I have several friends and and neighbors who own a Model S and we have put 76k on our 3 year old Model S. The main reason for purchasing a Model S for the owners I know is not to be green but the performance of the vehicle coupled with low maintenance costs. The closest competition for a Model S performance wise would be a BMW M5, and AMG Mercedes, or an S or RS Audi. Those cars cost as much or more than a Model S but are way more expensive to maintain. We have spent $170 on maintenance and service on our Model S in 76,000 miles and this is typical for other Model S owner that I have talked to. My neighbor who has an M5 BMW has spent over $5,000 on service and maintenance in 3 years(for fewer miles than we have on our Tesla)which is also typical. I’ve done the math for us and had we been driving a gas powered M5 or similar the last 3 years we would have also spent an additional $11,000 on fuel over what we’ve paid for electricity to run our Tesla. That works out to about $5,000 a year in fuel/maintenance savings. Assuming depreciation is about the same, a Tesla is much cheaper to own than something like an M5 or AMG Mercedes. I know 2 Tesla Model S owners who have over 120,000 miles on theirs and they still drive and perform like new with almost no maintenance or service costs. Neither has yet to replace even brake pads. High performance without the expense to operate and maintain. In a sense us Telsa owners are having our cake and eating it too.
I share the same sentiment and is one of the major factors in why I ended up getting the performance model 3 when cross shopping the M3, c63. I think what you said holds true of the performance model 3 vs M3, c63 and ats-v. But unlike the new M5 that’s awd, neither the M3 nor c63 come in awd. The RS4 isn’t even avail in the states. Throw in the all weather handling as another advantage.