By about 5 yards. Not by much.
 
ok i see, just wondering. any ideas as to why that is?
 
Aerodynamics perhaps?
 
That is my guess too Bakemono.
 
that makes sense, its just kind of odd in my opinion because callaway constantly advertises their square drivers, especially the iQ, as a driver that maximizes both distance and control. it seems like the square dymo would do that also
 
It has a ridiculously hot face.
 
ya thats what i felt when i hit it today. most callaway clubs do in my opinion. im just wondering why callaway can maintain the same distance out of their sqare drivers as their round drivers, yet nike can't. and not like its a huge difference just 5 yards like you sad, its just interesting and starts me thinking
 
It was just our testing AK. We found very few that liked the Dymo2 (square) but everybody LOVED the Dymo.
 
interesting. was it feel, appearance, distance, or something else that turned people off the dymo 2. 500th post!
 
I cannot speak for them, but for me it was just SOMETHING. I couldnt pin point it. But I love the round ones. Everybody did.
 
awesome, sounds like nike really did their homework seeing as the sumo 5000 wasnt incredible
 
Back
Top