579″]
Swing weighted out easily. I was impressed.
You’ve seen me swing, the aggression is real, no issues.(y)
[/QUOTE]
I get that from a flex/transition perspective, but there’s also swing weight and such beyond just standing up to sheer aggression, yes/no? 🙂 I am curious if 75 is a great fit for everyone, why make 95 and 105? What’s the negative on these shafts going heavier vs lighter?
Sincerely,
-Your 4 year old internet golfer with to many questions. :p
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 9244090, member: 3″]
I know some people see bubble shaft (I dont).
What I see is DG Spinner in that it is a quick taper early on from the handle.
[/QUOTE]
I wasn’t around for bubble shafts so the DG Spinner is exactly what came to mind!
Super intriguing product here. Thanks for the great review James. I would absolutely put them in play if I got an extra 3 mph, especially in the 4 and 5 irons.
Is it safe to say this has a higher kick point than a lot of traditional iron shafts?
[QUOTE=”obedt, post: 9244980, member: 10652″]
Super intriguing product here. Thanks for the great review James. I would absolutely put them in play if I got an extra 3 mph, especially in the 4 and 5 irons.
Is it safe to say this has a higher kick point than a lot of traditional iron shafts?
[/QUOTE]
If I could answer that and be confident I was entirely accurate, I would, but I’m not sure as it wasn’t in any of the info I got on the RT’s pre review.