Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If you don’t care what players, but only want to see good golf, you get more of it with LIV than you do PGA Tour.Not my logic yours . I don't watch LIV .
If you don’t care what players, but only want to see good golf, you get more of it with LIV than you do PGA Tour.
If you are anti LIV and it has nothing to do with golf, that’s a different beast and has nothing to do with golf. I can get down with that, but I think many are using the “i don’t care about names I just want golf” as a reasoning that just doesn’t make sense.
And plenty of bad commercials. Seriously, though the golf was very good.Saying you get more good golf with LIV is a stretch. I saw plenty of good golf this weekend at the Players.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Its literally just math. I loved the Players.Saying you get more good golf with LIV is a stretch. I saw plenty of good golf this weekend at the Players.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I think handful might be generous.Its literally just math. I loved the Players.
One has wall to wall coverage with no commercials. The other shows only a handful of shots and then goes to commercial.
Even if you said well there is an extra day, the amount of shots still wouldnt be the same.
I get it, people hate LIV. Im not a fan of a lot of it either, but coverage vs coverage, there is no comparison
IMO with LIV you get good golf each time they tee it up. Now with the PGAT we get good golf for the majors and the Players. All other tour stops are snooze fests with minimal coverage. LIV has them here IMO.Saying you get more good golf with LIV is a stretch. I saw plenty of good golf this weekend at the Players.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I also like that I know I don't have to sit in front of the TV all day to piece together what is going on. Everyone is on the course and it will be done in about 5 hrs. This works great for a normal tournament.IMO with LIV you get good gold each time they tee it up. Now with the PGAT we get good golf for the majors and the Players. All other tour stops are snooze fests with minimal coverage. LIV has them here IMO.
I am not sure I totally agree here. You get good golf with both. You get 5 -7 big names every time LIV starts were as the PGA could have zero names. But the golf is good. the production is what is lacking. Now, if names is what you need for good golf I can understand that. But if we are just talking shot quality. You get that every week with the Tour as well. It just might great shots by people you have never heard of..IMO with LIV you get good golf each time they tee it up. Now with the PGAT we get good golf for the majors and the Players. All other tour stops are snooze fests with minimal coverage. LIV has them here IMO.
I am strictly speaking from a product perspective. The PGAT offers nothing week to week outside of the majors that makes me want to watch. Even prior to LIV the production was bad and I only tuned into non majors for the location, i.e. Riviera, etc and not who is teeing it up.I am not sure I totally agree here. You get good golf with both. You get 5 -7 big names every time LIV starts were as the PGA could have zero names. But the golf is good. the production is what is lacking. Now, if names is what you need for good golf I can understand that. But if we are just talking shot quality. You get that every week with the Tour as well. It just might great shots by people you have never heard of..
I thought it was disingenuous for NBC to thank their sponsors for allowing them to have fewer commercials, then continue to have the "Playing Through" BS constantly showing when players in the mix were hitting shots.And plenty of bad commercials. Seriously, though the golf was very good.
Every guy on both tours is hitting great golf shots.I am not sure I totally agree here. You get good golf with both. You get 5 -7 big names every time LIV starts were as the PGA could have zero names. But the golf is good. the production is what is lacking. Now, if names is what you need for good golf I can understand that. But if we are just talking shot quality. You get that every week with the Tour as well. It just might great shots by people you have never heard of..
Well.. Caleb Surratt is just “out” of high school lol. But yes that is my point. The relegation does help LIV. They had or have some pretty poor players. Chase Koepka comes to mind. Not sure he is competing with the best anywhere. But he is also no longer on LIV.Every guy on both tours is hitting great golf shots.
This idea (not from you) that the 30th ranked player on LIV is some high school golfer, is crazy talk.
They could compete on any tour in the world just as the guys on the PGA Tour.
We had multiple rounds in the 80s this past week at the Players.Well.. Caleb Surratt is just “out” of high school lol. But yes that is my point. The relegation does help LIV. They had or have some pretty poor players. Chase Koepka comes to mind. Not sure he is competing with the best anywhere. But he is also no longer on LIV.
I was joking about Caleb. I think that kid is a stud.We had multiple rounds in the 80s this past week at the Players.
Hell Cam Davis was nearly 20 over through 2 rounds.
Tom Kim isnt that far removed from high school and before he burst on the scene, people would have asked the same thing.
Too bad you are missing some good golf.Not my logic yours . I don't watch LIV .
Thats not really what happened though, right?Saw plenty of good golf this weekend . I don't hate LIV don't hate where the money comes from . But don't tell me you're leaving to spend more time with your family and then try to sue to come back .
Saw plenty of good golf this weekend . I don't hate LIV don't hate where the money comes from . But don't tell me you're leaving to spend more time with your family and then try to sue to come back.