This has been a topic on the internet for several years. It's sometimes the response when anyone posts their desire for a more consistent swing and I've always thought of that reply as being almost useless.
I would readily agree that we use the same basic swing and that basic flaws remain regardless of the outcome of the shot. I also believe that there are "good" mechanics which can setup a golfer to successfully minimize both the frequency and degree of wayward shots as well as poor contact.
At the same time, I believe a swing that - even if far less than perfect - is not always the reason for high scores. I also believe that there are small, almost indiscernible to the naked eye variations that cause the difference between a well-struck and online shot and one that results in a penalty and that those small variations have a greater impact on score.
So for someone like me - a lifer in the Trying to Break 100 thread - I'll seek lessons to try to improve. The instructor watches me take a few swings and sees the same repeating flaws with every swing. Regardless of the results of the shot, he or she is taking mental notes on what to change. Line up 5 different instructors and they may very well address 5 different "weaknesses" or priorities.
But what if the mechanics are not the root cause of the problem? If I compare video of my swing to that of a tour player, even I can see the differences - and they're substantial. The trouble is, I'm not looking to be a tour player. I'm not even looking to get to single-digits. I'm simply hoping to play bogey golf on a consistent level.
Having explained this to several instructors, I've had exactly one say that my basic swing is fine for that goal. Instead of a swing overhaul, he had me working on the mental game and a pre-shot routine with intent of reducing the slight variations that cause inconsistent results. Looking back, that may have been a better approach.
Like most high cappers, I have the ability to hit very good shots with every club in the bag. I also have the ability to go through a series of shots where I cannot make good contact or worse make great contact and fail to control the club face. And like most, these two extremes will happen in the same round.
After years of recording swings into the net, at the range and during a round of golf, I've come to the conclusion that I can easily go back and forth to drastically different swings.
So to the question in title, I say BS... kind of.
I can also look at video of two swings that look as close to exactly the same with two drastically different results. Which brings me to my point... some of us struggle more than average in controlling the very small degree of consistency it takes to play this game at a slightly higher level. And it might have very little to do with my general swing.
So what do you say THPers? No doubt it's a combination of both. But is either more important - decent swing mechanics or ability? Do you know golfer whose swings don't match their ability? Can we improve without focusing as much on swing changes? Do factors like age and a target level of golf come into play? If so, how?
I would readily agree that we use the same basic swing and that basic flaws remain regardless of the outcome of the shot. I also believe that there are "good" mechanics which can setup a golfer to successfully minimize both the frequency and degree of wayward shots as well as poor contact.
At the same time, I believe a swing that - even if far less than perfect - is not always the reason for high scores. I also believe that there are small, almost indiscernible to the naked eye variations that cause the difference between a well-struck and online shot and one that results in a penalty and that those small variations have a greater impact on score.
So for someone like me - a lifer in the Trying to Break 100 thread - I'll seek lessons to try to improve. The instructor watches me take a few swings and sees the same repeating flaws with every swing. Regardless of the results of the shot, he or she is taking mental notes on what to change. Line up 5 different instructors and they may very well address 5 different "weaknesses" or priorities.
But what if the mechanics are not the root cause of the problem? If I compare video of my swing to that of a tour player, even I can see the differences - and they're substantial. The trouble is, I'm not looking to be a tour player. I'm not even looking to get to single-digits. I'm simply hoping to play bogey golf on a consistent level.
Having explained this to several instructors, I've had exactly one say that my basic swing is fine for that goal. Instead of a swing overhaul, he had me working on the mental game and a pre-shot routine with intent of reducing the slight variations that cause inconsistent results. Looking back, that may have been a better approach.
Like most high cappers, I have the ability to hit very good shots with every club in the bag. I also have the ability to go through a series of shots where I cannot make good contact or worse make great contact and fail to control the club face. And like most, these two extremes will happen in the same round.
After years of recording swings into the net, at the range and during a round of golf, I've come to the conclusion that I can easily go back and forth to drastically different swings.
So to the question in title, I say BS... kind of.
I can also look at video of two swings that look as close to exactly the same with two drastically different results. Which brings me to my point... some of us struggle more than average in controlling the very small degree of consistency it takes to play this game at a slightly higher level. And it might have very little to do with my general swing.
So what do you say THPers? No doubt it's a combination of both. But is either more important - decent swing mechanics or ability? Do you know golfer whose swings don't match their ability? Can we improve without focusing as much on swing changes? Do factors like age and a target level of golf come into play? If so, how?