Words do not start fights. Fists, feet, elbows, knees, and weapons start fights... and maybe the occasional headbutt.
Yes, but sometimes it's words that get those fists, feet, elbows, and knees going.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Words do not start fights. Fists, feet, elbows, knees, and weapons start fights... and maybe the occasional headbutt.
Yes, but sometimes it's words that get those fists, feet, elbows, and knees going.
If you assault someone, then you're guilty of starting a fight. Not sure what you're trying to get at here, but there's a huge difference between,
- I'm coming over there to rip your head off and sh!t down your neck! (assault)
and
- Be careful what you ask for, you might get more than you can handle... (taunt)
all im getting at (youd have to consider our whole recent conversation began)
You said that initiating a fight is always wrong. But yet you also say you would entice someone to make the first move.
Well, I think most would agree that is also just as wrong.
I don't think your seeing how that could be considered one in the same thing. If you are to talk of what is right or wrong , your statement is contradicting. Not sure how else to explain it.
... and it's the fists, feet, elbows, and knees constitute battery which is a crime. Taunting is not, at least to my knowledge.
Taunting can be considered assault if the individual feels in imminent threat of bodily harm.
That's why you make it clear that you're only there to protect yourself if they're feelin' frisky.
Difference between "assault" in criminal and civil law contexts. That may be the root of the debate.As for the debate about what is assault and what is not, I cannot speak for other states nor municipalities, but at least in NY (where I was a police officer) a physical injury must be incurred to elicit a charge of assault.
Words or threats may amount to harassment, aggravated harassment, threatening movements usually with an object in hand, may amount to menacing. But words or movements absent of injury or substantial physical pain would never amount to assault.
Assault is determined by the intent to cause physical injury and thereby causes physical injury. Or through depraved indifference for human life when a person acts in a reckless manner resulting in physical injury to another.
Threatening words may help to form an affirmative defense if an altercation were to arise but words alone do not cause physical harm nor do they alleviate responsibility for subsequent intent or recklessness.
As for the debate about what is assault and what is not, I cannot speak for other states nor municipalities, but at least in NY (where I was a police officer) a physical injury must be incurred to elicit a charge of assault.
Words or threats may amount to harassment, aggravated harassment, threatening movements usually with an object in hand, may amount to menacing. But words or movements absent of injury or substantial physical pain would never amount to assault.
Assault is determined by the intent to cause physical injury and thereby causes physical injury. Or through depraved indifference for human life when a person acts in a reckless manner resulting in physical injury to another.
Threatening words may help to form an affirmative defense if an altercation were to arise but words alone do not cause physical harm nor do they alleviate responsibility for subsequent intent or recklessness.
Wow, just wow. First you demean the NJ education system and now you question the NY criminal statutes. It's a real good thing you are here to correct all the ills in society.Sounds like battery to me, but that wouldn't be the first thing NY was off the mark on.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
It would be refreshing to read one response of yours during a position of debate that was devoid of snark.Sounds like battery to me, but that wouldn't be the first thing NY was off the mark on.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
Well that makes a ton of sense why pop culture, including law and order, always get assault vs battery "wrong" per common legal definition and statutes here in Florida.As for the debate about what is assault and what is not, I cannot speak for other states nor municipalities, but at least in NY (where I was a police officer) a physical injury must be incurred to elicit a charge of assault.
Words or threats may amount to harassment, aggravated harassment, threatening movements usually with an object in hand, may amount to menacing. But words or movements absent of injury or substantial physical pain would never amount to assault.
Assault is determined by the intent to cause physical injury and thereby causes physical injury. Or through depraved indifference for human life when a person acts in a reckless manner resulting in physical injury to another.
Threatening words may help to form an affirmative defense if an altercation were to arise but words alone do not cause physical harm nor do they alleviate responsibility for subsequent intent or recklessness.
I play in a golf league, and we're all seniors, many in their upper 80's. Most of the guys play once a week, and many are not very good - it is more social than athletic, and its a chance for them to get out of the house for a few hours. I get frustrated with their slow play (my regular foursome usually plays 18 in ~3:15) but the course has reserved time for the league and I have to accept that it is going to be a LONG round.
My opinion is that the course should have advised you that there was league play and it was going to be slow. If you decide to play anyway, be prepared to wait, and don't go yelling at the members of the league to speed up or threaten to "meet them in the parking lot." As frustrating as it is, this is their time on the course! JMHO
Gonna reply and then read the replies. First and foremost, don't ever get into an altercation around your kids. EVER. Dude could pull a gun and shoot your kid instead of you. Second, you aren't defending yourself. Defending yourself is when someone attacks you physically, not a finger. Be a better man. Ok, now that I said that, go back and take kids on different holes instead of waiting might have been the prudent move.
Absolutely correct sir. My only counter to that though is, should I never say anything to anyone when they are with me? That's not really practicle and there was nothing I originally said or did that warranted that guy charging at me. I've already explained why that once that happened I really had no course of action but to stand my ground. If he was intent on getting me he'd have caught me. Not to mention I damn sure am not going to leave my kids there alone.
I was DEAD wrong for stopping the cart in the parking lot and luckily, even though my neighbor was an a-hole towards me, I wasn't looking at him as a threat nor did I take his a-hole behavior badly. His actions were just words of which I did shake off. Sure it ticked me off but I wasn't worked up over it. The guy that charged me had represented a threat and even though he just flicked me off (and I should have ignored it) he had threatened me prior to that by charging at me.
The only way I could have avoided the entire situation was by not saying something that a lot of people would have said. You can't always avoid crazy. I should have avoided it from that point on by ignoring him, and I didn't. I'm wrong there for sure.
Not judging U but speaking from experience. I'm a hothead myself under certain circumstances. One time I honked my
Horn cause this ****stick was in turn lane but arguing with his girlfriend and could've gone like 3-4 times. There was nowhere to go around him. He got outta car and yelled at me and my 2 year old was in the backseat but I was having none of it. I got out and clocked him and knocked him down. He popped his trunk and grabbed a tire iron and by now people were stopped in the middle of the road and he took off when others got out.
He could've grabbed a gun and shot me in front of my kid though and I've never had that kinda altercation again. I'd say it's practical to stand your ground but I'd lean on the side of passiveness around your children but that's just my opinion