- Admin
- #51
This is just a question, because I honestly would like to see it, but would she be taking a spot from someone else that would have nowhere to go and is trying to earn a living, or would all of the typical spots be open, and she be added to the field?
Not with an exemption. They dont really go out to up and comers looking for a check.
I think it comes down to personal feelings. I do believe, right or wrong, that if you asked 100 people, the majority would see negatives with it. Maybe to go backwards a little here, if a woman went through Q-School, qualified for the tour and earned her way there, people would see it less of a publicity stunt and take her seriously. Maybe she doesn't "have to" due to exemptions, but maybe she should anyway.
Somehow not doing that, just wanting to tee it up once or twice with the guys to see what happens, makes it feel cheap.
But publicity is exactly what a sponsors exemption is for. Just like having Mike Weir out at an event when everybody knows he cannot make the cut right now (using the examples from 2011 season). That is the entire point of the exemption. For a draw. This brings a draw to two tours.
I guess I am still wondering. What is the negative? Outside of the feelings that its a mens tour (which is false) and its about giving spots to only PGA Tour members (also false). What is the negative? If she succeeds than all the power to her and it gives some life to the LPGA. If she fails, then it becomes something that fans got to see and enjoy and still brings life to an event and the LPGA.