Wormkiller
Active member
From what I've seen on social media, there seems to be a perception that high handicappers are more likely to win club competitions. Do you agree?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
But if you have a demographic that by it’s very nature is of higher handicap , then that will have a higher percentage .Golf Australia have taken all the stats from every single golfer in the country with a handicap and looked at win rates in competition according to handicap. Bearing in mind, in Australia only rounds played in competition count towards handicap and at clubs most rounds played would be in competition. So this is tens of thousands of golfers over tens of thousands of rounds. Pretty clearly obvious that there's no real significant discrepancy when it comes to the likelihood of winning a competition and handicap.
So if you're a low handicap you're just as likely to win a comp as any other individual regardless of their handicap. The only discrepancy is that fields would have more golfers at a higher handicap level as this is the mean handicap here (18.2 is the mean average handicap).
View attachment 9193879 View attachment 9193880
View attachment 9193881
I get my butt kicked on a 9 hole match play league when I am playing people giving them 2 strokes per hole. ( the most the league allows) darn near have to make a birdie every hole to not get smoked. Guys might make big numbers on a few holes, but they certainly arent making big numbers on every hole. Meanwhile if I make par I'm lucky to half.
But if you have a demographic that by it’s very nature is of higher handicap , then that will have a higher percentage .
In match play if you are using full handicaps then yeah, High Handicappers are likely to have a big advantage, because as you stated a lot of high handicappers have a few blow up holes but can play respectfully the rest of the way.
In stroke play I don't think there is any advantage for high handicap players as the blow up hole isn't negated as much as it is in match play.
I see a number of good responses that will refute what I am about to say, which admittedly is purely anecdotal and based on my own game.From what I've seen on social media, there seems to be a perception that high handicappers are more likely to win club competitions. Do you agree?
In a match play scenario, unless you are a very "consistent" high handicapper with lots of pars and triples (ex. average 12 pars and 6 triples a round for an "18"), a much lower handicapper will beat you 55-60% of the time in a match. The handicap formula has a bias toward lower handicaps based on the 8 of 20 scores and the maximum score of net double bogey.I see a number of good responses that will refute what I am about to say, which admittedly is purely anecdotal and based on my own game.
I am a high handicapper, because of how volatile my game is. I am not only capable of, but often will rattle off three or four straight pars during a round, but then 2 straight triple-bogeys. The strokes I get in competition for my handicap. Don’t help me when I triple a hole, but make a lot of those pats into birdies.
Therefore, for golfers like myself — very capable, just prone to blowups — I feel that my high handicap does offer me an advantage over a lower handicap player who inherently is much more consistent
The problem with playing straight up is that a higher handicap would have virtually no chance of ever being competitive in a tournament unless it was flighted. It works for the pros because they're all plus handicaps and the differences between their games are very small - the difference between a scratch handicap and a 20 handicap is huge.My handicap is 47 right now, and I would never play against someone expecting that many pops. I shot a 116 on Monday and my net was 69. How could I say I beat someone like that?
I still think people should just play each other straight up like the pros do if they want to be competitive.
I get that but honestly, someone like me has no business playing in a tournament. It’s just hard for me to wrap my mind around the concept of one person beating another even though the one who lost actually played better.The problem with playing straight up is that a higher handicap would have virtually no chance of ever being competitive in a tournament unless it was flighted. It works for the pros because they're all plus handicaps and the differences between their games are very small - the difference between a scratch handicap and a 20 handicap is huge.
It’s not a perception, it’s math. A high HC player can easily have a range of scores that is 20, 30, even 40 strokes apart. They can have a day when they shoot 10-15 strokes below their HC. That is NEVER going to happen with a low HC player. If I am a scratch or better golfer am I going to shoot a 55 on a regulation size course? No way!From what I've seen on social media, there seems to be a perception that high handicappers are more likely to win club competitions. Do you agree?
If anyone accuses me of that I’ll confidently tell them “my bad game is all real baby!”And let's not forget those carpetbaggers that manipulate their handicaps. They give us high handicappers a bad name!