- Thread starter
- #26
I would imagine it could make a tremendous difference, but I've seen you hit that driver multiple rounds and I'd certainly try to stick with that formula or as close to it as possible. I'm in the same boat as you so this should be an interesting journey to watch unfold with you.
That was my thought originally. But, I do believe that combination of shaft and head can make a huge difference. I'm excited that my CPC fitting in a couple of months will allow me to try several shaft/head combinations in the search for the best fit for me, and hoping that my RIP 70 Alpha shaft will be in that mix. If it isn't, I would always wonder "what if".
What happens if you find a great shaft for you that is low launch and low spin and you love the feel. Then you switch to a low spinning deep head. Unfortunately too many are doing this now and then assuming a club head does not work for them. We fit someone last year for a great combination in the Amp Cell. Then they switched to the SLDR and thought the shaft would still be great. Sadly, they were hitting shots too low.
I know so many that assume that the shaft is the more crucial part, but I would be willing to bet that I can show a bigger difference in driver heads via launch monitor than shaft changes for many many people.
Interestingly, a Bridgestone ball fitter told me last year that I was playing a low spin head and a low spin shaft, so I certainly didn't need a low spin ball. He was explaining to me why he had just fit me for the B330-S despite my swing speed being under 105. I had the preconceived notion that the RX would be better for me, but that's for a different discussion. It brings to mind another question, however. Is a low spin/low spin combination of shaft/head a bad one? My current set-up certainly produces great accuracy/control for me, but perhaps I'm sacrificing some distance.
Lots of great discussion in here, and I'm learning a good bit, which was my goal for originally posting.