Fourwiggle
Member
Time to post that hang-banging-against-wall animated gif
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Time to post that hang-banging-against-wall animated gif
Ok, then quantify it. PLEASE?!?! If I can't measure loft, lie, length, weight and speed and repeat an angle of launch then what am I missing??
CG is only for forgiveness of off center strikes, not launch angle.
loft can alter launch angle but so can moving the CG it may not be as drastic but try adding lead tape to the top of you iron and the launch angle will change
You're changing weight, gotta keep things the same...
Of course. However that is the only way some can quantify the idea that sometimes things change.
Just like the idea that loft is the most important part of the equation is completely false. And here is why. Every player comes into the ball a different way. Therefore loft will be different for every single golfer (generalization). However moving the weight around in the head will offer a chance for completely changing the ball flight and offering it at either lower or higher levels. Any person can deloft any single club at setup and change any factor, but they cannot change where the weight is located at impact.
But that is the only way as consumers we can alter the CG with out a milling machine
Ok, then quantify it. PLEASE?!?! If I can't measure loft, lie, length, weight and speed and repeat an angle of launch then what am I missing??
CG is only for forgiveness of off center strikes, not launch angle.
I guess i should ahve said shaft Kick point. Face thickness may be not as much as other things but i was using it illustrate a point that loft is not the only thing that matters with launch angleAll have an impact but all are not equal. Loft and CG dictate launch more than face thickness and shaft flex do.
Ok then, if loft is not the main factor let's do this:
You have one shot with each club at a 150yrd pin surrounded by water.
Club 1. 8-iron with 35* loft
Club 2. 8-iron with 40* loft
If you hit them both the same, I know which one gets wet. Because PHYSICS tells me that...
Ok then, if loft is not the main factor let's do this:
You have one shot with each club at a 150yrd pin surrounded by water.
Club 1. 8-iron with 35* loft
Club 2. 8-iron with 40* loft
If you hit them both the same, I know which one gets wet. Because PHYSICS tells me that...
17.5 grams of weight is strategically redistributed to lower and center the CG location, promoting a higher launch angle, higher peak trajectory and a steep, soft-landing, quick-stopping descent angle.
This is taken from the rocketbladez iron write up on Taylormade website, from this i can take it if you move the CG down you get a higher flight? So a 35* face with a high CG will launch lower than a 35* face with a low centre of CG?
Of course. However that is the only way some can quantify the idea that sometimes things change.
Just like the idea that loft is the most important part of the equation is completely false. And here is why. Every player comes into the ball a different way. Therefore loft will be different for every single golfer (generalization). However moving the weight around in the head will offer a chance for completely changing the ball flight and offering it at either lower or higher levels. Any person can deloft any single club at setup and change any factor, but they cannot change where the weight is located at impact.
Actually, loft has much more impact on launch angle than anything else.
Because you are asking us to compare clubs from different manufacturers - which know will have different designs - your equation is incomplete and your answer is potentially wrong.Ok then, if loft is not the main factor let's do this:
You have one shot with each club at a 150yrd pin surrounded by water.
Club 1. 8-iron with 35* loft
Club 2. 8-iron with 40* loft
If you hit them both the same, I know which one gets wet. Because PHYSICS tells me that...
Amateurs do not hit down as well and consequently, need a lower CG.
Like me
^Siri probably sucks.
17.5 grams of weight is strategically redistributed to lower and center the CG location, promoting a higher launch angle, higher peak trajectory and a steep, soft-landing, quick-stopping descent angle.
This is taken from the rocketbladez iron write up on Taylormade website, from this i can take it if you move the CG down you get a higher flight? So a 35* face with a high CG will launch lower than a 35* face with a low centre of CG?
Effects of Center of Gravity on Golf Shots
The lower the center of gravity and the farther back the center of gravity is from the face of the club, the higher the trajectory of the shot will be for any givenloft angle on the clubhead.
Go back to the 60* wedge scenario. We can manipulate loft with one club that will change launch angles and spin rates and trajectory...
Without a doubt. But putting the ball back in my stance will not let me hit a 60* wedge farther. Add a lot more spin, yes, but not necessarily distance.