Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So I went and looked at the online version. I see that she's demonstrating some exercises. Would I believe in the exercises more if they showed an LPGA player doing them? No. Would I think I'd be a better golfer because an LPGA player was pictured doing them? No. Do I think I can have a Gretzy like body if I do them? No. It doesn't really matter who is shown doing the exercises to me, I just want to learn what to do, how to do it and why I should do it. And this is the area where I think the magazine missed the mark. The online version has no meaningful text addressing these points, so the reader is left to infer. The associated text is sort of "human interest-y" type stuff, which I don't care about - regardless of who is pictured. And to make it worse, there's a quote where she says fitness is 70% diet and 30% exercise...so why am I reading this exercise segment again?
So I went and looked at the online version. I see that she's demonstrating some exercises. Would I believe in the exercises more if they showed an LPGA player doing them? No. Would I think I'd be a better golfer because an LPGA player was pictured doing them? No. Do I think I can have a Gretzy like body if I do them? No. It doesn't really matter who is shown doing the exercises to me, I just want to learn what to do, how to do it and why I should do it. And this is the area where I think the magazine missed the mark. The online version has no meaningful text addressing these points, so the reader is left to infer. The associated text is sort of "human interest-y" type stuff, which I don't care about - regardless of who is pictured. And to make it worse, there's a quote where she says fitness is 70% diet and 30% exercise...so why am I reading this exercise segment again?
http://www.golfchannel.com/media/le...ster-critical-golf-digest-cover-choice_040414
debate on Morning drive..Matt Ginella(former Golf Digest employee) vs. Paige Mackenzie(LPGA) not really heated but you can tell in the end that Paige was really pi$$ed about it
Damn. Paulina is not in the golf industry or the fitness industry Paige nailed it. Holly last year makes sense but this doesn't. Paige made some good points like you could have a male golfer or someone from the fitness world and acknowledging that sex sells and they could have used an LPGA player. Don't get me wrong Paulina looks good but has zero credibility in the golf and fitness world.
Most shocking to me is the fact Golf Digest hasn't had an LPGA player on the cover since 2008. Hey Rex if the goal is to grow the game that fact is embarrassing.
I agree and as someone who follows golf majorly, I agree with the Holly statement. At the same time, I don't think it has anything to do with golf for them this time. It's strictly a "sex sells" statement and looking to cash in on the people who don't know any better if she's apart of the industry or not.
Damn. Paulina is not in the golf industry or the fitness industry Paige nailed it. Holly last year makes sense but this doesn't. Paige made some good points like you could have a male golfer or someone from the fitness world and acknowledging that sex sells and they could have used an LPGA player. Don't get me wrong Paulina looks good but has zero credibility in the golf and fitness world.
Most shocking to me is the fact Golf Digest hasn't had an LPGA player on the cover since 2008. Hey Rex if the goal is to grow the game that fact is embarrassing.
Is it really that shocking? What has happened on the LPGA tour that is tremendously noteworthy and when did it happen? Presumably it isn't going to beat out a comparable PGA story and some months are taken up with pre-defiend topics (e.g., Hot List, or whatever it is called), so there probably are smaller windows of opportunity than it seems. Inbee Park had that incredible run and they obviously could have worked in a more human interest type piece that wasn't tied to a particular event, though one could have an honest belief that she isn't going to move the needle in the US market. But for the sake of argument I will agree that was a potential miss. Other than that, anything?Most shocking to me is the fact Golf Digest hasn't had an LPGA player on the cover since 2008. Hey Rex if the goal is to grow the game that fact is embarrassing.
Is it really that shocking? What has happened on the LPGA tour that is tremendously noteworthy and when did it happen? Presumably it isn't going to beat out a comparable PGA story and some months are taken up with pre-defiend topics (e.g., Hot List, or whatever it is called), so there probably are smaller windows of opportunity than it seems. Inbee Park had that incredible run and they obviously could have worked in a more human interest type piece that wasn't tied to a particular event, though one could have an honest belief that she isn't going to move the needle in the US market. But for the sake of argument I will agree that was a potential miss. Other than that, anything?
What's the big deal lol ... "to say the least"? That's almost a bit extreme .. so to, "say the most"? What's that gotta be like?I really really do not like this move. It frustrates me to say the least.
Is it really that shocking? What has happened on the LPGA tour that is tremendously noteworthy and when did it happen? Presumably it isn't going to beat out a comparable PGA story and some months are taken up with pre-defiend topics (e.g., Hot List, or whatever it is called), so there probably are smaller windows of opportunity than it seems. Inbee Park had that incredible run and they obviously could have worked in a more human interest type piece that wasn't tied to a particular event, though one could have an honest belief that she isn't going to move the needle in the US market. But for the sake of argument I will agree that was a potential miss. Other than that, anything?
Golf Digest may see short term gains, but it may do long term harm to their brand. Could the LPGA be in the drivers seat on this issue, refusing to grant GD any access/interviews for the forseeable future? I think they should do so ...
Additionally, the mere fact that the first LPGA player they put on the cover will be the first LPGA on the cover since 2008 (IIRC) would make a splash in and of itself, so attractiveness wouldn't even be a factor.
Same here.[/COLOR]
Wasn't Kate Upton on the cover of a golf magazine awhile back? Not sure how this is different.
Damn. Paulina is not in the golf industry or the fitness industry Paige nailed it. Holly last year makes sense but this doesn't. Paige made some good points like you could have a male golfer or someone from the fitness world and acknowledging that sex sells and they could have used an LPGA player. Don't get me wrong Paulina looks good but has zero credibility in the golf and fitness world.
Most shocking to me is the fact Golf Digest hasn't had an LPGA player on the cover since 2008. Hey Rex if the goal is to grow the game that fact is embarrassing.
The fact that there are 9 pages of discussion here = Golf Digest wins.
Is it really that shocking? What has happened on the LPGA tour that is tremendously noteworthy and when did it happen? Presumably it isn't going to beat out a comparable PGA story and some months are taken up with pre-defiend topics (e.g., Hot List, or whatever it is called), so there probably are smaller windows of opportunity than it seems. Inbee Park had that incredible run and they obviously could have worked in a more human interest type piece that wasn't tied to a particular event, though one could have an honest belief that she isn't going to move the needle in the US market. But for the sake of argument I will agree that was a potential miss. Other than that, anything?
The fact that there are 9 pages of discussion here = Golf Digest wins.