SquirrelyDave
Allegedly....
I don't blame him for not going...not at all. I can see a lot of negatives to going, and not many upsides. This looks to be a cluster, this might even make Sochi look like a good choice by comparison.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This reads like you're suggesting professional golfers are above Olympic living conditions, and professional hockey players are not because it's been the norm for them.
I really can't possibly disagree more with that idea. If it's good enough for the fastest man on the planet, it's good enough for a tour player.
Glad I am not the only one to mistake the NZ flag for Australia. They look basically the same.I guess one good thing about this makes Danny Lee almost a lock to represent Australia and im ok with that. Im a Danny Lee fan
As I understand it you don't "have" to live in the village. Those with means can stay wherever they want.
Correct. You won't ever see the likes of Roger Federer or Novak Djokovic slumming it in the Olympic village.
I'm a strong believer that certain sports shouldn't be in the olympics. Golf is one of em. Adam Scott clearly doesn't care about a gold medal, he wants majors. Ask Andy Murray what his gold medal now means to him. Probably meant loads until he went on to win Wimbledon the following year. Now, I bet he doesn't even know where his gold medal is LOL.
The only golfers that probably genuinely care about winning gold are those that aren't ever gonna win a major.
Objectively, I agree. If it's good enough for an Olympian, it's good enough for a tour player.
But I'm neither of those things. I think that the Olympics is part of the culture of certain sports, including sports with high-paying professional elements, like soccer, tennis, and hockey, but not others, notably golf, cricket, and rugby league (yes, I know, sevens will be in the Olympics this year), especially given that those sports already have top-tier international competition with a lot of tradition behind it. I'm not judging the rightness or wrongness of the cultures of those sports, I'm just saying from my view they exist and that when/if these sports become Olympic events that they will have to successfully integrate the Olympics into that culture, and not everyone is going to agree with it.
Why does the Ryder Cup matter then?
I thought it should have been a team event the whole time. Maybe even mixed teams (how cool would that be)?I wonder if Adam Scott would have been as inclined to drop out had the Olympic stage been more of a team design.
I thought it should have been a team event the whole time. Maybe even mixed teams (how cool would that be)?
Why does the Ryder Cup matter then?
Not sure how you equate the Ryder Cup to the Olympics mate? Enlighten me.
Funny part is almost everyone who was an athlete says the Olympic village and dorms for athletes only was the best part.There really isn't much of an upside, for the golfers at least. "You mean I can stop making hundreds of thousands of dollars to go live in a dorm to play in a tournament where I'll make zero dollars, possibly catch a flesh eating virus, AND probably be murdered while exhausting myself before several other important tournaments? Sign me up!"
Funny part is almost everyone who was an athlete says the Olympic village and dorms for athletes only was the best part.
An exhibition where a golfer is representing their country or region that is not a major (which was listed as what matters most). Why is the Ryder Cup important and the Olympics wouldnt be? Both exhibitions, both about patriotism.
Funny part is almost everyone who was an athlete says the Olympic village and dorms for athletes only was the best part.