Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I read more and more about launch numbers and good launch numbers. I also read about feel and how good this felt over that. I want to know what takes precedence. If I go to my local big box and jump on the monitor and the sale guy claims the number are great, do I take him at his word and buy the club? Or do I go off what I felt in my hands, arms and swing?
Have we fallen in love with numbers and pushed feel to the side? Are we too dependent on numbers and raw data? Or are we took reliant on feel and marketing and not enough on the numbers? I'm curious, do you know your true numbers? Do you trust your feel?
I agree Hawk, couldn't be more well said. It is a combination of both. I had great numbers with the Answer with the blur stiff shaft. I played the club and was in the middle with it for as long as I had it. It was not as long as other clubs I hit, but, it's dispersion was great. In the end, I had to get something else, because I couldn't stand the sound. I didn't switch until I found a club that gave me equal or better performance with a better sound. Most club engineers will say that sound is a big part of feel. I think it has to be a combination of both feel and numbers.
I agree Hawk, couldn't be more well said. It is a combination of both. I had great numbers with the Answer with the blur stiff shaft. I played the club and was in the middle with it for as long as I had it. It was not as long as other clubs I hit, but, it's dispersion was great. In the end, I had to get something else, because I couldn't stand the sound. I didn't switch until I found a club that gave me equal or better performance with a better sound. Most club engineers will say that sound is a big part of feel. I think it has to be a combination of both feel and numbers.
I think 'feel' is probably one of the most overrated elements when it comes to club selection. The reason being that we tend to use our inflated images of ourselves to make decisions. Then we justify it by using intangible terms that don't really mean anything. I've done it many times.
If we're looking at two clubs with mostly equal performance and one looks/sounds better, then I'd say it's not overrated.
If you are knowedgable enough to know what numbers to look for, they are a great way to judge performance. Same thing goes for finding a good club fitter. What doesn't work (very often) is hitting a club for ten minutes on a launch monitor and then buying it. I think you need to try things out a few times, see if there's a pattern or if you just had a good day the first time, see the ball flight outdoors, see how it works when you're not locked into the comfort zone of a place that doesn't penalize bad shots, etc.
I hit a lot of golf clubs indoors in either sims or launch monitors to get data, but my experience has shown me that my opinions may change greatly when I hit that first ball off the grass.
People get wrapped up in one or the other, when I think a combination of the two is probably the best.
Let me throw this out at you. Is it possible to have great feel and bad numbers. I mean, the ball melts into the face of the club, it goes straight but everything else is off. Does this mean you had a 'striaght ball flight" kinda of day and your flaws will start to show over time. Or does the body knows what it likes? Do you understand what I am trying to say?
This is how we used to purchase clubs. The ball went straight and it felt good at impact. But now we have number that might say different. How do we know which to trust?