- Admin
- #101
MD easily destroyed us in Tampa that time too. It wasn't even a fair fight.
Sure did and frankly we could have moved up to any tee and the results would have been the same.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
MD easily destroyed us in Tampa that time too. It wasn't even a fair fight.
10 shot swing seem a little much, but I don't know if it's too crazy...over 18 holes. A lot of course that I have played don't have the forward tees near 500 yards for par 5's. Most golfers, even those with high handicaps, should be able to get home in 2 shots as long as the hole is around 450 yards. Right? So one would think that most of the Par 4's are not much more than around 350-300 yards. While most golfers won't be able to driver the greens on these, the should have a better shot at getting home in two shots and making a par.
Seeing claims of a 10 stroke difference is rather interesting. Moving ahead that much is going to take a bogey golfer and make them a single digit? Interesting. Very interesting.
Seeing claims of a 10 stroke difference is rather interesting. Moving ahead that much is going to take a bogey golfer and make them a single digit? Interesting. Very interesting.
I am not sure I agree with that. You are assuming they would be using driver off the tee. With the shorter holes chances are they'd be using easier to control clubs off the tee, and leaving distances that still would make reaching a par 5 manageable.
Now if they are going to stick with driver and try and drive all the greens they can, then I agree with your assessment.
Maybe a couple of strokes better......Maybe not though. Even though I'm a short hitter, my problems don't result from distance off the tee, but rather the distance between my ears.
JM
I probably hit a green that's 450 yards away in 2 shots about 2% of the time. And that might be high.
I would have guessed better than 2%. We are talking about hitting a tee shot, what...250? Then following up with a 200 yard shot. You think you could only hit the green 2 out of 100 shots from 200 yards?
I would have guessed better than 2%. We are talking about hitting a tee shot, what...250? Then following up with a 200 yard shot. You think you could only hit the green 2 out of 100 shots from 200 yards?
Take the driver out of the bag and the above 7 handicapper will still be about the same. I watch a lot of amateur golf. I spend more time watching amateur golf than I do myself playing. On average I watch more than 24 hours of live in person golf a week. If you can't shoot an 80 from middle tees with a driver you can't do it from the forward tees without a driver.
To be accurate from 450 yards, it takes me three shots. A drive, a 5i, and then a well placed 9i, PW or 50* wedge. I'm definitely not long (I get excited when I hit 220), and most people I play with are maybe 10-15 yards ahead of me. Only a few people I have played with can put themselves 50 yards ahead of me, and most of them are from THP.
I imagine people would play slightly better or even with what they currently play, but unless they played from the front tee's often, they wouldn't see huge drops. It's been my experience that people especially need short game work, and that would hinder them regardless of what tee's they played.
Seeing claims of a 10 stroke difference is rather interesting. Moving ahead that much is going to take a bogey golfer and make them a single digit? Interesting. Very interesting.