Jjmorris
Will Post for Thanks
Nice dude! Would love to get a crack at this. Man that thing looks great! TEE nailed it in the looks department
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Nice dude! Would love to get a crack at this. Man that thing looks great! TEE nailed it in the looks department
They sure did! We'll get it in your hands ASAP!! Golf Addiction run might have to happen before long.
I would be curious to see the answer to this as well. I'm currently playing the XGC6, and I feel like if I don't hit it dead center, the ball flight is almost a low knuckler that doesn't even know where it wants to go.Hey Jake I don't know what your miss is but do you have any thoughts on toe forgiveness as well as shots high off the face? With my new swing shots off the toe have become my miss and I've found some drivers to be terribly penal in that area.
Seems to me that if you miss with this misses higher on the face don't kill you as much. In fact I've hit a couple high on the face and was quite surprised at the distance I still got. I can't really comment about misses on the toe though, sorry Jordan. My misses are almost always high on the face or if not I seem to miss on the inside more so than the toe. The high misses still keeping good distance seems to be a common theme with drivers in the past few years, I remember a while back if you missed one high on the face you were toast. Now days it seems like you can actually hit those shots just as far a lot of times, of course assuming the miss wasn't TOO bad.Hey Jake I don't know what your miss is but do you have any thoughts on toe forgiveness as well as shots high off the face? With my new swing shots off the toe have become my miss and I've found some drivers to be terribly penal in that area.
BUT, the Exotics heads are always advertised as "longer" or the "longest" and in my demoing processes, I've not seen that at all. I loved the FEEL of last year's model! It was 15 yards shorter than what I play... I like the looks, colors, all of it, I've just never seen the on-course results in the drivers.
I think given that COR/CT is maxed and limited and that drivers have been there for years, then there's only so much that can be in the head. Where one head stands out versus another is in ball speed on off center hits and spin (both back and side). Last year's XCG6 was seemingly great on off center ball speed. It sounds like the XCG7 is great for low spin.
The rest of driver performance really comes down to the fit, which includes the shaft. Find the right shaft, loft, shaft length, fit, etc. and I suspect most drivers of similar spin properties will max out at about the same numbers on squarely hit balls. The differences are going to be in those off center hits and how close to the absolute best fit that you are.
I personally have seen that the Exotics titanium fairways produce great distance numbers. Not every fairway is up at that max CT/COR and you can see a difference there.
Nate: Tour Edge's selling points with the Exotics lines are materials (often multi-metal with titanium, tungsten and at least one type of steel), construction technique (combo brazing as opposed to welding), design aimed at mid-low cappers, looks (subjective admittedly, but I find their designs to be attractive) and a lifetime warranty. They've got a limited sales network and don't actively sponsor pros (that I know of), but most people who have their clubs really like them.
I have my X Hot Pro at 44.75 inches
BUT, the Exotics heads are always advertised as "longer" or the "longest" and in my demoing processes, I've not seen that at all.
That's why I put "demoing processes". I Tried different shafts at a demo event! Was nowhere close in distance. Their claims of distance may just be against their previous clubs.
The shaft I have with the XHP is the Fubuki K series (60g). Sorry but I'm not sure what that actual swing weight is.Great review...look forward to any further information u can provide.
I too am currently gaming the XHP driver (9.5 deg / Project X 6.0) but the one thing I don't like is the length of this driver (stock = 45.75) and that is one of the reasons I am looking at the XCG7 Beta driver (44.75)...plus I have played Matrix shafts in the past and like them as well. Not to get "off topic" but can u tell me what your setup is (shaft, swing weight, etc..) on your XHP at 44.75? Again thanks for the very insightful review!
The shaft I have with the XHP is the Fubuki K series (60g). Sorry but I'm not sure what that actual swing weight is.
Yeah that's starting a whole new conversation for another thread but I could suggest you ask Jman, he did something similar with an X Hot driver earlier this year.Thanks...nice shaft...I really like the stock Project X shaft but if I cut an inch off I am gong to loose serious swing weight...I talked to a builder I know and he says that would take a lot of lead tape (front and back) to get it back to a stock swing weight or close...anyway thanks for the info as I dont want this thread to be about shorter driver shafts...maybe I will just bag a XCG7 Beta and be done with it since you seem to feel that the distance is similar...and I like deep face smaller (440cc) drivers...thanks again!