Search results for query: *

Just came the other day....Recteq Deck Boss 590. It's going to be a fun summer!!

This guy knows the golf ball industry and knows what it takes to make a good golf ball. His 3.0 is very interesting and will probably try some. His original MTB series was also a good ball so I'm these balls won't disappoint.

Maltby 58*, PXG 54* 52* and 50* all forged.

I might have to go back and try these again. I've been on a soft-ball trend lately...reason, don't know why, just like the feel of something soft I guess but I played these once and they just had too much of a firm feel, but as I remember they performed really good. BTW, I am DEFINATELY not the...

Never heard of the guy..went on YT to catch his act, two things, got tired of hearing him talk and IMO a wrong fit.

Speaking about bulge and roll, there used to be a driving iron out in the market called the Controller which incorporated a bulge and roll face.

I somehow don't think that these were the irons that he had printed. The ones he had printed were just approved last week.

Like a few others here, my 58 is usually from 30 yards in...hardly ever take it past that.

https://bacanagrills.com/product/bacana-grill-original-7-skewers/ Saw this for the first time...anybody have one of these?

Just received an ad for Bridgestone BX series golf balls for $34.99. Probably last years but for that price that's a deal. From fairwayjockey.com

Played 18 the other day with these and my AVX. Definitely not an apples to apples comparison but gave me a lot of insight. Played the front 9 with the Volvik and the back 9 with the AVX. Volvik: launches higher, not as much spin as the AVX but comparable in all sense to the QST. Feels good off...

I understand, but given that, would you play non-conforming clubs, not just to try out but to actually play them for a time?

I already have a given, so why should I spend time just looking what I could (or not) out of my old Ping?

I guess the old saying applies here...to each his own....I mean I don't play in tournaments that it would matter, and I do have in fact a Ping lob wedge with grooves that were grandfathered in, but I still choose to play my current wedges because I know what to expect out of them.

other than sucking back a bunch (which is nice to look at) what benefit would there be?

Why?

The only company that would benefit is Wilson big negative for TE.

No for me don't do 4 for 3!

I agree...but I'm not a 4 for 3 type of guy. I did at one point, but I found out that It was hard just using 24 balls plus the good ones that you find in a season and I usually play 3-4 times a week, not 18 all of the time. I just hate to be tied down to a certain ball and it's tough getting...

I agree, looking at the Volvik site is "almost as bad as the Wilson site. If your going to make a golf ball and be successful at it, at least throw some technical information about the product with a comparison cut-away.