Franklin51
On the Verge
Was wondering if anybody compared the three. Tired of paying 50 bucks a dozen
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I have played both the 2013 q star and the chrome+. Both are the best value balls in their respective category (mid tier and tour ball) My vote would go to the chrome + it's more durable than the Pro V1 and due to the sale going on callaway's website they can be had at $21/ dozen so that pretty much takes away the incentive to go with the q stars.
Very different golf balls. Two of them are surlyn covered and the Chrome is urethane covered. You will find far more greenside spin with urethane covered golf balls.
True but I'd like a bit less spin than the prov
Where are you seeing chrome+ for $21, I see it for $28.10
Deal of the day thread has a 25% off code
Why do you believe it spins less? Not in our testing for what its worth. Could just be a "mileage may vary" kind of thing. To be fair, despite what marketing is throwing out there from many companies, I find most urethane balls to offer plenty of spin regardless of manufacturer.
Perhaps what you need is to take a lesson, not look for a new ball.I should have clarified. Not wedge spin but driver spin is what I'm looking to cut back on. I tend to get a big fade almost slice when I get wild and I'd like a little less driver spin
Perhaps what you need is to take a lesson, not look for a new ball.