- Joined
- Feb 6, 2015
- Messages
- 12,376
- Reaction score
- 2,888
- Location
- Too close to golfinnut
- Handicap
- ∞
I typically fix it at the sporting goods store. Temporarily, anywayThis is fine. We can fix this.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I typically fix it at the sporting goods store. Temporarily, anywayThis is fine. We can fix this.
Buy it in bulk!I typically fix it at the sporting goods store. Temporarily, anyway
Me a loyalist? LOLThought this could spark some interesting discussion, perhaps @Jman, who I believe is a USGA loyalist would have some thoughts. After the college football season and salivating for golf season to come back to New England, I'm back and posting more here on THP.
Some guys from our local golf course were talking (after the announced golf ball rollback) about boycotting the USGA by not getting handicaps this year. Our course is not one that you can get a handicap from so everyone either signs up from nearby courses we do play somewhat frequently or we do a digital version. They thought that, combined with the rollback, was enough! I realize for some who play in tournaments this is not an option.
The men's league proposed using simply league scores rather than any handicap and apparently they only have two flights anyway: under 55 and over 55. I brought up that it could potentially hurt our local state golf association and the many programs they run (especially for the youth), but if enough people got on board it could seriously hamper the USGA.
What say all of you?
Thought this could spark some interesting discussion, perhaps @Jman, who I believe is a USGA loyalist would have some thoughts. After the college football season and salivating for golf season to come back to New England, I'm back and posting more here on THP.
Some guys from our local golf course were talking (after the announced golf ball rollback) about boycotting the USGA by not getting handicaps this year. Our course is not one that you can get a handicap from so everyone either signs up from nearby courses we do play somewhat frequently or we do a digital version. They thought that, combined with the rollback, was enough! I realize for some who play in tournaments this is not an option.
The men's league proposed using simply league scores rather than any handicap and apparently they only have two flights anyway: under 55 and over 55. I brought up that it could potentially hurt our local state golf association and the many programs they run (especially for the youth), but if enough people got on board it could seriously hamper the USGA.
What say all of you?
I think its the direct opposite. The hackers who post here wont really notice anything myself includedI would be willing to bet the ball rollback doesn't end up being instituted. The PGA a couple of other testing and data organizations have already shown that what they are trying to do won't actually come about from this proposed rule. The only people it will actually effect are the 99.9% of golfers whom this rule isn't targeting.
I can appreciate a good imagination, but I am a bit curious as to how you've managed to come to this conclusion.A long of folks on here are angry about their 95mph driver swing and losing 3 yards.
Probably a Mike Davis burner acct...and I suppose am a tiny bit curious why anyone would bother to defend the USGA at this point, but I welcome the madness
Playing the long game. Nice.Probably a Mike Davis burner acct
I've never been a member of the USGA and probably never will be. I don't need to keep a handicap, and there would be no benefit to me being a member. As a recreational golfer, they don't have my best interest in mind.
It's been 7 hours since reporting season started in Ohio and I'm already contemplating waffling on my decision to not pay for a handicap.I won’t be paying to have an ‘official’ handicap. I’ll just use Grint for the approximation.