Going off memory they are .355 taper.
that was my guess but wanted someone to confirm.
Thanks guys!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Going off memory they are .355 taper.
Thanks to a mistake at a local shop yesterday....I had the next release in hand.
Thanks to a mistake at a local shop yesterday....I had the next release in hand.
Do tell...
Agree, Please do tell ! Was it still the CBX name or CBX 2? look feel, etc. Did they say a release date?
While I don't have an NDA, I don't want to giveaway too much because I know they are still under embargo. I snapped some pics and when load them at the appropriate time.
To me, the profile looked sleeker and I thought the sole gave a bit more heel relief.
We will have all of the info everybody needs come Monday morning on the THP Home Page, including in hand pics and a full tech breakdown.
Link has been removed from above post as that site has been asked to take down the article and offered to comply.
We will have all of the info everybody needs come Monday morning on the THP Home Page, including in hand pics and a full tech breakdown.
Is there any other club info coming from Cleveland on Monday?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
BobA;n8621846 said:I own CBX 50 52 54 and 60. Didn’t see anything in CBX2 that really leaps out and makes me want to replace any version 1 models
agdickson;n8875438 said:I agree. All of the reviews on the original CBX said the sole grinds were plenty versatile, but now for the new release all the same reviewers are saying the originals weren't versatile enough... $74 for certified pre-owned original CBX on global golf vs. $140 for a new CBX 2. I think I know my decision.
I wonder if some of it is a mental block, a player sees the thicker sole and assumes they can't use it in a variety of situations. I personally can vouch for the versatility of the original CBX. I understand that the thicker sole can scare some people away, but I've never had a problem hitting it out of tight lies, or opening the face up a smidge on reasonable FW grass. That said, I'm not going to attempt a flop off of the hardpan or anything... but I probably shouldn't do that anyway.JB;n8875447 said:Or $85 brand new from Budget Golf with the THP Coupon. #FreshGrooves #NoSweatyHands
I am in the camp that prefers the CBX 2 and I have numerous posts in this thread talking about how the original CBX had plenty of versatility.
rallo;n8875530 said:I wonder if some of it is a mental block, a player sees the thicker sole and assumes they can't use it in a variety of situations. I personally can vouch for the versatility of the original CBX. I understand that the thicker sole can scare some people away, but I've never had a problem hitting it out of tight lies, or opening the face up a smidge on reasonable FW grass. That said, I'm not going to attempt a flop off of the hardpan or anything... but I probably shouldn't do that anyway.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
JB;n8875538 said:I think so. I also think a variety of media outlets put that info out there, without either trying it, or making the assumption. Can it be opened and closed? Sure can. As much as some muscle back wedges out there with heel relief and such? No. With that said, a few of those traditional designs suffer from an ease of variety through manipulation, and then have a very rounded leading edge that takes some of it away (in my opinion). Sole width, rounder leading edge, more mass, etc all offer more forgiveness.