Went to golfsmith to test and buy the new XR irons, and they had an excellent set up that allowed me to test both the Callaway XR irons and the mizuno's
I currently have the X20 irons and after reading all the hype wanted to test the XR irons out. If the launch monitor is accurate then these def get the extr distance on my x20's, as I was hitting the 7 iron about 160-180 ( my x20 would be 155). Problem was dispersion for me..... Made for a nice firework display on the screen but didn't fill me with huge confidence that these are the ones.
Then tried the mizuno EZ, and dispersion seemed to be a bit better and to be honest I was surprised that the distance was pretty similar to the XR which I was expecting to be far longer. Had some time away from the monitor to think, and probably on a blind test, I would have veered more towards mizuno EZ ... But really didn't like the look of the irons if I'm being honest.
Then I saw a set of mizuno's jpx 825 on the rack on sale for 499... Which was considerably cheaper that the XR and EZ.... So thought I may as well trial...
They only had a graphite shaft in stock to trial.... But all of a sudden I found a club that was long and straight for me., and just felt so much better than the others.
I will return in a few days to trial the jpx 825 in steel to see if as good, and also compare again with the Callaway XR.... Which I so wanted to be the right club for me, and hopefully pull the trigger.
Would be keen to hear from anyone else who has tried the XR and the 825, and in particular to understand if in practice they are the same distance...as never sure if the launch monitor is 100% accurate to real life..., if it is, then I will just go with feel and distance per the launch monitor when I return.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I currently have the X20 irons and after reading all the hype wanted to test the XR irons out. If the launch monitor is accurate then these def get the extr distance on my x20's, as I was hitting the 7 iron about 160-180 ( my x20 would be 155). Problem was dispersion for me..... Made for a nice firework display on the screen but didn't fill me with huge confidence that these are the ones.
Then tried the mizuno EZ, and dispersion seemed to be a bit better and to be honest I was surprised that the distance was pretty similar to the XR which I was expecting to be far longer. Had some time away from the monitor to think, and probably on a blind test, I would have veered more towards mizuno EZ ... But really didn't like the look of the irons if I'm being honest.
Then I saw a set of mizuno's jpx 825 on the rack on sale for 499... Which was considerably cheaper that the XR and EZ.... So thought I may as well trial...
They only had a graphite shaft in stock to trial.... But all of a sudden I found a club that was long and straight for me., and just felt so much better than the others.
I will return in a few days to trial the jpx 825 in steel to see if as good, and also compare again with the Callaway XR.... Which I so wanted to be the right club for me, and hopefully pull the trigger.
Would be keen to hear from anyone else who has tried the XR and the 825, and in particular to understand if in practice they are the same distance...as never sure if the launch monitor is 100% accurate to real life..., if it is, then I will just go with feel and distance per the launch monitor when I return.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk