- Joined
- Apr 26, 2018
- Messages
- 33,203
- Reaction score
- 47,434
- Location
- Oxford, Mississippi
- Handicap
- 10.4
Enough to overturn a call either way?
Catch/no catch
I think it's a catch
This frame and the frames before and after make me think no catch, but it's tricky.
A player makes a play like that it deserves to be a catch
It's close, but I call it a catch.
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2018
- Messages
- 33,203
- Reaction score
- 47,434
- Location
- Oxford, Mississippi
- Handicap
- 10.4
- Thread starter
- #6
Watching it live, I thought he trapped it. Watching the replay, I go back and forth but don’t see enough to overturn the on field call.
No catch
From the still frames, it looks like a catch. But agree that there’s not enough to prove it either way.
I don't see enough to overturn whatever the on the field call was. To me it looks like a catch based on the direction his glove was pointed in the dive, but I could also see the argument it hit the ground and then caught the thumb of the glove to be contained.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2012
- Messages
- 21,551
- Reaction score
- 13,610
- Location
- Parker, Colorado, United States
- Handicap
- 5.4
Think it's hits the inside glove on the finger side then bounces into the thumb/pocket. If it hits the turf it would bounce to strong for the thumb to collapse the pocket enough. .02
Heck of a catch.
Heck of a catch.
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2018
- Messages
- 33,203
- Reaction score
- 47,434
- Location
- Oxford, Mississippi
- Handicap
- 10.4
- Thread starter
- #11
The on field call was a catch and it was overturned.
That's a catch. Unless it's against my team, then it's not a catch.
Wow, I really don’t see enough in that view to overturn it. They must have had a different view.
This is why replay sucks.
It’s not clear an obvious. There is no bearing to overturn. You have 100 people in the room, no way you a clear majority saying that’s not a catch.
I don't know how it ends up in his glove like that without being a catch? It's a catch.
