Why are you always trying to stir the pot with this? You posted a terrible youtube video that is not news nor a source of credible information. You made a point about RAM and then in your rebuttal you not only change the subject completely but you use vague language to make a completely different point that is hard to follow.
From what I gather you are trying to say is that Xbox is an all inclusive entertainment system and that Sony is trying to catch up? If this is what you are saying I will have to disagree, I will concede that overall and for the majority of the systems life Live has been a better service but at this point its negligible at best. They both offer services such as Netflix and Hulu, I forget if Live offers a music service but I know Sony does. If accessories like kinect are what you are driving at Xbox One would be blowing PS4 out of the water because it comes standard with motion controls. Believe it or not gamers are still going to make a majority of purchases, the main demographic is still young males who want to play sports games, car games and shoot stuff. This is a far cry from dancing zumba in the living room.
I've already made a point in earlier posts that the systems will most likely be close in terms of graphics, they are pretty close in terms of specs to begin with so it won't really change. The only major difference will be in the systems OS and services, which in my opinion at this stage in the game, are fairly equal and from the sounds of it on next gen will be similar. You make it seem like Sony is so far behind or hasn't done anything right. The PS2 still has or had games being released for it, I believe this years or last years FIFA was the last title. The original PS3 was actually a killer system but people weren't ready for its price point in a game console. The thing literally had a PS1/2 inside it, not an emulator, it also had one of the better if not best Blu Ray player available at the time when stand alone units cost more than the console. Sure there were short comings to the system but Xbox had them as well. HD DVD, RROD are just a few, I know I personally went through five Xbox's.
If you want to know true differences in system architecture, then you have to go onto forums where developers post like this:
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=63474
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=62867
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=62936
So far from what I have been able to take away is:
The Xbox One has 32MB of ESRAM which is 4.5X times faster and can be used as both cache or scratchpad and has a theoretical bandwidth of 192GB/s by itself. The featureset of both APUS is identical in that they use the same CPUs and the same family of GPU.
There is nothing that you have seen on PS4 that is not possible on XB1. However, if you include the control factors of Kinect there are plenty of scenarios which are not possible on PS4 because the supporting hardware isn't there (Never mind the SHAPE audio chip).
Wow, okay I'll just not post anything then. There was outrage over rumors of the ps4s ram, i posted a video explaining it. (one that supports sony's decision.) and I get attack.
Bye.
~Joseph~
Via Tapatalk